Wikipedia:Deletion review/The Juggernaut Bitch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep Deleted after citation of second AfD. Xoloz 02:23, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

The Juggernaut Bitch

 * Articles_for_deletion/The Juggernaut Bitch
 * Articles_for_deletion/The Juggernaut Bitch (again)

The debate was closed as keep as the consensus, but the article was deleted. Brokenfrog 00:37, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Abstain  Have notified the admin who deleted it "as per Afd" (which said keep), pending a reason. MartinRe 00:53, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * comment Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents might (very possibly!) be a related issue. MartinRe 02:10, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Endorse Deletion Most recent afd was delete. Regards, MartinRe 11:44, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Undelete . Looks like article was deleted even after the AfD vote of keep (I don't know why). It was then recreated with nonsense, which I promptly deleted (and not going over the previous deleted versions--who would have though "Juggernaut Bitch" could be anything but vandalism? Truth is stranger than fiction). Anyway, the 'keep' version is about a short film. --F a ng Aili 說嗎? 03:42, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Change vote to keep deleted per 2nd Afd. --F a ng Aili 說嗎? 15:49, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep deleted, You're all looking at the wrong AfD, Which I confess is my fault. The newer one can be found at Articles_for_deletion/The Juggernaut Bitch (again)-- Shanel § 04:07, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * NOTE: THE LINK IS WRONG (was done automatically by monobook) here's the proper nomination Articles_for_deletion/The Juggernaut Bitch (again) as you can see, it's a valid deletion, so keep deleted -- ( drini's page   &#x260E;  ) 04:24, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep deleted as I stated in the seconds afd, every article on wikipedia must meet certain requirements, these include verifiablity, and notability. Just because this is on google video does not make it noteworthy.  -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 04:36, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Endorse deletion, valid process and valid per policy. Just zis Guy you know? 10:16, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Endorse deletion Since the nominator seems to be mistaken and hadn't noticed the alter AfD, perhaps this DRV should be closed. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:49, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Undelete. I personally feel that the second AfD was without merit anyway.  Deleting it certainly isn't the answer. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEMES?) 21:34, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Endorse deletion. - Mailer Diablo 07:15, 14 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.