Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives/Archive 11

81.158.247.47

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * The Awesome Snakes


 * Description
 * Tried to add the last release by the band, and also stated that Awesome Snakes is no longer active. I was then greeted by this error: "An automated filter has identified this edit as potentially unconstructive, and it has been disallowed."


 * Date and time
 * 01:10, 16 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * What it was complaining about is the word "ASS", written in all caps. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:39, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

203.188.219.38

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Pathogen


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 01:44, 16 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Not a false positive. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:41, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

76.253.187.176

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Ramesses II


 * Description
 * I was trying to make this section better.


 * Date and time
 * 02:00, 16 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * No, you were vandalizing it. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:42, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

140.78.223.2

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Mendeley


 * Description
 * I tried to remove the false "Category:Free_reference_management_software". Note that although the filter warned about deleting the last category of the article, th page still contains the correct link to "Category:Reference_management_software"


 * Date and time
 * 11:24, 16 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Actually, you were removing the only category on the page. A navigation box on a page isn't the same as a category.עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:35, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The website describes the software as free. Is there something in the EULA that signifies that it's not?  Is it a trial version only?   —  Soap  —  12:57, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Bluehawks87

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Beavercreek High School


 * Description
 * wouldnt let me add alumni and tell that are football program is horrible


 * Date and time
 * 00:14, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Consider this a warning: even attempted vandalism could lead to you being blocked. Either edit constructively or don't edit at all.  — Soap  —  00:31, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Stevencurtis

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Jacob Dibdin


 * Description
 * I was trying to give a outline of his life and his lifes work.


 * Date and time
 * 06:47, 17 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Non-admin comment: Just to let everyone know that this user has vandalized at least 3 articles:  and . Thanks --VandTrack (talk) 07:26, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I notice this user is blocked now, and although he didnt make it clear which article he was reporting a false positive on, all I see is attempted vandalism.  —  Soap  —  13:58, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Seamiekid

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Camlough Rovers F.C.


 * Description
 * Trying to enter Jackie Mooney as Chairman and Gary Quinn as Manager


 * Date and time
 * 19:07, 17 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Thanks for the report - fixed the issue with the filter - please try your edit again. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:11, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

173.100.181.54

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * List_of_Fred_characters


 * Description
 * Someone redirected this article to Fred Figglehorn even though the content on this page is unique and the deletion discussion had no consensus to merge. I tried to undo the redirect and it said the edit was unconstructive.


 * Date and time
 * 04:26, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

I fixed what I think was the problem stopping you; I have no opinion on the page itself but it shouldn't stop you from restoring or editing it now.  — Soap  —  10:24, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

98.117.38.125

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Babylonian astrology


 * Description
 * i was trying to add a edit to a page and it stopped me


 * Date and time
 * 21:22, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Consider this a warning: even attempted vandalism could lead to you being blocked. Either edit constructively or don't edit at all.  — Soap  —  21:30, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

208.96.121.65

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Gun politics in Canada


 * Description
 * Adding missing commas, that some people KEEP FORGETTING! It should be in the policies to check for missing commas, damn it! FUCK!


 * Date and time
 * 04:11, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Even in the edit summary foul language (especially if capitalized) is considered vandalism.  — Soap  —  10:25, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Johnconorryan

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Brewster Kahle


 * Description
 * Blocked, editing bio of Brewster Kahle, using factual information and links to outside, credible sources.


 * Date and time
 * 13:03, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Please check to be sure you're not using the Skype Toolbar ... I've yet to see this filter trigger on someone who wasn't using it. Previous discussions have turned up evidence that the plugin keeps on running even when it's not activated, and must be actually uninstalled.  — Soap  —  13:53, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Wetty2222

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Kalahari Desert


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 14:32, 18 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Not a false positive. Trying to change Kalahari Desert to say that it's "full of poop" is vandalism.  Don't do it again.  NawlinWiki (talk) 14:35, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Stlbrick

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Bobby Foglesong


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 02:01, 19 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Edit filter working as intended. –MuZemike 03:38, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

71.245.252.218

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Meerkat Manor


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 03:28, 19 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Because Of Automated Fitler message


 * Filter working as intended. Please do not make edits like that again, or you will be blocked from editing. Regards, –MuZemike 03:39, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

98.244.68.63

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Under a War-Torn Sky


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 18:20, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Consider this a warning; even attempted vandalism may lead to your IP being blocked.  — Soap  —  18:27, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

174.100.15.245

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Brain


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 22:35, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

A vandal.  — Soap  —  22:40, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

173.77.37.54

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * The Child School


 * Description
 * Updating old information, that was incorrect.


 * Date and time
 * 22:07, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Please check to be sure you're not using the Skype Toolbar ... I've yet to see this filter trigger on someone who wasn't using it. Previous discussions have turned up evidence that the plugin keeps on running even when it's not activated, and must be actually uninstalled.  — Soap  —  22:11, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

64.150.16.5

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 5-Hour Energy


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 15:52, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Consider this a warning; even attempted vandalism may lead to your IP being blocked.  — Soap  —  16:50, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

204.174.133.37

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Ford Quadricycle


 * Description
 * hitler is a dumb fatass jerk hag who likes chicken nuggets


 * Date and time
 * 16:44, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Consider this a warning; even attempted vandalism may lead to your IP being blocked.  — Soap  —  16:50, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

CUT 2 DA QUICK

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * The grim gremlin


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 19:18, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

I've removed the filter that was stopping you, but those articles you were attempting to make seem to be about people who would not pass notability requirements and thus would be deleted (as one already has been).  — Soap  —  20:59, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Farm that puppy

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * David Michael King


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 21:28, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Your pages have been deleted; consider this a warning that if you continue to vandalize your account will be blocked.  — Soap  —  21:45, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

118.210.161.67

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Hamburger


 * Description
 * YOUR GAY


 * Date and time
 * 02:16, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

The filters were working correctly. πr2 (t • c) 02:18, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

118.209.11.113

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:Aidan Rolfe


 * Description
 * I was trying to get rid of the part where it says that this page was posted by Aidan Rolfe, and thus was posted about himself. It was actually posted by his friends, Sarah and Celeste, so this information is false.


 * Date and time
 * 03:46, 21 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Actually, the section you're removing refers to edits that were, in fact, done by the account (as an adin, I can see edits that were already deleted). Additionally, it's not your job to remove warnings from other people's user talk pages - if they want to, they can log in and do it. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:25, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Rich Pappas

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Saint Ann School


 * Description
 * the original post was completely false and in naccurate. I am the webmaster for this school and was trying to post correct information to the artical.


 * Date and time
 * 21:55, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

If you believe you have found information in an article which is inaccurate, and it is unreferenced, you can remove it, but be careful not to remove the navigation templates at the bottom which help people find the article. Additionally, any content you wish to add needs to be referenced to a reliable source, or else the article will be in no better a state than when it began. The third paragraph of the text you were adding is especially not usable because it is written in a first person voice, much like an advertisement. (See WP:SOAP).  — Soap  —  22:13, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

108.8.121.75

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Toluene


 * Description
 * Trying to update the syntax of Refractive Index so that it appears in the chart:

Refractive Index(nD) = 1.497 (20 °C) --> RefractIndex = 1.497 (20 °C)
 * Date and time
 * 03:07, 21 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Your Skype toolbar is adding stray text to the article. See . Please deactivate or uninstall the Skype toolbar before attempting to edit Wikipedia articles. Someguy1221 (talk) 04:19, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I did this edit for you, as you can see here. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:02, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Jxse55

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Ancient Rome


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 19:17, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism. User has been warned.  — Soap  —  19:20, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

RalphOnTheRailroad

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User:RalphOnTheRailroad/Sandbox/Ralph_of_the_Roundhouse


 * Description
 * Finished detailed plot summary through end of book. Pressed Save Page and got warning. This is just initial draft to be revised many times before it is moved as a link to the page based on /User:RalphOnTheRailroad/Sandbox/Ralph_of_the_Railroad in turn linked to /List_of_Stratemeyer_Syndicate_series entry about 1/4 down next to note 9.

I could not see error report even after I pressed link something like Reset Server Cache so I don't know what the error was.
 * Date and time
 * 03:59, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Sorry for the trouble, you should be able to continue your editing now. I've pasted the text for you, but I should warn you that this plot summary is well beyond the length that we usually allow on Wikipedia, and should probably be cut down. You may want to look at other articles for novels to compare yours to.  — Soap  —  10:18, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

30

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Pennhurst State School and Hospital


 * Description
 * This isn't mine, but I came across it while viewing the recent changes. Seems a bit odd to me, but I haven't looked at the filters for a while so this could probably be easily explained.


 * Date and time
 * 18:33, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

When a user changes a paragraph, the MediaWiki software sees it as deletion of the entire (old) paragraph and addition of the entire new paragraph. There is currently no way to get around this limitation. Thus, when a user edits a paragraph containing certain watch words, the edit filter will see it as possible vandalism. It is possible to check edits for instances in which the watchword text was present in the original, but this does not always work, because the filter uses an "all or nothing" type of system. That is why this tag is only considered possible vandalism.  — Soap  —  18:43, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * I see. Good to know. - 30 ( talk ) 17:10, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Georgewilliamherbert

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:Count Iblis


 * Description
 * edit filter repeatedly intercepted normal and harmless admin comment on userpage


 * Date and time
 * 07:13, 25 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Tried to leave this text on User talk:Count Iblis:
 * :Just as an aside - I didn't see this happen (was busy / off wiki) but IMHO, despite having proposed extending the prior advocacy ban a few weeks ago, this particular incident doesn't seem to have been disruptive to me. I don't see anything you posted here as being further evidence that the prior advocacy ban should be renewed, Count Iblis.  ~
 * Further note: Edit Filter 341, related to zsfgseg...
 * Should be fixed now, so that it no longer blocks the edit you were making. Thanks! Evil saltine (talk) 07:29, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Kikifrka

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Kristian Frketić


 * Description
 * I try to edit this page but something stopped me...


 * Date and time
 * 19:05, 25 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * You're putting in exclamation points ! where you should be putting in pipes | and it's tripping the filters. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  19:11, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I've seen this false positive come up before. Are you sure the !!!! is wrong? It does seem when I use preview that it just makes a single cell with exclamation points in it, which would be presumably wrong. Either way, I've made a temporary change to the filter (it can be changed back later) that will allow the !!!! through.  —  Soap  —  19:14, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

JustMeOnWiki

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * YouTube_Instant


 * Description
 * Tried to add a popular spin-off (listandplay.com) to the article, blocked for some reason.


 * Date and time
 * 20:12, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

bit.ly is banned for the most part, even when it is not made an active link, because of people using it to link to prohibited or unwelcome content. For the meantime all uses of this URL (and many others) must be added manually by administrators or other long-term users of the site. I apologize for the inconvenience, but there's no way I could remove or change the filter to let edits like this through normally.  — Soap  —  20:17, 25 September 2010 (UTC) Aaah that explains it! I wrote about the smart use of bit.ly on their site, will fix that!--JustMeOnWiki (talk) 20:19, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Caseymike503

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Thearchfiend


 * Description
 * I tried to write an article for a pretty well known youtuber,but it said my article is unconstructive.


