Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives/Archive 12

188.25.174.118

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Laws regarding rape


 * Description
 * WHY was my contribution repeatedly removed as vandalism?

Article 128 is entitled Sexual violation defined. Article 128 (1) states that Sexual violation is the act of a person who rapes another person or has unlawful sexual connection with another person. Article 128 (2) defines rape as follows:

Article 128 (3) outlaws "unlawful sexual connection" (which refers to sexual acts other than those described in 128 (2) - i.e without the penetration of genitalia - committed under the same circumstances of 128 (2).

Article 128 (4) makes it clear that spousal rape is illegal: "One person may be convicted of the sexual violation of another person at a time when they were married to each other."

Consent
The mere fact that a person allows sexual connection to be performed on them, does not automatically mean that they are legally consenting. If that person allows sexual connection due to coercion (eg, under force, threats or fear of force; when he/she is asleep or very intoxicated; if he/she is affected by an intellectual, mental, or physical condition or impairment of a certain nature and degree; when he/she is mistaken about the partner's identity) than he/she is not legally consenting.

128A Allowing sexual activity does not amount to consent in some circumstances

(1) A person does not consent to sexual activity just because he or she does not protest or offer physical resistance to the activity.

(2) A person does not consent to sexual activity if he or she allows the activity because of—
 * (a) force applied to him or her or some other person; or
 * (b) the threat (express or implied) of the application of force to him or her or some other person; or
 * (c) the fear of the application of force to him or her or some other person.

(3) A person does not consent to sexual activity if the activity occurs while he or she is asleep or unconscious.

(4) A person does not consent to sexual activity if the activity occurs while he or she is so affected by alcohol or some other drug that he or she cannot consent or refuse to consent to the activity.

(5) A person does not consent to sexual activity if the activity occurs while he or she is affected by an intellectual, mental, or physical condition or impairment of such a nature and degree that he or she cannot consent or refuse to consent to the activity.

(6) One person does not consent to sexual activity with another person if he or she allows the sexual activity because he or she is mistaken about who the other person is.

(7) A person does not consent to an act of sexual activity if he or she allows the act because he or she is mistaken about its nature and quality. (8) This section does not limit the circumstances in which a person does not consent to sexual activity.

(9) For the purposes of this section,—
 * allows includes acquiesces in, submits to, participates in, and undertakes
 * sexual activity, in relation to a person, means—
 * (a) sexual connection with the person; or
 * (b) the doing on the person of an indecent act that, without the person's consent, would be an indecent assault of the person.

Attempted sexual violation and assault with intent to commit sexual violation are also punished (Article 129).

Article 129A is entitled Sexual conduct with consent induced by certain threats and makes it illegal for a person to have sexual connection with another person or to do an indecent act on another person  when the accused knows that the other person has been induced to consent to the connection/act by threat. However a person is guilty of this crime "if (and only if) he or she knows that the other person has been induced to consent" to the sexual connection/indecent act "by an express or implied threat". Subsection (5), (a), (b), (c) of this article defines "threat" for the purpose of this article.

Article 135 outlaws Indecent assault. Article 138 outlaws Sexual exploitation of person with significant impairment.


 * Date and time
 * 21:37, 10 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Well, this certainly isn't vandalism. I'll contact one of the people in the Edit Filter Manager group. Endofskull (talk) 00:03, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Devin25505

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Pickens County, Georgia


 * Description
 * i wrote real statements and it would not let me do it


 * Date and time
 * 22:00, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism, user has been warned.  — Soap  —  22:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Vasyl tkach

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Trembita


 * Description
 * I was adding the external link to the sounds and pictures of trembita. Previously I was adding some links to the pages of other Ukrainian Music Instruments (there are samples and pictures of ALL of them)


 * Date and time
 * 07:53, 12 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Adding the external link to the sounds and pictures of trembita. Previously I was adding some links to the pages of other Ukrainian Music Instruments


 * The filter has been appropriately warning you (but not stopping you) from linking to your own website. Someguy1221 (talk) 08:17, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

216.249.72.222

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * SMD


 * Description
 * Inform people what the acronym SMD means in graffiti.


 * Date and time
 * 05:24, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Yes, you could call it a false positive, but we would not have an entry like that on the SMD page anyway. It's similar to an attempt a few weeks ago to get "Third Tier Toilet" on the TTT page. It wasn't removed because it was obscene, it was removed because it doesn't point to a Wikipedia article or a misspelling of one.  — Soap  —  11:07, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Weatherextremes

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Catenanuova

While spending an awful lot of time editing this article I received what I believe is a false positive for Vandalism.I have followed all the given instructions by adding the proper references and by giving edit summaries from the time I was warned onwards.Since I believed that someone was altering my text I missed a few times the edit summaries and have quicly asked the help of two administrators for content and dispute resolution before receiving the warning.Thank you
 * Description
 * The only entries I see on your filter log are from July, and in any case, that filter was designed to be very wide-open and catch false positives on purpose. The only one triggering the edit filter is .   —  Soap  —  15:50, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

So what am I supposed to do to properly add my references?I have asked both for content and dispute resolution with Amending from two administators but still have not heard anything
 * You should be patient; most Wikipedia editors are not online at all hours of the day, and he may not have seen your message yet. Disputes such as these can rarely be solved by just one person, anyway, and generally can't be solved in one day either. Likewise I can't promise to faithfully watch this page either.  You both should read the policies at WP:3RR which forbid a user from reverting a page to his preferred version more than three times per day; both of you are in violation of that rule now and could be blocked if you continue. You should instead try to talk to him on the talk page of the article (talk:Catenanuova); if he refuses to communicate then would be a more appropriate time to take action.
 * I will be giving an identical warning to Amending.  — Soap  —  16:22, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I will be giving an identical warning to Amending.  — Soap  —  16:22, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

The problem is the wording basically.I have presented my case all over Europe and in Italy in various meteorological forums that he participated.It has been months now and nothing has changed,so i can not take him in good faith.I am discussing and refuting in the discussion page but still the article remains the same

24.255.210.137

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Wilbur Sweatman


 * Description
 * I wanted to delete this article that was a complete fabrication of an actual ragtime musician of the early 20th century. Everything in the article was made up.


