Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives/Archive 14

Peakindicator

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * fucking off


 * Description
 * Wikipedia page describing fucking off and the 2010 fucking off movement.


 * Date and time
 * 21:03, 15 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

Creating the page / editing the text
 * To be brutally honest with you, without reliable sources that page is indistinguishable from vandalism or a hoax. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 22:24, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

173.23.37.243

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 01:54, 16 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * You should be thankful I surrendered my tools. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 05:57, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

65.30.169.156

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 23:39, 16 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

A vandal. — Soap  —  23:42, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

173.3.42.119

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Jeese McCartney


 * Description
 * the person who did his article left out an important interview. As a good fan, i was trying to add it when my screen said that my text was 'abusive' when all i did whas write what was said on 'the view'


 * Date and time
 * 00:09, 17 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * So, you thought it was OK to point out his sexuality in all caps, "GAY!"? And you also thought it was OK to delete an entire section about his career, to replace it with that announcement? Someguy1221 (talk) 04:43, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Canadianswim

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Limewire Pirate Edition


 * Description
 * Just Trying To Speak The Truth


 * Date and time
 * 06:33, 17 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * WP:BOOMERANG! Blocked. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:10, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Meta Pirate

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Limewire Pirate Edition


 * Description
 * REVEALING THE TRUTH


 * Date and time
 * 06:51, 17 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * WP:BOOMERANG! Blocked. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:10, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

4.156.228.142

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Comintern


 * Description
 * Made the English more precise. Removed slang, awkward terms, or unnecessarily figurative or lurid descriptions. Corrected some errors.

Did not change any quotes. Did not change the general sense, or factual information such as names or dates.
 * Date and time
 * 22:11, 17 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

Apologies for this, you should be able to do the edit now.  — Soap  —  01:57, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

128.36.69.134

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Azmi Bishara


 * Description
 * Changing 'a' to 'an' in front of vowel


 * Date and time
 * 01:08, 18 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

This has been done by another administrator; thanks for reporting this.  — Soap  —  02:00, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Wangond

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:Ckatz


 * Description
 * i can't make a simple discussion edit on that talk page.


 * Date and time
 * 07:23, 18 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

Thanks, I've updated the filter and pasted the edit for you.  — Soap  —  11:32, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

186.212.38.71

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 09:45, 18 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another bogus report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  20:25, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

208.81.184.4

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:Gw225


 * Description
 * Was trying to add welcoming text to this user, as a part of a group of users that had recently made well intended but poorly executed edits to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Was also trying to do the same to User talk:Kcummins9, User talk:Opencontent, and User talk:Virginia86, using the same text I had used on User talk:Allosaur777, and received this same filter message on those attempts as well.

As for why I'm editing from an IP, please see: User talk:208.81.184.4 -- also http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/ec/208.81.184.4 gives a good overview of the edits from this IP.
 * Date and time
 * 21:20, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

I opposed this filter (here also)  but it was created with consensus and I can't overrule that. Sorry. All I can say is that while 'nowiki' tags are 99% legitimate, and are present in most welcome messages, stopping the 1% that aren't was the reason this filter was created.  — Soap  —  21:30, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments


 * The welcome I was using is just a customized version of Template:LDSWelcome (I don't like the old-style box around the welcome) which I hadn't even noticed uses the nowiki tags. Will a subst on that template still work, or will that be blocked too because of this new nowiki filter? -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 22:04, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * It should work, yes. The filter seems to see substing as just subst + the name of the template.  Example here. —  Soap  —  22:09, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

186.212.38.71

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 09:45, 18 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another bogus report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  20:25, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

96.26.213.146

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Gilo


 * Description
 * Changing "residential district" to "Israeli settlement", because there is no reason not to call a spade a spade and mince words.


 * Date and time
 * 20:17, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

This filter was coded in such a precise way that I feel a hit like this must be on purpose, and not a false positive. I have to ask you to go to the talk page, talk:Gilo, and write about the change you want to make, because I wouldn't feel comfortable touching an issue like that myself (if anyone else reading this page wants to do it, though, go right ahead; I'm not the final word on anything.)  — Soap  —  21:34, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * I made a comment requesting the change on the talk page. Incidentally, what is filter 58 and who created it? 96.26.213.146 (talk) 01:47, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * It's a catch-all filter for various types of unacceptable edits, including some things that relate to Israel. User:NawlinWiki is the author of most of the code in the filter, though some of the older lines of code are from others.  —  Soap  —  02:02, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

208.81.184.4

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:Gw225


 * Description
 * Was trying to add welcoming text to this user, as a part of a group of users that had recently made well intended but poorly executed edits to The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Was also trying to do the same to User talk:Kcummins9, User talk:Opencontent, and User talk:Virginia86, using the same text I had used on User talk:Allosaur777, and received this same filter message on those attempts as well.

