Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives/Archive 16

65.30.177.85

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Description
 * Change at from the
 * Change at from the


 * Date and time
 * 06:13, 4 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Requesting RFPP. There's no false-positive here.— Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 06:31, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

75.4.194.121

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * [[user_talk:Agradman]]


 * Description
 * I often want to make large-scale deletions to my talk page (delete the weekly Signpost, etc.) without logging in, because I'm on a forced wikibreak using Wikibreak enforcer. But every time I attempt to do so, this filter bars the edit from being made.


 * I realize this isn't exactly a "false positive", since the whole purpose of this filter is to prevent edits like this, which are almost always vandalism. But it would be nice if there were a way to "opt-out" my talk page from this filter.  Since I've never ever been the subject of vandalism, I would be willing to take that risk into my own hands ...


 * Just a thought :)


 * Date and time
 * 06:48, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, sorry, it would be theoretically possible to have an exemptions list, but it would run on every edit, and if even just a few people wanted to be added it would slow down the whole edit filter process. A bot would perhaps be a better idea than a filter for this type of thing.  — Soap  —  16:54, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

Beproude

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Girnar


 * Description
 * Consolidation and factual information editing.


 * Date and time
 * 23:20, 7 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * We are not a travel brochure. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 23:34, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

82.7.40.7

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Marianne Ny


 * Description
 * Remove the restored article content someone had added to this deleted article, someone listed it for DRV and added the DRV tag (which isn't required so the whole page could be deleted). Edit filter thinks I'm blanking the article, though I'm leaving the delrev template.


 * Date and time
 * 07:12, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

I'm honestly not familiar with the practice of creating a page with just a single tag and no content. It doesn't seem very helpful to the readers to tease them like that. But, if that's what we're doing now, I can add delrev to the exemption list, which currently contains only a few speedy deletion templates. Thank you for reporting this.  — Soap  —  12:25, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * Yes it's a bad practice and the person needn't (perhaps even shouldn't have done it), but since I can't then delete it... --82.7.40.7 (talk) 20:11, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

122.163.9.152

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Rajeev Karwal


 * Description
 * I was editing Rajeev Karwal's page. I attest all information is true & to the best of my knowledge.


 * Date and time
 * 07:19, 10 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Your edit tripped a trigger by deleting existing information. This is fortunate, as your edits turned this into a rankly promotional advertisment fawning over the subject in a non-objective manner. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  22:14, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

81.155.9.73

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Adele (singer)


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 01:45, 11 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

A vandal.  — Soap  —  01:54, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

68.5.234.167

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Ridgecrest Intermediate School


 * Description
 * I accidentally deleted it. I am so sorry please forgive me. I was trying to include information about the quads because i go there.


 * Date and time
 * 02:03, 12 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Well, all the text has been restored since you made the intended edit, so don't worry if you've removed it by accident. The filter only attempted to stop you because you removed all categories. Minima  c  ( talk ) 09:27, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

OlEnglish

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Benigno Aquino III‎


 * Description
 * Reporting on behalf of IP editor: 124.6.181.221. Received a "possible BLP issue or vandalism" tag upon adding a single initial to an article subject's name.


 * Date and time
 * 05:47, 12 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Oh.. I wasn't aware that Filter 364 was actually "Changing the name in a BLP infobox", which is exactly what the IP editor did. But the output of the tag as seen in Recent Changes (and the article revision history) was "possible BLP issue or vandalism", and it wasn't vandalism nor a BLP issue, so that's why I reported it as a false positive. Shouldn't the RecentChanges text and the filter description text match? -- &oelig; &trade; 06:06, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
 * No, because some filters' descriptions are too detailed. Not only that, but there's a separate entry on the edit filter management page to tag any edits tripped by the filter with a description, and if left blank it will not provide a tag. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 21:47, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

86.173.190.83

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Ohm's law


 * Description
 * mt friend thought it was funny to block my ip on wikipedia. he tried to delete the whole page. i am sorry


 * Date and time
 * 17:15, 12 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * There's a reason why the anti-blank filter is there: To stop IPs and new users from blanking pages without an explanation. Minima  c  ( talk ) 17:55, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Easykobo

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Skye Bank


 * Description
 * I was trying to enter the following like "http://www.easykobo.com/Getquotes.aspx?s=SKYEBANK" to the "Skye Bank" page on wikipedia so that people could click it and view the stock quote for skye bank directly, my addition was not accepted and it said that the system thinks i am trying to spam wikipedia, this was not my intention. so please accept my link.

Dear Soap, can you please explain to me why you think i am spamming? i have submitted a genuine link and asked the it be approved. This is not called spamming. Thanks
 * Date and time
 * 11:19, 14 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

It looks to me that you are spamming, but I'll wait for a second opinion.  ♥ Soap  ♥  12:39, 14 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Yeaaaaaah, user blocked for spamming and edits reverted. Syrthiss (talk) 13:09, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Eidetic Man

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Dana White


 * Description
 * I was just editing something that i had worked on yesterday. I changed some of the wording.


