Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2011 February 9

9 February 2011
SCV for 2011-02-09 [ Edit]

Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)

 * Thomas Glessner ([ history] · [ last edit]) from http://www.nifla.org/bio-glessner.asp. WMO 04:31, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid don't see it. The article isn't tagged; the contributor isn't notified. If your concerns persist, please follow the directions at the top of this page and relist this. You may wish to offer an example or two at the talk page of the article or indicate from where, in this source, the content is derived. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:58, 20 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Heartbeat International (anti-abortion organization) ([ history] · [ last edit]) from http://www.heartbeatinternational.org/services-about-us/, http://www.heartbeatinternational.org/services-about-us/about-us-home. WMO 04:44, 9 February 2011 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Pictogram voting support.svg|20px]] No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Already reviewed and cleared by another admin; I note that you attempted to delete this speedily after six days because it had not been addressed. Please review the directions when using admin noticeboards. As this one notes in its header, "Listings typically remain for seven days before review and closure by an administrator." It is not even ripe for closure when it has been listed six days, much less overdue. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:03, 20 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Padayani ([ history] · [ last edit]) from See talk for full reasoning as given the page history it's a bit complex.. Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:18, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Copying it over, for the record:

"This entire article appears to have been built on copyright violations. Most of the original edits (including the article creation) seem to be based, at least in part, on . I have looked at our article on Aranmula kannadi and we have never had the same text as the website on that subject so I can only conclude that we've copied from them rather than them wholesale copying from us.  The significant addition on 06:12, 28 December 2008 is taken from .  Given all these copyright violations I suspect that there is very little on the page that isn't a copyright violation and extracting what isn't is nearly impossible and probably wouldn't produce a viable article.  Hence I think we have to start again. Dpmuk (talk) 23:54, 8 February 2011 (UTC)"
 * --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:04, 20 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:49, 20 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications ([ history] · [ last edit]) from http://www.at0086.com/CUPT/. Nomination completed by VWBot (talk) 00:21, 10 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:53, 20 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Displacement chromatography ([ history] · [ last edit]) Copied and pasted. VWBot (talk) 00:21, 10 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:04, 20 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Duchy of Pomerania ([ history] · [ last edit]) Close paraphrase of Pommern im Wandel der Zeiten, by Jan Maria Piskorski (in German).. VWBot (talk) 00:21, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm going to let this relist. The contributors worked out the issue themselves on the last problematic article in this "series." --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:30, 21 February 2011 (UTC)