As for why I'm editing from an IP, please see: User talk:208.81.184.4 -- also http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/ec/208.81.184.4 gives a good overview of the edits from this IP.
 * Date and time
 * 21:20, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

I opposed this filter (here also)  but it was created with consensus and I can't overrule that. Sorry. All I can say is that while 'nowiki' tags are 99% legitimate, and are present in most welcome messages, stopping the 1% that aren't was the reason this filter was created.  — Soap  —  21:30, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments


 * The welcome I was using is just a customized version of Template:LDSWelcome (I don't like the old-style box around the welcome) which I hadn't even noticed uses the nowiki tags. Will a subst on that template still work, or will that be blocked too because of this new nowiki filter? -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 22:04, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
 * It should work, yes. The filter seems to see substing as just subst + the name of the template.  Example here. —  Soap  —  22:09, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

74.110.149.47

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 21:23, 18 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

Vandalism. → ♠ Gƒoley ↔ Four ♣ ← 01:26, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

98.148.115.142

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 05:15, 19 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * This appears to be intended to refer to this. It is clearly not a false positive: it was blatant attempt to suppress sourced information that does not support the editors point of view. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:08, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

98.148.115.142

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 05:15, 19 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * This appears to be intended to refer to this. It is clearly not a false positive: it was blatant attempt to suppress sourced information that does not support the editors point of view. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:08, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Dumby2012

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * tHE YEAR 2012


 * Description
 * THE TRUTH ABOUT WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN


 * Date and time
 * 19:21, 19 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another bogus report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  19:47, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Josh999x

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Adam Darski


 * Description
 * The information added, while initially unsourced, was valid information that is backed by blabbermouth.net, including the quote.


 * Date and time
 * 19:42, 19 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Unsourced BLP material is held to a higher standard. blabbermouth.net doesn't fall under the rubric of reliable sources. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  19:50, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

67.171.208.183

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 05:24, 20 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

This editor made many attempts to vandalise. I'll report it to AIV. Minima c  ( talk ) 08:01, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

2.100.101.55

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 19:53, 20 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Nothing but unconstructive editing attempts. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 22:31, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

2.100.101.55

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 19:53, 20 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Nothing but unconstructive editing attempts. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 22:31, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

ClassicalPiano66

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Game Maker


 * Description
 * I was trying to REVERT vandalism (absolutely MINOR) and they said I did something large. I tried to do NOTHING but REVERT the whole vandalism edit.


 * Date and time
 * 02:56, 20 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

It looks like this one was overlooked before, but, as it stands now, this filter tags some edits which are within the policy laid out at WP:MINOR, but I can see no way to exempt them without taking down the whole filter. So long as a filter like this exists you can simply not check the 'minor' edit box if it helps. — Soap  —  12:16, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

72.69.202.112

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * []


 * Description
 * I was learning how to use Wikicode.


 * Date and time
 * 23:14, 20 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

Sorry, but it is not possible to exempt the sandbox from the edit filters, due to the way it is programmed. The sandbox is wiped anyway every few minutes, so nothing you write is going to stay there for long; it's more meant as a place to see how things would look if they were able to stay (and preview will do that). — Soap  —  12:13, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

137.122.203.217

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:137.122.203.217


 * Description
 * Attempting to add ; editing from inside the University of Ottawa.


 * Date and time
 * 14:46, 21 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

This is a new filter, and I have really no knowledge of what it's doing, but like most filters, it has been coded in very precise way and any false positives are not simply due to mistakes or typos. I will let the authors of the filter know about this report. Thank you.  — Soap  —  15:54, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I've amended it in the meantime, so that edit should work. This is a dynamic filter, so it'll hopefully keep improving! -- zzuuzz (talk) 15:58, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

161.97.140.42

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 15:31, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

A vandal, of course, as essentially all editors who trip this filter are. — Soap  —  15:56, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

ClassicalPiano66

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Game Maker


 * Description
 * I was trying to REVERT vandalism (absolutely MINOR) and they said I did something large. I tried to do NOTHING but REVERT the whole vandalism edit.