 * Date and time
 * 06:06, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

It was a vandalized version of the original article. I've fixed it now.  — Soap  —  09:07, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * For future reference, please note that the way to delete an article isn't by blanking it. Please read our deletion policy to see how to request deletion. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:10, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

RomeEonBmbo

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User:RomeEonBmbo


 * Description
 * Tried to enter in a self-made userbox. Here is the code:
 * I see no reason why this was disallowed. When I tried to report this, another false positive showed up when I was displaying the original example.


 * Date and time
 * 20:03, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

It thinks "had had had...." is vandalism because it's 11 of the same word in a row. But it should be okay now.  — Soap  —  22:26, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * I did the edit for you. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 04:31, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Stealth eagle18

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Battle of Midway


 * Description
 * There was false information that needed to be corrected that appears to be true that i was trying to fix the blatent error. I am a history buff so I know that i am editing and placing in correct information


 * Date and time
 * 16:04, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

This is a rare error that happens sometimes when a lot of users edit a page at the same time. I don't really know how to explain it. It should self-resolve almost instantly when it does happen though. Sorry for the inconvenience.  — Soap  —  17:02, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

216.186.76.24

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * History of Switzerland


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 16:29, 15 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

User is blocked for 24h for repeated attempted vandalism on History of Switzerland.  — Soap  —  17:04, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

ABrock

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Le_Petit_Tourette


 * Description
 * Tried to add Chris Hansen's reaction to his appearance on South Park. Many other South Park Episode pages have applicable celebrity reactions listed. This reaction comes a speech given at Saint Louis University. Information comes from an eyewitness account. Also tried to reference a supporting interview posted on youtube he gave to campus news shortly afterward.


 * Date and time
 * 23:42, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

It would not be triggered if you typed the name of the youtube account as SLU-TV since it would not then contain the substring "slut". It does seem that they usually use the dash in their name on their website.  — Soap  —  23:58, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

71.226.44.29

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * hippopotamus


 * Description
 * I was adding facts that helped other readers more clearly understand the very fascinating animal.


 * Date and time
 * 03:59, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

This looks like vandalism to me. If not please explain what you were doing.  — Soap  —  10:15, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

206.130.132.142

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * forbidden city


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 04:12, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

A vandal.  — Soap  —  10:15, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

TheWiseOwl112

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * One Time


 * Description
 * DO YOU LIEK SOUP?!


 * Date and time
 * 02:27, 17 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Obvious vandalism, even on this report. I discovered that he's a vandal. If you look at his talk page history, you can see that he did a personal attack at a user. I reported him to AIV, since he seems to be a vandalism only account. Endofskull (talk) 03:15, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Maudet

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Irish Moutarde


 * Description
 * I created a page yesterday about this band (Irish Moutarde). This article is now being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy. I tried to edit the page today to add the info and the references I didn't have time to add yesterday and cannot add them, because I get the following message: "An automated filter has identified this edit as potentially unconstructive, and it has been disallowed. If this edit is constructive, please report this error. " Thanks


 * Date and time
 * 15:34, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Does it have to be spelled COCK Matin? As in, with all capitals? This filter specifically only looks for incidences of capitalized obscene words, such as this. If you spelled it Cock it would not be trapped. As an aside, there is no rule preventing you from editing a page more than 3 times in a day. WP:3RR specifically refers to edit wars, when attempting to undo the work of someone else. However some of the references you've been adding will likely carry little weight in an AfD, such as the radio interview, and a Facebook page. But this is not to say you cannot add them, or add anything else to the article that's true.  — Soap  —  17:00, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

134.253.26.12

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Template:University of Rio grande


 * Description
 * I am attempting to redirect Template:University of Rio grande to Template:University of Rio Grande and was blocked by the edit filter. This is a simple capitalisation error, which caused the template to be forked.


 * Date and time
 * 16:13, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

There is a filter in place to limit the number of redirects that a user can perform in a given amount of time, to prevent massive changes from going unnoticed. If you not averse to registering an account, you could do so and be free of the problem and other similar ones, since many of these limitations are only applied to users editing from anonymous IP addresses.  — Soap  —  16:57, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * Okay, I am not able to do this, but it is good to know that I can just throttle my edits. Thanks! 134.253.26.12 (talk) 18:18, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

193.253.141.82

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Saurashtra language


 * Description
 * I just modified "theses people" > "these peoples".

I can't see the full page, then I don't how I could remove all what the warning says.
 * Date and time
 * 19:08, 17 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

I assume this is a mistake; the filter shows you removing everything after the second paragraph. While there are some software platforms out there that could not handle large pages, this doesn't look like an example of that. If it is, though, then you won't be able to edit pretty much anything. Have you edited Wikipedia from this system before?  — Soap  —  19:15, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Bawolff

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Project:Sandbox


 * Description
 * (Note: I was not logged in at the time). I was just curious on how a template was implemented, so I substituted it into the sandbox. Well admittedly I was inserting non-sense, I don't think the edit filter should be triggered on the Sandbox, being the sandbox and all. No big issue though. Cheers.


 * Date and time
 * 20:37, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

This happens almost every day. Your recommendation has been brought up before, possibly more than once. Although a few filters do specifically exclude the Sandbox, because of the way the edit filter runs, to exempt all of them would require writing the exemption code independently on every filter, which would impede the performance of all of them. If there were a "skip all" function on the edit filter, it would be great, but that doesn't exist yet. — Soap  —  20:42, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * note this is a templated message, so some of it may sound odd. But I'm not using a template because I'm ignoring you, just because it's essentially unsolvable right now unless we were to run the same code 100+ times on every edit to exempt the sandboxes.  —  Soap  —  20:46, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Ledbury Portal

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Citizen journalism


 * Description
 * I was putting back a link to the Ledbury Portal which had been removed by someone. The Ledbury Portal is a citizen journalist website serving Ledbury


 * Date and time
 * 14:35, 18 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * In my opinion, not a false positive. Your name matches the URL of the site added.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 14:44, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

71.8.70.1

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * GDiaper


 * Description
 * I was trying to revert the last edit which made the page much more of an advertisement than an actual article. The article prior to this last edit had been a much more professional and less biased page.


