Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives/Archive 18

97.77.103.82

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:Eagles247


 * Description
 * I was trying to respond on a user's talk page. We are discussing the inclusion of a source. It is the talk page: User_talk:Eagles247


 * Date and time
 * 21:37, 21 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Thanks for the report. I have let User:Eagles247 know you tried to leave a message for him. 28bytes (talk) 21:45, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment: User is now blocked for 6 months as a ban-evading sock.  — Soap  —  00:42, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
 * He is now back on edit warring on the page that got him blocked in the first place. .  This is the original user http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3ACAtruthwatcher 24.239.153.58 (talk) 22:49, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

81.139.184.183

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:209.218.163.2


 * Description
 * I was trying to delete odd vandalism.


 * Date and time
 * 11:48, 22 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Thank you for the report. I've removed that text for you. Sorry for the inconvenience! 28bytes (talk) 12:22, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

71.41.38.234

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User:Rockerchic1080


 * Description
 * its a page about Me, alicia livernois. I dont know who made it, but the information is completely false and i wanted to edit it out.


 * Date and time
 * 17:56, 22 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Wikipedia is not a social networking site. I will be sending that userpage to MfD momentarily. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 18:21, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

85.210.209.111

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 19:44, 22 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I don't see any filter hits from your IP. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 19:51, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Nprfan77

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 18:38, 24 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I will defer to another filter manager given the filter tripped. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 19:56, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I found what triggered it, but I'm not certain how much I should post here given the nature of the filter. Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:38, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Psjenest

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 02:50, 25 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Sorry about that. I've fixed the problem. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky)  02:53, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Gk202

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * List_of_world's_fairs


 * Description
 * Tried to change the flag for Turin 1858 from Italy1861 to Kingdom of Sardinia 1816.


 * Date and time
 * 06:46, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

This has the potential to cause a lot of problems. Did you get your edits through? — Soap  —  16:21, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

Johnflalor

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Merom Golan


 * Description
 * In the strongest sense, I wish to complain about the bevahiour of wikieditor Supreme Deliciousness. His/her description of the "consensus" behind the condemnation of Israel's "occupation" of the Golan Heights is rife with bias & personal opinion - something of which he/she accuses me. He/she uses the BBC as objective legal reporting on the Conventions.  A proper, responsible editor would go straight to the source - i.e. the Geneva Conventions themselves.  Moreover, the use of Tom Segev as a source further discredits this editor, as Segev has never hidden his partisanship and antipathy of Israel.

I have been unable to contact Supreme Deliciousness directly, and my edits have been undone. I have thus been unable to add citations to my original post (I am new to wikiediting and have to learn this). This is journalistic thuggery of the most cynical kind. It is disgraceful and damages wikipedia as a reliable information source.
 * Date and time
 * 07:52, 25 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

You're on the wrong page. This is more like a WP:ANI item. Also, you've only edited twice since February. Which edits of "yours" have been undone recently? ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 07:55, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

The one I posted: 18:18, 18 April 2011 Johnflalor (3,086 bytes)
 * SD said, "this looks like personal commentary", and I'm inclined to agree with that assessment. You were editorializing. It had to go. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 08:34, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

1. "It had to go"? Fair enough - TEMPORARILY. So, where's my opportunity to put in the ample citations for my arguments? 2. Would you not say Supreme Deliciousness was editorialising? I presume it is not the case in wikipedia that ANY citations will do? (See my point above about the poor quality of Supreme Deliciousness' citations.)

Finally, and to support my point: I see that another biased page on Israel (Neve Ativ) that I previously edited has been re-edited by none other than Supreme Deliciousness! Making the same biased points ("consensus"), using the same weak, 2nd-hand references (BBC, rather than Geneva Conventions directly). This is lazy, cut-&-paste, biased editorialising by a man/woman who CLEARLY has an axe to grind about the Jewish State...


 * This is a content dispute. Work it out on the talk page of the article. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 09:38, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Dkmiec

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Douglas Kmiec


 * Description
 * I was requesting help from this editor who had previously updated my page for additional updating help. I have some helpful citations, but now do not know how i might convey them and to whom.


