Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2024 July 20

20 July 2024

 * Occupational injury ([ history] · [ last edit] · rewrite) from https://www.constructionbriefing.com/news/exoskeletons-will-they-become-a-more-common-sight-on-construction-sites-/8028048.article. Caught this one early. ⸺RandomStaplers 07:18, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
 * That was User:Persmas24, who had previously added poor content (that I had removed on editorial grounds) at Construction site safety, but that I now see was also a case of copyvio. I rev-del'ed both of those edits. This editor identifies as being a NIOSH-employed writer. Looking at this and the next entry (an editor who is Wikipedian-in-Residence at NIOSH) together, wonder if there there is something more centrally wrong there. DMacks (talk) 15:42, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Construction site safety ([ history] · [ last edit] · rewrite) from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304195662. AND https://web.archive.org/web/20210921151917/https://loginets.com/en/download-free-site-induction-template/ ⸺RandomStaplers 07:38, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
 * The researchgate source is CC-NC-ND. The relevant article content is (as Randomstaplers noted) the entirety of the "Hong Kong" section. It was added in this edit by User:John P. Sadowski (NIOSH), whom I notified. That edit was on 15 December 2018, so that would be a lot of rev-del. But at least that source appears contained to that section, so it would simply mean excising and RD, rather than having to roll the whole article back to prior to that time. DMacks (talk) 15:38, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
 * I didn't personally add the text, as my edit was a reorganization edit moving paragraphs around without changing them. It looks like this diff is the original addition. John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 05:26, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
 * The loginets content was added in this edit on 21 October 2021 by User:VeeraHuo, who was only briefly active and not recently. The edit added another sentence with a different cite, and that other sentence does not appear in either cite. Would be easy to excise. Is it worth rev-del'ing almost 3 years of edits for one sentence? Their other contribution is substantial content cited to multiple and diverse refs. Spot-checking, the contribution does seem to be supported by but not copied from them. So that places me more firmly in the "simply remove the one sentence from construction site safety" and take no further action based on that edit. DMacks (talk) 16:00, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
 * List of Batang Quiapo episodes ([ history] · [ last edit] · rewrite) . So sorry to have to report that most if not all of the several hundred plot descriptions appear to be copyvio. Some are possibly from www.themoviedb.org/tv/215803-batang-quiapo/season/1/episode/75; this might be a Wikipedia mirror. Examples of other urls include https://ent.abs-cbn.com/batangquiapo/videos/tanggol-iginiit-na-mabuting-tao-si-bubbles-353446, https://ent.abs-cbn.com/batangquiapo/videos/augustus-tinakot-si-amanda-tungkol-kay-primo-350520. The article was created on April 24, 2023‎, with content brought over from Batang Quiapo (TV series).  — Diannaa (talk) 21:23, 20 July 2024 (UTC)