 * Date and time
 * 21:30, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, I've done the edit for now. When I get some more time (I've been busier than usual lately) I'll try to work out a version of the filter that exempts articles about diapers. It's not as easy as it looks because of the way the filter is coded ... which, while it may seem somewhat difficult, it seems to be quite an improvement over the previous version of the filter. As for why the filter was stopping you in the first place, it was because of the word "poop" in the edit, which, believe it or not, is more common in vandal edits than similar words generally considered less mild.  — Soap  —  00:00, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

98.83.184.32

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Machinima.com


 * Description
 * Website/Company

I was adding an article for Machinima Respawn
 * Date and time
 * 01:28, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

I think this content is not necessary, but it's not up to me to take sides in questions like this, so I'll just say it will go through if you don't mention the name with the word SHIT (capitalized), or preferably any of the screen names at all.  — Soap  —  10:17, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

206.176.117.85

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:DARTH SIDIOUS 2


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 15:01, 16 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

tHIS ISNT FAIR MY EDIT WAS VERY CONSTRUCTIVE>:( GRRR YOU DAMN FILTER
 * Another false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  15:14, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

209.250.163.174

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Betamax


 * Description
 * hi


 * Date and time
 * 16:40, 16 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  19:59, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

150.101.229.164

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Arthritis Foundation


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 19:51, 16 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

i was trying to write that arthritis is a good foundation which helps many arthritis victims by giving them the best of life. : )
 * Another false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  19:59, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

163.150.204.213

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Miguel Cotto


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 20:01, 16 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  20:14, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

67.79.98.9

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Cheetos


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 00:00, 17 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Obvious vandalism; not a false positive. Reported user to WP:AIV. Endofskull (talk) 03:08, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

75.94.126.10

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Capybara


 * Description
 * TRUE INFO! I SWEAR!


 * Date and time
 * 02:34, 17 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Obvious vandalism; not a false positive. Endofskull (talk) 03:18, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

207.163.1.200

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Great Fear


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 17:11, 17 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Unexplained deletion of a big section of an article will always trip this trigger; you need to explain why you deleted this passage. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  17:33, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

63.227.190.54

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * History of mobile phones


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 17:25, 17 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  17:35, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Calligraphers

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Fastbacks


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 20:02, 17 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Spamusername account was blocked when attempting to insert spamlinks to website for "Calligraphers", a band. Excellent work, filter writers! -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  20:13, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

24.13.203.95

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Wot a Night


 * Description
 * "Removed Wot a Night link to closed YouTube account"


 * Date and time
 * 00:55, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

I think you just made a mistake. In the future please check to make sure you're not accidentally removing content beyond the parts you intended to.  — Soap  —  01:02, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

The clarkisaaaan

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Paralowie, South Australia


 * Description


 * ===THE RARGE===

The RARGE is a social club located on the corner of whites and burton rds in the centre of paralowie. Its beginings began as a humble garage out the back of the Clarkson residence. The Rarge was opened as just a local hangout where the founder Daniel Clarkson and a few of his close friends could hang out and have fun and enjoy the weekends. Then the boys thought they'd share there lucky gift and local hangout with the rest of the community and encouraged all people in the suburb of paralowie to come and share the fun. The Rarge was first erected in 1996 but wasn't actually opened as 'The Rarge' untill 2001. the rarge has been a nice safe environment for people to socialise and have fun throughout the years with no hassles or dramas and is a loyal hangout for the true locals and will go down through the years to come. At the start it only started with around 10 member with a few regulars stopping by, at this moment The Rarge memberships are around 500+ with only a very select few getting the honnor of 'life membership'..... while walking around in paralowie if you ask a friendly face(over the age of 18) they will gladly direct you in the right direction of The Rarge and will share some of the great stories and expiriences that they've had there..... The atmosphere is very relaxed and all people that act in a responsible manner are more than welcome there and will be greated with a smile and a hearty handshake from the founder Daniel Clarkson himself!..... Only 1 rule at the Rarge ALWAYS RESPECT THE RARGE AND ITS MEMBERS!!!!!!In conclusion The Rarge is a very friendly place and there is a novel in the works being written by the founder Daniel Clarkson about the history of The Rarge called 'If These Walls Could Talk: The Story Of The Rarge!'

was just adding a place of significance in paralowie south australia
 * Date and time
 * 07:21, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

You can try making the change again without all the exclamation marks, because the exclamation marks have no relevance or improvement to the article, and the filter stopped you because of your addition of "!!!!!". Minima c  ( talk ) 17:44, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Killerburke

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Alex skelly


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 18:01, 20 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Not a false positive. →Gƒoley Four   (GSV)  18:07, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

91.106.220.31

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Geyser


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 22:35, 20 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

A vandal, trying to vandalize Geyser.  — Soap  —  22:38, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Vaehne

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Satan Saves!


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 09:55, 21 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * This is the result of your repeated links to http://www.myspace.com/VexVaehne. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:04, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

99.238.25.94

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Act Respecting the Future of Quebec


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 14:34, 21 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

quebec people like bananas just like the snapping turtle and painted turtle and lots more!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 * Clearly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:02, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

174.59.153.253

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Talk:Juke Box Hero


 * Description
 * was trying to add amplifying information to an unsourced statement in the Discussion section of the article involving "Juke Box Hero"


 * Date and time
 * 23:36, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for reporting this, I've fixed it now. The edit filter thought that the string of "Juke was a variant of an offensive word, which is much too loose a match to be usable I think. — Soap  —  23:47, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Mike5906

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Epic Rage Guy


 * Description
 * Creating a page for the Internet meme "Epic Rage Guy".