 * Date and time
 * 05:43, 26 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * It's not why your article was blocked, but this individual does not satisfy Wikipedia's notability requirements. Even had you not been caught by the filter, the article would have been deleted without discussion. Someguy1221 (talk) 05:45, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

216.73.65.82

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Slurpee


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 18:41, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  — Soap  —  18:46, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

64.56.10.125

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Battle of Germantown


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 18:48, 22 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Filter working as intended. Admins can and do block users for repeated or egregious filter hits. —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v PC/SP is a show-trial! ) 19:30, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

195.194.84.25

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Sickle-cell disease


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 09:14, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Another vandal.  — Soap  —  14:48, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

188.82.216.53

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Luigi Delneri


 * Description
 * I was trying to stick to the truth. In the page it says that Del Neri went away from F.C. Porto aledging he wanted to return to Italy because of personal problems when, in reality, he was sacked by F.C.Porto board because he was doing an awfull coaching work in the pre-season. He was so pissed off that he even sewed F.C. Porto in a trial he lost. And recently, before moving to AS Roma he even said in an interview that the moment he regreted most was not being able to have succeeded in Porto. The story on his page teel a different history. That's problematic


 * Date and time
 * 22:30, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

If you want to challenge a claim made in the article, and it's not backed up by a reliable source, then you can remove that claim from the page. If it is backed up by a source or someone adds one and you don't believe it, you should take the discussion to the talk page (in this case, talk:Luigi Delneri. But not write commentary directly into the article.   —  Soap  —  22:33, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Hashemsalamah

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Category:Terrorism


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 00:35, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

I see only anti-Israel vandalism. This is no more, and no less, prohibited than any other type of vandalism, and continued attempts will lead to you being blocked from editing.  — Soap  —  00:49, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

193.120.216.45

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:Pharaoh of the Wizards


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 13:55, 24 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Filter working as designed; filer warned (npa3). —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v PC/SP is a show-trial! ) 17:10, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

198.85.233.2

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Andes


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 13:57, 24 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Filter working as designed; filer warned (vandalism4im). —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v PC/SP is a show-trial! ) 17:10, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

65.182.127.20

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Timeline of World War I


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 16:20, 24 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I'll leave this for an administrator; suffice it to say filter is working perfectly. —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v PC/SP is a show-trial! ) 17:10, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

75.155.138.145

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Fortunate Son (song)


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 16:21, 24 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Filter working as designed; filer warned (vandalism4im). —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v PC/SP is a show-trial! ) 17:04, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

72.18.250.226

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Metacafe


 * Description
 * We are no longer headquartered in Palo Alto - We are now located in San Francisco, California.

- Payam at metacafe dot com
 * Date and time
 * 18:16, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Please check to be sure you're not using the Skype Toolbar ... I've yet to see this filter trigger on someone who wasn't using it. Previous discussions have turned up evidence that the plugin keeps on running even when it's not activated, and must be actually uninstalled. I'd switch it myself, but the only link I can find, http://www.metacafe.com/jobs/, still says Palo Alto. Are you a representative of the company?  — Soap  —  19:08, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

210.212.161.67

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 2010 MTV Video Music Awards


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 10:31, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Im not sure what you're trying to do. Could you explain this change?  — Soap  —  10:47, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

24.140.30.237

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Mike Mizanin


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 20:01, 25 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

I corrected WWE Superstar: The Miz's WIkipedia Page, and It said I took out to much content, when I only switched John Cena to Daniel Bryan.
 * I see you making important changes in almost every section. This filter is only set to 'warn', not to stop you, so if you're sure the changes are correct then you can go on to make the edit and not worry about being accused of vandalism.   —  Soap  —  20:13, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Mikey9912345

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Shirt


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 20:24, 25 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * All vandalism, e.g. .  —  Soap  —  20:30, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Rino da albino

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Da beast websites


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 02:18, 26 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * You were trying to create an advertisement, and were properly blocked by a well-written filter. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  02:55, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Dontburnanyeffigy

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Bubba the Love Sponge


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 09:42, 26 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

IM SORRRY I FUCKING LOST IT GOD DAMNIT
 * For this and for other vandalism, your account has now been blocked (not by me). However, as for the filter that I presume you're reporting on, you should never add emails or other contact information into an article, even if they're your own, as people come to Wikipedia to learn about various subjects and not usually to communicate with people about them. It is still discouraged even to put such things on your userpage however because we have no way of preventing unwanted communication by those who browse the pages collecting names for various purposes.  Also you should never copy directly from other websites.   —  Soap  —  11:19, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Gillrob11

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Mintlaw


 * Description
 * Just clarifying that the Shak Bar in Mintlaw is not a gay bar.


 * Date and time
 * 18:37, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

I've deleted the whole sentence as I don't think it's really relevant. In the future, though, you should use the talk page to bring up disputes rather than writing directly in the article. People who do cleanup patrol will often want to get rid of any out of place comment like that, irrespective of what it is, and will consider repeated insertions of it to be vandalism, especially if the person is also removing other content.  — Soap  —  19:45, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Samcaplat

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Sam_Caplat


 * Description
 * Editing a page with information about myself. The page was not created by me, but was edited by me as per a request by the creator.


 * Date and time
 * 20:33, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

I believe you, but there isn't a way to get the filter to know that. It isn't a dynamic system where we can just tell it to "ignore" certain users. You shouldn't worry, though. Nobody browses the filter logs looking for pages to delete ... the regular page patrollers do that, and for the most part they don't even see the edit filter logs. Strictly speaking, the tags are still correct, anyway, because they indicate a person creating a page about himself, which you are. The page has been deleted twice now, but the edit filter isn't responsible for that. The page was deleted because it doesn't credibly assert your notability.  — Soap  —  21:03, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

222.152.238.143

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Fucking, Austria


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 05:30, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Another attempted vandal trying to, well, vandalise. I'm pleased the filter did the right thing. Minima c  ( talk ) 05:52, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

136.173.162.129

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:136.173.62.129


 * Description
 * Clean up old messages from one of our proxy server addresses. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:136.173.162.130

--136.173.162.129 (talk) 13:15, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Date and time
 * 13:15, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

I've removed the message for you. It's not possible for the software to tell that you're the same person, because the IP's are only 'similar', not the same. I apologize for the inconvenience.  — Soap  —  13:19, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

It would be better if you could make a list of IP's that you've used rather than submitting a separate report for each one. I would be happy to clean the talk pages if you do that. It's not really possible to change the filter in a way that would allow 'similar' IPs to be seen as the same because it sees the IP address as a single unit.  — Soap  —  13:28, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't think it's really reasonable to use WP:AGF to argue for the deletion of this filter. We have the false positive reporting system to handle cases like this, but removing the filter entirely would mean that none of the 11,000 or so examples in which the filter was correct would have been stopped.  —  Soap  —  13:30, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree - this filter is necessary. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:23, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

116.71.13.191

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * China Southern Airlines destinations


 * Description
 * I am in the process of updating China Southern Airlines destinations to table layout, some work still needs to be done and am being prevented from saving the work.


 * Date and time
 * 20:31, 27 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Reviewed the edits; looks like harmless tableifying of a list, which shouldn't have triggered the filter (all caps edit vandalism filter). Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 20:49, 27 September 2010 (UTC)


 * It's the FUK .. the edit filter sees it as a variant of, well, you probably know what. I'm not sure it's a good idea to remove that from the filter permanently, since some vandals'll go to extreme lengths to get around the filters, but a short-term removal should be okay. Do you still have the edit text saved?  —  Soap  —  21:15, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, I have also put "underconstruction" label there as many Chinese cities are yet to be included there.
 * All of a sudden I cant copy paste at wikipedia, is any software/filter preventing that too? its working ok at other sites.
 * No, that's not the filter's fault. The filter can't possibly have any affect until you click on the "Save page" button. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:48, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

195.194.187.132

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Karl Benz


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 15:09, 28 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

YOUR MUM IS SO FAT SHE CANT LIVE AND SHES A MAN AND A WOMEN AND YOU HAVE HAD 12 KIDS WITH HER
 * it looks like you tried about 16 times to vandalize a particular article, and then gave up and came here. I'm going to have to block your editing access for 24 hours since it's the only way to get you to stop.  —  Soap  —  15:16, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

87.194.133.96

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Badoo


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 19:59, 28 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Was trying to edit, and you boons wouldn't allow it - morons!
 * The edit was clearly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 20:54, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

208.98.211.162

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Athabasca oil sands


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 21:07, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

What were you trying to do? You didn't leave an edit summary, so I can't see any reason for the deletion of all of that content. Please explain.  — Soap  —  21:18, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * Another false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  15:05, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

173.79.124.148

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Jamestown, Virginia


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 23:01, 28 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * It's a false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 23:45, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Carlpcurran

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Gareth Edwards


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 14:50, 29 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Our error, fixed, please try again. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:00, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

213.162.113.89

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Two-stroke engine


 * Description
 * Add/amend this:

"Suzuki was one of the first manufacturers outside of Europe to adopt loop scavenged two stroke engines. This operational feature was used in conjunction with the expansion chamber exhaust developed by Walter Kaaden of East German motorcycle manufacturer MZ, after their racing rider Ernst Degner defected to the West taking the knowledge with him."

Suzuki did not come up with the idea themselves, they only knew what to do after Degner had given them the knowledge.
 * Date and time
 * 14:50, 29 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Our error, fixed, please try again. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:00, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

216.246.226.161

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * The Ultimate Fighter: Team GSP vs. Team Koscheck


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 14:50, 29 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Our error, fixed, please try again. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:00, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Stephenelliotrocks

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Frog Toes and Tentacles


 * Description
 * added two sentences about the publication history of the book and a story included in it.


 * Date and time
 * 14:50, 29 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Our error, fixed, please try again. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:00, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

65.116.35.251

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * DBFS


 * Description
 * I tried adding a link to the wiki page on the Nyquist-Shannon sampling theorem on the word "Nyquist" since I've never heard that word and I believe that linking to it helps further the explanation.


 * Date and time
 * 14:51, 29 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Our error, fixed, please try again. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:00, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Patch101

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Jurassic Park


 * Description
 * I was trying to add the fact that the character Alan Grant was based off of real life paleontologist Jack Horner. Which it says on Jacks wikipage.


 * Date and time
 * 14:51, 29 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Our error, fixed, please try again. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:00, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Lord Psyko Jo

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Kingdom Hearts: Birth by Sleep


 * Description
 * I was removing the "Secret Keyblade" section, since it is not relevant to the article.


 * Date and time
 * 14:52, 29 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Our error, fixed, please try again. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:00, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

JESawyer1975

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Fallout: New Vegas


 * Description
 * A King of Comedy inserted (presumably) his own name as the author of Fallout: New Vegas. I was trying to manually revert that back to the actual author, John Gonzalez.


 * Date and time
 * 14:53, 29 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Our error, fixed, please try again. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:00, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Steved1973

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Online_Watch_Link


 * Description
 * Adding a relevent link to a wiki article. 'Pub Watch' changed to 'Pub Watch'


 * Date and time
 * 14:53, 29 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Our error, fixed, please try again. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:00, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

149.169.172.221

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Laredo – Nuevo Laredo Metropolitan Area


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 14:54, 29 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Our error, fixed, please try again. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:00, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Jonathanrtm

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:Jonathanrtm


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 14:55, 29 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Our error, fixed, please try again. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:00, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

I am unsure as to why my editing was not allowed. I was adding something to give an understanding of the political background on my piece on "From barren rocks to living stones".
 * Our error, fixed, please try again. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:00, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Your talk page cannot be used as a place to advertise your publications. The enormous advertisement has been deleted in full; Wikipedia is not Facebook. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  15:08, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

24.85.32.247

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Letter (message)


 * Description
 * I was trying to add more specific detail about where the placement of a stamp should be and what detail should be included in the address of both the recipient and the sender (Zip or Postal code).


 * Date and time
 * 14:56, 29 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Fixed the error, please try again. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 14:57, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

96.45.189.228

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Shinee

샤이니. What if someone else want to remove the Hangul text. Doesn't make sense to block something as small as this.
 * Description
 * I was just removing

AbuseLog - 3406398
 * Date and time
 * 15:15, 29 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Our error - please try your edit again. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 15:26, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Dhirajbora

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Commonwealth Games Village 2010


 * Description
 * I was trying to add an ecternal link to Official CWG 2010 site http://www.cwgdelhi2010.org/


 * Date and time
 * 18:41, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

I've moved it to the external link section. You were using "redirect", which is used for making one page automatically load another page, and is different. I also removed the sentence "CRPF Commandos and NSG commandos at strategic point in the village"; if you want to add it back could you spell out the abbreviations so that people unfamiliar with the situation will know what they mean?  — Soap  —  19:25, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

71.174.252.55

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Information Systems Audit and Control Association


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 01:26, 30 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

The process from taking the exam to a) receiving your result takes up to eight weeks (nine weeks in my experience in 2010). From passing to sending them your formal application, I sent it via email which was acknowledged within one day, however four weeks later received and email to say it was actually being reviewed and confirmation of review would take a further eight weeks!!!!!