 * Date and time
 * 23:47, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

I will remove this part of the filter for now since I can see its going to continue to cause problems. Thanks for reporting it.  — Soap  —  04:02, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

Inapproprichu

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Piop


 * Description
 * Redirect to poop haha


 * Date and time
 * 00:48, 19 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

I dont really think that's a plausible misspelling. We only very rarely make redirects for actual typos, it's usually for things that people might not know how to spell.  — Soap  —  01:02, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Template:LGBT symbols
The filter prevented a move from 'Template:LGBT symbols' to 'Template:LGBTQ symbols'  here is my reasoning for moving the template: The reason is because the 'Q' or Genderqueer has in the past decade created symbols to represent themselves. can someone fix this problem please. Iamiyouareyou (talk) 22:42, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 * there is a limit on the number of pagemoves that a "new" user can do in a certain amount of time, because pagemoves are often used for vandalism. Apologies for the inconvenience.  If you wait you will be able to do the moves.  —  Soap  —  00:55, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Calliopesdaughter

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Sara Northrup Hollister


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 16:28, 20 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

78.48.66.96

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Fourth dynasty of Egypt


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 17:28, 20 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Filter acted correctly. If you wish to make further test edits, please use the sandbox. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 20:32, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

98.144.0.52

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Ifihadahifi


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 20:06, 20 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Frivolous report from a thwarted would-be vandal. Due to the nature of the attempted vandalism edits, a level 4im warning will be issued. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 20:19, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Tammyhan

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Mary Jordan (Artist/Filmmaker/Curator)


 * Description
 * I was trying to post this article.


 * Date and time
 * 22:01, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

If you want to make this page, youll have to change the word "gay" to sentence case instead of all caps (and should probably change everything else to sentence case as well).  — Soap  —  02:18, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

That said, those claims and awards all have to be backed up by verifiable references, or they will simply be deleted anyway, which could cause the article itself to be nominated for deletion.  — Soap  —  02:22, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

108.7.219.52

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Apollo program


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 02:15, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

A vandal.  — Soap  —  02:18, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

71.105.76.251

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Matthew Ogens


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 05:02, 21 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

This is not the way to try to "delete" the page. If you think this page doesn't meet the requirements of inclusion in a encyclopedia, follow the instructions at WP:AFD. → ♠ Gƒoley ↔ Four ♣ ← 05:04, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Peebs31

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Deferiet, New York


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 21:40, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

A vandal.  — Soap  —  21:47, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

Sumedhasaraogi

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * DQ Entertainment


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 06:38, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

This is a filter that sometimes appears when someone creates a page about a movie or movie studio or anything really to do with film. As far as I know, it only appears on "our" screen, because a lot of the time the new page creation is legitimate. Although you will still see it if you look at your "recent contributions" page. However, it was not the reason for the deletion of your page and there is nothing really I can do except suggest that the company might not be notable, and that if you're convinced that it is, read the guides on your talk page and make sure if you re-create the article that you show us plenty of examples of other people talking about your studio and not just links to Twitter, etc.  — Soap  —  12:09, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

86.99.59.156

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Geiger counter


 * Description
 * Im trying to edit this into better words however it doesnt let me!


 * Date and time
 * 12:05, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

It looks like vandalism to me; if not please give a clearer explanation.  — Soap  —  12:18, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

69.125.113.172

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Frederick Douglass


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 20:17, 22 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

i can not edit it


 * We know, that's what the edit filter does - it blocks obvious vandalism, such as blanking an entire article. No false positive. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 21:25, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

24.74.72.222

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * ITV Wales & West


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 21:06, 22 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Replacing the text with "hi" would be considered vandalism. → ♠ Gƒoley ↔ Four ♣ ← 03:11, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Jtompkins723

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Charlie Chan


 * Description
 * I was trying to edit the hyperlinked ISBN for the Charlie Chan novel to be directed to its page on its publisher's website.


 * Date and time
 * 21:28, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Im not sure if there's a policy on it or not, but this sounds like a commercial website. In any case, the only reason the edit filter tagged it is because you didn't do it correctly; you put in a redirect instead of a normal hyperlink. But, as I said, we don't normally link to publishers of books used as references in an article about something else.  — Soap  —  03:40, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

Briannyb1

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 21:58, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

A vandal.  — Soap  —  03:41, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

216.45.121.32

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 03:06, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

A vandal.  — Soap  —  03:41, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

91.111.98.212

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description
 * just trying to fill you in, you seem highly confused.


