Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives/Archive 13

Ironass

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * List of fatalities from aviation accidents


 * Description
 * Added sortname template to many records on a sortable list. No changes to the table data, only added template, therefore Minor Change.


 * Date and time
 * 03:21, 18 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * My guess is because you marked the change as minor. The edit is clearly not vandalism, but because so many lines were altered you tripped the filter. (Note that the filter should not have prevented you from making the edit unless you navigated away from the warning note.) — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 03:35, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

24.16.148.194

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Tahoma Senior High School


 * Description
 * Tried to add Erik Totten (NFL Football Player) to Notable Alumni


 * Date and time
 * 03:34, 18 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Would a filter manager or administrator cover this one? — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 03:38, 18 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Tweaked the filter, you should not have this problem again with this page. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 04:11, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

58.168.235.103

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * List of dog breeds


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 06:42, 17 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * It's a false report. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 08:48, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

66.208.79.135

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Runts


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 14:47, 17 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Vandalism of course, false positives on this filter (46) are very rare.  — Soap  —  14:49, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

98.250.74.39

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Dog health


 * Description
 * http://pets.groups.yahoo.com/group/DogLiverDisease/       Added website for online support for dogs with liver disease


 * Date and time
 * 00:24, 18 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Wikipedia is not a linkfarm, and AFAIK groups.yahoo.com is on the spam blacklist. Filter working normally, but it wasn't what stopped your edit. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 03:30, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

121.73.185.178

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Sonny Bill Williams


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 07:44, 18 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I see no false-positive here. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 09:50, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Wikifun95

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Austin, Texas


 * Description
 * I am providing the links to very important article concerning the legal framework of Silicon Valley to  the pages about local versions of Silicon Valley.


 * Date and time
 * 09:16, 18 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * As it was told by Robert Metcalfe, "Silicon Valley is the only place on Earth not trying to figure out how to become Silicon Valley". The article clarifies why it's so hard to reproduce the California's Silicon Valley in any places outside the California's legal environment.
 * Generally, posting several links in a short span of time will trip this filter, especially if you're new or unregistered. (Note that the filter did not prevent you making your edits.) — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 09:49, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

98.83.75.108

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Hidden blade


 * Description
 * search wikipedia for "hidden blade"


 * Date and time
 * 10:00, 19 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * If you think a page should be de;eted as "useless", please don't blank it. In stead, please place a on the page, and explain the reason for requesting deletion ont he talk page (and just "this page is useless" is probably not going to be enough to convince people). עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:38, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

" The Memoirs of Virginia Lord' a book about a time when love was innocent
{placeholder}
 * This would be deleted for multiple reasons: One, it is largely copy pasted from http://www.amazon.com/Memoirs-Virginia-Lord-Marianne-Pilgrim/dp/1452802742; two, it doesnt really read like an encyclopedia article or tell us more about the book. Try looking at other pages for novels such as Catch_that_Rabbit (random example, I havent read it myself).  Thirdly it doesnt indicate notability.  A book that nobody other than the publisher has been promoting is not likely to survive on Wikipedia irrespective of any other qualities of its article.  —  Soap  —  16:36, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

78.147.70.143

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 666


 * Description
 * 666

666 penises
 * Date and time
 * 22:39, 20 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Blocked 24h by another admin. — Soap  —  22:53, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Rouxsd

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Water fluoridation


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 02:31, 13 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Fluoride is poisoning the water supply. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rouxsd (talk • contribs) 02:31, 13 December 2010
 * Posted to Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents as this seems to be part of a larger dispute. In any case, not a false positive.  —  Soap  —  02:42, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Agree. Not a false positive. Impressive filter! --Ronz (talk) 03:42, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

216.73.72.203

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Intertidal zone


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 16:26, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

User was attempting to vandalize Wikipedia by saying that anyone could edit it. Ironic, I suppose.  — Soap  —  16:33, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

99.62.118.221

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * IOS jailbreaking


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 21:22, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Evidently a vandal, no explanation given for edits.  — Soap  —  21:46, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Medium.mate

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Stephen Milne


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 03:23, 22 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * The filter log plus his contribs says VOA. Admin? — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 03:44, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Manganimesociety

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Countdown to Extinction


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 05:45, 22 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaallllllllllllllllllllllllllllllsssssssssssssssssss
 * Blocked by . עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:18, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Rowellvillagomeza

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 98.4 CSFM


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 11:09, 22 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Not a false positive - user was blanking page. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:56, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Jtma

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Chinese archery


 * Description
 * I was trying to take two images and rearrange them into one multiple image object.