 * Date and time
 * 05:36, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

"FFFUUUU" was on the list of watch words because it is often used for vandalism. I've removed it for now, but it may be added back in later. Even then, though, it won't stop an edit if the phrase is already present on a line.  — Soap  —  11:30, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

92.83.254.222

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Krypton (band)


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 17:32, 22 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Without checking the edit filter itself, the edit appears innocuous, although the format changes seem inappropriate. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 20:55, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
 * You shouldn't boldface band members like that. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  21:00, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

18.111.108.139

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Shueisha


 * Description
 * I was trying to remove a 3-word line of complete bullshit.


 * Date and time
 * 03:42, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Even in an edit summary, you should avoid obscenities unless necessary (e.g. if the content of the edit is referring to an obscenity). Even in these cases you should not capitalize it as this makes the edit stand out from the others unnecessarily.  — Soap  —  12:27, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Stevenbrumley

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Interview with the Vampire


 * Description
 * Add a film review by Norm MacDonald issued on the show Saturday Night Live


 * Date and time
 * 12:28, 23 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * You stripped it of substantive content, and attempted to replace that with a throwaway line from a comedy sketch show. The filter did just what it should. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  13:39, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

198.236.235.2

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Newberg High School


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 22:08, 22 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  23:37, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

67.77.68.82

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Clarke's three laws


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 23:23, 22 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  23:37, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

207.32.9.143

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Sam McGuffie


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 23:40, 22 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  23:45, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

71.63.151.219

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Gamer


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 00:47, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

All recent hits that I can see are vandalism, e.g. Special:AbuseLog/3774892. — Soap  —  00:50, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Georgemn1991

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Adam Holloway


 * Description
 * adam afriyie

Adding a relevant external link
 * Date and time
 * 14:06, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

This is better handled by people familiar with the articles, I think; it certainly isn't a false positive though because you really are adding the same link to a series of articles, and that is what the filter is for. Legitimate or not, this is not a common practice on Wikipedia.  — Soap  —  17:11, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

JAVADO

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Samaná Peninsula


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 14:44, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

As above, this is better handled by people familiar with the articles. Adding links to a series of articles is often a sign of attempted promotional activity and even if the link is "good" in and of itself it is not usually a good idea. If you only add it to the Samaná article I think you should be OK because another user has looked at that link and seems to approve of it.  — Soap  —  17:12, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * Actually, there is nothing to indicate that this is a reliable source in any way; seems to me that the filter did a good job of preventing a spamlink from being inserted. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  14:13, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

174.118.44.238

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Erella Ganon


 * Description
 * I was putting a link to a documentary about me and an article from the toronto star from last week with my photo.


 * Date and time
 * 15:09, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, you will need to use the full URL, not a tinyurl, as tinyurl and other similar sites have been used to hide links to malware sites or copyright violations.  — Soap  —  15:13, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Volleyballisbomb

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * ITunes


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 17:16, 24 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Simply don't add " :) " into the text. thanks. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 17:21, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * And don't add meaningless text like "the iPod is extremly awesome" either; it has no place here. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  18:24, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

202.58.180.202

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * A. L. Hendriks


 * Description
 * I TRIED TO ERASE FALSE INFORMATION BUT TO FIND OUT I COULDNT DO IT


 * Date and time
 * 04:21, 25 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

A vandal; user has been warned.  — Soap  —  04:24, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

87.36.85.137

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Textile manufacture during the Industrial Revolution


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 09:41, 25 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Apparent vandalism. — Soap  —  15:00, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

94.30.14.48

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Atul Kochhar


 * Description
 * I was trying to update Atul's Biography, on behalf of his agent James Bulmer, with his recent tv series commissioned this year, ''Atul's Malaysia'.


 * Date and time
 * 11:29, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

The edit will go through now, but I won't do it myself because the content is unreferenced. If you add it like this it may be removed by another editor.  — Soap  —  13:27, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

62.20.92.11

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Brian Lam


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 13:16, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Apparent vandalism. — Soap  —  14:59, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Neptunecanada

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * brittlestar


 * Description
 * trying to link a video showing brittlestars crawling around on the seafloor, fighting over a scrap of dead shrimp


 * Date and time
 * 20:35, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Not a false positive, you were really adding links to multiple articles. This is strongly discouraged, even if the links are relevant to the article and free of commercial content, and worse if they aren't.  — Soap  —  22:51, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Matthewoliver

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Wallace Rowling


 * Description
 * Adding a link to a newly published biography; and yes, I added 4 links in a row to 4 newly published biographies (David Lange, Arthur Lydiard and Douglas Lilburn) and I hope to add more as we publish more.


 * Date and time
 * 00:42, 26 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

71.79.64.65

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Saint Francis Seraph Church


 * Description
 * This page had a big "Success Story" section that I guess was copied from somewhere else, so I removed it (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Saint_Francis_Seraph_Church&diff=398919610&oldid=385191503), but it tagged me with a "blanking" tag. Even if it wasn't copied from somewhere else, it didn't have any references and wasn't written like an encyclopedia article: I removed it because I really think the article is better without it.


 * Date and time
 * 05:44, 26 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * It appears as though your edit has indeed gone through, so no harm done. The filter normally tags whenever an IP or new account removes a large amount of text, but otherwise does not hamper the edit (since there may be a legitimate reason for a new user to make the edit). — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 05:50, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Udafood

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * the office


 * Description
 * edit the page


 * Date and time
 * 06:10, 26 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Filter working as intended. I'd advise the admins to keep an eye on this user. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 06:13, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

67.168.103.161

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Joke


 * Description
 * fix spelling and false info


 * Date and time
 * 06:31, 26 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

A vandal. — Soap  —  23:08, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Kc98223

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Matthew Schools


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 06:40, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

This was stopped because of a phrase a few paragraphs down. But even without that, the article would be deleted almost instantly. — Soap  —  23:08, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

79.173.207.45

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Project


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 09:28, 26 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

A vandal. — Soap  —  23:08, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

24.71.136.78

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Johnny Horton


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 04:32, 28 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

I tried to put I HATE NIGGERS and i was flagged.
 * For a good reason. Such additions are inappropriate. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:18, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

64.235.202.213

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Communist Manifesto


 * Description
 * Was trying to add a section "References in Popular Culture" because there's a reference to that manifesto in the 2007 movie Smiley Face but I couldn't add it. As far as I know, there's nothing wrong in that...?