 * Date and time
 * 03:38, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Evidently another vandal.  — Soap  —  03:42, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

125.237.6.225

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 05:36, 23 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You haven't been touched by the filter. It's possible your IP address changed since you ran into the filter, however. Could you tell us which article you were editing, and what your IP address used to be? (if you happen to know, that is.) Someguy1221 (talk) 05:57, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

GBL

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Dot product


 * Description
 * Change markup to LaTeX (math). Proposed solution: Let the filter check that the only changes are confined to addition of "math" and "\" commands inside it.


 * Date and time
 * 13:40, 23 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Math isn't really my thing; it looks like the change was flagged because it was listed as a Minor change. Is it? UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 18:38, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

216.135.98.67

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 21:36, 24 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Pure vandalism. Blocked 6 months. Minima  c  ( talk ) 21:38, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Ruchikalia

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Shot of Love


 * Description
 * The link "http://www.rollingstone.com/news/coverstory/greatestsingers/page/7" on the last section of this page, namely "Notes and references" does not take you to the desired page. so I was trying to remove the section until it can be replaced with something that works.


 * Date and time
 * 01:05, 25 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

Note that the references are spelled out where they're linked from, the References section at the bottom is just a copy of that. It also looks like you removed a lot of other unrelated things which are not defective. In this case, the page had simply moved to a new URL, anyway, not been deleted. However that article needs a lot of work; I don't think I've seen a page that long with so many unreferenced statements in a long time. Feel free to remove any other unsourced/unreferenced statements that cannot be easily verified.  — Soap  —  01:16, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

96.25.191.170

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Fyodor_Pavlov-Andreevich


 * Description
 * Tried to change the slang word "dick" to "penis."


 * Date and time
 * 03:24, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Oddly, "penis" is on the stopword list, but "dick" isn't, perhaps because it's not case sensitive and therefore the name Dick and other legitimate uses of it would cause problems. I think there is nothing we can do but I'll paste the edit for you and hopefully this kind of problem won't come up much ... otherwise we'll have to start allowing edits consisting of just the word "penis" again.  — Soap  —  21:39, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

Jaker is me

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 04:23, 25 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Your friend's book does not get an encyclopedia article. Someguy1221 (talk) 04:28, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Theundecided10

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 06:54, 25 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Your band does not get an article. Someguy1221 (talk) 07:10, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

192.100.112.202

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Kitana (Mortal Kombat)


 * Description
 * some minor corrections, link updates and adding character ranking info from few sites


 * Date and time
 * 09:59, 25 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

Well it was the word "FUCKALITY" towards the bottom, which I've pasted in (but if it is removed by another editor, I would talk to them instead of adding it back in, since this filter is unlikely to ever be turned off.)  Do you have the rest of the text saved?  — Soap  —  21:38, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

209.174.60.8

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 20:12, 25 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Care to explain what you were trying to do? Someguy1221 (talk) 07:40, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Biggles38

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * []


 * Description
 * remove entry


 * Date and time
 * 08:52, 26 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * That isn't how you delete an article. Try WP:Articles for deletion instead. The filter did not erroneously trip here. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 22:29, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Thecopshothimself

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 15:15, 26 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * That article would be deleted as an A7 since it's just that one line. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 22:28, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Gizmoch

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * A Very Rucka Christmas


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 22:15, 26 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I am going to suspect this is a false-positive, and that the filter's tripping on the racial epithets. However, the article would be wholly unreferenced if it had not been stopped by the filter. Do you have sources? — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 22:32, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

67.255.73.130

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 23:36, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Attempted spamming, filter working properly. NawlinWiki (talk) 23:42, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

108.14.65.122

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 02:08, 27 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

Filter working. Ajltalk 02:12, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Maximiii

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 06:30, 27 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I see no false-positive here. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 06:54, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

80.6.176.67

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description
 * I DIDNT DO NOTHINK WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA


 * Date and time
 * 17:13, 27 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * False report from a thwarted would-be vandal. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 17:47, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

117.193.10.120

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 17:27, 27 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Filter appears to have acted properly. Could you explain why it was necessary to attempt to blank out the page Teja (film director)? -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 17:43, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Mazordude

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * I am sorry i didnt mean to edit any thing


 * Description
 * nothin =g sorry


 * Date and time
 * 19:54, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

No legitimate edits that I can see.  — Soap  —  22:48, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

98.110.193.54

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 03:20, 28 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I see no false-positive here. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 03:56, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

72.82.38.238

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Rancid (band)


 * Description
 * Within the first paragraph of the page, there is a sentence fragment. When attempting to fix the mistake several times, I get a message saying that my edits may be potentially not constructive, and that the automatic filter will not proceed to save my changes. I tried both signed into my account and signed out. Please fix this problem.