 * Date and time
 * 13:36, 23 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * For some reason it's flagging your edit summary... I'll doublecheck the history and redo the edit for you. Nevermind, you seem to have gotten the edit through. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 19:52, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Alyxandor

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 200 (Stargate SG-1)


 * Description
 * I was adding an easter egg to the episodes page that was not listed. I understand the filter merely tried to censor my edit, but I assure you this is relevant to the page and such information about the show should not be censored as it is fact.


 * Date and time
 * 19:15, 23 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * We actually don't do easter egg stuff, at least in relation to the work the easter egg appears in. Wikipedia is not for indiscriminate collections of info. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 19:50, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

99.105.46.92

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description
 * Hello,

I was attempting to edit the character 'Danny' under 'Minor Characters' on the Wiki page for List of Trailer Park Boys Characters. I was attempting to add the following bit of additional detail:

"Most commonly he can be heard screaming "WHAT IN THE FUCK" and "FUCK OFF WITH THE GUNS" whenever something goes wrong. Occasionally he screams longer monologues, such as in "A Man's Gotta Eat," the same episode where he is referred to by name (for the first time) by Ricky after three seasons of anonymity. Danny can also be heard screaming in jail when the hockey game gets canceled in Trailer Park Boys: The Movie."
 * Date and time
 * 01:13, 24 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Just don't use all-caps. Someguy1221 (talk) 04:34, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

68.175.14.232

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description
 * his current credit is MY BUG GAY ITALIAN WEDDING. It's off Broadway, and he's playing the lead role of Andrew


 * Date and time
 * 06:54, 24 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Just don't use all caps. Someguy1221 (talk) 09:47, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

92.3.223.251

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 02:27, 25 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Not a false positive; user was attempting to vandalize with obscenities. — Soap  —  12:15, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

71.217.85.118

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:Flying Jazz


 * Description
 * I was trying to get rid of my unconstructive edits, but it thought that they were not unconstructive, but when I went to remove them, it said that it was unconstructive


 * Date and time
 * 06:06, 26 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

OK, I've reverted it to the previous version. Thanks for reporting this.  — Soap  —  11:28, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

24.66.18.33

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Big Money Rustlas


 * Description
 * I was fixing a misspelling of the word moronic. It was spelled moranic, which is not a word, and for some reason, fixing poor spelling is seen as unconstructive.


 * Date and time
 * 20:24, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

Apologies, but there's not really any way for the edit filter to know that it's a typo. 3 ¢ soap Talk/Contributions 00:41, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Dolly Parton



 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Dolly Parton


 * Description
 * Somehow, one of the album names in this edit turned up a false positive for possible BLP issue/vandalism. Note that I am not 74.177.241.245 but TenPoundHammer.


 * Date and time
 * 21:46, 26 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Probably because he wrote "whorehouse". Not really much can be done here, I think, This is one of the type of false positives that really can't be fixed without disabling the filter. 3 ¢ soap Talk/Contributions 00:40, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (film)



 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Charlie and the Chocolate Factory (film)


 * Description
 * Two previous edits by different users, which I fixed, contained some Skype formatting. However, it also marked my edit with Advisor.js as containing Skype formatting. I don't use Skype at all, so I don't know why it is doing that.


 * Date and time
 * 01:50, 27 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

Well, you did leave some skype formatting in, and the filter was warning you so. If this filter were set to disallow instead of just warning, situations like this would not happen, but people wanted it this way. — Soap  —  00:59, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

80.212.75.148

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 04:39, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

User changed Jeff Gordon's page to that of Dale Earnhardt, and was warned for it by the edit filter.  — Soap  —  00:58, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

78.82.197.84

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 23:04, 27 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

I was just being brutally honest
 * Blocked.  — Soap  —  00:56, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

98.160.221.12

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Marxism


 * Description
 * I was trying to edit the introduction on this page to accurately reflect governments that currently are lead by rulers subscribing to the political philosophy of Marxism, as the page did not appear to contain well-known information dating back to at least January 20, 2009. Subsequently it was missing a few major world governments that have recently been over-taken by Marxism.  I can't possibly imagine why the edit would not be allowed unless, of course, Wikipedia itself subscribes to Marxist theory.


 * Date and time
 * 11:30, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

It's a false positive because this filter is supposed to track a particular long term troublemaker who isn't you. But the edit you were making is still factually incorrect and if you want it to go in the article you should explain why on the talk page.  — Soap  —  12:05, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Marclluell

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Abdim's Stork


 * Description
 * I was moving the page to the one that has the scientific name.


 * Date and time
 * 14:14, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Should be OK now. Why just this one, though? Is it because it's an eponym? Most of the other storks are given common names. — Soap  —  23:15, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

110.159.180.25

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 15:40, 28 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Not a false positive - user was blanking page. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  16:41, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Babystealer

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Chuck Schumer


 * Description
 * We edited correctly but the site would not accept our masterful and quite information.