 * Date and time
 * 15:20, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Make sure you dont accidentally post on the userpage instead of the user talk page; the filter shows that's what you were doing. Not a vandalism edit by any means, but still a mistake, and that is what the filter message is intended to warn you about. The message is pretty badly written, I agree. Here is what it is:
 * Comments

For a filter with nearly 0% false positives that would be OK, for something like this it probably should be worked on. I apologize if the message bothered you. However it is still correct in that you should be editing the talk page instead of the user page.  — Soap  —  16:19, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I apologize as well, since I wrote the filter and the message; the wording is intended to discourage attempts at circumvention. I considered the trade-off worth making, as receiving the types of attacks which the filter catches is probably as disturbing as a false positive (see the log; it's prevented some pretty rough stuff.) I'm open to removing the last sentence though. The filter itself worked as intended, since the message was posted on the wrong page. However, I've added another test to detect userspace drafts. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky)  18:42, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Update &mdash; I've removed the warning above and added some more checks against false positives. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky)  07:01, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Johnflalor

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Merom Golan


 * Description
 * This is an issue extending from my repeated attempts to update an edit (which was deleted) I made a few days ago. I have been blocked from doing so.

Overall, I am troubled by the editing concerns of many people here. I have complained about the gross partisanship of Supreme Deliciousness (see: Merom Golan, Neve Ativ, amongst many others). What I have discovered is that many editors are purely interested in the "wiki'ing" side of editing: the location of the topic, lexographically correct posting, and general compu-pragmatic issues. There seems far, far less regard for the accuracy of said postings. While these rules are essential for the fluid operation of wiki'ing, where is the concurrent concern for accurate material? Surely if the material is partial, partisan, and, in Supreme Deliciousness' repeated case, very weakly referenced (i.e. secondary sources, rather than primary), what use is the high quality upkeep of the site??
 * Date and time
 * 10:33, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

I've deleted the filter that was causing this problem, however I won't re-do the edit itself as that would indicate that I have taken a side in the dispute which I don't endorse. I would recommend using the talk page as recommended by the other editor. I mean no disrespect to you or your position.  — Soap  —  11:42, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

Weintraub.a

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Robert Levithan


 * Description
 * a page detailing the career of writer and AIDS activist Robert Levithan


 * Date and time
 * 15:52, 27 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Thanks for the report. The problem with the edit was the use of ALL-CAPS for the play titles. Please try again using title-case: for example, "The Vagina Monologues" instead of "THE VAGINA MONOLOGUES". Certain words in all-caps trigger vandalism filters. Sorry for the inconvenience! 28bytes (talk) 16:03, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
 * A large number of all-caps characters in a row also trip filters. —Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 08:14, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Kkniech

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * bitchue


 * Description
 * definition of a term describing someone who is being annoying by complaing about an issue that is of little of no significance and/or the amount of complaining is or will annoy others.


 * Date and time
 * 02:43, 28 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * If the article in question had been created successfully, it would have been marked for deletion. Please see WP:DICTIONARY and WP:MADEUP. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 02:50, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

220.255.2.122

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:Emily123456


 * Description
 * Issuing warnings (first using Template:Uw-vandalism1, then Template:Uw-delete1


 * Date and time
 * 08:48, 28 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Fixed. You should be able to make similar edits in the future. -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 17:29, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

4.253.96.72

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Talk page for user NawlinWiki


 * Description
 * I was adding a new section pertaining to an article that was deleted today.


 * Date and time
 * 01:44, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

I knew this was going to happen someday ... the word 'masturbation' was on the list of stopwords, because sadly enough it is often used by anonymous vandals, but since it has legitimate uses including this one I've removed it and apologize for the inconvenience (also, I was not the one who added it to the list in the first place.)  — Soap  —  01:48, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * And it appears that NawlinWiki has already addressed your request by deleting the summary of the deletion of the page.  — Soap  —  01:50, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Paju64

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description
 * Queer As Folk (UK)