 * Date and time
 * 06:25, 28 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * This filter's NawlinWiki's sacred cow. Take it up with him. (I will note, however, that this has also hit WP:ANI.) — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 06:36, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

NatalieDaRosa

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Timothy P. Riley


 * Description
 * Trying to start a new Wiki page


 * Date and time
 * 06:26, 28 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Your article would have been severely rewritten to bring it in line with our policy requiring a neutral point of view. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 06:35, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

124.178.181.84

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 07:52, 28 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * False report from a thwarted would-be vandal. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 08:09, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

24.199.123.35

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Melissa Leo


 * Description
 * I was removing the word "spontaneously", as there is no data to support that claim, and it's possibly not true.

Also, I was cleaning up the "dropping the f-bomb" bit -- and quoting the word she actually said, which was "fucking". People not familiar with English idiom, at least, are not well served by the euphemism - nor are people in general. I left in the "f-bomb" link and stuck it in parentheses, as I think it's fine to have it there, mainly because the major media meme post-show has been using that expression.
 * Date and time
 * 08:56, 28 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I went and made the edit for you. Thanks for letting us know. Soap, if you're reading this, I bow to your precognitive abilities. Someguy1221 (talk) 10:04, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

81.0.157.201

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 11:23, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

I don't see any legitimate-looking edits here; could you explain what you were doing?  — Soap  —  13:04, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

showwrote
kjlghk
 * A vandal.  — Soap  —  13:04, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

137.205.142.122

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 14:59, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

A vandal.  — Soap  —  15:00, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

173.15.141.101

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 17:25, 28 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Filter acted correctly. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 18:36, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

67.136.153.114

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description
 * I was trying to add in some posotive information about subway!


 * Date and time
 * 19:03, 28 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Your recent editing attempts at the Subway (restaurant) article that actually tripped the filter were unconstructive. Therefore, the filter acted properly. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 19:35, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Cetlan

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 19:11, 28 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The disallowed edit was clearly unconstructive; therefore, the filter acted correctly. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 19:21, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

141.217.173.162

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 19:30, 28 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

false positive when I tried to honestly edit an article


 * False report from a vandal who is currently blocked for 6 hours. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 19:41, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

75.111.139.127

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 00:58, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

A vandal.  — Soap  —  04:10, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

Wrebecca.m10

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Being Globally Responsible Conference


 * Description
 * This was a newly created article. I am not sure why it was 'filtered'.  How can I have it posted LIVE?


 * Date and time
 * 15:08, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

All I see is a warning saying that a large edit should not be marked as "minor". A new page, by definition, is not a minor edit, so there should be no reason to mark it as one. I've said to others that I don't really see a need for this filter to exist, but it does, and it was acting correctly in this case.  — Soap  —  15:13, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

Cj005257

 * Username
 * - edited first without logging it at


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Portal:Rock Climbing


 * Description
 * Tried to add the following code to the top. Didn't let me at first be after I logged in it worked fine.


 * Date and time
 * 21:54, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

The "position absolute" has occasionally been used for vandalism. It is rare, but when it happens it's a big enough problem (since it can cover up the tabs, sidebar, etc. leaving no way for most people to figure out how to edit a page) that we need to have the filter on all the time. Sorry for the inconvenience.  — Soap  —  22:40, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

Aether9000

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description
 * Eye wuz edititing sum stuf


 * Date and time
 * 00:20, 2 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

I was uhhhhh idk man
 * Another vandal.  — Soap  —  00:23, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

72.234.61.173

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 07:58, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Pure vandalism. Minima c  ( talk ) 12:01, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

Omrigilan

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Ian Zachary Whittingham


 * Description
 * i was trying to post my article and it asked to me enter the text into the textbox which i did twice and it rejected it. it also mentioned something about external links, most likely from my sources

i was just trying to post my article!!!!
 * Date and time
 * 16:31, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Answered on your talk page.  — Soap  —  03:57, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

146.186.218.203

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 17:46, 2 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Pure vandalism. Minima  c  ( talk ) 18:08, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

78.146.48.212

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 17:53, 2 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Not a false positive. Please refrain from inserting your personal opinions into articles. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 23:50, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

142.227.53.193

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 18:26, 2 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

in my bum
 * Definitely a false report from a thwarted would-be vandal. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 23:53, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Lika sumbodeee

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * How to get blocked


 * Description
 * I was creating this page and the "automated filter" disallowed it. i followed the instructions for if you think this is an error and it said to click save page again and report the error. i clicked save page and it still came up with "AUTOMATED BLAH BLAH BLAH" so i report NOW.


 * Date and time
 * 23:29, 2 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Note: The filer has been blocked indefinitely as a vandalism-only account. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 04:04, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

108.13.152.106

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description
 * I was trying to say that Eros is the GOD of love!!