So four months from taking an exam to actually being formally accredited?? I called their main office and one of the reasons for this length of time was given......"to have a level of consistency throughout this process those people sitting the CISM exam in counties which don't have easily accessible pc's need not be disadvantaged." That's fine, my only concern is those people (and they were unable to give me an exact percentage) sitting the exam, I would imagine will have far bigger priorities in life rather than sitting an CISM exam????
 * If you believe you have found an inaccurate statement in an article, you should bring it up on the talk page rather than writing in the article itself, as any commentary will be removed regardless of what it is. However, this sounds like personal experience to me and I'm not sure we can use that even on the talk page.  —  Soap  —  09:07, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

203.184.0.106

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:202.180.86.126


 * Description
 * talk page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:202.180.86.126

i read in guidlines deleting old things can be ok
 * Date and time
 * 10:28, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

There's no way for us to know that that IP address used to be long to you, so it is being seen as you blanking someone else's talk page, which is not allowed. However I see no reason to doubt you and will do the edit for you. (Except for the signature in the middle; did you really want that?)  —  Soap  —  10:49, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

63.76.10.106

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Battle of Gettysburg


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 14:45, 30 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Not a false positive, obvious vandalism ("MY NAME IS TYLER LANGSTON AND IM GOING GAY"). The Thing  //  Talk  //  Contribs  14:51, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Furthermore, the filer is currently blocked 12h for vandalism per the block log. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 18:27, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Tigerz2010

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Gay Gumdrop King


 * Description
 * I'm trying to tell everyone about the Gumdrop King


 * Date and time
 * 17:45, 30 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Wikipedia is not for stuff that you or your friends make up one day. The page that you attempted to create would have been subjected to deletion if the filter hadn't intervened. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 18:21, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Sexyj Southards

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Jarod southards


 * Description
 * i was trying to make a wikipedia page about myself


 * Date and time
 * 23:26, 30 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Wikipedia is not your personal webpage or a social-networking site. —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v PC/SP is a show-trial! ) 03:18, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

92.98.123.56

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Battle of Hastings


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 07:29, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

An apparent vandal.  — Soap  —  12:29, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

18.111.97.132

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * PyPy


 * Description
 * included a reference url (a mailing list archive) which contained the name of the mailing list


 * Date and time
 * 17:09, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

This filter catches anything matching the pattern (string)@(domain name).(TLD) because this is what an email address looks like. Since there are a lot of other things that fit this pattern, this particular filter has a lot of false positives. They are safe to ignore; please dont feel youre being classified as a problem account or a vandal; a lot of long time editors accumulate edit filter hits like this during their time on Wikipedia.  — Soap  —  17:53, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Poodude2008

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Zebulon Pike


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 00:20, 2 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * No comment on the FP, but reporting filer for username violation. —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v PC/SP is a show-trial! ) 00:31, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * It actually is vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:56, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

360Concept

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Băile Olăneşti


 * Description
 * Baile Olanesti Town - Romania


 * Date and time
 * 08:44, 2 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

I want to put a link to the 360 virtual tour that allows visitors to see the Baile Olanesti Town in an interactive way. Like this:
 * It's a nice site, but I don't see how it really educates people about the towns, which is what external links are supposed to do. I've removed all the links, but if someone has a third opinion that's fine with me.  —  Soap  —  10:51, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Nyttend

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Sandbox


 * Description
 * Reporting this on behalf of an unregistered user: 156.12.158.222 attempted to edit the Sandbox, but was blocked by the edit filter because the edit resembled vandalism. Details here.  Could the filter be adjusted so that it doesn't worry about vandalism in the Sandbox?


 * Date and time
 * 11:48, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

This happens almost every day. Your recommendation has been brought up before, possibly more than once. Although a few filters do specifically exclude the Sandbox, because of the way the edit filter runs, to exempt all of them would require writing the exemption code independently on every filter, which would impede the performance of all of them. If there were a "skip all" function on the edit filter, it would be great, but that doesn't exist yet.  — Soap  —  12:52, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

92.0.13.154

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Indiana University (Bloomington)


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 14:00, 2 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

IDIOT!
 * Vandalism, e.g. this; user is now blocked.  — Soap  —  15:01, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

68.61.179.126

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Googlewhack


 * Description
 * I was trying to edit it so that it was true, because it said stupid and obnoxious things before.


 * Date and time
 * 18:19, 2 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * It's a frivolous report. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 18:59, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

74.233.182.81

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Vineyard


 * Description
 * i was editing the word vine yard i was giving facts about where they were popular and that 1 cup ofv red wine a day is good for you especialy women and i reccomended a really good book/novel that i read


 * Date and time
 * 21:59, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

The text you added is the grapes are usualy used to macke wine and red wine is known to be healthy for you if you drink 1 cup a day and vine yards are really bpopular in californi where imigrants work picking the grapes for moneytheir is a very good book the author is pam munos ryan the name of the book is esperanza rising its kinda a novel and its really GOOD !!!!!. This is not appropriate for the article because it doesn't teach people anything about vineyards. Also the style of writing is not really up to par (although that alone wouldn't be cause for removing it, if the information were valuable and not a duplication of something already in the article).  — Soap  —  22:58, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

109.204.82.155

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Elder race


 * Description
 * Hi


 * Date and time
 * 16:03, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

For repeatedly vandalizing articles, your account has been blocked 24 hours.  — Soap  —  16:09, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

208.68.118.30

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Alfred, Lord Tennyson


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 17:33, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Obscene vandalism and other vandalism on Alex Flinn a few days ago.  — Soap  —  17:39, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

142.227.236.129

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Kyoto Protocol


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 17:52, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

A vandal.  — Soap  —  18:34, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

208.94.41.67

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Tape drive


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 17:58, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

A vandal.  — Soap  —  18:34, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Davydoo

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Vasectomy


 * Description
 * Updating clinical information on the lack of postvasectomy compliance. Is it because the content is sexual in nature? Use of the word semen, etc? I am backing up all my edits with clinical journals.


 * Date and time
 * 07:31, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, "my semen" was triggering the filter. I put in a word-boundary check so that it would not see postvasectomy as a variant of my.  — Soap  —  07:41, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Saskia bell

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Saskia bell


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 08:45, 5 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Had this been saved successfully,, it would have been deleted as unnotable (CSD A7). עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:59, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Borisba12

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Otuzco Province


 * Description
 * Otuzco Province


 * Date and time
 * 12:01, 5 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Im adding informacion of Otuzco city with their costumes, transportation, turism, tradicional, food ect.
 * This content is unverified and will probably be removed, but the edit filter isn't aware of that. It was preventing you from saving the article because you typed all of the headers in capital letters instead of using sentence case surrounded by ==  == signs, as is used on the other articles.  Again, though, I'm not trying to be harsh, but sentences like Meanwhile, Spain Heard about this miraculous virgen and decided to bring a big virgen dell to Otuzco and top out the little virgen into the heart of dou and the story ten sues that the scar son the wodenheart magically close and al of the people napped stated to warship the virgen acound the world. This is why Otuzco and it’s virgin are so famous. are impossible to ever verify, and will have to be removed almost as soon as they're added.  —  Soap  —  12:12, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

68.15.100.95

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Red River Rivalry


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 15:51, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

This is vandalism, although the last attempted edit was only a minor change it was still wrong.  — Soap  —  17:01, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

65.254.15.47

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Nile


 * Description
 * JUST TRYING TO FIX SOMETHING INCORRECT


 * Date and time
 * 18:11, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

A vandal.  — Soap  —  19:50, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

PaulTweddle

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Deffinition


 * Description
 * creating an article and it wont post or save


 * Date and time
 * 18:40, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Please note that Wikipedia does not allow articles about artists who don't meet the notability criteria, and this article would therefore be deleted almost instantly. If you're sure you're notable, you can go ahead by typing the name I'm a C--nt (misspelled on purpose) without the capitals so that it will not be seen as vandalism.  — Soap  —  19:49, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

24.109.220.238

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Toronto Maple Leafs


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 23:07, 5 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Filter working as intended. uw-vandalism4im given to filer. —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v PC/SP is a show-trial! ) 23:11, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

64.251.49.194

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Unobtainium


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 12:42, 6 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Unobtainium. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:12, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

63.232.115.130

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Triangular trade


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 14:57, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

A frivolous report by a vandal.  — Soap  —  14:59, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

142.22.152.2

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * How It's Made


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 17:37, 6 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

THIS IS THE BIGGEST CRAP EVER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

..!..
 * Use the talk page if you want to challenge the legitimacy of an article, don't remove content.  — Soap  —  17:38, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

69.244.148.227

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Parrot


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 20:27, 6 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

i just try to put that they were from rainforests and they put that they were rock stars and corrected my text i think this website is poor and shall not vist here again <3 Lexi <3 Things like They were Rock Stars!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! will always be considered vandalism.  — Soap  —  20:31, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

216.11.69.5

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 1997 in sports


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 14:54, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

No legitimate report here, just a user vandalizing an article.  — Soap  —  15:11, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

66.60.156.2

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Adam Smith


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 15:23, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Only vandalism from what I can see.  — Soap  —  15:30, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

91.105.44.236

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Fuck (film)


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 16:50, 7 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

There's no need for the capital letters. Maybe you were just doing a test edit? Minima c  ( talk ) 16:51, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

82.3.128.51

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * King Harold


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 17:12, 7 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Filter working as intended. User given a uw-blank2 warning. —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v PC/SP is a show-trial! ) 17:22, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

74.133.120.250

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Interpol (album)


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 19:21, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Not a legitimate report from what I can see, only things like this.  — Soap  —  19:28, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Toddshealy

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Religion science the univerese explained


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 20:28, 7 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * And ye shall be damned to an eternity of /dev/null for your assumption that thou art mightier than a god. —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v PC/SP is a show-trial! ) 20:32, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

205.157.206.223

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Comedy Central


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 21:02, 7 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  23:03, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

24.43.217.226

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Mario Kart Wii


 * Description
 * uhhh. I was trying to edit so i could give some info on how to unlock "Jesus Land" and the characters "Jesus" and "Jeebus", because they are such great controversial characters, I felt they should be included in da article.


 * Date and time
 * 01:32, 8 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * It's a false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 08:22, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Tousif Habib

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Tobey Maguire


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 15:36, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

A vandal.  — Soap  —  17:12, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

165.234.180.14

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Crosby Garrett Helmet


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 16:45, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

A vandal.  — Soap  —  17:12, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

66.203.28.119

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Jaguar


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 18:29, 8 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Another vandal. Minima c  ( talk ) 18:31, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

86.112.51.161

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Talk:Editing Recharging alkaline batteries


 * Description
 * Hi I was trying to delete something which I accidently created using the wrong title (Editing Talk:Editing Recharging alkaline batteries) but Im being blocked from doing this. Surely an editor should be able to remove something they posted themselves (seconds earlier) ??? 86.112.51.161 (talk) 20:25, 8 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 20:25, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, I've removed the page content for you. I would ordinarily say that this is a problem in the filter, and that it should be restricted, but it's been running more than a year and I actually haven't heard of this problem before. I'm guessing that's just because there aren't many examples where a talk page will become completely blank since most talk pages at least contain templates and such. I apologize for the inconvenience.  — Soap  —  20:39, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * Actually the page should really be deleted, not just blanked, since there is no article called "Editing Recharging alkaline batteries", which I've also done.  — Soap  —  20:40, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

24.61.157.241

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Metric


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 21:14, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Content like METRIC UNITS ARE TOTAL BULLSHIT IF YOU ARE AN AMERICAN. I DONT GIVE A FUCK ABOUT THE DAM MINORITY UNITS. GOD BLESS AMERICA. will always be considered vandalism.  — Soap  —  21:36, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Hashemm1776

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Gonatostylis


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 02:27, 9 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Filters are working correctly in this case; filer has been warned for repeatedly triggering the filters with unconstructive editing attempts. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 03:13, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Kpthot

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Bystroye Channel


 * Description
 * Attempted to correct a basic error. One instance of "Romanian" in the article should be changed to "Romania". Edit does not process and is reported as an nonconstructive edit.


