Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2024 May 2

2 May 2024

 * Party for Freedom ([ history] · [ last edit] · rewrite) from https://www.ftm.nl/artikelen/amerikaanse-suikeroom-geert-wilders . As the source is paywalled, I can't prove this section has been copied. However, this contributor has inserted copyrighted texts into numerous other articles GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 02:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Yandex ([ history] · [ last edit] · rewrite) from https://www.ftm.nl/artikelen/nederlandse-yandex-dochter-levert-rusland-surveillance-software . Same as above, though this time I can show the first few lines appear in this source: https://www.ftm.nl/tag/toloka-ai, which the website likely re-uses throughout their own content. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 02:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Draft:Islam and Arabic language ([ history] · [ last edit] · rewrite) from https://archive.org/stream/WorldReligionsAndIslam.ACriticalStudyVol.1ByHamidNaseemRafiabadi/World%20Religions%20and%20Islam.%20A%20Critical%20Study%20%2C%20vol.1%20by%20Hamid%20Naseem%20Rafiabadi_djvu.txt. — Diannaa (talk) 13:50, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The book is not directly copied here but rather than summarized. 202.134.9.136 (talk) 15:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Pictogram voting delete.svg Article deleted for a reason other than copyright concerns. MER-C 15:35, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Phoenician settlement of North Africa ([ history] · [ last edit] · rewrite) from I've added examples of the extensive copying of tesxt from soureces with the lightest of edits to the talk page. 2001:8F8:1B69:1AFD:30A9:6768:87CA:4A82 (talk) 08:52, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 * There's not enough to justify the tag, and User:Skitash made changes to the article. I removed the tag. I hope you don't add it back. Also as I noted on the RPP, further investigation into your claim is welcome. Until you can prove extensive copy/paste that justifies the tag please don't add it back. el.ziade (talkallam) 18:13, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Also, based on the examples provided on the talk page (all of which have been addressed by Skitash), it seems that the copied passages are short and have been cited. Since the copied material is properly attributed and linked to its original sources, it does not constitute a copyright violation. I do not think it's justified to tag the article with a copyvio. el.ziade (talkallam) 18:25, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
 * On top of that, copyvio tool indicates that there's a less than 5% similarity and I've already changed and reworded content the IP hopper showed concern about, so their argument lacks merit. They are either deliberately pretending to not see it or refusing to acknowledge it by continuing to edit war. It's perplexing that they opted for a full copyright investigation over a few similar-sounding sentences rather than trying to improve the article. My best guess is that this is just another petty excuse the IP hopper is using to continue harassing me as they have done on my talk page. Skitash (talk) 11:06, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
 * All that proves is that copyvio tool is pretty useless. 2001:8F8:1DDA:A9B6:17CC:E045:8086:7B37 (talk) 11:27, 6 May 2024 (UTC)