 * Date and time
 * 04:13, 3 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Pure vandalism from this editor. Although it stopped, it attempted to vandalise five times. Minima  c  ( talk ) 05:59, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Writerose

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Billy Doolan


 * Description
 * I was creating a biography of a living artist called Billy Doolan. To the best of my recollection, there were no email addresses in the text or references that I attempted to save yet I got an automatic warning that said it looked like I was trying to post an email address. Incidentally I find your instructions above could be worded in a far more polite manner. Where is the adherence to assuming good faith on the basis of users of this reporting mechanism?


 * Date and time
 * 05:10, 3 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * One of the links you provide includes abs [atsign] nrp.nsf as part of its URL, which tripped the trigger. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  23:56, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Cbkia0000

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 07:42, 3 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another bogus report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  23:58, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

24.207.51.104

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 04:55, 4 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * False report from a thwarted would-be vandal. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 05:11, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

207.190.85.98

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 16:25, 4 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Pure vandalism. Minima  c  ( talk ) 18:40, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Levityadmin

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Craig Shoemaker


 * Description
 * add the book: “What You Have Now… What Your Mommy Had Then.”


 * Date and time
 * 18:30, 4 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The filter stopped your edit because it inserted "Your Mommy" which is typically added by non-constructive editors. Thank you for reporting this. I have added the edit for you, despite the fact that I've tagged it as requiring a citation. Minima  c  ( talk ) 18:38, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

72.152.120.17

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User_talk:Machine_Elf_1735


 * Description
 * Fixing an unclosed tag on the user discussion page.


 * Date and time
 * 18:58, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Because of abuse by vandals it is no longer permitted to use nowiki tags in userspace except for certain "cleared" users. Sorry. It seems that the relevant page section has been deleted by the user, anyway.  — Soap  —  21:53, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

99.165.73.246

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description
 * deleted evrything tring to add 1910-2011=101 years and didnt know how know to deletee it


 * Date and time
 * 20:54, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Could you explain better what you're trying to do? I don't see you adding anything, just deleting most of the page. Was this an accident?  — Soap  —  21:54, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

69.67.144.103

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 22:48, 4 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

dude, what the beep?
 * The filter appears to be working properly here.  — Soap  —  02:26, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Hyenadan

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Daniel W Barrett


 * Description
 * i was creating this page with no advertising or anything and there is nothing wrong with it. i didnt steal anything considering it is me


 * Date and time
 * 22:54, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

The filter was correctly detecting you adding a link with your username in it. Please read WP:Notability for more information about Wikipedia's inclusion standards; it isn't that easy to get an article about you. Generally if you're notable you won't have any trouble getting people to believe it. — Soap  —  02:25, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

Writegambler

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * J. Darroll Hall Author


 * Description
 * provide recent and updated information and source information.


 * Date and time
 * 01:33, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

It was the capitalized "bitch" that set it off, but that book appears to be self-published, so you probably shouldn't be linking to it anyway. In fact I would advise you to read AUTHOR and related pages such as Notability (books) if you are not familiar with Wikipedia's notability guidelines for authors.  — Soap  —  02:23, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

Snoball666norrie

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 04:09, 5 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Nothing but pure vandalism attempts. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 04:18, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Killerjj4444

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description
 * roar- the utterance of the animal


 * Date and time
 * 09:59, 5 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

it was an accident i didnt now how wikipedia workes
 * You wiped out the References section, which is where all the references are listed. The filter caught and tagged it. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 10:17, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Corvos99

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Pokemon Ranger Shadows Of Almia


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 12:53, 5 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Your personal opinions/reviews about the game should not be placed in the article, as doing so would violate Wikipedia's neutral point-of-view policy. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 17:37, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

67.142.170.22

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description
 * on the Naruto: Clash of Ninja (series) page, a person had amended in a new game with the intel he got from the official company. I know it's real because I got the same info. the page was edited during the night and someone (a dumbastard) was trying to prove that wiki can lie and sabotaged the entire page! they deleted all the history info and messed up the character info and deleted everything else. Fortunately, I had previously looked at the page under the "edit" tab and i clicked "BACK" on my browser and found the original page before the vandalism. I was trying to put the info back, but wikipedia won't allow me too! This info is important and needs to be put back on the site and I may be the only one who has an exact copy of the data. I need to put the info back on the site. Can you help?


 * Date and time
 * 15:58, 5 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I went ahead and reverted the vandalism for you. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 17:53, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

98.163.238.215

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 22:39, 5 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * A blatant vandal. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 23:33, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

59.178.172.116

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * JSSATE Noida


 * Description
 * I was trying to simply throw light on reality!


 * Date and time
 * 07:53, 6 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * no you didn't; "sucks" and ALLCAPS is not shedding light. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 07:55, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

213.246.80.217

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Template:Airports in Greece


 * Description
 * Flag to left of text (see alignments elsewhere), less chunky dots.