 * Date and time
 * 20:30, 28 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Filter working properly, prevented vandalism. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:33, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Bkonijn

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Evelyn_Morris


 * Description
 * Trying to have the page un-deleted by the user who deleted it (NawlinWiki) on their talk page with the following message to verify that it had been deleted in error:

Hi There,

I bought my pikelet cd, and found her page deleted when i looked her up on wikipedia. She may may not be setting the world on fire in Louisiana, but here on the other side of the world (Melbourne, Australia), she has achieved some degree of "importance [and] significance".

A quick google reveals that she has had articles written about her in Melbourne's main broadsheet ,and elsewhere over the past 3 years, and played at Melbourne's main Arts Festival

A quick look at her Myspace page reveals that she has released 2cds on the Chapter Music Label.

Please accept my minor challenge to this cultural imperialism and restore the page that was deleted.

--Bkonijn (talk) 09:07, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Date and time
 * 09:07, 29 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Ive copied this over to NawlinWiki's talk page for you, thanks for reporting it. — Soap  —  16:14, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

82.47.114.61

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description
 * stop using modbots


 * Date and time
 * 14:16, 29 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

User was attempting "Don't trust Wikipedia" vandalism.  — Soap  —  16:15, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

124.148.175.16

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description
 * thermal cooking


 * Date and time
 * 20:26, 30 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

remove how-to content and rewrite in wikipedia style.
 * I see only blanking. Assuming that was on purpose, if you want to see an article deleted and/or rewritten, don't just blank the page with no explanation.  That will be considered vandalism always.  You can register an account and start a rewrite of the article in your userspace if you're not ready to do it now. —  Soap  —  23:34, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Beastyness

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 00:35, 31 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I suspect this is a VOA - I see no false-positives. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 04:23, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

122.150.200.116

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * [[Talk:Hawaii]]


 * Description
 * I just wanted to ask 'How old is Hawaii, i.e. when did it first break the surface of the waves?' on the Hawaii wiki page. Everytime I hit save it reminded me that I was not logged in (as I understand it, I'm free to post without being logged in?)


 * Date and time
 * 01:58, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

The message is always there. You can just hit save and it will go through. — Soap  —  02:09, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Comments

Iamany

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User page design center


 * Description
 * I was trying to revert the User page design center back to normal as someone seemed to have accidentally edited/replaced it with text from a different article


 * Date and time
 * 02:29, 31 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I can confirm Iamany's false positive. A spam-only account created his spam biography at WP:UPDC. Apparently replacing the entire content of a namespace page didn't trigger the filter, but when Iamany tried to revert it, the edit filter caught the reversion and reported it to AIV. As an admin I'm whitelisted, so I reverted the spam bio (and sent him a UsernameHardBlocked for New Year's Eve. :-)


 * Something to think about: the first admin who responded to the AIV report couldn't really tell if this was vandalism or not, so making the details a little more user-friendly would be a great help for newbie admins.  K rakatoa    K atie   03:37, 31 December 2010 (UTC)


 * This filter is important enough that it probably should not be deleted, even though it does tend to produce false positives such as this. I'm not sure what you mean by making the details more user friendly, could you explain?  —  Soap  —  11:52, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Thetruthisoutthereteehee

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * sri chinmoy; controversies


 * Description
 * I included a e address as my back up for my comment, the address will lead to a site containing testimonials of alleged abuse.


 * Date and time
 * 04:05, 31 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Even if the edit stood on its merits, it would have been deleted - and oversighted - as a security risk. (Because Wikipedia has a high Alexia rank, there is likewise a very high likelihood that a spammer will use it to harvest email addresses from foolish users.) — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 04:21, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Meitar

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Adolescent sexuality in the United States


 * Description
 * I deleted old references that were not being used in the article. The page was rendering with big, bold, red "Cite error" messages, so I removed the references that were causing the error. I think it is proper to consider that a minor edit, as article content is not, in fact, being changed.


 * Date and time
 * 06:49, 31 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments

It's not possible for this filter to be able to tell the difference between deleting broken references and deleting valid ones. Thank you for reporting this though.  — Soap  —  11:51, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

68.5.97.191

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User Talk: Hlj


 * Description
 * I posted something on this page, and tried to improve it by deleting irrelevant arguments.


 * Date and time
 * 04:32, 31 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * This filter triggers whenever any IP blanks any portion of any user's talk page, for good or ill. This is a false-positive, but there's no way to fix it without breaking the filter. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 04:54, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Enis Beqiri
Enis Beqiri(born 1 April 1981 ,Gjilan -Kosovo)profession Economist,

Primary and Secondary School has finnished in Gjilani from 1990-1999 till is registered in University of Pristina after War in 1999 and continous till 2005 as a Graduated Economist in Management and Computing.