 * Date and time
 * 06:23, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Apologies, this filter has some problems. There is no real way to fix it. If you try the edit again it should go through (though personally I discourage you because a list like this with only one item is not very informative, there's no policy based reason to forbid the edit either).  — Soap  —  13:19, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

71.79.65.198

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:Rtgates


 * Description
 * I was just removing some instructions to properly post media that I have taken care of. I did delete 4 such large paragraphs but the situation has been cared for.


 * Date and time
 * 13:30, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Please login to your account to remove messages from your talk page.  — Soap  —  13:40, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

202.124.88.19

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Abiotic component


 * Description
 * I WAS PUTTIN INFO THAT U HAV MISSED BY LOLBUNNZ


 * Date and time
 * 13:58, 28 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Probably a test edit. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:35, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

62.30.219.79

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:117.207.209.206


 * Description
 * Blank the page, which is 2.2mb worth of unnecessary useless data, makes people's browsers very slow, and clutters up Database reports/Long pages.


 * Date and time
 * 11:18, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

OK, I've blanked the page.  — Soap  —  13:59, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

82.234.207.120

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Reference_desk/Humanities


 * Description
 * normal editing


 * Date and time
 * 22:13, 29 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

24.158.112.143

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Ken Schrader


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 22:40, 29 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

tHIS FUCKER KILLED JUNIOR!!!
 * Clearly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:04, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

71.203.80.214

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Almanac


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 22:50, 29 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

what are u guys talking about i didnt do nothing i just want to report something
 * Probably a test edit. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:04, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Arad1027

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Aryan Brotherhood


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 01:38, 30 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Clearly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:05, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

121.54.92.8

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Kanata Hongō


 * Description
 * edit


 * Date and time
 * 10:24, 30 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Clearly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:06, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

208.108.199.128

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Plague


 * Description
 * i was stating that barney roxz!!!!


 * Date and time
 * 15:58, 30 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I see no false-positives here. Keep it up and you will be looking at a vandalism block. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 00:23, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

MaxfliGolf

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Maxfli


 * Description
 * Updating the current product list and historical product list.


 * Date and time
 * 16:42, 30 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Company name and advert-only account. Admin? — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 00:21, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

170.158.238.102

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * United States Senate Homeland Security Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 17:28, 30 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I see no false-positives here. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 00:19, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Droopy Weeg

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Tramp


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 19:03, 30 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I see no false-positive here. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 00:16, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

205.196.188.169

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Private university


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 20:13, 30 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I see no false-positives here. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 00:18, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Walsh27

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Internet leak


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 21:29, 30 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * This one needs admin attention - repeated filter hits today and on 11/11. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 00:15, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Tim Thomason

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * List of United States Chairmen of the Joint Chiefs of Staff by time in office


 * Description
 * The page shows no differences from last edit. I just added 's to the 17 names so as to sort them by last name, and not by rank and then first name. Alot of additions, sure, but they were all minor and didn't change the look of the page.


 * Date and time
 * 21:31, 30 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Your edit did indeed go through and shows up in the article history. The filter merely tagged it. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 00:14, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Aashu95

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 15:17, 1 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Username similar to name of article and advertisement-only account. Admin? — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 21:18, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Spam-only account; blocked as such. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  21:24, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

41.250.188.115

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 09:33, 2 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

User has been warned. — Soap  —  09:34, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Fabolousity

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Niña de Fuego


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 19:14, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Not a false positive at all. — Soap  —  19:33, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

74.170.82.210

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Derek Fordjour


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 01:53, 3 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Anonymous attack in all-caps on a living person; properly blocked. No problem here. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  01:59, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

A40DeepStrike

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 2nd Battalion, 20th Field Artillery (United States)


 * Description
 * I added an entire section of 2/20th unit history. I supported this addition with links of material importance, providing comprehensive, visual images concerning 2/20th Field Artillery's location (Francois Kaserne) in (Hanau, Germany) and what happened to the remainder of the unit when it was reflagged as 2/20th FA (A/40th Field Artillery - 'Deep Strike!') This link was extremely important because this is where the "Deep Strike" call sign of 2/20th originated (with A/40th FA, MLRS) which was co-located with 2/20th FA on Francois Kaserne in Hanau, Germany from 1987-1992.


 * Date and time
 * 05:16, 3 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Are you indeed affiliated with a40deepstrike.com? If so, you should not be posting links to your own website on Wikipedia. See WP:Conflict of interest and WP:Username policy for more details. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 06:15, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Catdyxvf

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 05:13, 4 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

05:11 UTC, 4 December 2010: Catdyxvf (talk | contribs) triggered filter 225, performing the action "edit" on "Fuck you, Asshole!". Actions taken: Disallow; Filter description: Vandalism in all caps.
 * Uh... huh. Signed by Barts1a Suggestions/complements? Complaints and constructive criticism? 05:16, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

User has been blocked. Signed by Barts1a Suggestions/complements? Complaints and constructive criticism? 08:42, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Thedavemeister

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description
 * i was advising people not to make the same mistake that i did in studying architectural technology, it is a complete waste of time, money and effort.


