Wikipedia:Draft rewrite of Notability (academics)/Side-by-side

This is a side-by-side presentation of the changes proposed in the draft rewrite of the notability criteria for academics at Draft rewrite of Notability (academics). The initial version is based on my understanding of the proposals. If this understanding is incorrect or proposals change/have changed, please correct/update this. Red strikethrough and green italics are used to highlight small changes only.

Lead
[Unchanged, I think, other than the addition below]

Proposed addition: This guideline specifically does not include those engaged in pseudo-science and marginal or fringe scientific theories, who would be notable only if they meet criteria under the general notability or WP:BIO guidelines

General notes
[no changes proposed?]

Criterion 8 notes (new criterion)
See Notes at the main proposal page. I am entirely unclear whether these are intended as alternatives to or notes associated with this proposal or something else.

Citation metrics
[No changes proposed]