Work Experience

In early life i've done a lot of jobs as a youth as a TWELFTH i've started witha trade as a seller till 1998,in 2000-2002 i've begin to work in Premium Intenet Provider and the same job i had continous to work till 2004,

In 2005- i have begin to work in a bank here in Gjilani,Kosovo as a Loan Officer in Procredit Bank -Assist customers in obtaining loans from banks. -Sell bank products and services to customers. -Implement effective marketing and promotion techniques. -Evaluate financial needs and requirements of the customers. -Build customer relationships through qualitative services.Till November 2010....
 * The filter was correct at judging that this is an autobiography, no? It is also a candidate for speedy deletion, specifically because it has "no indication of notability".   —  Soap  —  17:51, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I think this is actually less an autobio and more a resume. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 05:28, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

173.180.92.214

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description
 * I was trying to edit a page.


 * Date and time
 * 22:58, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Which filter are you reporting? I can't answer you until you give more information. Some of the hits (e.g. Special:AbuseLog/3984835) are obvious vandalism.  — Soap  —  23:10, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

CharlesBroughton

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Giga pudding


 * Description
 * Accidentally disallowed a legitimate creation of an article from a redirect. :| TelCo  NaSp  Ve :|  05:14, 2 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 05:14, 2 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * He was disallowed for trying to write about the "puddi puddi" internet meme. Short of this meme being shown to be notable, I don't see a reason to exempt any form of it from the filter. Someguy1221 (talk) 05:28, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The meme is old, and whatever vandals associated with the phrase may be gone for now. Even if it wasn't notable, why would any mention of this be disallowed in his userspace and on talk pages as well, if there's a redirect about it? :| TelCo  NaSp  Ve :|  04:01, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Briefboynotboxers

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * black watch


 * Description
 * i was exprssing how lovable kilts can be, you must understand my dilema. Yes i am currently wearing one, why do you ask?


 * Date and time
 * 20:08, 3 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Ach see nae false-positive here. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 20:45, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

92.12.94.0

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Burnham Upper School


 * Description
 * I was trying to add the schools moto and the names of houses


 * Date and time
 * 21:00, 3 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I see no false-positive here. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 21:06, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

114.76.59.13

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Trend Micro


 * Description
 * Warn people of genuine serious errors being made in website trust recommendations by Tend micro. This has been going on for over two years!!!!!


 * Date and time
 * 07:58, 4 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Community forums are not considered reliable sources. Further, Wikipedia does not accept editorializing or personal opinions (see WP:NPOV and WP:OR). Someguy1221 (talk) 08:04, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * What does that have to do with the abusefilter? I don't believe it's supposed to censor RS; we generally do it manually instead. Abusefilters aren't meant to censor unreferenced content; they're supposed to handle vandalism. :| TelCo  NaSp  Ve :|  09:32, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The filter log blocked the IP editor because their edit included four exclamation marks in a row (note that they have now escalated to five). -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  17:34, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

The Pluton

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk: The Pluton


 * Description
 * trying to post a new section relating to the article "Death of Adolf Hitler"


 * Date and time
 * 07:11, 5 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * It's because of the all-caps words in the section you added. Decapitalize them and the filter will not trip. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 07:14, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

KatharineHepburn

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Only Words (book)


 * Description
 * I crated a page for feminist Catharine MacKinnon's influential book "Only Words."


 * Date and time
 * 01:02, 6 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

It's probably the "suck cock" sentence about halfway down. You should be able to go through now. Do you have the page text saved?  — Soap  —  03:39, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

70.108.55.240

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Radiohead


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 06:42, 7 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

That was a good edit, but the filter only stopped you because of your addition of several exclamation marks (Which was added in the reference I think). I will try and re-insert the edit for you. Minima c  ( talk ) 07:55, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

134.253.26.11

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:RJaguar3


 * Description
 * So, I left a friendly message for RJaguar3 explaining the issues with the Pufc template, due to date formating issues. After I added the message, I realized that putting a demonstration for Pufc on the talk page, I had now put the talk page into a bunch of Pufc categories.  So, I went back to try to modify my message, to show the output, rather than transclude the template, and I was repeatedly blocked.  Finally, I was able to at least disable the templates by removing one of the {} on each side, but now it just looks stupid, since it's not showing anything useful.  I would like to replace the first "pufc" example with "Error: Invalid time", since that is what it produces, and the second with "the desired result", since it does what you want.  I understand you are trying to keep folks from removing these tags, but it seems a bit extreme if I am the one who added it by mistake in the first place.