 * Date and time
 * 02:52, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for reporting this. I've fixed it, but the underlying problem (the fact that one of the links is the same name as that of a particular banned user) remains, and I will have to come up with a better long term solution.  — Soap  —  09:45, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

94.193.163.60

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Trotskyism


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 20:20, 9 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

I dodnt add anything unconstructive, I added a quotation from lenin about Trotsky that was positive post 1917, to give balance to the pre 1917 anti Trotsky quote from lenin. If you dont agree, please tell me, but dont ban me.
 * It should be okay now, please try again.  — Soap  —  20:39, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

72.144.180.248

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Killing of British tourists in Yemen


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 04:28, 10 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

THIS PAGE IS INCORRECT UNDER "RUTH WILLIAMSON" AMERICAN ACTRESS PLEASE CORRECT IMMEDIATELY, THIS CREATES A negative ENERGY STREAM THOROUGH THE ENTIRE ALPHA "ACTRESS RECORD" THANK YOU!
 * This comment doesn't seem to be related to the actual edits, so I'm assuming this is just a frivolous report. If not please explain.  — Soap  —  09:51, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
 * And the actual edit looks like vandalism - Even if the article were a complete hoax, replacing it with the sentence "this is WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" is vandalism; instead, either nominate it for deletion (see WP:DELETE), or add a hoax tag on top. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:19, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Evil Monkey g1

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Debasedtothis


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 07:35, 10 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

I am working for the unofficial site debasedtothis.org and we wanted to have a wikipage after being online for 2 years. It's under Debasedtothis and I believe that it in no way should be a problem.
 * You or someone related to you has created the page twice and it has been deleted twice; this is not due to anything from the edit filter, but because the article makes no credible claim that debasedtothis.org is notable. However, if you want to edit other articles on Wikipedia, you should remove the "Skype Toolbar" which is inserting formatting into pages that shouldn't be there, and causing other people to have to work to remove it.  —  Soap  —  09:48, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Newser506

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Thalia Patillo


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 05:02, 11 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Trying to delete the entire excerpt. It's inaccurate!!!!
 * What you were actually removing with your edit isn't the reference, it's the place where the references appear on the page. If the reference is inacurate, then please:
 * Click on the caret (^) which appears between the number and the link.
 * edit the relevant section where you are brought to, and remove everything from the relevant &lt;ref&gt; tag to the following &lt;/ref&gt; tag.
 * עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:24, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

67.100.125.184

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * American Crossword Puzzle Tournament


 * Description
 * I think the 220 filter issue was an URL included in a comment that accompanied a reqmap I added to the article...


 * Date and time
 * 07:12, 11 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Yes, that does seem to be it. I don't think that this is such a big deal - this type of false positive is probably rare enough to be ignored, even on a warn+tag filter. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:27, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

195.169.10.53

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Biotechnology


 * Description
 * you suck


 * Date and time
 * 09:50, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

I see no good edits among the series recorded in the logs.  — Soap  —  11:07, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

92.4.229.243

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Help desk


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 14:31, 11 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

I will not be using this site again, because of your decision to make the new skin mandatory, this leaves less room for content, and more room for advertising, meaning you don't care about content anymore, you only care about money, several wiki's I use have already left the site and set up their own page, I have bookmarked these to avoid having to get to them through your greedy site.

Thanks for forgetting why you are really here.

Go fuck yourselves. Sell Outs.
 * I'm not sure you really understand what you're upset about. The content of Wikipedia is free, so your vow to "not use this site again" isn't going to take anything away from us, unless you've donated to us in the past and are now deciding to do so no longer.  If that's the case you may want to write to the foundation, since they're the ones who deal with the ad banners.  Note that the people who edit Wikipedia are volunteers, not paid by the Foundation, and being angry at us is only going to make you look less educated and give less weight to your opinions.   —  Soap  —  14:41, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Another false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  16:48, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

216.56.12.146

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * History of the United States Forest Service


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 19:39, 11 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * False report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 19:45, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Micah31680

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Micah Vandergrift


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 20:04, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

False report by a thwarted would-be vandal.  — Soap  —  20:25, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Ms Reality

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Nevada


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 05:50, 12 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

It's when there's a false positive.
 * No false positive here - you did attempt to add 7 exclamation points together. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:15, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

24.62.126.170

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * The Chant of Jimmie Blacksmith


 * Description
 * The_Chant_of_Jimmie_Blacksmith

The entry was for the novel only, and someone had added information as it was for the film. The film already has it's own entry, and this created two entries for the film, instead of oe for the film and one for the book. I deleted information that sholdn't have bee in the entry for the novel to begin with.
 * Date and time
 * 05:55, 12 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You actually did remove all categories, so this isn't a false positive. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:16, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

86.108.114.202

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Romeo and Juliet


 * Description
 * I think the information about Romeo and Juliet is too complicated and wrong, if someone wanted to do a project about Romeo and Juliet, it would take them hours to get the information they need, I merely removed some of the incorrect information and added needed information


 * Date and time
 * 12:33, 12 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * You should put commentary like this on the talk page, not the article itself.  — Soap  —  13:02, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually, this vandal replaced the entire article with "why waste so much time writing about Romeo and Juliet? It's a play by William Shakespeare about two lovers, who cares???? See, how much I can summarize ten pages???" -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  19:02, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

204.113.97.5

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Mashup (video)


 * Description
 * I was trying to write a passing reference to YouTube Poop, an Internet meme where users create comedic mashups and post them on youtube.


 * Date and time
 * 18:35, 12 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Actually, you were trying to insert text claiming that "YouTube Poop" was a synonym for "video mashup". -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  19:00, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Entrpz

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * BAB


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 00:59, 13 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

BAB abbreviation for "BAD ASS BITCH" or "BAD ASS BASTARD" Used in texting to describe an individual.
 * I believe you, but that doesn't mean it can go onto the page. A disambiguation page ideally should only contain entries that lead to articles which one would reasonably expect a reader to type in the name of the disambiguation page while trying to reach.  A page called "Bad Ass Bitch" wouldn't exist, so it wouldn't be on the disambiguation page either.  —  Soap  —  10:47, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

24.24.142.225

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Talk:Straw Dogs


 * Description
 * I assume it triggered because I added to a section that was already on the talk page entitled "anal rape", because it flagged as edit summary vandalism. The edit summary was the default one though, so not my fault.


 * Date and time
 * 09:21, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

I was about to remove it, but then I realized that this filter is a "tag only" type, which means it won't stop you from making the edit. You don't have to be worried about being considered as a vandal because of things like this; all of our most experienced editors accumulate a few false positives during their time here and there is no one who will take them as evidence of vandalism.  — Soap  —  10:44, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

203.193.220.150

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Parthenon


 * Description
 * Looking through this user reported at AIV and the blocked edit, it doesn't look like a bad-faith or vandalistic edit, despite the misspelling of Zues for Zeus, but a genuine attempt ot help. I am User:Fram, not the editor that was blocked, but I suppose I can report a false positive on someone else as well?


 * Date and time
 * 10:06, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

This particular filter gives us a lot of false positives. But they aren't a result of bad coding, so much as entries deliberately added to keep particular vandals with predictable editing patterns away. Although, as I said, it does give us a lot of false positives, I have several different times seen an edit being stopped that I was sure was a false positive, because it didn't look like vandalism, and then later found out that it was working properly after all. But even so, some of the watch words are too easily triggered by innocent edits and have had to be removed. I can't tell which kind this is going to be so I think the best thing for me to do is to alert the person who added it in.  — Soap  —  12:06, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * Thank you. Fram (talk) 12:32, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

207.160.116.49

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * International School Ibadan


 * Description
 * I was trying to add the anthem of the school.


 * Date and time
 * 14:55, 14 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

We don't generally add mottos to school articles, or signature songs, unless the song itself is something that receives attention from those not affiliated with the school. The filter tagged your edit because it had !!!! in it, however, which is a separate issue.  — Soap  —  15:28, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

83.24.154.200

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Joanna Rutkowska


 * Description
 * This must be the new filter, but more importantly, I don't how this should be called vandalism when this IP was restoring the correct name according to the title of the page. Minima  c  ( talk ) 16:55, 14 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 16:55, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

I've added a line that will cause it to ignore edits in which the article title is contained in the lines the user is adding; this should catch most of the false positives. Not necessarily all; for example it wouldn't see "Bill Clinton" and "William Jefferson Clinton" as equals, and there is unfortunately no way to get the filter to run on last name only or first name only or both.  — Soap  —  17:23, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

144.90.38.92

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Common Sense (pamphlet)


 * Description
 * This bot report from WP:AIV seems to be a false positive.


 * Date and time
 * 17:34, 14 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Reported by -- A. B. (talk • contribs) 17:34, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * This filter turns up a lot of false positives, and there isn't really a good way to fix it. Sometimes a temporary fix can be added, but other times we just have to push the edits through manually.  In this case, though, it seems to be a test edit that doesn't add any useful content and removes some that is useful, so I don't think it should be pushed through.    —  Soap  —  17:41, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I have adjusted the filter so this shouldn't happen again. It was a recent change to the filter, but a change too far, imo. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:04, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

BankIFSC

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Allahabad Bank


 * Description
 * i was trying to edit the external links but it was not working so!!!


 * Date and time
 * 14:43, 13 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

The filters will tag anyone editing an article and inserting a link to a website with their username in it. So really, this is not a false positive and the filter is working as it should. To be honest, my first instinct is to remove the links you added along with some similar links that were already in the article, but I will leave that for a second opinion as they don't seem to really be actually commercial websites. However, someone else may remove the links, and if they do so, you should talk with them before attempting to add them back in.  — Soap  —  14:48, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

203.193.220.150

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Parthenon


 * Description
 * Looking through this user reported at AIV and the blocked edit, it doesn't look like a bad-faith or vandalistic edit, despite the misspelling of Zues for Zeus, but a genuine attempt ot help. I am User:Fram, not the editor that was blocked, but I suppose I can report a false positive on someone else as well?


 * Date and time
 * 10:06, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

This particular filter gives us a lot of false positives. But they aren't a result of bad coding, so much as entries deliberately added to keep particular vandals with predictable editing patterns away. Although, as I said, it does give us a lot of false positives, I have several different times seen an edit being stopped that I was sure was a false positive, because it didn't look like vandalism, and then later found out that it was working properly after all. But even so, some of the watch words are too easily triggered by innocent edits and have had to be removed. I can't tell which kind this is going to be so I think the best thing for me to do is to alert the person who added it in.  — Soap  —  12:06, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * Thank you. Fram (talk) 12:32, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

207.160.116.49

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * International School Ibadan


 * Description
 * I was trying to add the anthem of the school.


 * Date and time
 * 14:55, 14 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

We don't generally add mottos to school articles, or signature songs, unless the song itself is something that receives attention from those not affiliated with the school. The filter tagged your edit because it had !!!! in it, however, which is a separate issue.  — Soap  —  15:28, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

83.24.154.200

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Joanna Rutkowska


 * Description
 * This must be the new filter, but more importantly, I don't how this should be called vandalism when this IP was restoring the correct name according to the title of the page. Minima  c  ( talk ) 16:55, 14 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 16:55, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

I've added a line that will cause it to ignore edits in which the article title is contained in the lines the user is adding; this should catch most of the false positives. Not necessarily all; for example it wouldn't see "Bill Clinton" and "William Jefferson Clinton" as equals, and there is unfortunately no way to get the filter to run on last name only or first name only or both.  — Soap  —  17:23, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

144.90.38.92

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Common Sense (pamphlet)


 * Description
 * This bot report from WP:AIV seems to be a false positive.


 * Date and time
 * 17:34, 14 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Reported by -- A. B. (talk • contribs) 17:34, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * This filter turns up a lot of false positives, and there isn't really a good way to fix it. Sometimes a temporary fix can be added, but other times we just have to push the edits through manually.  In this case, though, it seems to be a test edit that doesn't add any useful content and removes some that is useful, so I don't think it should be pushed through.    —  Soap  —  17:41, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I have adjusted the filter so this shouldn't happen again. It was a recent change to the filter, but a change too far, imo. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:04, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Sophie

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * talk:Megaupload


 * Description
 * Adding a comment, got the skype detection message (ie, adding into the text). However, it was not added to the page I am/was trying to edit.