 * Date and time
 * 02:56, 20 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

It looks like this one was overlooked before, but, as it stands now, this filter tags some edits which are within the policy laid out at WP:MINOR, but I can see no way to exempt them without taking down the whole filter. So long as a filter like this exists you can simply not check the 'minor' edit box if it helps. — Soap  —  12:16, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

209.174.184.226

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 19:10, 20 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

I love hump $$$$


 * [[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] This is your only warning. If you attempt to vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked without further notice. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 23:00, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

72.69.202.112

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * []


 * Description
 * I was learning how to use Wikicode.


 * Date and time
 * 23:14, 20 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

Sorry, but it is not possible to exempt the sandbox from the edit filters, due to the way it is programmed. The sandbox is wiped anyway every few minutes, so nothing you write is going to stay there for long; it's more meant as a place to see how things would look if they were able to stay (and preview will do that). — Soap  —  12:13, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Aklevert

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Phenomenological Neuro-Linguistic Programming


 * Description
 * 


 * Date and time
 * 04:16, 21 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

WP:MADEUP page, essentially the same as the text pasted above (which I will delete later).  — Soap  —  12:12, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

137.122.203.217

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:137.122.203.217


 * Description
 * Attempting to add ; editing from inside the University of Ottawa.


 * Date and time
 * 14:46, 21 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

This is a new filter, and I have really no knowledge of what it's doing, but like most filters, it has been coded in very precise way and any false positives are not simply due to mistakes or typos. I will let the authors of the filter know about this report. Thank you.  — Soap  —  15:54, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I've amended it in the meantime, so that edit should work. This is a dynamic filter, so it'll hopefully keep improving! -- zzuuzz (talk) 15:58, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

161.97.140.42

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 15:31, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

A vandal, of course, as essentially all editors who trip this filter are. — Soap  —  15:56, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments


 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * THE GOLDEN PIN


 * Description
 * tried to add new festival screenings to the festival screening section and your website wouldn't allow it, calling it unconstructive. This was false on wikipedia's part.


 * Date and time
 * 16:39, 21 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

You can type "Gay" instead of "GAY" and it will work. But please before you add anything anywhere make sure you have proof that it's true, you can read WP:V if you want more information.  — Soap  —  22:05, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

204.57.106.208

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 16:47, 21 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Filter correctly stopped this user's blatant vandalism attempt. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 22:02, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

75.150.201.157

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 16:49, 21 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * [[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] It's a false report. In addition, per the filter log, this user attempted to continue vandalizing after receiving a final warning. Therefore, any patrolling admin may choose to block this IP immediately. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 21:53, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

AlSchulz

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Edit page of an admin.


 * Description
 * Admin had requested supporting evidence. I provided supporting evidence including text and various http links. The system caregorized my reply as filtered


 * Date and time
 * 21:27, 21 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

Thanks, I've posted the reply to him. I'm not really sure what caused the problem but I'll look at it when I have more time. — Soap  —  22:03, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

98.224.79.182

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 03:37, 22 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I see no false-positive here. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 04:00, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Jack Ikhan

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Hysteria Project


 * Description
 * I searched for a PSP mini-game titled Hysteria Project through Bing and found myself at this site. The article I read here was foolish and biased for an encyclopedia. So I decided to search for the game again and I obtained information which contrasted with the information here, such as the release date of the game, and gaming consoles for which the game was published. Also the information from a website was mentioned but the website itself wasn't in the reference section. Freestyle writing is one thing, but if an article is to be published in a so called encyclopedia it should be at least thoroughly researched with proper references and credit given.


 * Date and time
 * 05:05, 22 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * The problem is that you *removed* the references system, all the interwiki links and categories, and added some opinion to the page. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 05:48, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Anas Qtiesh

 * moved to User talk:Anas Qtiesh  —  Soap  —  16:29, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

24.86.242.30

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 19:42, 22 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Just page blanking, removal of content. → ♠ Gƒoley ↔ Four ♣ ← 22:21, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

90.201.75.176

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 20:36, 22 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Blanking of the Reference and External Links sections. → ♠ Gƒoley ↔ Four ♣ ← 22:23, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

24.0.72.23

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 22:19, 22 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Vandalism. → ♠ Gƒoley ↔ Four ♣ ← 22:25, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Peakindicator

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Fuck Off


 * Description
 * Made a proper article for "Fuck Off" rather than linking to "Fuck" which has an entirely different meaning and social context. Please read it.


