Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2008 March 9



9 March 2008
<!--Please notify the administrator who performed the action that you wish to be reviewed by leaving page name on their talk page.

Add a new entry BELOW THIS LINE with the format:

~

contribs) deleted "Robin the Bobbin" ? (g1 nonsense content was: 'Robin the bobbin, big-bellied BenHe ate more people, ...')" What has the encyclopedia do with the "slet their two year old children"? It's not a day care! And it was proceeded this way! How is it possible to delete a rhyme, which describes the sequestering of the church property, because of "slet children"? This rhyme must be LINKED to the article which describes describes secularisation of the lands and property after the Reformation, yet it was deleted because of ... children? I have never met such ignorance, coupled with arrogance! And I was BLOCKED for trying to reinstall it? I don't understand, how it's handled: someone will sweat, write an article, add reference, for his work to be swept away and the author blocked because of 2 years old children? In my opinion, people who delete articles based on the presumption that there are 2 years old children exist in this world! Why, to put an article in, one has to do research, to quote, but to delete one has just to announce that there are ... in fact, children! Where are the references and quotes of the people who deleted it? Scientifically proved basis? Maybe links or quote to the articles which announced to us that sequestering of abbeys and church lands in medieval England was dangerous to the 2 years old children nowadays? ~

~ I am appalled as to how this article was handled. First it was DELETED by someone who, apparently, could not even spell properly, with the reason given: "00:46, 21 July 2007 NawlinWiki (Talk | contribs) deleted "Robin the Bobbin" ? (g1 nonsense content was: 'Robin the bobbin, big-bellied BenHe ate more people, ...')" What has the encyclopedia do with the "slet their two year old children"? It's not a day care! And it was proceeded this way! How is it possible to delete a rhyme, which describes the sequestering of the church property, because of "slet children"? This rhyme must be LINKED to the article which describes describes secularisation of the lands and property after the Reformation, yet it was deleted because of ... children? I have never met such ignorance, coupled with arrogance! And I was BLOCKED for trying to reinstall it? I don't understand, how it's handled: someone will sweat, write an article, add reference, for his work to be swept away and the author blocked because of 2 years old children? In my opinion, people who delete articles based on the presumption that there are 2 years old children exist in this world who suffer from it, must be blocked! Why, to put an article in, one has to do research, to quote, but to delete one has just to announce that there are ... in fact, children! Where are the references and quotes of the people who deleted it? Scientifically proved basis? Maybe links or quote to the articles which announced to us that sequestering of abbeys and church lands in medieval England was dangerous to the 2 years old children nowadays?

}} ~

~     -->