 * Date and time
 * 15:08, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you mean with your comment up above. Generally, though, whenever you load up an edit box with a number that looks like it might be a phone number, the Skype plugin will change it automatically into a call-able link unless you uninstall it. That doesn't mean it will happen on every page, just if it appears in the edit window.  — Soap  —  15:20, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Lmgen3b

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Lisbeth Salander


 * Description
 * editing the third paragraph of the profile, to make it more accurate and faithful to the book's own words and description of the event mentioned.


 * Date and time
 * 15:59, 13 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * What tripped it is the all-capped quote. Try editing it sans the shouting quote. —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v PC/SP is a show-trial! ) 16:19, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

169.204.238.46

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Hanging Gardens of Babylon


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 21:25, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

A vandal. — Soap  —  21:37, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

74.244.212.183

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * NASA


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 21:48, 13 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

A vandal.  — Soap  —  21:56, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

216.96.19.97

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:Hmrox


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 00:19, 14 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Filter working as intended. Admins may want to block based upon filter log hits. —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v PC/SP is a show-trial! ) 00:52, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

71.205.200.117

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Fish Hooks


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 00:29, 14 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Vandal. —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v PC/SP is a show-trial! ) 00:49, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Getrangaed11

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Support group


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 03:30, 14 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

I HATE YOU ALL!!


 * False report; vandalism-only account. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 04:31, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Myleftkidney

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Self Service Science Forum


 * Description
 * myleftkidney is my sign in name http://www2b.abc.net.au/science/k2/stn/ and in this forum kidney did declare wikipedia a religion because it could not be used in a science forum as any one could alter


 * Date and time
 * 05:41, 14 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * No, you cannot use Wikipedia to complain about being banned from another site. Someguy1221 (talk) 05:47, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

82.13.86.11

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Owain Glyndŵr


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 16:31, 14 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

owain glyndwr was a git in sHoes!
 * A vandal. — Soap  —  16:42, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

92.17.163.189

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Joseph Goebbels


 * Description
 * I was trying to put right an error where it says Goebbels died in 1945 but was born in 1946 so i didn't think this was possible


 * Date and time
 * 19:46, 14 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  19:55, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

71.56.12.40

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * For Lack of a Better Name


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 21:09, 14 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  21:10, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Srgt snuggles

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Laredo, Texas


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 00:42, 15 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

im tryin 2 edit the site
 * Bullshit! That edit was so ugly it could be a modern art masterpiece! —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v PC/SP is a show-trial! ) 00:50, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Randomz2

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Zachary Taylor


 * Description
 * to give an explanation on zachary taylors life


 * Date and time
 * 14:23, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Attempted edit: "he will kick ur ass in fmx and bmx." Go away. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:27, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

208.39.168.238

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Coolhunting


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 15:54, 15 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  15:56, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

207.73.253.41

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Norse mythology


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 16:17, 15 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Filter working as intended. —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v PC/SP is a show-trial! ) 16:22, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Nowefaa

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Freeze-drying


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 17:36, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

The filters will tag anyone editing an article and inserting a link to a website with their username in it. So really, this is not a false positive and the filter is working as it should. That by itself does not mean anything though. Your edits made under the IP were reverted because someone else thought that they were not helpful additions to the article, according to the reading of the external links policy, and I imagine the same would be true if you made them under this account.  — Soap  —  17:57, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

EllieWod

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Eleanor wood


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 20:02, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

If this page were created, it would be deleted since the subject is not notable under Wikipedia guidelines. If you want to create articles about people you should make sure they meet the guidelines.  — Soap  —  20:06, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

97.102.106.80

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Tutorial (Editing)/sandbox


 * Description
 * I know you guys can't exempt the sandbox, but I just thought I'd make you aware that I got caught in the Edit Filter while accidentally logged out. (I was brushing back up on redirect syntax). --nn123645 (talk) 07:32, 16 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 07:32, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

We can exempt the sandbox, but it must be done individually on every filter, and it wouldn't include the talk page or any subpages, and it wouldn't exempt redirects.  — Soap  —  09:43, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

173.79.245.106

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Saskatchewan


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 16:20, 16 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  16:52, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

PeterKneer

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Hand grenade


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 01:15, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

A vandal.  — Soap  —  01:24, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Matthew wrong01

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Jezza kyle


 * Description
 * EVERYTHING IN THE ARTICLE WAS TRUE FACT


 * Date and time
 * 01:37, 17 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Filter working as intended. —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v PC/SP is a show-trial! ) 02:29, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

68.81.3.216

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Shia LaBeouf


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 02:10, 17 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Filter working as intended. —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v PC/SP is a show-trial! ) 02:28, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

121.127.207.160

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Bell-Boeing V-22 Osprey


 * Description
 * add a redirect to the page Lockheed Martin KC-130 when KC-130 was mentioned


 * Date and time
 * 03:00, 17 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The "REDIRECT" code can only be used on redirect pages. It can break actual articles, so just use brackets to make the link. Someguy1221 (talk) 06:54, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

86.112.54.154

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Carrick Academy


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 14:11, 17 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 15:08, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

92.15.109.249

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Great Hanshin earthquake


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 15:14, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

A vandal.  — Soap  —  15:30, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

96.54.84.74

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Sword fern


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 18:41, 17 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * False report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 18:44, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

90.201.60.255

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Brighton


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 20:50, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Vandal. Netalarm talk 21:12, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

70.174.74.152

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Oatmeal


 * Description
 * I was describing a humerous, yet true scenario of how to eat oats in the Southwest Culture of India. It is a popular dish there even though most Americans would find the idea humorous.


 * Date and time
 * 22:09, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

A vandal, of course  — Soap  —  22:18, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

MCawesome69

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User:Giftiger wunsch


 * Description
 * This guy needs to know how to have fun


 * Date and time
 * 22:45, 17 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  22:48, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

71.195.55.228

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Tween (demographic)


 * Description
 * Tween


 * Date and time
 * 00:36, 18 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

I was editing an article.
 * You seem to be dripping malformed content all over the page, in edits such as this. This has to be cleaned up if you don't remove it yourself.  From the looks of it I would assume it's due to using a proxy, which can often cause problems like this.    —  Soap  —  00:52, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

123Amir

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * FBLA-PBL


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 12:41, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

A vandal.  — Soap  —  12:49, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Connor5463789

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Connor Nicholas Gerald Hawkins


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 18:53, 18 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Filter working as intended. Requesting oversight of the edit immediately prior to mine due to revelation of private information. —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v PC/SP is a show-trial! ) 18:56, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

64.122.6.89

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Constitution of North Korea


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 22:19, 18 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

A vandal.  — Soap  —  22:52, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Sudsie

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Sudarshan "Sudsie" Maharaj


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 00:17, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

I don't see any false positives here; which of these do you think was an error? It's normal for the edit filter to notice when someone creates an article about themselves.  — Soap  —  00:22, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Jclarke650

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Michele Clarke


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 02:15, 19 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * You do not get a say in whether an article about you stays or goes any more than your opponent does. If there's factual inaccuracies, contact the Wikimedia OTRS team at info-en-q@wikimedia.org . —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v PC/SP is a show-trial! ) 02:57, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Aggiesis13

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * tungsten


 * Description
 * add more current info that is more accurate and more simplistic info for students


 * Date and time
 * 02:55, 19 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * While your effort is commendable, it also removed all the inter-language links, references, categories, and the related reading/see also list. An edit that does any or all of these things will generally always be considered vandalism. —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v PC/SP is a show-trial! ) 03:00, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Also we can't accept content taken word for word from other sites, which it seems like this is based on a few quick searches that turned up sites like http://www.eoearth.org/article/Tungsten .  — Soap  —  11:30, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

195.67.51.130

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Black Panther Party


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 11:08, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

I see only vandalism such as this.  — Soap  —  11:28, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

116.15.61.61

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Otome Youkai Zakuro


 * Description
 * I was trying to edit the character summary to hold more information as well as improve the language used by the former editor.


 * Date and time
 * 10:38, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

It seems that it was reading strings like 's butt as an insult (different from merely being obscene). I've removed it for now in the absence of any better solution since I don't think people will write things like "he's a butt!" very often (though I do plan to come back to this later). Thank you for reporting the false positive. I've done the edit for you, but un-done it again because I'm not familiar with this series enough to write about it. To restore the edit, just click here and hit Submit or Enter or whatever the button to save an edit appears as.  — Soap  —  11:23, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

69.180.80.221

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Maple leaf


 * Description
 * i was trying to edit a post


 * Date and time
 * 00:10, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

All I see is vandalism; is this right?  — Soap  —  00:20, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Sequoyahgenius1

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Sequoyah High School (Georgia)


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 02:09, 21 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

I was merely adding a few clubs at sequoyah high school in canton Georgia that have been offered there.
 * All I see is vandalism . Tim  1357  talk  03:21, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

219.89.226.110

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Come Around Sundown


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 09:47, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

A vandal. — Soap  —  10:26, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

ThomasRaver

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Cockdra


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 09:56, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Do you really think posting here is going to get your vandalism article up? Consider this a last warning, any more vandalism will lead to your account being blocked.  — Soap  —  10:26, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

168.216.210.175

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Lincoln High School (West Virginia)


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 12:33, 21 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Clearly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 18:30, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

92.23.244.76

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Graeme Eaglesham


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 14:02, 21 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  17:24, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

72.2.102.254

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Sign language


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 17:09, 21 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  17:24, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

68.225.211.242

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Friday the 13th (franchise)


 * Description
 * gay out


 * Date and time
 * 23:05, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

User blanked part of an article and added "YOU PEOPLE SICKEN ME." to the top.  — Soap  —  23:09, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Cmills88

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Domestic Violence


 * Description
 * I attempted to remove a line of text irrelevant to the article


 * Date and time
 * 14:44, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

This is due to a rare bug that sometimes prevents edits from going through when several different people are repeatedly editing the same page with edits that are denied by the filter. Without having any opinion on whether the paragraph is helpful or not, I am pretty sure that if you tried to make the same edit again it would go through.  — Soap  —  15:09, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

A40DeepStrike

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 3rd Armored Division


 * Description
 * Adding the unit web site for A/40th FA, MLRS - 3rd Armored Division Artillery (1987-1992)


 * Date and time
 * 06:22, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

If you add a link to a40deepstrike.com, which contains your username, the filter will point that out. It is a machine and thus not capable of making a judgment as to whether a particular link is good or not, it just notices your username. You should not have to worry about people being suspicious of you, but if you are, you may want to change your username (or just make a new account), as the website you're linking apparently contains an online store and your username could be seen as on the edge of being promotional (regardless of your intentions).  — Soap  —  07:07, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

203.24.97.8

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Horace_de_Vere_Cole


 * Description
 * Changed "The prankster at one point gave theatre tickets to each of his bald friends, strategically placing them so that their heads spelled out an expletive when viewed from the balcony" to the more descriptive, and better-referenced "The prankster at one point gave theatre tickets to each of his bald friends, strategically placing them so that their heads spelled out the word 'SHIT' when viewed from the balcony ". Probably picked up because of 'SHIT' in all-caps; but in this case it is accurate.


 * Date and time
 * 09:03, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Was it really in capitals? The filter would work if you wrote it in lowercase. The one Internet source I could find, http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/permalink/the_pranks_of_horace_de_vere_cole/, seems to indicate it had a dot over the i.  —  Soap  —  12:29, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Satyarthster

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Bombay india


 * Description
 * I was trying to restore the page from the edit I had done. I had intended to edit the page 'Bombay, India' and not 'Bombay india'.


 * Date and time
 * 10:14, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

This has been handled on your talk page, I believe. There is no independent Wikipedia article for "bombay" at any title because we already have Mumbai.  — Soap  —  12:20, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

84.153.222.131

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Reference_desk/Mathematics


 * Description
 * just submit a proof for refutation. the reference desks should allow ascii art, even if it is inappropriate in other artiles.


