Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2012 March 28

28 March 2012
SCV for 2012-03-28 [ Edit]

Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)

 * World Capoeira Federation ([ history] · [ last edit]) from http://www.new-wcf.org/about.php. Gunnex (talk) 21:15, 28 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. -- Wizardman  Operation Big Bear 03:28, 29 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Parliament Interpretive Centre ([ history] · [ last edit]) from http://www.heritagetrust.on.ca/Conservation/Museums/Parliament.aspx. Secondarywaltz (talk) 22:15, 28 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:13, 8 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/FACETS OF GOD’S CREATION: REVEALED FOR THE SEEKERS OF TRUTH ([ history] · [ last edit]) from . DpmukBOT (talk) 00:00, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The tag has been removed, as no source was identified and I found nothing in spot-checks. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:18, 8 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Anthony F. Tonnos ([ history] · [ last edit]) from http://bt.hwcdsb.ca/5092/The-Most-Reverend-Anthony-F.-Tonnos-D.D..html. Copy paste. DpmukBOT (talk) 00:00, 29 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. This looks like a potential CCI in the making. I've left a strong warning. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:25, 8 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Arab Chamber of Commerce and Industry ([ history] · [ last edit]) with no source given. Copy paste. DpmukBOT (talk) 00:00, 29 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:29, 8 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Central Excise (India) ([ history] · [ last edit]) with no source given. Copy paste. DpmukBOT (talk) 00:00, 29 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:33, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Ocaasi:
 * Wael Khalil
 * [[Image:Pictogram voting question.svg|20px]] Issue resolved. Didn't find anything that was a concern here although I did re-write one sentence, which although I don't think it was a problem, was closer to the source than it needed to be. --Dpmuk (talk) 17:24, 27 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Mona Seif ([ history] · [ last edit]) with no source given. Close paraphrase. DpmukBOT (talk) 00:00, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Dpmuk (talk) 21:20, 2 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Gabriel Cousens
 * Note that Gabriel Cousens was drastically condensed by other editors and I no longer think there are any significant close paraphrasing issues. Ocaasit &#124; c 19:58, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. I'd agree that this has changed significantly enough that any concerns about your contributions should be gone. --Dpmuk (talk) 20:58, 2 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Death of Hamza Ali Al-Khateeb ([ history] · [ last edit]) with no source given. Close paraphrase. DpmukBOT (talk) 00:00, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * I think this is largely fine but I've let Ocaasi know that there are two sentences which I think could do with a re-write although they're probably border line cases. Dpmuk (talk) 18:29, 29 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Have just rewrote those two sentences myself --Dpmuk (talk) 21:52, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

I'm requesting a review of articles I recently wrote after some editors expressed concerns about close paraphrasing.
 * Kamal Abbas ([ history] · [ last edit]) with no source given. Close paraphrase. DpmukBOT (talk) 00:00, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * This looks largely good to me. I've removed a couple of sentences that I thought were too closely paraphrased and asked Ocaasi if they are willing to re-write one paragraph.  If that's done I think the close paraphrase tag can go.  I also have a slight concern about the number of quotes used but given that this is the sort of person where we need to be reporting their views I don't think this aspect needs urgent attention. Dpmuk (talk) 16:35, 26 April 2012 (UTC)