 * Date and time
 * 18:42, 6 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I'm going to defer to an admin on this one - I'm reluctant to answer requests involving sockpuppet or LTA filters. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 19:37, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 * As much as I admire NawlinWiki and his extreme patience, I'm going to have to ask him to spend more time on this page, at least when it comes to questions like this that only he can answer. I can see what set off the filter, but I can't tell why it is on the list of badwords, and likely not many other admins would know either.  In the meantime I've made the edit reported here.   —  Soap  —  00:02, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Doesn't look like the edit got through after all. 213.246.80.217 (talk) 11:56, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Should be OK now.  — Soap  —  00:46, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Your attention is appreciated. 213.246.114.92 (talk) 18:21, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Iamafrenchking

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * List of French Consorts


 * Description
 * I was trying to correct an error. Queen Louise de Lorraine married Henri III on 13 February 1575, but the chart states she was not crowned.  This is an error - she was jointly crowned with her husband the following day on 14 February 1575.  She was one of the few Queens that was not crowned at St. Denis, but at Reims with her husband.


 * Date and time
 * 07:22, 7 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Something in the edit summary was what tripped the filter, but I have no idea what. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 19:34, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The string "Dynasty (House" is seen by the filter as Nasty Ho. I've removed that phrase from the list of words, since it has caused problems before, but I'm not confident in making the edit since there's no link to an external source to verify it.  —  Soap  —  23:30, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

66.228.80.2

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 18:33, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

This really hurts my feelings to make an error like this.
 * Comments
 * I see no false-positive here, so stop with the fake sympathy. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 19:33, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Multinationalcorporation

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 20:14, 7 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * You've been here *how* long and you've already got a laundry list of what I assume (from looking at the most recent one) are legitimate positives? Admin! — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 20:21, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Another bogus report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  20:23, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Osono

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 02:15, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

PLEASE REMOVE THIS OBIT, STEPHANIE DID NOT WANT TNIS ON THE INTERNET!
 * Comments
 * Then contact OTRS. We do not acquiesce to someone's on-wiki request to remove sourced and cited information, end of. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 03:29, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Goldstein1996

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 05:10, 8 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * No false positive with edits. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:25, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

24.38.121.66

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 15:06, 8 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another bogus report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  15:08, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Dpeverel

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * George P. Smith II


 * Description
 * I am trying to create a new page on an Indiana Law School Alum. I make the page and then i get a message telling me to enter a capcha because I have external links as references.  I enter the capcha and try to save page again and get a warning saying that the edit was not constructive and my page was not saved.  please help.


 * Date and time
 * 15:25, 8 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * The system is blocking the edits because the article as written includes long strings of all-caps text. ALL CAPS is a form of "shouting" in internet text, and our filters interpret such strings as vandalism. Do these magazines really put their article and review titles in all-caps? If you correct this, restoring the case of the article and review titles to the cases actually used, this block should cease. (I would advise you, also, to read WP:EL and perhaps WP:CITE in order to understand why external links in place of actual formatted references are considered a bad sign in a proposed article.) -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  15:41, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Miss333

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 16:56, 8 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Please do not insert nonsense into articles. If you want to make test edits, please go to the sandbox. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 18:04, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

82.95.163.173

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * House


 * Description
 * Trying to revert changes.


 * Date and time
 * 22:25, 8 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The edit that you tried to revert was an inappropriate cut-and-paste from House (TV series), so I went ahead and undid the edit for you. Thank you for reporting this. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 23:05, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

98.212.8.252

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Evernote


 * Description
 * I was telling my good experience


 * Date and time
 * 00:33, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

A vandal.  — Soap  —  00:43, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

Crouchie999

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 02:02, 9 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Nothing but vandalism attempts. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 05:01, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

71.136.253.126

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 05:44, 9 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Could you explain why you attempted to delete material at the Trust seal page? -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 08:20, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Kilmuckridge

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Karin Dubsky


 * Description
 * I was trying to add some references to Karin's page, as a notability tag had been added by an editor requesting secondary sources. The references I was adding were from RTE, the Irish national broadcasting authority, and included video news clips and web news only - no advertisements.


 * Date and time
 * 10:57, 9 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * It's because one of the links you edited has the string "kilmuckridge" - your username - in it. Normally such links are added by spam accounts. The edit should have gone thru, as the filter merely tagged it. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 18:48, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

168.212.224.99

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * I am the Walrus


 * Description
 * change stuff!!!!!!!


 * Date and time
 * 20:00, 9 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Pure vandalism. Minima  c  ( talk ) 20:14, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

137.86.183.49

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 21:53, 9 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

SUCKS BRAH
 * False report from a thwarted would-be vandal. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 22:05, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Manuelt15

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Home on the Range


 * Description
 * Hello, I think there is a bug with filter 225, check abuselog 4385845, there's nothing in all caps.