 * Date and time
 * 11:53, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

I suppose so, I'd want a second opinion before exempting though. Note that your theorem is wrong, because the four color theorem allows "point borders" to be the same color on both sides, as you can see in the example map File:Four_Colour_Map_Example.svg. (If it didn't allow point borders, you could just take a circle and divide it into 360 segments that meet at the center and say that you'd need 360 colors to appropriately color it.)  — Soap  —  12:42, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Dragon110101

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Nancy Drew Question Mania


 * Description
 * Make questions


 * Date and time
 * 13:14, 23 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I think the edit filter worked as intended here. Ucucha 14:05, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

71.187.70.170

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Duke Blue Devils


 * Description
 * town name

Give the correct name of the town
 * Date and time
 * 18:25, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

The only edits I see are vandalism: Special:AbuseLog/3567227.  — Soap  —  18:29, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Captainjk27

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Ben Fernandez


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 16:19, 22 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Filter working as intended. —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v PC/SP is a show-trial! ) 16:56, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Linda Wolf

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Linda Wolf


 * Description
 * Please replace this with a description of the edit you were trying to make.


 * Date and time
 * 17:34, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Are you reporting the filter that triggered on the links you added? Strictly speaking it isn't a false positive because it correctly detected that you added a series of links to your own website. However I understand different people may have different reasons for so doing, and that not all of them are promoting their business. The edit filter is a machine and is thus not capable of making a judgment as to whether a particular link is good or not, it just notices your username. You should not have to worry about people being suspicious of you, however, as anyone editing an article about themselves will be noticed by others for other reasons.
 * Comments

I will tune down the filter, but it may be restored later.  — Soap  —  18:53, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

24.192.19.29

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Sally Brown


 * Description
 * Was trying to add what I thought was useful information, but every time I would click save, it would send be back to where I was editing it.


 * Date and time
 * 13:08, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

It will work if you don't put all those exclamation points. Capitals probably aren't necessary either, since the comic strip uses capitals by default, but that's up to you. The saved edit is here if you didn't save it anywhere else.  — Soap  —  13:15, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

86.26.12.31

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Wrestlemania


 * Description
 * Some faggots don't seem to understand that disc is spelled disc and not disk. Not only am I worried by the spelling levels of some of your moderators I'm also pretty pissed that I got a warning about editing the page. Fuck this site man


 * Date and time
 * 16:42, 24 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * If you were trying to use both obscenities and bigoted slurs in your edit summaries, it's no wonder you got blocked. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  00:16, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

77.103.142.78

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * HolbyBlue


 * Description
 * saying how good it was


 * Date and time
 * 17:29, 24 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

173.20.190.206

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Wikimedia Foundation


 * Description
 * Trying to revert vandalism, said that I put an email in (Which I may have, but not sure).


 * Date and time
 * 18:01, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

I apologize, but there is really no way to prevent things like this, which don't happen very often. It would be nice if we could make a list of all the articles to exempt from this particular filter, but there would be so many of them that the system wouldn't run. Thank you for helping to keep the page in its proper state.  — Soap  —  20:20, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Jfinkle

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Jim Moran


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 22:13, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

The edit may be reverted, but I can give you "confirmed" status which will allow you to make edits like this (though it won't remove the tags which are there for everybody).  — Soap  —  22:21, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

2.120.120.108

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Sergio Busquets


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 22:39, 24 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Edits like that will ALWAYS be considered vandalism, chummer. —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v PC/SP is a show-trial! ) 03:17, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

65.78.54.139

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * John Lennon


 * Description
 * The Beatles or The Quarrymen

I was trying to edit the word information. somebody put infrometion.
 * Date and time
 * 22:57, 24 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Wikipedia is not the place to out yourself as a whore. Filter working perfectly. —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v PC/SP is a show-trial! ) 03:18, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

71.102.135.98

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Zero Zero


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 23:17, 24 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * BADLINK REPORT ON TIME LIFE PAGE under music.....AM gold takes you to zero zero page.....What the fuck
 * We have zero power over Time Life's website; just because it's taking you to an incorrect page does not give you the right to deface where it does take you, Wikipedia article or not. —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v PC/SP is a show-trial! ) 03:19, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

97.121.159.86

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Zero Zero


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 00:08, 25 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Filter working as intended. Go screw around with greetings on Facebook, not here. —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v PC/SP is a show-trial! ) 03:15, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

72.45.55.3

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Arab–Israeli conflict


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 01:36, 25 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Reporter warned with uw-bv. —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v PC/SP is a show-trial! ) 03:15, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Corrector12

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Northwich Victoria F.C.


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 23:11, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

I have made the edit for you; this article is under a kind of protection that prevents some edits from going through; I apologize for the inconvenience.  — Soap  —  00:03, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

206.176.249.157

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Ghana


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 23:34, 25 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  00:14, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

140.104.19.39

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * John Anderson (American football)


 * Description
 * I was trying to update his current role in football. He is coaching the linebackers at carroll university.


 * Date and time
 * 00:07, 26 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Nonsense like "He especially loves his stack package of linebackers that go by the name of Ja-Pac-a-Korus!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :)" has no place here. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  00:12, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

98.227.6.26

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Black Veil Brides


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 02:47, 26 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Filter working as intended. —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v PC/SP is a show-trial! ) 03:12, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Editingchief

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Web Soup


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 05:14, 26 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Filter working as intended. —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v PC/SP is a show-trial! ) 05:37, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

180.192.73.94

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Chemical element


 * Description
 * changing the report


 * Date and time
 * 10:56, 26 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Replacing part of an article with a statement that it's boring, and adding such a statement elsewhere, is clearly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:05, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

82.152.216.15

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents


 * Description
 * Tried to open a case about the abusive behaviour I had received from 2 users. I received response: "An automated filter has identified this edit as potentially unconstructive, and it has been disallowed. If this edit is constructive, please report this error." Therefore I am here to report the error.


 * Date and time
 * 14:06, 26 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Edit has since been allowed. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  15:28, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

220.255.1.168

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 14:23, 26 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

I don't see any edit filter log entries for your IP address; and since you didn't give us the article you were editing, I have no idea where to find this false positive. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 15:19, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Looking at all edits from just before your report, it seems that you're talking about this edit, which isn't a false positive. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 15:34, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Daytonhighschool

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Dayton, Nevada


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 15:06, 26 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Clearly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 15:21, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

68.96.156.144

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Switzerland


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 16:27, 26 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

this sucks
 * Then go get a book from your local library. Filter working as intended. —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v PC/SP is a show-trial! ) 16:51, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

88.111.144.214

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Belle Vue Boys' School


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 22:17, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Seems to be a vandal.  — Soap  —  22:46, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Astanax

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Astanax


 * Description
 * I was trying to turn the keyword Astanax into an entry which was associated with Travis Gill's novel, "The Adventures of Sir Astanax Tahlmarine". It only describes what happens in the book from beginning to end, much like what happens when someone goes to Wikipedia to read what happens in a book, movie, or play, for example: the play Spamalot, or the Harry Potter novels.


 * Date and time
 * 22:29, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

This appears to be a self-published book, or one published through a vanity press, which in either case would indicate that it cannot meet the notability requirements necessary to have an article on Wikipedia. Generally if the author of the book doesn't have an article, there will not be an article for any of his works either.  — Soap  —  22:42, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

76.176.27.3

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Douglas (given name)


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 22:35, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Seems to be a vandal.  — Soap  —  22:45, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

88.163.179.45

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Michel Houellebecq


 * Description
 * political background of Houellebecq work, affinities to Michel Clouscard thought (see the french page of Houellebecq)


 * Date and time
 * 00:13, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for reporting this; I've finished the edit for you.  — Soap  —  00:30, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Breezeboy

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Quinque viae


 * Description
 * I was trying to add the version of the "First Way" from St Thomas' Summa Contra Gentiles. It is a much clearer version in 16 paragraphs.


 * Date and time
 * 01:07, 27 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

It may be hard to believe this, but you're actually commiting a massive copyright infringement, which probably isn't why the filter stopped you. But, please remember, copying off sites like http://dhspriory.org/thomas/ContraGentiles1.htm is not allowed per WP:COPYPASTE. Minima c  ( talk ) 06:37, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Friendo9876

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Screw You Longhair Society


 * Description
 * I was trying to create a wiki page on a huge facebook group that has enormous amount of follows and yet it wouldn't allow me to create the page


 * Date and time
 * 01:18, 27 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Groups on social networking sites are generally not notable per the notability guideline which states: "A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Unfortunately there are no sources based on this group. So you'll have to wait until they receive any media coverage from any new sites or stuff like that. Minima c  ( talk ) 06:30, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

98.231.22.199

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Paleo-Indians


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 01:33, 27 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Clearly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:11, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

24.7.50.177

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Avinash Wadhavan


 * Description
 * I was crafting a description of a young upstanding member of society and his exploits. The previous edits were referring to a man by the name of "Avinash Madavan," which is clearly not topical.


 * Date and time
 * 05:41, 27 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

If you would like to create a piece of information based on the same name as the article then don't replace the entire content with it. I would advise you to create an account first then have a look at Starting an article to get used to the process. If you can't do that, you could try posting it at WP:Articles for creation where you can deliver the text yourself and see if someone agrees with it. Minima c  ( talk ) 06:20, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * This is, the one who vandalized Diannaa's RfA and then went on to oppose.  — Soap  —  10:21, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

188.114.137.34

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * ToeJam & Earl


 * Description
 * was trying to give a internal link to the composers page john baker(Radiophonic musician)


 * Date and time
 * 06:31, 27 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

That was a good edit, but you also must have clicked on a Redirect box which added the text #REDIRECT I know wasn't intentional, it was probably a test edit you've just made. Minima c  ( talk ) 06:42, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

KeptSouth

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Levi Johnston


 * Description
 * duplicate entry at 10:40, October 23, 2009, same edit, same filter. I would like the duplicate to be removed from my record. Thanks.


 * Date and time
 * 09:55, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

This happened over a year ago and the filter has been changed quite a bit since then. It's not possible to remove the entries, if that's what you're asking, though I urge you not to worry, because most long-term editors have tags like that in their filter logs, and anyone who tries to make lesser of them for that reason will be told that they're wrong.  — Soap  —  10:14, 27 October 2010 (UTC) Well, someone is after me, Soap, that's why I bothered to post there, thanks for looking at and for telling me it isn't anything!KeptSouth (talk) 10:17, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

KeptSouth

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Angela Davis


 * Description
 * Autoed clean up was large and automatically checked the minor edit box. I did not get a warning of Are you sure?, otherwise I would have unchecked the box


 * Date and time
 * 10:05, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

This filter is in a testing phase, and the reason for the lack of a warning is because it may turn out to not be such a good idea for a filter, and to warn people for making good edits would be counter-productive. Again I apologize but there is no way to remove that entry from your filter log, just as I can't remove the entries from my own filter log or anyone else's.  —  Soap  —  10:17, 27 October 2010 (UTC) Thanks again - good to know that. KeptSouth (talk) 10:19, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Amjad.c

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Mumbai


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 14:17, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I can't get the page to load. Can you describe what you were doing and why? (Unless someone else can get the diffs in the filter log to load up.)  — Soap  —  14:26, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * He/she was editing the Mumbai article. Minima  c  ( talk ) 14:57, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, and the filter was stopping it because it was "a large change to the featured article of the day". But I can't get the diff to load to see if it was a good edit or not.  Given the user's other edits, though, I'm guessing that it was at best a test edit and consider this to be not a false positive unless someone shows me I'm wrong (in which case I apologize for the assumption).  —  Soap  —  15:22, 27 October 2010 (UTC)


 * It was a series of bits of garble which the poster was inserting in place of most of the article (which is why it took so long to load). -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  20:45, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

216.165.95.70

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Palestinian People


 * Description
 * I was correcting a statement that did not reflect its own citation. The statement alleges the "widespread" use of the word "Palestinian" to describe the self-identification of the then Arab inhabitants of Palestine prior to WWI. While this nationalist concept existed, it was far from "widespread" and did not become popular until after the Six-Day war of 1967. Not even the citation, an online Britannica article authorized by a famous Pro-Palestinian academic, alleges otherwise. The current phrasing is an expression of a nationalist Palestinian narrative, not historical fact. It was probably given a filter precisely for this reason.


 * Date and time
 * 05:06, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

I agree that citing another encyclopedia is not the best way to go, but it does seem to contain the statement at the page. Whereas the edit you were changing it to had no citation at all. If you would like to make the edit again, you should be able to do so, but it may be reversed by another editor, in which case you should talk to them before adding it back.  — Soap  —  10:20, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

filter 268 no. 1

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Gravitational potential


 * Description
 * Filter blocks interwiki link de:Gravitationspotential; seems that this filter has only false positives...