I was trying to add information about the origin of the title of the TV program. I am trying to source phtographs that will illustrate the edit but that will take some time. I am a bit new to this so it may be that what I am doing should actually be a "notation" or a "Reference" but my proposed edit is factual, detailsed and accurate as well as entered in good faith. theinformation is accurate since the actions and actors referred to within the edit are all still alive and the activities and history referred to is recalled by them. I would be happy fgor you to provide advice. Perhaps an alternative location, an alternate page - perhaps about the street art scene in the SA capital - that would take me longer to develop though and I would need a fair bit of help. I am quite genuine and the information is factual and I think useful in its location of the name of the TV program within the zeitgeist or spirit of that time. It doesn't detract from the details of the original, but does add depth ofinformation about thed evelopment of the title. (PS - I do need to correct some typo's. I have, in my word version but would need to in this, the online version.)
 * Date and time
 * 02:11, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

If you remove the all caps in the edit it will go through. While I agree this is a false positive there's really no chance that this filter could be disabled and the edit filter software doesn't have the capability to exempt edits individually. I or another long-term user could capitalize the words later. But before I do any of that I want to recommend you find references for all of the content you are adding, or else the content may end up being removed regardless. That's the only reason why I'm not willing to simply copy your text into the article myself. I apologize for the inconvenience but I want to take this time to try to encourage you to find references first before you make big changes on any article.  — Soap  —  02:28, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

85.180.144.149

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Talk:Bouncy ball


 * Description
 * It would be nice if the warning or refusal linked directly to the definition of the filter that was triggered.

The information is too hard to find in the user's filter log because the log itself is not easy to find. As a means of education, I think it's more effective to tell people immediately *what* they were doing wrong, for public filters at least.

Also, it would be nice if the warning or refusal stated "if you keep trying this, you will be blocked".

Tried to add the following to the top of the page:

Yes, like that, in commented-out form, tried once with and once without the nowiki. The filter triggered is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseFilter/139. Above, I have spaced the "absolute" to avoid the filter.
 * Date and time
 * 10:05, 29 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

What do you think of this message? Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky)  10:34, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Great! When reading it the first time, I actually missed the link to the filter, maybe because the wording "An automated filter" suggests a link to a generic explanation of the notion of "edit filter". A wording like "Automated filter 139" or "The Fixed position vandalism filter" (using the public description from the filter's definition) would make it clear that the link leads to the specific filter that was triggered. Actually I was thinking about a generic message applicable to all filters alike. On the one hand, using a dedicated message for every filter allows for easy-to-understand messages. On the other hand, they are probably more work to write. 85.180.159.155 (talk) 16:47, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the feedback! I've updated the message. <font color="#BBAED0">Feezo <font size="-2">(send a signal | watch the sky)  20:37, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

MonicaFORA

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Ian Dunbar


 * Description
 * editing external links section to link to a video presentation/talk given by Dunbar


 * Date and time
 * 17:52, 29 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * COI.Jasper Deng (talk) 02:43, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

98.246.191.164

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * TBD TV


 * Description
 * The channel is currently called NewsChannel 8, but was briefly called TBD TV. There was one outdated reference to TBD TV that I updated to NewsChannel 8. I also removed a notice (that I originally wrote) about old information pertaining to TBD TV, because the old info had been updated.


 * Date and time
 * 13:45, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

I don't really see a need for this filter since it has only stopped 5 edits in the last six weeks and one of those was yours. I have disabled the filter and there should not be any trouble in the future.  — Soap  —  16:34, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

194.150.65.41

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:Mifter


 * Description
 * I tried to remove a section I had created. I know I shouldn't be editing others' talk pages but I just wanted to take my message back since he evidently doesn't have time for it. (Could someone remove that for me?)


 * Date and time
 * 15:26, 30 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

He'll still get the orange bar and likely want to go into the history to see what the message was, but OK, I'll remove the text.  — Soap  —  16:18, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Tamannatamanna

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 16:03, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Nobody is going to be able to answer this report unless you can tell us what you were trying to do and why. The "Description" field is there for you to fill it in. Otherwise it just looks like you were trying to rewrite the whole article by replacing it with something completely different, which is not really something you should do.  — Soap  —  16:21, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

162.40.51.34

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Department of Fun - Radial Ultra Cross


 * Description
 * adding a word (it's Dept of Fun!)