 * Date and time
 * 16:43, 6 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * You were inserting your personal opinion based on your own experience, poorly formatted, without any supporting evidence and followed by a dozen or more exclamation points. The filter did just what it was designed to do. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  18:00, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Rose5394

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 21:59, 6 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  22:17, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

188.152.140.248

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Allure


 * Description
 * I was trying to insert the italian interwiki it:Allure


 * Date and time
 * 22:37, 6 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Apologies, problem has been fixed, please try again. — Soap  —  02:28, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

124.126.139.2

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Don King (boxing promoter)


 * Description
 * Дон Кінг tried to add Ukrainian language of the article see


 * Date and time
 * 23:35, 6 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Apologies, problem has been fixed, please try again. — Soap  —  02:29, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

204.174.87.29

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 00:59, 7 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Apologies, problem has been fixed, please try again. — Soap  —  02:28, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

66.66.47.134

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Harold Pinter


 * Description
 * none of the edits reverted is "vandalism"; they are all constructive edits. Jezhotwells has taken ownership of this article since December 2008 and prevent[s] other editors from making corrections to errors in citations and from updating and providing citations; he has removed WP:BLP warning templates from the discussion page [I've restored it]; they apply to other living persons in this article; all statements about living persons must be verifiably documented or they must be removed; there are many errors in source citations, missing citations (which my edits supplied (as per the editorial interpolated requests and comments added earlier by other editors, to which these changes respond.  If one does not use e-mail with Wikipedia, there is no recourse to overcoming the problems that Jezhotwells and a very small coterie (fewer than 5) others have created for this article since Harold Pinter's death.  The versions that Jezhotwells et. al keep reverting to are not accurate or documented by verifiably accurate sources.  Please examine every edit that he has been reverting to see the inaccuracies of his claims of "vandalism."  The reverted edits are constructive improvements to the article.  Jezhotwells is not the arbiter of any article in Wikipedia; he is simply one editor.  Other editors need to be able to correct his mistakes.  He is not familiar with most of the print-published reliable sources being cited and also not familiar with the content and format that he has been reverting.  A few extra sentences here and there are not going to harm this article, if the sentences are correctly documented and follow Wikipedia's core editing policies.  Supplying the correct information and allowing others to examine it without reverting immediately (as he has been doing) enables other editors to evaluate the changes and to decide whether or not they are verifiable improvements to the article.  A template indicating that WP:BLP applies to living persons mentioned in this article (Pinter's relatives and friends, e.g.) is needed on the discussion page.  (Note: I do not use e-mail with Wikipedia; there is no way, other than to post this comment here  [publicly] for me to dispute Jezhotwell's false claims about the editing changes that he has reverted).  --66.66.47.134 (talk) 10:24, 7 December 2010 (UTC) [Did not see "don't wikilink"; removed Wikilink. [?]--66.66.47.134 (talk) 10:25, 7 December 2010 (UTC)]


 * Date and time
 * 10:24, 7 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

I'll be honest, I don't really like the way this filter works, but if you're banned, then even good edits are denied as a matter of enforcement. This is on ANI now so not really within the scope of the edit filter at this point.  — Soap  —  14:06, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

194.111.71.133

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 10:45, 7 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Been tried before, not a notable usage irrespective of its obscenity. — Soap  —  14:16, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

70.177.126.20

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 18:51, 7 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * It's a false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 19:28, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

64.25.209.77

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 19:12, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

We don't put lyrics into songs, as they are easy to find elsewhere, and may be copyrighted. You shouldn't be adding text after the page footer anyway, as people aren't generally going to look there for page content.  — Soap  —  19:31, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

137.89.147.135

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 19:27, 7 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

User was trying to vandalize Antelope. — Soap  —  19:33, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

John Watson H

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Editing List of mine warfare vessels of the Ottoman Empire


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 01:51, 8 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Could you give a reason why you wanted to do this?  — Soap  —  14:27, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

24.90.81.20

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User_talk:Tbhotch


 * Description
 * trying to inform a user who is removing correct information i added to an article and accusing me of vandalism


 * Date and time
 * 04:12, 8 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Sorry, this would perhaps have gone better if it had not stopped you, but strictly speaking, the edit filter was doing what it was designed to do. In the future please don't write things like this, particularly not with all the capitalization, or it will likely again be mistaken for vandalism.  — Soap  —  14:26, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Jeffster222

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 10:42, 8 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Large unexplained deletion, effectively vandalism. — Soap  —  14:27, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

DoKo SE

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Biofortification


 * Description
 * I was filling in a single ] in an incomplete WikiLink as to make the Link to Vitamine A Deficiency work. The filter reported that this was considered not constructive. I don't quite agree.


 * Date and time
 * 09:51, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Apologies, this is a rare bug that sometimes arises when making small edits to mal-formed wikilinks. I have completed the edit for you. The filter itself has proven useful and I would not be willing to take it down without discussion with the others who use it, but it is unlikely it will bother you in the future.  — Soap  —  11:48, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

92.12.242.10

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Baba Guru Nanak University


 * Description
 * tried to add interwiki for hi:बाबा गुरू नानक यूनिवर्सिटी, and stops me from saving page. --92.12.242.10 (talk) 16:20, 6 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 16:20, 6 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * This is the same error as plagued 93.218.148.73 below. I'm contacting a filter manager to see if this has been fixed. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 21:10, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

182.53.61.17

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Malaysia


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 19:06, 6 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  22:15, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

81.139.137.178

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description
 * gay


 * Date and time
 * 15:22, 7 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I see no errors here.

77.167.204.117

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * weather forecatsing


 * Description
 * I tried to rant weather forecasters.


 * Date and time
 * 13:41, 8 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

A vandal.  — Soap  —  14:24, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Cubanabop

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * user:arbatchelor


 * Description
 * The original page was named the "user" name while it was in draft form. It has now been worked on by a couple of people to insure compliance with Wikipedia guidelines, and when one of the two people involved in the editing tried to rename the page so that all the history migrated with the page, thge system refused to let us do that.


 * Date and time
 * 19:57, 8 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * It's because you're a new user and you're attempting to move a page out of userspace. My suggestion would be to run this by an admin or an experienced and knowledgeable user and have them move it out of userspace. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 20:55, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

93.218.148.73

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Conscription in Germany


 * Description
 * I was correcting the interwiki link so that it would link to the correct German article instead to the one about conscription all over the world. The filter triggered, "red link vandalism" doesn't make sense to me, as the article I changed the interwiki link to is existent in the German Wikipedia. P.S.: Get your filters fixed because next time I won't make the effort to write a time-consuming cumbersome report for such a trivial edit!