 * Date and time
 * 06:02, 28 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

There was an error in the code which has now been fixed; sorry for the inconvenience.  — Soap  —  10:26, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Lionelr

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Slate_(writing)


 * Description
 * I've just wanted to add an interwiki link to the french wikipedia article: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tableau_noir


 * Date and time
 * 06:36, 28 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

There was an error in the code which has now been fixed; sorry for the inconvenience.  — Soap  —  10:26, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Tableau noir is already linked to the English article chalkboard, but feel free to re-do this if you believe it is best.  — Soap  —  10:41, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

91.152.204.9

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Great Unknown (A Series of Unfortunate Events)


 * Description
 * tried to add interwiki: Suuri tuntematon (fi:Suuri tuntematon)


 * Date and time
 * 06:41, 28 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

There was an error in the code which has now been fixed; sorry for the inconvenience.  — Soap  —  10:26, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

193.202.109.254

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Snellius–Pothenot problem


 * Description
 * Tried to add interwiki links; (ar:تثليث مساحي) (bg:Трилатерация) (de:Rückwärtsschnitt)


 * Date and time
 * 09:52, 28 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

There was an error in the code which has now been fixed; sorry for the inconvenience.  — Soap  —  10:26, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I didn't add these because I'm not familiar enough with the subject material and the other languages to be able to tell if it's really the same; feel free to re-do the edit when you see this though.  — Soap  —  10:44, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

70.240.4.64

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * poop


 * Description
 * poop


 * Date and time
 * 23:16, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

A vandal. Would have been stopped by 225, but I had to remove that one a few days ago.  — Soap  —  23:36, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

193.253.141.65

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * United States elections, 2010


 * Description
 * It's hard to write with a mobile phone keyboard... I'm new at Wikipedia (since August) and I have still have a lot of things to learn to use it and make some corrections, but I don't understand what happened: in reality, I didn't think that I would remove text: I just wanted to copy some sentences to paste them in the calender app. of my phone, and delete 2 spaces in excess after commas.

Is it because I have only a mobile phone that a problem appeared (I can't buy a PC)? If I did something wrong, it wasn't my intention and I'm sorry. And thank you for the filter that avoided vandalism: I'm really not a vandal. NOTE: 1) I can't create an account, probably because I have just WAP, but I would like to do so and make things correctly. 2) my Christian name is Eva (the Tahitian). The filter shows you deleting everything after the words " Voters have paid relatively little attention to". Other than that, I can't say anything, because we don't have access to the information about what kind of browser you use or what appeared in the window when you were editing. On some very old browsers there is a bug that will not allow a "textarea" to be more than 32 kilobytes, but I doubt you have that, or you would have noticed it before on other websites.  — Soap  —  10:03, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Date and time: 08:29, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Msnicki

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Bash (Unix shell)


 * Description
 * newsgroup message ID in a reference I was trying to cite looks like an email address.


 * Date and time
 * 17:49, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Yes, this filter will trigger whenever it sees a string followed by @ plus a full domain name. In this case it was gnusenet930421bulletin@prep.ai.mit.edu. Apologies, but there's no way to get the filter to tell the difference between things like that and actual email addresses.  — Soap  —  20:20, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Nanngo

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * DivX


 * Description
 * removed deprecated profiles, added new profiles


 * Date and time
 * 20:29, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

They made a standard called ASS? A rather unusual name. I will remove that so that it won't cause problems like this in the future. Thanks for reporting.  — Soap  —  20:36, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

-ASS is Advanced Sub Station Alpha, I'll make sure to place a reference to it. Thanks! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SubStation_Alpha [nanngo]

8loginout8

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Standby


 * Description
 * i was trying to add a link to my article Стендбай


 * Date and time
 * 09:52, 28 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

There was an error in the code which has now been fixed; sorry for the inconvenience.  — Soap  —  10:26, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

173.166.41.45

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Bow High School


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 18:38, 28 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  18:48, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Walk and Cycle

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Royal Military Canal


 * Description
 * wish to add the following useful external link


 * Walk and Cycle Hampshire - The Clarendon Way
 * Date and time
 * 06:39, 29 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

The block template explains this better than I could, I believe; I'd just be re-wording it.  — Soap  —  10:04, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Tamutfaculty

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Texas_A&M_University-Texarkana


 * Description
 * I inserted the accreditation status of various programs in which accreditation is very important. Then, I linked to accrediting bodies so that readers could verify that the information is in fact correct.  Although I would consider this information negative, it is very important for people who are interested in the school's reputation.


 * Date and time
 * 18:07, 29 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * 1. You were marking major edits as "minor".
 * 2. You were adding strings of exclamation marks to an article, a sign of non-encyclopedic content.
 * 3. Your username has been blocked as it represents a group of people, and is editing an article about that group of people (Texas A&M University–Texarkana). -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  18:24, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

68.98.243.154

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Tutorial (Editing)/sandbox


 * Description
 * you stoped me from editing when it was my fist time


 * Date and time
 * 20:42, 29 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I do not understand why the edit filter stops sandbox edits... —  Jeremy  ( v^_^v PC/SP is a show-trial! ) 20:54, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Many filters do exempt sandboxes, but it has to be done individually for each filter; there is currently no way to exempt sandboxes from all filters. So generally, the "tag-only" filters do not have the exemption (which is what this was).  But it won't stop you from saving the edit, and you don't need to worry that you're being looked upon suspiciously because most long-term editors have "tags" like that as well.  —  Soap  —  22:17, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

86.130.127.82

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Veganism


 * Description
 * my friend is a gay vegan and by putting gay at the end of this encyclopedia of veganisam is not against any religen or for that matter any gay vegan (Basil rules)


 * Date and time
 * 21:10, 30 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Edit was clearly vandalism, filter working as intended. Momo san Talk 21:13, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Allanarockspaper

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Native Americans


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 04:42, 31 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Clearly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:50, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

173.20.190.206

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:Parasect


 * Description
 * Removing personal attack... Not blanking the page at all.


 * Date and time
 * 20:23, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

A false positive unfortunately. I have explained to this user offsite why it is not likely that this filter will be removed or significantly changed, though suggestions are welcome.  — Soap  —  20:39, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

78.144.24.2

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Luca Toni


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 18:38, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

An edit like this, particularly with no explanation as to why you are deleting so much of the article, will always be considered vandalism and reverted. Not really a false positive even though the filter that tagged the edit wasn't set to "disallow".  — Soap  —  19:34, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

213.25.24.213

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Horace Grant


 * Description
 * JA PIERDOLE


 * Date and time
 * 22:17, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

A vandal.  — Soap  —  22:21, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Neelg123

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Chernobyl disaster


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 09:36, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

An edit like this will always be denied and considered vandalism.  — Soap  —  11:44, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Gigglaughter

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * List of Pepsi variations


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 13:34, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

An edit like this will always be considered vandalism. (Indeed, it triggered the same filters as the one above.)  — Soap  —  13:46, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Rrd822

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Inception (film)


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 15:09, 1 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Attempted vandalism, filters working properly. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:12, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

72.177.25.46

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Bodacious (bull)


 * Description
 * the link for Richard 'Tuff" Hedeman showed to be a red link but you do have a Wiki page for him. I was trying to link his Wiki page to the page for Bodacious.


 * Date and time
 * 16:58, 1 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Although you weren't formatting your edit properly, this was a false positive filter hit. I've made the change for you.  NawlinWiki (talk) 17:01, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

64.163.135.154

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * The Queers


 * Description
 * edit stuff


 * Date and time
 * 21:40, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

A vandal.  — Soap  —  22:41, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

173.63.178.132

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * New Jersey elections, 2010


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 22:00, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

A vandal. — Soap  —  22:41, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

98.212.182.165

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Human Genome Project


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 22:17, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

A vandal.  — Soap  —  22:41, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

24.151.238.255

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Tony Shipley


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 00:50, 2 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * IP was attempting to blank an article, filters working properly. NawlinWiki (talk) 00:51, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

72.64.122.51

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Edgar Rentería


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 01:52, 2 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  02:40, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

DJmaster edit

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Boston Celtics


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 02:49, 2 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  03:00, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Anqua99

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Green Route


 * Description
 * Tried to add this info . . . (Please Note That This Trek Is Illegal Without Permission And You Can Be Convicted Under The Indian Railways Act 1989. Trek With Proper Permissions. Permission Can Be Obtained From Railway Dept. At Mysore From Welfare Officer.). ..


 * Date and time
 * 06:00, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Do you have a verifiably true source for this claim? It may be removed if you don't, but other than that, you can add it to the article if you don't type all in caps (which is considered disruptive to those reading casually).  — Soap  —  12:03, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

173.49.140.141

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * List of Percy Jackson & the Olympians characters


 * Description
 * It was only about removing 7 Kb, and it was removing off-topic information.


 * Date and time
 * 15:02, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

I will look at this when I get a chance. What I can say now is that the filter considers anything over 5 KB to be a "large deletion", but that you shouldn't worry that people are going to look at you suspiciously because a lot of editors have "tags" like these. Few people are going to be browsing someone else's edit filter log anyway.  — Soap  —  22:17, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * Most of the removals are related to The Heroes of Olympus, but a few of the removed sections are actually on topic. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:24, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Sandun36

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Tamil Eelam


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 17:39, 2 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  19:15, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

86.175.56.96

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * James_Hetfield


 * Description
 * Update section on "Guitars".


 * Date and time
 * 18:48, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Is "SO FUCKING WHAT" really the name of the guitar? I think that is what is stopping you, and what is triggering the other filter as well. If you type in lowercase it should go through, and can be changed later once I get a chance to look at the code more closely.  — Soap  —  21:18, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

--(I removed the 'so f*ing what' and the edit got through. thank you)

209.177.210.217

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Bottle Caps (candy)


 * Description
 * I was changing the are that says "or in small individually wrapped pouches of two candies, which can be given out as Halloween treats in the U.S" this is small but should be corrected to say that it contains individually wrapped pouches of three candies.. as times have changed... they now contain three.


 * Date and time
 * 18:52, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for reporting this; I've fixed it for now.  — Soap  —  21:12, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

mos:dabrl
I was cleaning redlinks from the disambig page CAF per MOS:DABRL: diff. I consider this a minor edit, although it changes the page content. On a cranky sidenote: for years I was allowed to decide for myself whether my edit was minor or wasn't, and I really liked it that way. I'm not a friend for automated filters and I have been getting along pretty well withot every edit being counter-chacked by a sackful of nagging automata. Cheers, Theoprakt (talk) 19:43, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree with you (you're not the first to complain about this filter, either), but it's also true that your edit doesn't really fit the criteria laid out at Help:Minor edit.  —  Soap  —  22:10, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

EllieMai

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Sarah Calvert


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 20:05, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Hello,
 * I was trying to improve this page but it said it 'indentified' something, please help as she is my biggest fan. Thank-You.


 * Comments
 * Filter worked as intended, blocking you from adding gibberish like "I'm her #1 fan!!!" and x0x0x. This is an encyclopedia, not Facebook or Gaia. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  20:38, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

84.152.191.144

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Cornish language


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 21:45, 2 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Not a false positive. Someguy1221 (talk) 03:24, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

77.243.61.136

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Cubesat Space Protocol


 * Description
 * Trying to insert a new protocol header format. This is the specific text: http://pastebin.com/m9KBiwKD


 * Date and time
 * 08:29, 3 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Thank you for reporting this. I have done the edit for you. I'll check why the part which caught you was added to the filter. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:42, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Citizensnyc

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User:Jemilah


 * Description
 * Page ready to go live but an automated filter obstructed it. Thank you.