 * Date and time
 * 03:08, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

It was in the edit summary. Your own edit didn't trigger the filter because you've been around long enough to be considered "confirmed".  — Soap  —  03:20, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * Oh right, I forgot about the edit summary. Thanks :) -- Màñüé£†¹5 talk 05:00, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Ldub123

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 03:34, 10 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Nothing but vandalism attempts. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 05:37, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

168.10.26.145

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 14:17, 10 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Another bogus report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:50, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Iamawesome16

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 16:46, 10 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Filter properly flagged your edit to hoax article. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:51, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

189.155.155.50

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Monty Hall Problem


 * Description
 * saying what is best


 * Date and time
 * 18:54, 10 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Another bogus report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:07, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Morgan rathbone

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 20:08, 10 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another bogus report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  20:20, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Emk100

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 00:11, 11 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

No edit summary, no explanation. Please explain what you were trying to do or we're just going to have to assume you're another vandal.  — Soap  —  00:15, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

71.224.73.184

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 01:50, 11 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Filter acted correctly. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 02:17, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

97.64.177.101

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 02:19, 11 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another bogus report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  03:19, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

109.76.78.42

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 18:16, 11 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Your unexplained content removal attempt does not appear to be constructive. Could you explain why you attempted the edit in question? -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 20:13, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

71.184.207.67

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 21:25, 12 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

A vandal.  — Soap  —  21:28, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

77.101.177.149

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 21:32, 12 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

ghujdhhgfhj
 * A vandal.  — Soap  —  21:37, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

75.73.201.218

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 01:58, 13 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Vandalism. — G FOLEY   F OUR  — 02:22, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Talk2todd

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 07:30, 13 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I see no false-positive here. Wikipedia is not a place to wage crusades. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 07:47, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

69.118.61.152

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 17:39, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

A vandal.  — Soap  —  17:42, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

72.87.82.159

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Government of Hong Kong


 * Description
 * I was just trying to add some extremely vital information that the original author had left out.


 * Date and time
 * 21:03, 13 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Nope, what you attempted to do is called vandalism. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 21:33, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

174.116.22.88

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description
 * hey is another way of saying hello.


 * Date and time
 * 22:07, 13 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

A vandal.  — Soap  —  22:24, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

202.126.198.66

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 00:51, 14 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Personal attacks correctly thwarted by filter. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 04:27, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

116.12.251.216

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 03:45, 14 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA


 * Frivolous report from a thwarted would-be vandal. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 04:20, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

69.251.214.84

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description
 * add the rest of rogert ebert's quote

When I think of the elegant construction of something like "Gunfight at the OK Corral," I want to rend the hair from my head and weep bitter tears of despair. Generations of filmmakers devoted their lives to perfecting techniques that a director like Jonathan Liebesman is either ignorant of, or indifferent to. Yet he is given millions of dollars to produce this assault on the attention span of a generation.

Young men: If you attend this crap with friends who admire it, tactfully inform them they are idiots. Young women: If your date likes this movie, tell him you've been thinking it over, and you think you should consider spending some time apart.
 * Date and time
 * 06:08, 14 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * That's too big a chunk of the review to pass copyright muster, in my opinion. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  14:02, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

XxCUPPSxX

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description
 * rebecca hall


 * Date and time
 * 09:42, 14 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Frivolous "article" properly blocked by well-written filter. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  14:03, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

64.18.42.167

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 14:35, 14 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Filter acted correctly. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 16:28, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Dinoridingjesus

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 20:21, 14 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * VOA. Admin? — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 20:50, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Jcckid

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Jason Carlos Cox


 * Description
 * Create a page


 * Date and time
 * 02:48, 15 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The filter was triggered because the URL of the Facebook page that you cited contains a string that matches your Wikipedia username. If the article that you recently created is about yourself, please see WP:Autobiography to learn why Wikipedia users are strongly discouraged from writing autobiographies on Wikipedia. Also, considering that your article has been nominated for speedy deletion, I suggest that you read the notability guidelines. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 03:42, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Podgy62

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Phonovision


 * Description
 * clicking link to www.tvdawn.com produced warning message from my computer's Norton Internet Security that the site was an "attack site." Google search for tvdawn.com brought up three examples of URLs flagged "This site may harm your computer." It appears these links were placed maliciously (or the destination site has been compromised), so I removed the links to protect users who may not have up-to-date antivirus protection. Apologies if I did anything wrong.


 * Date and time
 * 06:27, 15 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Generally you do not remove the reference list; you comment out the link in the citation, I believe, with hidden tags. (I'm not 100% on this, however; seek confirmation.) You also wiped out a template. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 09:43, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

81.159.213.111

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink) IPad2
 * 


 * Description
 * I was writing about the ipad2's release date.