 * Date and time
 * 16:54, 6 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I've redone the edit for you, and I've no idea why it threw that error up at you... Maybe ask a filter manager? — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 21:03, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I must have forgotten to answer these. My apologies; the filter was quickly fixed.   —  Soap  —  04:01, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

97.116.181.186

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 00:35, 9 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I see no false-positive here. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 02:51, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Laneline0932

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Yellow Creek Beagles


 * Description
 * I was just trying to send this message: My page being deleted: Could you please explain why? Granted that I am new to this, but the reason given was because the page was a blatant advertisement of a business or company. The page was about a man named L.M. Watson and the Yellow Creek beagles that he established in 1908, and how they affect the beagles of today. Several books have been written about him and Yellow Creek beagles, several magazines have covered the subject, but he is dead, the Yellow Creek dogs no longer exist and there is no business or company, just an informational article. A few individuals were named to serve as an example of the lingering effects of the Yellow Creek beagles in today's show rings and as hunting dogs, but absolutely no intentional advertisements towards anybody in any form. Is there something I can "take away" from the article to let remain on Wikipedia?


 * Date and time
 * 04:51, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Figures; you tripped NawlinWiki's sacred cow filter. (Due to frequent harassment by meatpuppets of a long-term abuser, NawlinWiki has generally been given carte blanche to edit the filter to adjust to incoming attacks, the most recent of which was today.) If I could make a suggestion, I would, but at this point all I can suggest is to wait for a response here from edit filter managers; they'll know better about how you tripped the filter. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 05:03, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * Since the filter clearly wasn't supposed to stop you, I've made the edit on your behalf. I'll also look into how you tripped it and fix it if necessary. Someguy1221 (talk) 05:04, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I see now, you didn't trip it at all (sort of). Since you didn't create a new section (there's a little "new section" tab at the top of user talk pages), the paragraph above yours got pulled through the filter, and that paragraph tripped it. It's possible to prevent, but I'll leave that to someone else if they feel it's necessary. Someguy1221 (talk) 06:11, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Kimyshinichi

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Kimy Shinichi Kagawa


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 07:25, 9 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Please see WP:AUTO - Wikipedia is not a vanity press or a social networking site. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 07:34, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Pigbusiness

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Factory Farming


 * Description
 * Add an external link to a film documentary about factory farming


 * Date and time
 * 13:24, 13 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * False report by a thwarted would-be spammer trying to plant spamlinks to pigbusiness.co.uk. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  15:26, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

206.110.20.2

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Foothill High School


 * Description
 * I was putting another real notable alumni in the notable alumni section and i put a personal comment, but that comment is true. He is a very large human being.


 * Date and time
 * 17:31, 13 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * That sort of childish remark is unsuitable for an encyclopedia; we aren't Facebook. The filters are well-enough written to keep you from putting it into an article. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  17:34, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Bakerac1

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Sacred and Profane Love


 * Description
 * I completed a detailed analysis of this work for a class this semester, and I have updated the information for this piece of art. The previous description was weak and unfounded, so I started fresh with a new page that featured several theories and analysis. Most of the previous sources were not reputable, so I removed them. Please keep this page intact for I have put a lot of thoughtful work into it.


 * Date and time
 * 19:49, 13 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * A revision this drastic should be discussed, in detail and at length, on the talk page of the article. Have you done so? After such a discussion, it's still a good idea to execute the revision a piece at a time, in order to facilitate consensus. Apparently, you did not follow this procedure. (I will note additionally that the new version was very poorly formatted, showing a lack of understanding of our Wikimarkup interface.) -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  19:58, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

70.50.211.101

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * endangered species


 * Description
 * Trying to add info about species


 * Date and time
 * 02:52, 14 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

User typed "Cheese is great!!!!" into the Endangered species article.  — Soap  —  03:07, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Wd930Bot

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User:Wd930Bot/Editnotice/doc


 * Description
 * I think that this page isn't constructive, but not unconstructive, but it is a user page, so I don't think that it should be editing it.


 * Date and time
 * 02:58, 15 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Wd930Bot

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User:Wd930Bot/Editnotice/doc


 * Description
 * I think that made it look neeter, but didn't destroy the page.
 * Agin, it shouldn't do it if it is the same edit?


 * Date and time
 * 03:03, 15 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

It was stopping you because you were using 'nowiki' tags. I've told others here and here that I oppose this filter with all my heart. But I can't overrule the decisions others make. You seem to be okay for now, but I'm sure there will be more problems like this in the future. Apologies for the troubles.  — Soap  —  03:15, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

24.154.161.10

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Neha


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 03:05, 15 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

The exclamation marks added are unnecessary, and that is the reason why the filter stopped your edit. You may wish to re-write your constructive edit without them. Minima c  ( talk ) 06:30, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Venicenc

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Venice, Los Angeles


 * Description
 * Updating "Venice Neighborhood Council" web site url, removing unaffiliated "Venice Town Council" label.


 * Date and time
 * 07:45, 15 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * You should not be editing on behalf of your employers. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 08:27, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Kpasby

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Pulcheria


 * Description
 * For a class I have done extensive research on the topic of Pulcheria and have over 10 different sources. I am clearly not trying to "vandalize" I am trying to contribute what was an originally a very weak and poorly referenced page. I have not completely finished, but would like to know why my article seemed not correct, when the article I was editing only had 2 references and many false and un-cited source? Please fix this or explain it to me.


 * Date and time
 * 07:21, 15 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * This is going to sound very anal, but you were stopped because you spelled "victorious" as "victorius", which at one time was a mispelling commonly used by vandals. Someguy1221 (talk) 07:34, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

alright, well that makes sense, and thank you for helping me out. I will defiantly pay more attention to my spelling errors in my final draft. Thanks for your help!