 * Date and time
 * 14:32, 3 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Your username represents the name of a company, group or organization which is not allowed under the WP:USERNAME policy. Momo san Talk 14:35, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Citizensnyc (talk • contribs)

72.2.102.241

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Larry Bird


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 17:50, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

All filtered edits appear to be vandalism.  — Soap  —  18:27, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Trinicardo1

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Trinicardo


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 14:49, 4 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Not a false positive; a page like this would be deleted pretty much instantly and the filter was right to prevent it.  — Soap  —  14:56, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

146.229.225.93

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Claude (name)


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 18:26, 4 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  18:30, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

200.44.50.43

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:Soap


 * Description
 * THIS BOT CAN SUCK


 * Date and time
 * 19:00, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

User has been blocked for attempting to vandalize various pages, including this one.  — Soap  —  19:04, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Toaddodger

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * PoundWire


 * Description
 * My business partner tried submitting this article, but received the same error. He asked me to try as well in case it had to do with prior edits or length of time using Wikipedia. But I was unsuccessful as well. The page is simply an information page related to our company and its product. There is no damaging or offensive information, and it is all factually correct. Please include it within Wikipedia. Thanks.


 * Date and time
 * 17:48, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

It won't save because it still has the bitly link in it, which I explained above cannot be used directly. You can type it as bitly. Also,I'm curious about the pp-move-indef at the top.  — Soap  —  18:09, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Oneppo

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * PoundWire


 * Description
 * After spending many hours constructing an article about poundwire.com I tried to save it and got an error message. The message was "An automated filter has identified this edit as potentially unconstructive, and it has been disallowed."  I don't know how this could be true.  I spent a lot of time trying to find as many references as I could and citing my work.  It wasn't perfect and I plan on editing it further, but there doesn't seem to be any reason to 'disallow' the page.


 * Date and time
 * 09:03, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Due to abuse it is no longer allowed to type bit. ly or other URL shorterners, even in the sense of making a link to the article. I apologize but this is the best solution we have come up with in order to prevent people linking to malware and/or copyright violations and disguising it as a legitimate link. You can still type the link as bitly. Do you have the text saved? Also, is part of this copied from another article? I notice you have a pp-move-indef at the top, which can only appear on a page that has been around long enough to have been in need of protection from vandalism or a content dispute.  — Soap  —  10:46, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * Thank you. Yes, I copied and pasted another article to use as a template, but none of the original content should be there.  I fixed the bitly issue and removed the pp-move-indef and it worked!

Vanhalen10

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * German


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 20:26, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

A vandal.  — Soap  —  23:10, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

TedwardHall

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * In Your Face (first song on $O$ Album)


 * Description
 * Trying to enter the lyrics of this song with some translations of the Afrikaans that I just translated


 * Date and time
 * 00:03, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

The filter was stopping the creation of the article because of the many repetitions of the word "fuck" which is generally a sign of vandalism. So it's a false positive, but I think this article should probably not be created for several reasons. One is that we don't usually put lyrics on the articles for songs, since they might be copyrighted and even if not they're generally accessible on external websites. Secondly, translations are difficult to agree on; its a gray area but it is difficult to avoid WP:OR. Thirdly, songs aren't given their own articles anyway unless theycan be demonstrated to be individually notable. So I would have to assume an article like this would be deleted even if it didn't have the lyrics in. If you believe the song does meet the notability criteria you can create a new article for it, but if the lyrics are copyrighted (and generally all lyrics of recently released songs are), they shouldn't be in the article.  — Soap  —  00:32, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

122.58.96.48

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Wisteria Lane


 * Description
 * As it says the top, this page needs a clean-up. And that is what I was doing. I was not vandalising the page at all. It took me ages to do, so please have the dency. It is all correct, no copying whatsoever. Thank you


 * Date and time
 * 00:48, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

I've fulfilled the requested edit here; the reason it wouldnt go through earlier is likely because of the "pedophile" part, which I don't see any way to be able to get around.  — Soap  —  11:55, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

WikiKiwi

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Plants vs. Zombies


 * Description
 * The filter warned a minor edit as not being "minor", but that was in fact a vandalism rollback. The filter should be able to understand (from keywords in the edit subject?) if I'm reverting a vandalism... (here the edit)


 * Date and time
 * 05:23, 7 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * When a relatively new user does such an edit, it's more likely to be vandalism than reverting vandalism. Please note that merely the use of such words isn't an indication that the edit is actually a revert; and that reverting an edit which adds legitimate content could easily be vndalism. Please aklso note that no admin would actually take any action against you merely overt the fact that you triggered an edit filter, and looking at the edit in question is clearly a revert of vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:22, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

92.8.204.2

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Derek Walcott and Steel (play)


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 15:26, 7 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Obvious vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:05, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

173.29.147.197

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Shamu


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 03:15, 8 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Clearly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:55, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

67.174.159.161

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * The Hangover (film)


 * Description
 * It actually happened in the film


 * Date and time
 * 06:07, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

If so, it could probably be worded better, but it's not the edit filter that removed your edit, it was a bot. Challenged content should be backed up with a source even if it's a plot summary.  — Soap  —  11:35, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

72.129.135.233

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:Smokey Joe


 * Description
 * I was asking him if he could re-open an archived discussion about a category after an admin had banned my IP for trying to unarchive it so I could sumbit a comment.


 * Date and time
 * 07:13, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

I've made a note of this on the user's talk page, but if you're blocked, you should not be editing anyone's talk page other than your own, under any IP. I will look into this more clearly later.  — Soap  —  11:33, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

81.134.202.34

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Stakeholder (corporate)


 * Description
 * i want to change it to i hate stakeholders!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


 * Date and time
 * 14:02, 8 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another bogus report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  22:26, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Nicosuav3

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Nico Suave


 * Description
 * i was trying to identify a fake nico suave under the bmi i am nico suave i am registered as an artist.


 * Date and time
 * 14:51, 8 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another bogus report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  22:27, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

64.254.62.2

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Maize


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 19:25, 8 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another bogus report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  22:29, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Delicat123

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Winnipeg


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 23:06, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

A vandal.  — Soap  —  23:11, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Tnk2010

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Liberal


 * Description
 * Vandalism and unneeded anti-liberal text and images.


 * Date and time
 * 04:38, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for reporting this, it has been fixed by another user (strictly speaking, though, it was ClueBot that reverted you, not the edit filter.)  — Soap  —  11:25, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

193.253.141.81

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Skymark Airlines


 * Description
 * 1) I just did this: an low-cost airline > a low-cost airline
 * 2) I have only a mobile phone, not any PC, so:
 * 3) I don't see the categories in the little window of my phone. I don't understand how I can remove them.
 * 4) I created my account (Eva.i.uta, before I signed "Eva the Tahitian"), as recommended, but as soon as I go to a page I become anonymous again. And the history of the my IPs show vandalism. But this is each time about someone with the same IP but not me.
 * Date and time
 * 07:13, 9 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

I assume it was a mistake then. Please try to be sure you're not inadvertently deleting content, as you did on Skymark Airlines. Some very old browsers will automatically delete all content after the first 32K in a textarea, but I think you're not likely one of those, because if you were, it would happen every time, not just off and on.  — Soap  —  10:31, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

24.253.222.94

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Jerod Impichchaachaaha' Tate


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 09:06, 9 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Could you explain what you were doing? It looks to me like you are removing the whole page.  — Soap  —  10:31, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Explained further on User_talk:Jerod_Tate.  — Soap  —  12:16, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

194.14.70.168

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Fredrik Reinfeldt


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 13:58, 9 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  14:02, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

64.18.37.85

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:Bluerasberry


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 17:02, 9 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  18:17, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

128.59.179.240

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:Agradman


 * Description
 * Is it possible to "whitelist" all alleged non-constructive edits to user_talk:Agradman? Reasons: (1) I often edit from an IP address. (2) I steer clear of controversy, so I doubt my page will ever be subject to vandalism.  Thanks.


 * Date and time
 * 00:05, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Generally we don't do individual exceptions like this, because the edit filter runs on every edit, so that means every edit by every person will be checked to see if it's you editing your own talk page. There have been a few cases in which we have added individual exceptions, but only if it's an "emergency" (as much as something on Wikipedia can be considered an emergency) and it is removed when the situation is over. No long term exemptions, in other words. If a new version of the filter software is written that doesn't automatically run all filters on all pages then something like this may be easier to adopt.  — Soap  —  11:36, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

70.24.111.38

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Jared Warren


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 01:27, 10 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Clearly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:08, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

67.134.35.66

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Akira (film)


 * Description
 * Protest Zac Efron's possible involvement in a live action film of Akira and the bastardization of a classic groundbreaking manga.


 * Date and time
 * 03:53, 10 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Inserting the text N0!NO!NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! in the middle of a sentence is clearly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:39, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

24.130.205.209

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Solar core


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 04:00, 10 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Not a false positive. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:40, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

98.245.150.11

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Dubai


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 04:02, 10 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Not a false positive. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:42, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Xcannabis

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Springville, Utah


 * Description
 * Spam false positive


 * Date and time
 * 06:23, 10 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Note No apparent involvement by the spam filter; this is a case of several external links the user had posted that were manually rejected by several editors per WP:EL. --Ckatz chat spy  07:14, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I see no edit filter log entries for you editing tis page. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:44, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

217.40.220.101

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Cup-and-ball


 * Description
 * get the ball in a cup

Add a section
 * Date and time
 * 10:05, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

A vandal; this user is blocked now.  — Soap  —  11:07, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

203.59.64.176

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Wyrd


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 11:44, 10 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Clearly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:43, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

86.133.170.98

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Ishmael


 * Description
 * I am Ishma'el, no I'm serious and I have contacted various religious leaders will 100% proof of who I am, only to get dismissed because they founded the religions in my name for profit and war, can you Imagine how that would feel ?

I wanted to add this edit to the page at the bottom...

Ishma has been brought back today, along with many others mentioned in various religious texts spanning all religions, many of these people are actually in the public eye while people are non the wiser, how can I say this ? Ishma is writing this edit right now!, there are a great many changes that are going to happen here, the human race are going to realise that there reality is nothing more than there waking conscious influence in agreement over the forces around them, and that there dream state is the same minus the amplification of all the others, this transition will be painfull, and others will come here now, what type depends on the fear each of you have within. Time and death will cease on May the 12th 2012, Peace Love and Empathy.
 * Ishma Says:

---end

I will not persue this, I have proven my existence without question to the appropriate leaders, and dispite this irrefutable proof they have dissmissed me and acted out of fear for what I may say or the physics I may teach people that will free them of the slavery and suffering they endure.

Your just going to have to base your decision on your heart & soul and then see what starts to happen.
 * Date and time
 * 14:03, 10 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * An unusual but pointless complaint by a crank editor. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  14:26, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

75.147.10.230

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Igneous rock


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 14:36, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

A vandal.  — Soap  —  14:37, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Trevoncooper18

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Trevon Cooper


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 14:56, 10 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Had the edit filter not stopped you, thje page would have been deleted under one of our criteria for speedy deletion - specificly CSD A7. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 15:02, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Ciffy97

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Luke Hartkopf


 * Description
 * trying to report a false error


 * Date and time
 * 17:45, 10 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  18:04, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

188.25.174.118

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Laws regarding rape


 * Description
 * add a section on New Zealand laws


 * Date and time
 * 21:13, 10 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

A couple sections down this is answered. (This is a repeat, I guess.) Endofskull (talk) 00:14, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Heheh1234

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Grayson Hall


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 21:15, 10 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

This is vandalism. Endofskull (talk) 00:09, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

66.108.200.56

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * United Nations Security Council and the Iraq War


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 21:17, 10 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Not a false positive, this is obvious vandalism. Endofskull (talk) 00:10, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

188.25.174.118

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Laws regarding rape


 * Description
 * section on New Zealand laws


 * Date and time
 * 21:25, 10 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

See below. This seems to be a repeat. Endofskull (talk) 00:05, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

74.87.13.194

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Gravitational Constant


 * Description
 * Deletion of all untrue facts about this subject


 * Date and time
 * 21:58, 10 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

❌ Hello! The reason this edit filter did that is because you can't just remove a huge part like that. You need to go to the talk page. Thanks! Endofskull (talk) 23:58, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Dccamman

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Inaccurate


 * Description
 * I simple wrote some examples of one using misleading or inaccurate information on wikipedia and outside.it is a rough copy but i found noting unconstructive because i used only information found from my expiriance. Thank you very much for helping me with this error.


 * Date and time
 * 06:25, 11 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Wikipedia isn't a dictionary. If you find anything inaccurate on Wikipedia, please either remove/fix it or discuss on the talk page. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:40, 11 November 2010 (UTC)