 * Date and time
 * 16:53, 15 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * First, it is not necessary to type in all-caps or place several exclamation points at the end of a sentence. Second, your attempt to encourage people to purchase a particular product would have violated Wikipedia's neutral point-of-view policy. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 17:07, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

137.164.201.74

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 17:33, 15 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Vandal. — G FOLEY   F OUR  — 17:35, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Dick johnston

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 19:59, 15 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another bogus report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  20:03, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

68.196.51.62

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Not George Washington


 * Description
 * I was trying to make the world a better place for all of us in America. But if some of you butts wont let me than ur a piece of crap.


 * Date and time
 * 00:09, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

A vandal, tripped filter 46 among others.  — Soap  —  00:14, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

Swatnio

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * WTFPL


 * Description
 * I added the version 1.0 of the License (like in http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/WTFPL ) but it didn't let me:

Your action has triggered the Abuse Filter. An automated filter has identified this edit as potentially unconstructive, and it has been disallowed. If this edit is constructive
 * Date and time
 * 02:25, 16 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * It's because of the last part - this filter trips on almost any sequence of letters in all-caps. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 03:50, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
 * So what should I do to write the V1.0 License? because the original is "all-caps"... Swatnio (talk) 21:53, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I'd sooner say so in private so as not to tip our hand to vandals... check your talk page. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 04:12, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

75.57.242.120

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Dining philosophers problem


 * Description
 * Trying to remove most of the contents of "example solution" section, which consists of overly verbose and buggy code (see talk page), stopped by section blanking filter. I also tried adding a link at the same time, which got into a filter loop between the link captcha and the blanking filter. After enough attempts to work around that, I apparently stopped being able to edit the page at all.


 * Date and time
 * 08:09, 16 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * See below. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 15:04, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

75.57.242.120

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Dining philosophers problem


 * Description
 * This is really annoying; attempting to just remove that section (or part of it), without trying to add a ref/link like before, still gives a "Some material on Wikipedia should be removed, for example vandalism and false or libelous information. If this is what you're doing, and you believe your removal is correct, please go to the bottom of this page and press 'Save page' to continue", where trying to save the page just goes back to the same dialog. This seems like a bug to me.


 * Date and time
 * 12:06, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Sorry for this problem; all I can really say is that it doesn't seem to happen very often, as I've never seen a report like this before. Perhaps there has been a recent change in the captcha system, but that isn't controlled by the editors the way the edit filter is. If this becomes common it is likely this filter will be deleted.  — Soap  —  20:34, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * Only the first report (where I was trying to remove the section and add a link in the same edit) involved captchas. This report is that it was plain impossible to remove a block of text if the filter triggered.  I found a way to prevent the filter from triggering but I think there is still a bug in the filter mechanism.  I do have some unusual browser settings that could conceivably be interfering with the reconfirmation scheme so I might try reproducing the problem from another browser.  75.57.242.120 (talk) 19:33, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Maxslam13

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * American Bison


 * Description
 * I was trying to show why they breed easy with cattle.


 * Date and time
 * 23:24, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

I only see hits for leatherback sea turtle ... in that case, there is a bug that appears once in a while when several people try to edit a page and none of them save their edits ... but that doesn't seem to be what you're reporting.  ♣ Soap  ♣  00:59, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * The filter didn't block you when you were editing American bison (although your edits were unsourced and likely to be removed anyway). You were blocked from editing leatherback sea turtle because you twice tried to insert a sentence randomly into the middle of a footnote, thus breaking the references. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  18:32, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

174.24.215.64

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 18:18, 18 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * The filter caught the vulgarity which you inserted into the body of the article's text. Instead, you should have posted to the talk page of the article, without the vulgarity or the ALL CAPS, WHICH IS THE SAME AS SHOUTING; and somebody would have dealt with it. I do thank you, though, for drawing our attention to this obvious hoax from a now-blocked editor. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  18:26, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

75.216.153.191

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Heatwave Central Heating


 * Description
 * I was changing the name of a song. It is listed as "Party Pops" but the song is actually titled "Party Poops."


 * Date and time
 * 03:36, 19 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Danke, redoing edit. However, filter's not technically at fault (as most "poop" edits added by anons and new users are almost-unanimously vandalism). — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 04:25, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

24.247.203.191

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * turkish people


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 21:55, 19 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I see no false-positive here. — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 22:15, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

24.233.99.119

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * sandbox


 * Description
 * it was on the sandbox i did a thing that was long line of test for a test


 * Date and time
 * 22:32, 19 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I see no false-positive here (and editor tripped filter twice more before reporting.) — Jeremy  ( v^_^v Hyper Combo K.O.! ) 01:02, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

76.206.47.149

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 14:59, 20 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

fuck uy
 * A vandal.  — Soap  —  15:24, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Ky-Ky10

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 17:21, 20 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The page that you attempted to create would have been marked as vandalism and speedily deleted. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 17:45, 20 March 2011 (UTC)