Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2011 February 10

10 February 2011
SCV for 2011-02-10 [ Edit]

Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)

 * United States Army Basic Training ([ history] · [ last edit]) from http://www.usarmybasic.com/basic-training/. · The lead section was pasted from a copyrighted source, as was much of the remaining article content· Ryecatcher773 (talk) 23:58, 10 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Pictogram voting support.svg No copyright concern. False positive. Reverse copyvio. Details on my talk and the article's talk. VernoWhitney (talk) 02:52, 22 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Anubhooti ([ history] · [ last edit]) slightly complex see article talk page. Dpmuk (talk) 13:08, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Taank ([ history] · [ last edit]) from http://www.punjabi.net/talk/messages/45121/12121.html?1045780693 http://www.jatland.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-11953.html. More likely from print sources, but this will do. CCI: LRBurdak (20101122) MER-C 13:18, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Natta Company ([ history] · [ last edit]) Copied and pasted. VWBot (talk) 00:21, 11 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Pictogram voting question.svg No source found; copy-paste tag removed and cv-unsure tag placed at article talk. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:57, 21 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Leonidas Kouris ([ history] · [ last edit]) Copied and pasted. VWBot (talk) 00:21, 11 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Pictogram voting question.svg No source found; copy-paste tag removed and cv-unsure tag placed at article talk. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:01, 21 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Memetic algorithm ([ history] · [ last edit]) Close paraphrase. VWBot (talk) 00:21, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, I've verified duplication of some content, but for every text match I've been able to find, we are the point of first publication. This is a strange one, but it seems that the content was placed here by the author first, either directly or through a PhD student agent. Without some evidence of prior publication, I believe we should presume that the content is here legitimately. If evidence of prior publication is produced, we'll need to seek an official donation. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:53, 22 February 2011 (UTC)