Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2009 September 2

2 September 2009

 * Eugenio Torre ([ history] · [ last edit]) from . Most of the "Wins the 2002 Philippine National Championship" section comes from that souce and the entire next section sounds like it was copied from a news release (probably the dead link at the end).  Bubba73 (talk), 03:38, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Text entered the article in August 2006. Other text contributed at that time should also be evaluated and possibly presumptively removed. I am blanking and relisting, since the contributor (who is still active) was not notified. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:02, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * 2009 flu pandemic in Singapore ([ history] · [ last edit]) from http://www.h1n1.gov.sg/ http://www.h1n1.gov.sg/homepage.htm http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/438422/1/.html. Numbered items have been taken from multiple press releases. One large paragraph taken from a new article. I removed copyvio from this article recently but didn't notice these other problems, so I am relisting again. — Cactus Writer |   needles  10:19, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * As no one undertook a rewrite of this and copyvio was foundational, it has been deleted to allow creation of clean. The only material that remained after the copyvio was a single "paragraph" of current statistics. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:56, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Irish Phytochemical Food Network (IPFN) ([ history] · [ last edit]) from http://www.ipfn.ie/. Permission asserted on talk page.  The left orium  14:53, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * 2009090310022091 received; awaiting explicit CC-BY-SA release. Stifle (talk) 15:48, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisting this one, since the permission letter was just processed yesterday. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:37, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Radical Simplicity: ([ history] · [ last edit]) from http://www.radicalsimplicity.org/radical_simplicity.html. The author said he would rewrite the article.  The left orium  18:51, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Lydia Canaan ([ history] · [ last edit]) from http://www.myspace.com/lydiacanaan. Permission asserted on talk page.  The left orium  18:56, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * User responded to my message today (September 7) here.  The left orium  14:18, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
 * According to Talk:Lydia Canaan, there is a license release on the myspace page. I can't verify it (work internet restrictions) but if it's there, then there shouldn't be any further problems. OTRS ticket#2009090210044836 also refers. Stifle (talk) 11:45, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Released at source, but tagged for cleanup & neutrality. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:49, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * ITW Brands ([ history] · [ last edit]) from . Nomination completed by DumbBOT (talk) 23:13, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Institute of Business Ethics ([ history] · [ last edit]) from . Nomination completed by DumbBOT (talk) 23:13, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * OTRS. Tagged for COI & Primary sources. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:46, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Vouvray (wine) ([ history] · [ last edit]) from . Nomination completed by DumbBOT (talk) 23:13, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Looks like a reverse infringement. Investigating further. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:11, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I am undecided. The article was created as a split from another article in April 2006 with elements that are present in the external link, but tremendous differences. The following year, the article was revised to bring it closer to that external source. The article was changed subsequently by other editors, but it is this version that appears in that external source. Complicating matters further, wayback does not record an archival version for the English translation of the official site, but does for the original Italian. I see two possibilities: either our article was copied (it certainly sounds promotional: "When the weather is right, the wines can be some of the greatest in France."), or the official site, when it decided to add English, snagged our article. Making the latter less likely, they would have had to have done so in 2007. Think I'll blank and relist, since the contributor was not invited to comment. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:27, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Seeing Dogs Alliance ([ history] · [ last edit]) (url not detected). Nomination completed by DumbBOT (talk) 23:13, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Long resolved, but still listing. What the? --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:09, 10 September 2009 (UTC)