 * Date and time
 * 01:33, 1 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

162.40.51.34

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Department of Fun/Word Association/Radial Ultra Cross


 * Description
 * adding a word


 * Date and time
 * 01:34, 1 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

162.40.51.34

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Department of Fun/Word Association/Radial Ultra Cross


 * Description
 * adding a word to the game


 * Date and time
 * 01:39, 1 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

You should be able to do the edit now; sorry for the inconvenience.  — Soap  —  10:54, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Tresory

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 02:13, 2 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * You hit the pagemove throttle, intended to keep people from doing rapid-fire pagemove vandalism. By now, you should be able to move pages... —<font color="228B22">Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 00:04, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

96.39.62.90

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Goal!


 * Description
 * I have no idea what the fuck this page is, or why I'm now barred from editing this page in order to fix a redirect to a disambiguation page, but I'm extremely pissed off at the fact that when I tried to fix your encyclopedia for you I got screens of incomprehensible colored boxes yelling at me and then dumped to a confusing page that makes no fucking sense. Please consider creating an interface for the fucking site instead of a wave of impenetrable pseudocode and warning boxes. Thanks, and please change that page so it doesn't redirect to Goal! (film) and is instead a disambiguation page that distinguishes between that and Goal! (video game).


 * Date and time
 * 20:09, 3 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I'll fix it for you. You were accidentally deleting the contents of the film page, which is why you were getting warnings and errors and such. 28bytes (talk) 20:13, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I added a line to the top of Goal! (film) to direct users to Goal! (video game). Generally, if there are only two things with the same title, a disambiguation page isn't necessary. 28bytes (talk) 20:17, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * No, I was on the non-film page - I was just editing an old version because I tried to see if there was an earlier version of the page that was a disambiguation that I could restore. Mind you, apparently I got permablocked from that page because of repeated vandalism. Which happened because I followed the directions on one of the colored boxes of doom that said "if this is not vandalism, click save page again." Which I did. And then got blocked for trying to vandalize the page too many times in a row. So, basically, because I tried to remove categories that had already been removed from a page when it got made into a redirect and then followed the instructions on how to save the edit despite the filter, I got blocked from the article automatically and dumped to this incomprehensible page, and then had to spend five minutes trying to figure out how to edit my own report because you semi-protected the page and have no edit links on the individual reports.
 * Congratulations, Wikipedia. Facebook privacy settings are easier to use than your site now. 96.39.62.90 (talk) 20:20, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

74.250.184.89

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 23:54, 3 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I see no false-positive here. —<font color="228B22">Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 00:00, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Achecker

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 01:38, 4 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Keep editing like that and you'll end up seeing an indefinite block. —<font color="228B22">Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 06:41, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

DragoMaster009

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * HeartCatch PreCure!


 * Description
 * Trying to fix some vandalism in the villain's section. Under the Desert Apostles title, take a look at the last line and see what I'm trying to correct.


 * Date and time
 * 02:23, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

We appreciate your edits but you appear to be running an extension called QuickiWiki which sometimes leaves messages on pages because it's not intended to be used while editing. I won't type the message as a single string because it could cause problems but it is usually just "QuickiWiki" plus "LookUp" and you can see it here. That is part of your edit, even if you didnt type it consciously. You've also done the same thing three times before, as can be seen here. If you want to edit Wikipedia you should remove the QuickiWiki extension; otherwise every edit you make has the potential of leaving messages like that which others will need to clean up.  — Soap  —  02:37, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

Hsfacility

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Eureka Springs High School (Eureka Springs, Arkansas)


 * Description
 * delete as it is slander


 * Date and time
 * 16:48, 5 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I have removed the offending content for you and warned the person who added it. Thank you for reporting the issue. 28bytes (talk) 16:59, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Gjay66

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description
 * Hi

I have been trying to send you a message regarding my wife's page - message below: Hi

I am trying to get the page "Anu Haasan" removed as this is the incorrect spelling.

You will see Anu's name spelt three different ways on the internet - Hasan, Hassan and Haasan. The Haasan spelling is often erroneously used as it is the spelling used by her more famous uncle, Kamal Haasan.

I know that Hasan is correct as I am married to Anu - it is spelt that way on her passport, drivers licence and our wedding certificate among other things!