 * Date and time
 * 16:31, 7 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

I was against the creation of this filter but there's not much I can do about it. The "nowiki" tags are sometimes used by vandals to make a page unreadable, and therefore their use has been greatly restricted, even though they have legitimate uses. Is there a way to get the message you want to write without using "nowiki"? ' — Soap'' — ''' 16:37, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * It wasn't the "nowiki" that triggered it, but the removal of "{pufc", as far as I can tell. For example, I was able to do this, but I couldn't replace the tags completely (or remove the final set of curly braces). 134.253.26.11 (talk) 16:42, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * No, that wouldn't trigger any filter. The thing is that this filter knows that false positives will come up, so it allows you to make a few edits but not too many in a row.  So the nowiki is really the trigger, but it doesnt come to force until you've made three edits in a row with that in the text.   —  Soap  —  16:47, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * So, does it time out? Will I be able to fix it if I wait a bit? 134.253.26.11 (talk) 16:49, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Answering my own question - Yes, it does time out, and I was able to fix it after waiting a bit. Thank you. 134.253.26.11 (talk) 16:54, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Ld5hkyplayer

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Lachesis (mythology)


 * Description
 * I'm new and I accidently typed up a new reference area i.e., although there was a reference table i tried to start a new one below it with &lt;references&gt; and &lt;/references&gt;. It took me a second to understand the code, however, when I tried saving the changes I'd made, it was marked as unconstructive because it thought I was deleting THE reference table when it was actually just an axillary one.


 * Date and time
 * 16:47, 7 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

Thanks for letting us know, but it's not possible for the filter to be able to tell whether you're deleting a spurious reference table or a good one. It also seems that the edits it tagged were not deletion, but simply changing the spelling of "references" to "refernces", which would mean the references section never ends.  — Soap  —  16:50, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree, it was a mess. I have sorted it out ... 134.253.26.11 (talk) 16:52, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Altweiler

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Chicanery


 * Description
 * I was trying to move the whole article to "Chicanery (band)", since the word "Chicanery" on its own requires disambiguation. I changed the "Chicanery" page to a disambiguation format, and created a new page "Chicanery (band)" which was linked to by the disambiguation page.


 * Date and time
 * 17:29, 7 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

The standard way to do this would be to move the old page to the new title, and then rewrite the now-empty Chicanery as a disambiguation page. That way the edit histories of the articles are in their proper place. The edit filter would not stop that. But if there is no such page as legal chicanery then I would hold off until an article is written before creating a disambiguation page. It is not necessary to have articles for all English words, in fact some of them are specifically protected against creation (though pages for them exist on Wiktionary).  — Soap  —  18:14, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

RIOULT

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Bolero (disambiguation)


 * Description
 * I was trying to make the following edits: Change the name Pascal Rioult Dance Theatre to RIOULT (the name was changed in 1995), change the word "made" to "choreographed" and add a link to the company's official website: www.rioult.org. I'm the E-Marketing Manager at RIOULT and I'm authorized to make changes. I'm sorry if I raised any flags on your site. This is my first time making edits on your site. Eventually I want to add a page for RIOULT and Pascal Rioult. Thank you.


 * Date and time
 * 00:01, 10 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

I will answer on user talk:RIOULT.  — Soap  —  01:10, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Э

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * German camp brothels in World War II


 * Description
 * Concentration camp tattoo "Feld Hure" means the Army Whore in German. Reliable source has been provided. An edit-filter error. Please restore.


 * Date and time
 * 18:15, 10 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * The problem is the string "MELISSA KUNTZ" in the reference tag. Decapitalize it, and the filter won't trip. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 20:48, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅. Thanks. — Э (talk) 21:13, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Null perspiration. Some of the false positives concerning this filter are because of allcap words in the references section; I don't think people realize the filter reads every aspect of the edit. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 21:32, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Nownownownow

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * The_Orange_Lights


 * Description
 * i wish to delete the page, as i am one of the ex band members and due to legal reasons, wish this page to be removed.

delete the page
 * Date and time
 * 20:15, 10 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Then contact OTRS about it. Blanking an article is not the same as deleting it, and in any case subjects of articles don't have a whole lot more pull then men off the street unless they contact OTRS. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 20:50, 10 January 2011 (UTC)


 * I stuck a PROD on the page on the subject's behalf.  Them From  Space  22:04, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

164.58.144.196

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Dr. Mario (video game)


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 17:41, 4 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

there are also various types types of pill capsules
 * Another ersatz complaint by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  17:44, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

75.69.132.70

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:Jlancaster


 * Description
 * This is discussion page on my User:jlancaster page, into which User:Knowsetfree placed offensive material designed to embarrass me. I deleted only the offensive portion of this inserted material.