 * Date and time
 * 00:28, 16 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

I'll disable the filter for now. It's very similar to another filter, anyway.  — Soap  —  00:35, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I should note though that the filter being turned off doesn't mean this content won't be deleted, as said above.  — Soap  —  00:46, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Anas Qtiesh

 * moved to User talk:Anas Qtiesh  —  Soap  —  16:29, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

24.86.242.30

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 19:42, 22 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Just page blanking, removal of content. → ♠ Gƒoley ↔ Four ♣ ← 22:21, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

90.201.75.176

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 20:36, 22 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Blanking of the Reference and External Links sections. → ♠ Gƒoley ↔ Four ♣ ← 22:23, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

24.0.72.23

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 22:19, 22 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Vandalism. → ♠ Gƒoley ↔ Four ♣ ← 22:25, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

72.184.50.71

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 01:19, 23 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

I edited a page but they say it wasn't constructive but it was giving a great opinion.
 * A vandal. — Soap  —  01:19, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

67.169.239.128

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Glee (Tv series)


 * Description
 * Edit for accuracy and consistencey.


 * Date and time
 * 05:30, 23 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Replacing an article on a TV show with a thing on gay smut isn't an "edit for accuracy and consistencey" [sic]. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 06:43, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Responsivereaction

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Republic Day (India)


 * Description
 * Deleted 3 duplicate paragraphs. Hence it is a minor edit because there's no change to the actual content.


 * Date and time
 * 08:27, 24 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * A minor edit is for stuff that is actually very minor, such as copyediting, punctuation, etc. Removing paragraphs, even if they are duplicates, is never a minor edit. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 09:10, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

67.169.239.128

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Glee (Tv series)


 * Description
 * Edit for accuracy and consistencey.


 * Date and time
 * 05:30, 23 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Replacing an article on a TV show with a thing on gay smut isn't an "edit for accuracy and consistencey" [sic]. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 06:43, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Responsivereaction

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Republic Day (India)


 * Description
 * Deleted 3 duplicate paragraphs. Hence it is a minor edit because there's no change to the actual content.


 * Date and time
 * 08:27, 24 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * A minor edit is for stuff that is actually very minor, such as copyediting, punctuation, etc. Removing paragraphs, even if they are duplicates, is never a minor edit. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 09:10, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

119.12.177.10

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 2004 Redfern riots


 * Description
 * Updating page to include contested nature of Hickey's death - including testimony to a Parliamentary Inquiry - the ongoing family and community protests, and claims that police continue to harass the family.


 * Date and time
 * 10:19, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Even though the newspaper spells RACIST in all capitals, on Wikipedia it would be considered distracting since it stands out too much from the surrounding text. If you make the same edit with the title spelled lowercase it will be fine.  — Soap  —  11:56, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

67.169.239.128

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Glee (Tv series)


 * Description
 * Edit for accuracy and consistencey.


 * Date and time
 * 05:30, 23 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Replacing an article on a TV show with a thing on gay smut isn't an "edit for accuracy and consistencey" [sic]. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 06:43, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Responsivereaction

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Republic Day (India)


 * Description
 * Deleted 3 duplicate paragraphs. Hence it is a minor edit because there's no change to the actual content.


 * Date and time
 * 08:27, 24 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * A minor edit is for stuff that is actually very minor, such as copyediting, punctuation, etc. Removing paragraphs, even if they are duplicates, is never a minor edit. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 09:10, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

119.12.177.10

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 2004 Redfern riots


 * Description
 * Updating page to include contested nature of Hickey's death - including testimony to a Parliamentary Inquiry - the ongoing family and community protests, and claims that police continue to harass the family.


 * Date and time
 * 10:19, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Even though the newspaper spells RACIST in all capitals, on Wikipedia it would be considered distracting since it stands out too much from the surrounding text. If you make the same edit with the title spelled lowercase it will be fine.  — Soap  —  11:56, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

We0are0kkk

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 23:02, 24 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

Vandalism. (WP:BOOMERANG coming?) → ♠ Gƒoley ↔ Four ♣ ← 23:30, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Wow quick!! → ♠ Gƒoley ↔ Four ♣ ← 23:31, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

RichPikiwEagle

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Water fluoridation controversy


 * Description
 * I was merely trying to get someone to add to the Further reading section and can't figure out why my suggestion for this addition was sabotaged


 * Date and time
 * 01:17, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Mentioning the Fluoride Action Network was banned, and because of the way the filter software works, even a comment left by a previous editor (who edited when the ban was not in place) can be considered as part of yours. I've removed the entry on the list for now since it was making some parts of the page uneditable.  — Soap  —  01:26, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

71.105.29.100

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description
 * i was trying to say bar refaeli has been modeling for years, and has been on the sports illustrated front cover. She has been working with swimsuit.