I would be grateful for your assistance in correcting this - it was correct until yesterday when someone changed it

Regards Graham Jay Gjay66 (talk) 07:41, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Date and time
 * 07:41, 6 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I've no idea why this's tripping the filter. —<font color="228B22">Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 17:54, 6 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * [[The 5fats Dev Team

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_5fats_Dev_Team]]
 * Description
 * A page containing information on my Dev Team.

I was trying to put my page back after it had been deleted 5 times, and all i want is a wikipedia page on my Dev Team.
 * Date and time
 * 06:02, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

This is not a false positive; this user even attempted to restore the article a sixth time, ignoring all others' advice, after this report was added.  — Soap  —  21:36, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

74.79.113.4

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Rigel


 * Description
 * Adding a locator to the stars location so people who are amateur astronomers or just dont know where rigel is


 * Date and time
 * 20:22, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

HTML in general should be avoided in mainspace since it may not appear properly on some browsers. For the individual case, the use of fixed and absolute position div's has been disallowed because it was often used in vandalism, e.g. to cover over the important parts of a page, or even the entire page. There may be a way to get red dots without using HTML, as we do with locator maps, but I wouldnt be able to tell you how.  — Soap  —  21:35, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

Sudhirkbhargava

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Hemu


 * Description
 * Page has to be re-named as 'Samrat Hem Chandra Vikramaditya' or 'Hem Chandra Vikramaditya' which is the person's true identity. Present name Hemu is confusing and does not show his true identity. Moreover, there is a city in China by this name and any body looking for that city also lands on this page. The page was earlier also had the name 'Samrat Hem Chandra Vikramaditya' Even 'Hem Chandra Vikramaditya' is acceptable, but Hemu is not his identity. Please do the necessary changes.


 * Date and time
 * 06:48, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

To be honest Im not sure what you're saying even with the explanation. If you had tried to redirect that page, it wouldn't work, because the page Samrat Hem Chandra Vikramaditya already exists and is a redirect to Hemu. I think the name Hemu may have been chosen simply because it is shorter. For Western names, we usually use the most common form of the name, e.g. Barack Obama, not Barack Hussein Obama II. There is no article that I can see for Hemu, China at any title.  — Soap  —  21:27, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

Nmheise

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Sandbox


 * Description
 * Trying to experiment in a sandbox.


 * Date and time
 * 19:24, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

It still would make the page uneditable by many users, and is not really an example of something you'd need to be able to test, since there'd be no legitimate usage of a long string like that in an article. In other words, even in the Sandbox, some types of edits are disallowed by the software because they would interfere with other users' ability to read and edit.  — Soap  —  20:13, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

178.77.20.122

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Family name


 * Description
 * I was adding "Bosnia and Herzegovina" in "South Slavic countries" part. Since a lot of last names in Bosnia end with ov/ev, ski, ak/ek/ik, and Bosnia wasn't on the list. So I decided to add it, but it wouldn't let me for some reason.


 * Date and time
 * 20:12, 8 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * A typo in your edit tripped the filter by accident. T. Canens (talk) 20:15, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

68.44.146.10

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Sandbox

well nevermind I can't even paste it wtf encyclopedia that anyone can edit am i right nevermind i figured it out
 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 02:26, 9 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

It's the "lol*snip*". T. Canens (talk) 02:28, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * yeah I figured, pretty cool math functionality in any case :D

Scruff

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * hair's breadth


 * Description
 * Trying to add back in section on RCH. Section removed for no reason.


 * Date and time
 * 04:33, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

There's really no reason to capitalize.  — Soap  —  18:34, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

Farmsworth

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * War Resisters League


 * Description
 * Trying to correct vandalization by user Adamtheclown. Please take the time to look through Adamtheclown's edits on the War Resisters League page.


 * Date and time
 * 14:59, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Im not sure how you came to think Adamtheclown was the one who vandalized, but I think you should remove your warning to him. However, I do thank you for trying to revert the vandalism and I apologize that it's not really possible to make the filter avoid instances like this without removing the wrod 'racist' as a stop word. (Perhaps it could look for " racist", with a space, instead of just "racist", though?) I've restored the original content, though without the last sentence since it seemed to vague to be meaningful. Again sorry for the inconvenience.  — Soap  —  18:32, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

Venturebrosblog

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Doc Hammer


 * Description
 * I am trying to add a link to news and interviews relative to Doc Hammer. Filters on the site have not allowed me add the link. Please help.