 * Date and time
 * 08:22, 5 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Log in to remove comments from your talk page. (This filter is designed to prevent anonymous users from doing so, as it's often vandalism.) — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 08:45, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

94.9.27.42

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * King of the Ring (2010)


 * Description
 * give the real reasults


 * Date and time
 * 16:29, 5 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I see no false positive here. You weren't reporting results, you were talking smack. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 17:35, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

66.193.131.33

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Kentucky


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 17:10, 5 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I see no false positive here. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 17:34, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

68.186.49.94

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Extraterrestrial life


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 23:43, 5 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another ersatz complaint by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  03:22, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

123.211.110.97

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * The Time of Our Lives (EP)


 * Description
 * The page in the track listing did not include the clib so I was just hanging it so it did.


 * Date and time
 * 03:20, 6 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another ersatz complaint by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  03:23, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

173.147.157.90

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Rhode Island Red


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 18:08, 6 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

No explanation of test-like edits, I presume this is just another vandal. — Soap  —  23:24, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

64.107.190.9

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Ford Model T


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 19:49, 6 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

User was vandalizing Ford Model T. — Soap  —  23:23, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

174.98.242.72

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Structuralism


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 23:33, 6 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another ersatz complaint by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  23:36, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Encyclopedia Geek

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Wikipedia


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 02:38, 8 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

I was just unblanking a page.
 * I apologize, but there's not much that can be done about false positives like this because there's no way for the filter to know if a page has old edits or not. Large edits could be excluded, but I believe that there are some people who watch this filter for the sake of protecting people's privacy and they would want the large edits in.  In any case, a vandalism as blatant as this will be reverted very quickly by those using automated tools.  —  Soap  —  22:50, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

99.128.194.135

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Sammy Sosa


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 16:37, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Vandalism, evident long term vandalism against Sammy Sosa from this IP.  — Soap  —  22:50, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

212.50.173.142

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * CITV


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 15:13, 9 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The filter acted correctly in this case, as the editing attempt in question did not appear to be constructive. If that particular edit was intended as a test, please use the sandbox for any future test edits. Thank you. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 19:52, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

65.92.58.119

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Geography of Canada


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 22:47, 9 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

Pure vandalism. → ♠ Gƒoley ↔ Four ♣ ← 01:32, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Big streinzy

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * The Fairly OddParents


 * Description
 * ummm i was trying to edit a page of a popular cartoon show, because they forgot a vital piece of information about Remey Bucksaplenty, the local rich kid.


 * Date and time
 * 23:03, 9 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

The filter appears to be correct. → ♠ Gƒoley ↔ Four ♣ ← 01:28, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

69.132.63.29

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Cliff-dwelling


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 00:32, 10 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

Vandalism. → ♠ Gƒoley ↔ Four ♣ ← 01:34, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

CHReptar

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Eric brian speers


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 03:40, 10 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Rather vile attack page. Admin? — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 04:17, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Nirmal786 niru

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Krishna


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 09:13, 10 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * The problem is you're overusing equals signs (which are used to denote the beginnings of sections). In any case, I have some concerns that your text may be plagiarized; in which case the filter rightly stopped your edit. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 20:53, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

98.88.199.6

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * ILP


 * Description
 * i was trying to add another hink that ilp meant


 * Date and time
 * 01:05, 11 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I see no false-positive here. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 02:42, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

99.53.162.212

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Purple


 * Description
 * that purple is a primary color ..


 * Date and time
 * 04:11, 11 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I see no false-positive here. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 04:32, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

PoppyPaws

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 18:14, 11 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

This seems to be essentially vandalism; if not, it's a copy of another article with the wording changed to be about somebody else and would be deleted as not notable. — Soap  —  18:44, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

PoppyPaws

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 18:14, 11 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

This seems to be essentially vandalism; if not, it's a copy of another article with the wording changed to be about somebody else and would be deleted as not notable. — Soap  —  18:44, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

24.193.65.16

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 22:37, 11 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

huevos rock!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 * I see no false-positive here (and user created another hit in posting this report). — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 05:11, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

67.173.71.134

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * The quadrilateral page


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 05:04, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

I did nothing wrong just added info that was just approved about quadrilterals not to make anyone misleaded. Politely i am angry!!!
 * Comments
 * I see no false-positive here. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 05:09, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Mummy-whale

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Phillip Blashki


 * Description
 * Document a famous Australian person referenced elsewhere in Wikipedia.


 * Date and time
 * 04:38, 12 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

I replaced capitalized surnames (and it got past the filter). Sorry!
 * I was about ready to say, decapitalize the surnames and the filter won't trip. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 05:11, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Mummy-whale

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Phillip Blashki


 * Description
 * Document a famous Australian person referenced elsewhere in Wikipedia.