 * Date and time
 * 01:55, 25 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Uh, no, what you actually tried to add was "She is hot!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" Filter is working properly.  NawlinWiki (talk) 01:57, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

67.161.43.121

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description
 * change a grammer error


 * Date and time
 * 03:49, 25 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * No, that is definitely not what you tried to do. Someguy1221 (talk) 03:58, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

87.204.219.14

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Pidgin (software)


 * Description
 * I was trying to restore a citation, with an updated mailing list thread URL. I probably could have just escaped the @ sign as %40, but I think someone should have a look at it, just in case.


 * Date and time
 * 10:39, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, I missed this earlier. But it's not really possible to do anything to this filter that can make it tell the difference between a real email address and any other URL of the form xxxx@yyyyy.com. Sorry.  — Soap  —  15:30, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

163.150.59.117

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 22:45, 25 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

Adding IM GAY in random places is vandalism. → ♠ Gƒoley ↔ Four ♣ ← 22:54, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Spartapraha

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Riverside School, Prague


 * Description
 * The Primary Principal is no longer Susan Anderson. I was attempting to update that to say that the Primary Principal is Graeme Chisholm


 * Date and time
 * 20:26, 25 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

Sorry, one of the names in the page was stopping the filter; I've changed it now.  — Soap  —  03:30, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

184.59.84.75

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 23:39, 25 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Vandalism. → ♠ Gƒoley ↔ Four ♣ ← 00:36, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Mohitsingh538

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 06:09, 26 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Filters are working properly - email address are not listed in Wikipedia biographies. To see how to correctly add an external link, please see Help:Link. Someguy1221 (talk) 06:41, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Mohitsingh538

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 06:09, 26 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Filters are working properly - email address are not listed in Wikipedia biographies. To see how to correctly add an external link, please see Help:Link. Someguy1221 (talk) 06:41, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

KidsFromTech

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 13:02, 26 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another false report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  14:46, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

173.2.48.104

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 00:01, 27 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Page blanking/removal of content. → ♠ Gƒoley ↔ Four ♣ ← 00:32, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

69.182.31.251

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 04:43, 27 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * More page blanking/removal of content. Not a false positive. → ♠ Gƒoley ↔ Four ♣ ← 04:46, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

BrecksLFC

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * dancing


 * Description
 * jamie barrett


 * Date and time
 * 13:09, 27 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * False report by somebody trying to create an attack page. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  14:20, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Tobias Franz

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Caroline Wozniacki


 * Description
 * The page material is doubled on her biography. The automated filter would not allow me to delete the repeated material because it was essentially half the article.


 * Date and time
 * 06:51, 27 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * This filter trips on all edits like that by unregistered or unconfirmed users, beneficial or baneful. Another user has already redone the edit for you. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 20:29, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

BrecksLFC

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * dancing


 * Description
 * jamie barrett


 * Date and time
 * 13:09, 27 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * False report by somebody trying to create an attack page. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  14:20, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Candorite

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * mary jemison


 * Description
 * trying to post a question about her age on discussion. I just started here so maybe I missed some protocol.


 * Date and time
 * 19:45, 27 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * You don't sign your edit summaries; rather you sign your post immediately after your addition. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 20:26, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I think he caught a spam filter, actually, one of the words in the summary was that of a spam site. I'll remove it, since this filter doesn't support word boundaries.  —  Soap  —  20:49, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Tobias Franz

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Caroline Wozniacki


 * Description
 * The page material is doubled on her biography. The automated filter would not allow me to delete the repeated material because it was essentially half the article.


 * Date and time
 * 06:51, 27 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * This filter trips on all edits like that by unregistered or unconfirmed users, beneficial or baneful. Another user has already redone the edit for you. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 20:29, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

BrecksLFC

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * dancing


 * Description
 * jamie barrett


 * Date and time
 * 13:09, 27 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * False report by somebody trying to create an attack page. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  14:20, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Candorite

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * mary jemison


 * Description
 * trying to post a question about her age on discussion. I just started here so maybe I missed some protocol.


