Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Luigi di Bella

Luigi di Bella


14 July 2013

Have you discussed this on a talk page?

Yes, I have discussed this issue on a talk page already.

Location of dispute Users involved Dispute overview

The issue is if for the article a list of publications is appropriate. And it grounds on the question if following assumed rule is in the spirit of Wikipedia: "for persons which are not authors, musicians, & artists, only notable works that are heavily referenced by peers should be listed". Note: last year there was a dispute about some links added that I understand failed under the "original research" criteria: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard/Archive_44#Luigi_di_Bella There was only a mention about "references" deletion, which I did not pursue for lack of time, having been given too much pages to read at that time.

Have you tried to resolve this previously?

Only the talk page.

How do you think we can help?

In case the rule: "for persons which are not authors, musicians, & artists, only notable works that are heavily referenced by peers should be listed" is the Wikipedia spirit, how do we find if a work is "heavily referenced by peers" and which criteria should be used (minimum number of references, reputability of the peers, and what else is needed).

Opening comments by Yobol
Please limit to 2000 characters - longer statements may be deleted in their entirety or asked to be shortened. This is so a volunteer can review the dispute in a timely manner. Thanks.

Luigi di Bella discussion
Please do not use this for discussing the dispute prior to a volunteer opening the thread for comments - continue discussing the issues on the article talk page if necessary.