Wikipedia:Deletion review/Cajun Nights MUSH

Cajun Nights MUSH
Relist Cajun Nights MUSH


 * This entry was deleted because the Mush is not popular? the number of google hits is irrelevant. Well, as far as Mushes go, all of them are unpopular.  Mushes and Muds aren't the same since the creation of MMoRPGs (Massive Mult-User Roleplaying Games) like Everquest or World of Warcraft.   Mushes have always been a small niche in regards to Muds, and as such didn't attract many players.


 * This mush has historical sigificiance, and as such, regardless if it is popular, well known, up and running or dead and gone. It is still one of the only mushes to be running concurrently for over 10 years.  However, the mush is up and running and still attracting players.

Deletion Debate: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Cajun_Nights_MUSH%282%29

John 'Imagicka' Blackthorne 16:20, 3 May 2006 (EST)


 * Keep deleted "Historical significance"? Gee, I must have missed that exhibit last time I was at the Smithsonian.  All kidding aside, there was a 4-to-1 consensus to delete, and the reasoning of the delete voters (low Google score, poor ranking on Mudconnector) was more persuasive than the one guy who wanted to keep it (because he said he'd heard of it before).  I can't imagine that anyone would have closed the debate differently. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  19:41, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep deleted, spammy article about software of no particular evident importance. Just zis Guy you know? 21:35, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep deleted Valid Afd. Nomination provides few reasons for reexamination, none of them compelling. Regarding historical significance, if the mush is still running in 20 more years, I will reconsider then. Xoloz 12:30, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
 * 'Keep deleted. French.' --Col. Hauler 19:06, 5 May 2006 (UTC)