 * Date and time
 * 19:45, 27 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * You don't sign your edit summaries; rather you sign your post immediately after your addition. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 20:26, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I think he caught a spam filter, actually, one of the words in the summary was that of a spam site. I'll remove it, since this filter doesn't support word boundaries.  —  Soap  —  20:49, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Large and hairy

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Bottle


 * Description
 * it won't let me type Wat bottles r for.


 * Date and time
 * 23:26, 27 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I see no false positive here. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 23:29, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Tobias Franz

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Caroline Wozniacki


 * Description
 * The page material is doubled on her biography. The automated filter would not allow me to delete the repeated material because it was essentially half the article.


 * Date and time
 * 06:51, 27 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * This filter trips on all edits like that by unregistered or unconfirmed users, beneficial or baneful. Another user has already redone the edit for you. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 20:29, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

BrecksLFC

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * dancing


 * Description
 * jamie barrett


 * Date and time
 * 13:09, 27 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * False report by somebody trying to create an attack page. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  14:20, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Candorite

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * mary jemison


 * Description
 * trying to post a question about her age on discussion. I just started here so maybe I missed some protocol.


 * Date and time
 * 19:45, 27 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * You don't sign your edit summaries; rather you sign your post immediately after your addition. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 20:26, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I think he caught a spam filter, actually, one of the words in the summary was that of a spam site. I'll remove it, since this filter doesn't support word boundaries.  —  Soap  —  20:49, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Large and hairy

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Bottle


 * Description
 * it won't let me type Wat bottles r for.


 * Date and time
 * 23:26, 27 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I see no false positive here. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 23:29, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Tobias Franz

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Caroline Wozniacki


 * Description
 * The page material is doubled on her biography. The automated filter would not allow me to delete the repeated material because it was essentially half the article.


 * Date and time
 * 06:51, 27 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * This filter trips on all edits like that by unregistered or unconfirmed users, beneficial or baneful. Another user has already redone the edit for you. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 20:29, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

BrecksLFC

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * dancing


 * Description
 * jamie barrett


 * Date and time
 * 13:09, 27 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * False report by somebody trying to create an attack page. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  14:20, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Candorite

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * mary jemison


 * Description
 * trying to post a question about her age on discussion. I just started here so maybe I missed some protocol.


 * Date and time
 * 19:45, 27 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * You don't sign your edit summaries; rather you sign your post immediately after your addition. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 20:26, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I think he caught a spam filter, actually, one of the words in the summary was that of a spam site. I'll remove it, since this filter doesn't support word boundaries.  —  Soap  —  20:49, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Large and hairy

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Bottle


 * Description
 * it won't let me type Wat bottles r for.


 * Date and time
 * 23:26, 27 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I see no false positive here. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 23:29, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

59.160.74.254

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 08:53, 28 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

A vandal, blanking the whole page with no explanation. I'm surprised this didn't trip the "page blanking" filter.  — Soap  —  12:44, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

98.22.123.210

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 16:02, 28 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Vandalism, correctly stopped by filter. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:04, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Tobias Franz

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Caroline Wozniacki


 * Description
 * The page material is doubled on her biography. The automated filter would not allow me to delete the repeated material because it was essentially half the article.


 * Date and time
 * 06:51, 27 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * This filter trips on all edits like that by unregistered or unconfirmed users, beneficial or baneful. Another user has already redone the edit for you. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 20:29, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

BrecksLFC

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * dancing


 * Description
 * jamie barrett


 * Date and time
 * 13:09, 27 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * False report by somebody trying to create an attack page. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  14:20, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Candorite

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * mary jemison


 * Description
 * trying to post a question about her age on discussion. I just started here so maybe I missed some protocol.


 * Date and time
 * 19:45, 27 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * You don't sign your edit summaries; rather you sign your post immediately after your addition. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 20:26, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I think he caught a spam filter, actually, one of the words in the summary was that of a spam site. I'll remove it, since this filter doesn't support word boundaries.  —  Soap  —  20:49, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Large and hairy

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Bottle


 * Description
 * it won't let me type Wat bottles r for.


