Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2023 January 29

29 January 2023

 * Nodular regenerative hyperplasia ([ history] · [ last edit] · rewrite) from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21472097/ – appears to have been introduced in this revision – other people have added to the text since, some of the added sentences may be original (not copied from this particular source) SomethingForDeletion (talk) 19:52, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. MER-C 17:40, 5 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Altai flood ([ history] · [ last edit] · rewrite) I am not 100% confident I chose the right venue here, but the "large blocks" section under "deposits" looks like a copy paste from an academic paper to me. It doesn't show up to the analysis tool, so I can't provide a source article, but I strongly suspect that the reason.for that is that it has been machine translated from the original, which was in Russian. Inserted with this edit. Licks-rocks (talk) 21:29, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
 * User:Licks-rocks I think the source article is https://inside.mines.edu/UserFiles/File/Geology/AltaiFlood_red.pdf SomethingForDeletion (talk) 23:27, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
 * User:Gaianauta you appear to be the person who added the text copied from that source, see above. If that is correct, do you agree you copy it from that article? Did you have permission to do that from the author, or something? (In which case I think the text is allowed to stay, but you have to submit to WP:VRT written evidence of that permission, and the reuse should be attributed.) SomethingForDeletion (talk) 23:36, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Pictogram voting wait red.svg Article cleaned, revision deletion requested. – dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 19:35, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Revision deletion declined. MER-C 10:29, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
 * My apologies, I only read this now. Sorry User:MER-C I can't recall how I did that edit 12 years ago, but yes, I do know that linked document and it could well be that I took info from there. I see you have cleaned the parts in question. I won't question this decision, but just let me note that the document lacks any copyright claim and that citing the author and linking the source article (which is already the case) should therefore be sufficient. Gaianauta (talk) 14:34, 20 April 2023 (UTC)