 * Date and time
 * 04:38, 12 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

I replaced capitalized surnames (and it got past the filter). Sorry!
 * I was about ready to say, decapitalize the surnames and the filter won't trip. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 05:11, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Nummify

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Carter Bays


 * Description
 * A duplication of the text appearing in the summary had been pasted into the 'Notes' section below it. This did not include any special markup (hyperlinks/proper references).  It was removed, but with warning that the error may not be minor (likely due to the quantity of text being deleted).


 * Date and time
 * 21:58, 12 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

Thanks for reporting this. I see that the template has a "suggestions" link in the bottom

But there's not really anything that can be done since it's an automated process and can't tell one kind of deletion from another. This is one of those filters that I would rather we do without, but I can't go around disabling everything I don't like. Sorry for the inconvenience.  — Soap  —  22:18, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Nummify

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Carter Bays


 * Description
 * A duplication of the text appearing in the summary had been pasted into the 'Notes' section below it. This did not include any special markup (hyperlinks/proper references).  It was removed, but with warning that the error may not be minor (likely due to the quantity of text being deleted).


 * Date and time
 * 21:58, 12 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

Thanks for reporting this. I see that the template has a "suggestions" link in the bottom

But there's not really anything that can be done since it's an automated process and can't tell one kind of deletion from another. This is one of those filters that I would rather we do without, but I can't go around disabling everything I don't like. Sorry for the inconvenience.  — Soap  —  22:18, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

24.226.25.2

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 03:46, 13 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I see no false-positive here. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 03:56, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Nummify

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Carter Bays


 * Description
 * A duplication of the text appearing in the summary had been pasted into the 'Notes' section below it. This did not include any special markup (hyperlinks/proper references).  It was removed, but with warning that the error may not be minor (likely due to the quantity of text being deleted).


 * Date and time
 * 21:58, 12 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

Thanks for reporting this. I see that the template has a "suggestions" link in the bottom

But there's not really anything that can be done since it's an automated process and can't tell one kind of deletion from another. This is one of those filters that I would rather we do without, but I can't go around disabling everything I don't like. Sorry for the inconvenience.  — Soap  —  22:18, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

24.226.25.2

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 03:46, 13 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I see no false-positive here. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 03:56, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

67.100.126.89

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Twin Peaks


 * Description
 * My purpose was to add details from the New York Times about the Japanese VHS and laserdisc releases. Prior editors has spun-off such details to Twin Peaks media releases.  I noticed that Twin Peaks had significant duplicate content between the two, content that later caused the main article to be updated without keeping Twin Peaks media releases up-to-date.  I attempted to rectify the situation by removing most of that section's content from Twin Peaks and updating  Twin Peaks media releases with both the new details I was added as well as the details previously added only to the main article.

Of course the edit filter was triggered, which has happened in the past in such situations. In the recent past, I circumvent the problem by re-enabling cookies, and after another check-in attempt or two my content has been accepted. Apparently, the filter rules have changed, and my workaround no longer works, a blow against WP:Anyone can edit. If Special:AbuseFilter/30 had been just a little bit more patient, Special:AbuseFilter/279 wouldn't have to have been invoked, and I wouldn't have lost my work on Twin Peaks. Please consider relaxing rules for filter 30 a bit to allow someone with cookies off to turn them on and have a few more changes of getting past rule 30 before the situation is escalating. Thanks.
 * Date and time
 * 03:55, 10 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Edit filter 30 triggers on blanking large portions of a page, and only affects unregistered and newly-registered users. To avoid filter 30, you'll need to log in. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 04:15, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * What you say is true but not to the point. What makes this a false positive is that the filter system failed to recognize the change as legitimate. As I said before, the way the system used to work is that I enabled cookies, then apply my changes again. This time, that workaround failed.  Since WP:SS is still a guideline, I either need this to be recognized as a false positive since it didn't let me follow the WP:SS guideline, or advice as to what an IP editor can do to work around the filter system in this kind of case.  Thanks.  67.100.125.194 (talk) 21:46, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I'll ask again, in another way. I was following WP:SS and triggered an edit filter for blanking out a portion of a page.  Since summarizing a section requires "blanking large portions", I request that the edit filter be changed to allow an IP editor to summarize a section.  I was happy with the workaround that used to exist (described above) and am hoping either the earlier version could be reinstated or some alternative can be found.  Thanks.  67.100.127.117 (talk) 09:04, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * That can't be done w/o rendering the filter inoperable as the filter cannot differentiate between summarizing and blanking (as retarded as that may sound), as removing so much as one paragraph trips the filter. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 09:11, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * All I can add is that it's normal to accumulate edit filter hits over time, as many of our more active users already have. Here's mine: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:AbuseLog&wpSearchUser=Soap  (a few of those were deliberate, to test things, but most aren't).  —  Soap  —  13:01, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Also, this filter hasn't changed since April. I'm not sure what you mean about using cookies, but it shouldn't have any bearing on whether your edit is tagged or not .   —  Soap  —  13:04, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Vvvladut

