Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2009 May 29

29 May 2009

 * Author`s comments: The revised manuscript of the article has been submitted in temporary format. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Informagenesis (talk • contribs) 07:42, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your efforts to address concerns with Combinatorial library. I'm afraid your revision constitutes a close paraphrase and is not usable as it is. (See our copyright FAQ) For example, the source says,
 * Your revision says:
 * You have changed some words, but not sufficiently to address the question of infringement. You remain very similar in structure and in use of language, with direct duplication of runs of text "the best, and perhaps cheapest, way to obtain the target...." "to access this type of reaction information efficiently." This is simply selecting one section at random to check. I also note that there is duplication elsewhere: "This technique was pioneered by Furka and has been enthusiastically exploited by many others since its first disclosure. Thus, Houghten has used mix and split on a macro scale in a "tea bag" approach for the generation of large libraries of peptides" is taken from . I'm afraid you will need to rewrite this material completely in your own words unless you can verify permission from the sources themselves. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:03, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * With respect to the images, you may have compiled them, but the question would be whether you owned the original images? For instance, do you own the rights to those handbooks such that you are able to license derivative works? Otherwise, the act of compilation, I'm afraid, does not give you the right to release them. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:08, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * You have changed some words, but not sufficiently to address the question of infringement. You remain very similar in structure and in use of language, with direct duplication of runs of text "the best, and perhaps cheapest, way to obtain the target...." "to access this type of reaction information efficiently." This is simply selecting one section at random to check. I also note that there is duplication elsewhere: "This technique was pioneered by Furka and has been enthusiastically exploited by many others since its first disclosure. Thus, Houghten has used mix and split on a macro scale in a "tea bag" approach for the generation of large libraries of peptides" is taken from . I'm afraid you will need to rewrite this material completely in your own words unless you can verify permission from the sources themselves. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:03, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * With respect to the images, you may have compiled them, but the question would be whether you owned the original images? For instance, do you own the rights to those handbooks such that you are able to license derivative works? Otherwise, the act of compilation, I'm afraid, does not give you the right to release them. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:08, 29 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Iskandar Malaysia ([ history] · [ last edit]) from http://web.archive.org/web/20070220113501/http://sjer.com.my/pdf/cdp/20._Chapter17_-_Commercial_Development_Initiatives.pdf. Teofilo talk  13:06, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The sentence : "It is a profit-motivated company to drive strategic and catalytic..." is copied from page 17-4 of http://web.archive.org/web/20070220113501/http://sjer.com.my/pdf/cdp/20._Chapter17_-_Commercial_Development_Initiatives.pdf . Teofilo talk  13:07, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I've identified the point of origin of this text as December 2006. I've notified the contributor and am relisting under today to allow him or her time to respond. If we are not provided text permission by the end of seven days and a rewrite is not proposed, I plan to restore the last verifiability clean and, with proper credit, include contributions by other persons subsequent to that date. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:46, 29 May 2009 (UTC)


 * OzProspect ([ history] · [ last edit]) from http://www.ozprospect.org/about.html. Drawn Some (talk) 20:28, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Jeff Kingsbury ([ history] · [ last edit]) from . Nomination completed by DumbBOT (talk) 23:18, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * User:EarwigBot II/Template/doc ([ history] · [ last edit]) (url not detected). Nomination completed by DumbBOT (talk) 23:18, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Internally displaced persons NWFP ([ history] · [ last edit]) (url not detected). Nomination completed by DumbBOT (talk) 23:18, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * San Ramon, California ([ history] · [ last edit]) (url not detected). Nomination completed by DumbBOT (talk) 23:18, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Main infringement removed; other infringing sections revised. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:59, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Author`s comments: OK, The 2st revision will coming soon. It should be noted, that Figure-1 is the compilation of book covers, therefore I don`t need any permission. Figure-3 is the compilation created based on our articles and doesn`t need any permission, Figure-4 is the compilation of photos and alsodoesn`t need any copyright agreement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Informagenesis (talk • contribs) 19:21, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure why you presume that you can utilize book covers? They, too, are governed by copyright. Wikipedia utilizes covers only under our non-free content guidelines. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:06, 2 June 2009 (UTC)