 * Date and time
 * 23:26, 27 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I see no false positive here. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 23:29, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

59.160.74.254

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 08:53, 28 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

A vandal, blanking the whole page with no explanation. I'm surprised this didn't trip the "page blanking" filter.  — Soap  —  12:44, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

98.22.123.210

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 16:02, 28 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Vandalism, correctly stopped by filter. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:04, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Tobias Franz

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Caroline Wozniacki


 * Description
 * The page material is doubled on her biography. The automated filter would not allow me to delete the repeated material because it was essentially half the article.


 * Date and time
 * 06:51, 27 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * This filter trips on all edits like that by unregistered or unconfirmed users, beneficial or baneful. Another user has already redone the edit for you. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 20:29, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

BrecksLFC

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * dancing


 * Description
 * jamie barrett


 * Date and time
 * 13:09, 27 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * False report by somebody trying to create an attack page. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  14:20, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Candorite

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * mary jemison


 * Description
 * trying to post a question about her age on discussion. I just started here so maybe I missed some protocol.


 * Date and time
 * 19:45, 27 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * You don't sign your edit summaries; rather you sign your post immediately after your addition. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 20:26, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I think he caught a spam filter, actually, one of the words in the summary was that of a spam site. I'll remove it, since this filter doesn't support word boundaries.  —  Soap  —  20:49, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Large and hairy

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Bottle


 * Description
 * it won't let me type Wat bottles r for.


 * Date and time
 * 23:26, 27 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I see no false positive here. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 23:29, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

59.160.74.254

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 08:53, 28 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

A vandal, blanking the whole page with no explanation. I'm surprised this didn't trip the "page blanking" filter.  — Soap  —  12:44, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

98.22.123.210

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 16:02, 28 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Vandalism, correctly stopped by filter. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:04, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

McUgly

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * weegee


 * Description
 * adding more info


 * Date and time
 * 23:02, 28 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

Vandalism. (WP:BOOMERANG coming?) → ♠ Gƒoley ↔ Four ♣ ← 23:14, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Unless it's a sock, I rarely see the point of blocking a user who has no successful edits. If he keeps going however he'll be blocked the same as anyone. —  Soap  —  23:20, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

82.34.200.202

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * The Supersuckers


 * Description
 * The page reports that Supersuckers is in a hiatus and just touring with Thin Lizzy, I added more up to date information coming from Dan Bolton himself and available on video, stating that they're looking for a label and have material ready for a new album. I also added the name of the current guitar player who replaced Heathman and the interview page as a reference. Don't think there's anything wrong with that?


 * Date and time
 * 16:35, 29 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * The problem, as always with this filter and its false positives, is the "SUPERSUCKERS" in the url. (The filter is set up to trip on all new and unregistered users writing words in all-caps and can't distinguish between good and bad edits.) — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 19:37, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

76.167.186.145

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 16:56, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

THE WEBSITE WON'T LET ME DO THIS.
 * Comments
 * I see no false-positive here, and filer tripped a filter with this post. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 19:34, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

IaMwYaTt

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 00:02, 29 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Filters working properly, vandalism blocked. NawlinWiki (talk) 00:04, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Rickbull20

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * [[L.A.X. (album) to LAX (album)]]


 * Description
 * LAX (album) is the correct page not the L.A.X. (album) page.


 * Date and time
 * 01:16, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

I will look at this tomorrow, in the meantime anyone else who feels the move would be appropriate can do so. Note that a pagemove like this would normally be done at Requested moves, not by using redirects, but taking it there might not be necessary. AsI said, I will look into this tomorrow when I have more time.  — Soap  —  01:39, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * Old title restored. — Soap  —  02:12, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

76.250.189.117

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Anti-establishment


 * Description
 * trying to revert this crap


 * Date and time
 * 00:29, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, maybe it's time to consider ending this filter, even though it does stop a lot of vandalism, because much of the vandalism it stops would be caught by other filters anyway. I've reverted the edit.  — Soap  —  00:47, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

Komponistenarchiv

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Enrico Mainardi


 * Description
 * Add link to German Composer's Archive


 * Date and time
 * 13:42, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

As above, the filter correctly detected the conflict of interest, and the user is blocked.  — Soap  —  16:33, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

Ubcmedia

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Pick of the Pops


 * Description
 * I was trying to add a link to our website, Unique the Production Company. We produce this show for the BBC and would like to be credited.


 * Date and time
 * 12:42, 1 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * This is not a false positive, but the filter behaving precisely as it's supposed to. Please see External links and Conflict of interest. -- Rrburke (talk) 14:51, 1 February 2011 (UTC)