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * IAR 80


 * Description
 * Tried to fix typo and correct the word "Aerian"


 * Date and time
 * 10:23, 13 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I'm going to defer to an edit-filter manager on this one. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 10:30, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The filter thought he was the tennis guy. NawlinWiki will know who I'm talking about.  As for the edit itself, I don't speak Romanian, but do you (Vvvladut)?  I see no hits on Google for the "aerien" spelling, but only one for the "aerian" spelling.  I would expect the name of a division of the WW2 military to appear more than once in all of the Internet.   —  Soap  —  12:29, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

WaltonHil

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Wikimedia Commons


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 06:15, 6 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The article you wrote was unacceptable advertising., Wikimedia Commons, to post the advert. Someguy1221 (talk) 06:29, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

WaltonHil

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Wikimedia Commons


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 06:15, 6 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The article you wrote was unacceptable advertising., Wikimedia Commons, to post the advert. Someguy1221 (talk) 06:29, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

67.250.111.206

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * All i was doiing was bolding and italsicing to make it look better wikipedia is not reliable ii will start a portest to sotop goin on wikipedia you watch and see


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 22:46, 13 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

User was attempting to add "wikipedia is notr reliable you can edit anything like i just did" into an article but was stopped by an edit filter.  — Soap  —  23:15, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

24.191.82.37

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * AMERICAN DESERTS


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 23:02, 13 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

User was pasting "TO MAKE A YUMMY DESSERT GO TO WWW.DESSERT'S.COM" and similar lines into an article about American deserts.  — Soap  —  23:16, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

207.255.63.161

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description
 * the fountain of youth


 * Date and time
 * 01:30, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

A vandal.  — Soap  —  01:34, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

66.222.193.113

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description
 * Please replace this with a description of the edit you were trying to make.


 * Date and time
 * 04:52, 14 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I see no false-positive here. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 05:49, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Jnridlinghafer

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * wood stabilization


 * Description
 * I recently performed a search for "wood stabilization" and found that there is no page description or mention of "wood stabilization" anywhere (I recently updated the wood preservation page with a small blurb about it however that is not nearly sufficient to explain it and how it works and has evolved, as it is really a huge market (multi-Billion Dollar)and getting bigger every year, the closest thing to it is the "wood preservation" page which in all honesty has nothing to do with wood stabilization at all and does not even address or mention it. Therefore I have spent the whole day writing a page about it (I am a amateur knife maker and stabilize my own wood and have done over 2 years of research on the subject) that goes over its history and what it means, how it works and the market forces present and past.

When I tried to save the page it rejected it for some reason. So here I am
 * Date and time
 * 05:14, 14 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * It rejected it because you tripped a vandalism filter. (Any further than that I will leave for the edit filter managers to discuss.) However, the tone of the article you wrote was unencyclopedic and borderline instructional, so if it had gone through it would likely have been copy-edited mercilessly for tone, grammar, and the like. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 05:49, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

66.222.193.113

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description
 * Please replace this with a description of the edit you were trying to make.


 * Date and time
 * 04:52, 14 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I see no false-positive here. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 05:49, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Jnridlinghafer

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * wood stabilization


 * Description
 * I recently performed a search for "wood stabilization" and found that there is no page description or mention of "wood stabilization" anywhere (I recently updated the wood preservation page with a small blurb about it however that is not nearly sufficient to explain it and how it works and has evolved, as it is really a huge market (multi-Billion Dollar)and getting bigger every year, the closest thing to it is the "wood preservation" page which in all honesty has nothing to do with wood stabilization at all and does not even address or mention it. Therefore I have spent the whole day writing a page about it (I am a amateur knife maker and stabilize my own wood and have done over 2 years of research on the subject) that goes over its history and what it means, how it works and the market forces present and past.

When I tried to save the page it rejected it for some reason. So here I am
 * Date and time
 * 05:14, 14 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * It rejected it because you tripped a vandalism filter. (Any further than that I will leave for the edit filter managers to discuss.) However, the tone of the article you wrote was unencyclopedic and borderline instructional, so if it had gone through it would likely have been copy-edited mercilessly for tone, grammar, and the like. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 05:49, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

98.101.36.126

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 17:54, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

A vandal. — Soap  —  18:00, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

Fallout3Fan333

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 05:51, 15 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I see no false-positive here. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 06:42, 15 January 2011 (UTC)