99.234.117.193

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Dubstep


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 07:41, 9 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I see no false-positive here. Short block requested for repeated filter hits (4 incidents w/in 2 minutes). — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 07:45, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Ayeitsjay

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Dubstep


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 07:52, 9 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Vandal blocked. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:57, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

199.195.109.21

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * BTK


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 16:17, 9 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  16:39, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

70.158.165.105

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Bessie Coleman


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 19:56, 9 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Attempted vandalism, filter working correctly. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:58, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Tosh.what?

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * David Letterman


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 20:17, 9 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Serious BLP violations in the filter logs. Admin? — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 20:37, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

68.62.201.174

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Korean War


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 21:17, 9 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  21:48, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

72.150.46.71

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Natural resource


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 01:59, 10 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I see no false-positive here. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 04:04, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

96.42.227.63

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:96.42.227.63


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 06:11, 10 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

No matter which page they were contributing to, I see everything wrong with this IP's edits. Minima c  ( talk ) 06:31, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Bumblehole

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Anthony Neilson


 * Description
 * I was adding information about the career of anthony neilson. It was classified as unconstructive which is odd because I am the anthony neilson that the page is about.


 * Date and time
 * 09:29, 10 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Just don't use CAPS where it's not necessary. Someguy1221 (talk) 09:51, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Britt560

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Christmas tree


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 15:32, 10 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

A vandal. — Soap  —  15:33, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

74.222.226.194

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Sulfuric acid


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 16:18, 10 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

A vandal.  — Soap  —  16:24, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

24.234.138.203

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Solar vehicle


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 21:32, 10 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

A vandal.  — Soap  —  21:42, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

69.198.34.245

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Internet Explorer


 * Description
 * I was just editing for da truth. you people r liek totallly lame ppl. u suxxxorZ!!!1 lol noobs%$@#


 * Date and time
 * 23:54, 10 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Vandal, blocked 24h, possible static IP. — Soap  —  00:00, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

207.119.171.92

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Sex Drive (film)


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 00:07, 11 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Another vandal.  — Soap  —  00:12, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

173.198.84.50

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Carolina Panthers


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 02:39, 11 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * *throws yellow flag* Unsportsmanlike conduct, Offense, No. 50! — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 03:56, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Jheff11

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Sourmath.com


 * Description
 * it is an website that crashes computers


 * Date and time
 * 22:59, 13 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Wikipedia is not an advocate or warning site. Sites like this appear every day (and some never go away). — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 01:24, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Underclasspunks

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Chicano rock


 * Description
 * I was trying to list additional music groups that pertain to the context of the article


 * Date and time
 * 09:33, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

If there is a band called SBITCH then we can work out a way to get around the filter. But all I can find is a myspace page in which the name is not capitalized and it says they have never published an album, so they wouldn't be notable anyway. If you weren't aware of the notability guidelines I don't blame you because that article had dozens of other non-notable bands listed as well, which I've now removed.  — Soap  —  14:25, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

130.65.109.102

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Nation of Islam


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 18:42, 14 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * False report by somebody trying to insert an e-mail address and accusations of racism into an article. Filters functioning fine. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  19:37, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

ChuckBWong

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User:Ideaken


 * Description
 * Move the page from User:Ideaken to ideaken


 * Date and time
 * 10:55, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

If you want to create a page in mainspace, you should create it either in your own userspace, or directly in mainspace. I will delete this page in a few days because userpages should not be used for promotion, and I have blocked the Ideaken account anyway so they won't be editing their own page.  — Soap  —  15:30, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Flappy10

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Newhalen, Alaska


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 23:14, 14 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Apparent vandalism. — Soap  —  03:16, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Amruthpillai

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Amruth Pillai


 * Description
 * I'm creating a wiki named Amruth Pillai.


 * Date and time
 * 12:54, 15 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

I'm creating a wiki named Amruth Pillai (not me) but Wikipedia recognizes it as an autobiography. It is 100% not as such. It is just to let everyone know about the second youngest CEO of the World.
 * The filter is there to warn you such a page would very likely be deleted if created, but it won't stop you. Please read the Personal notability guidelines and the ones for companies too.  Most small companies are not notable. You need people completely unrelated to the company to be talking about your company in order to establish notability.  I don't even think you can claim "second youngest in the world" since I deleted a page about another web designer who was even younger last month, and he didn't claim to be the youngest in the world.  Additionally if you're not Pillai why are you using his name?  —  Soap  —  14:19, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Tzielo

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Tzielo


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 19:20, 16 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * [[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved, instead of writing it yourself. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to No original research, Neutral point of view, and Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you.-- Orange Mike   &#x007C;   Talk  19:30, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

67.117.130.143

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:Jayron32


 * Description
 * Jayron32's user talk

Trying to update a message I'd left Jayron a minute earlier, about an edit I made.
 * Date and time
 * 19:28, 16 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Thanks for reporting this: I added the comment with the link you provided. Minima c  ( talk ) 22:21, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

68.58.73.46

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Katara (Avatar: The Last Airbender)


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 02:38, 17 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Please explain your edits and use the talk page or you may be blocked regardless of the virtues of the edits. — Soap  —  02:43, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

66.93.220.9

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * SMD


 * Description
 * tried to add subheading

Acronym, Internet Slang Suck My Dic k (the most common occurrence of "SMD" in usage) edit added space in word because the filter stopped my report
 * Date and time
 * 19:55, 17 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * That's not encyclopedic content, even if we accept your unsupported claim. If it were true (which I doubt) it would be more suitable for Wiktionary or even Urban Dictionary. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  20:01, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Gurbaitis

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * The Swinging Erudites


 * Description
 * The Swinging Erudites

Add the text information
 * Date and time
 * 22:22, 17 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Cool story, bro, but that article would have bit the dust (as patent nonsense) even if you didn't include all caps. Wikipedia is not FictionPress. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 03:37, 18 December 2010 (UTC)