 * Date and time
 * 17:44, 9 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * This is intentional: please take a look at WP:EL for our policy regarding external links. Another problem with the edits you are attempting to make is that you are attempting to delete the template when you add your blog link. 28bytes (talk) 17:53, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Taking a closer look at the link you're trying to add, it might be OK. The edit filter won't let you insert it because the link and your username match (generally a sign of spamming), so I suggest you post a message on Talk:Doc Hammer requesting an editor there add the link if they feel it is appropriate to do so. 28bytes (talk) 18:15, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * He seems to want his blog to appear on a lot of pages.  —  Soap  —  18:33, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Looks like it's already linked to from The Venture Bros. and List of The Venture Bros. episodes, FWIW. 28bytes (talk) 18:39, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

71.130.203.164

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Hotmail


 * Description
 * Removing "end times/cataclysm" type message appended to the bottom of the page


 * Date and time
 * 17:14, 10 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Thanks for reporting the false positive, and for fixing the article; I'll take a look to see why that was happening. 28bytes (talk) 17:32, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Milldz

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Zechariah


 * Description
 * I wanted to add Fareed Zakaria to the list, because that's who I was looking for, and Wikipedia accused me of vandalism. This automatic filter does not work.


 * Date and time
 * 00:50, 11 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Thanks for your report. Your edit was not vandalism, but it wasn't correct, either; that page is for people known solely as Zakaria. There's a separate page, Zacharias (surname), (linked to from Zechariah) that lists people with that surname, and Fareed Zakaria is already on that list. 28bytes (talk) 01:10, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

67.160.101.223

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 17:51, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Is that you? You should log in to your account so that we know it's you. The MediaWiki software does not automatically resolve IP addresses to their originating account (and after 5 years it's not likely it'd be the same IP anyway). If you don't have the password to the account let me know.  — Soap  —  18:00, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

Phoenix1901

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Clay v. United States


 * Description
 * I was attempting to restore the original phrasing of Muhammad Ali's quote regarding his refusal to fight in Vietnam... the word "negro" is a bowdlerized version of the initial quote, which accurately reads, "I ain't got no quarrel With them VietCong...the never called me nigger."


 * Date and time
 * 04:16, 12 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Thanks for reporting the false positive. Looks like someone recently changed it without explanation, I've changed it back. 28bytes (talk) 04:21, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Bryce53

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User:Bryce53/Worst page


 * Description
 * I attempted to make a 'joke' page about the 'worst' page ever - however the edit filter marked it as 'potentionally unconstructive' - requiring me to go the other direction. See here.


 * Date and time
 * 10:52, 12 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Thanks for the report. Looks like you were able to create the page after removing the text that tripped the filter and trying again. 28bytes (talk) 12:28, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

MarkHenryBeats

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Mark Henry (producer)


 * Description
 * this is my first time creating a wikipedia page. the page is for industry producer Mark Henry. a lot of the external and reference links will be from the top music/hiphop/lifestyle sites. It is not promotion.... it's his music.


 * Date and time
 * 01:31, 13 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Thanks for the report. Unfortunately, there are a number of problems with this article. Firstly, if you're Mark Henry, it's best if you don't create an article about yourself. See WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY for our guidelines on this. Aside from that, there are some formatting issues with the article that suggest that you'd be better served by going through our Articles for creation process rather than attempting to "write it solo". The AfC folks can help give you a better understanding of our policies on notability and reliable sources. 28bytes (talk) 01:37, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

France3470

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Air Hostess (disambiguation)


 * Description
 * Created new disambiguation page. The 402 filter (New article without references) is incorrect in this case. Disambiguation pages should never contain references per WP:MOSDAB. I would have thought these would be exempt?


 * Date and time
 * 13:25, 13 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Thanks for the report. Yep, that filter needs to be tweaked; I'll do so now. It was triggered because it was only checking the article text – not the title – and since you didn't include a or  template in that edit, it didn't "know" the page was a disambiguation page, despite the title. 28bytes (talk) 13:42, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I thought that may have been the case. Silly me. However recognizing "(disambiguation)" in the title would be useful, many new editors often leave out the . For instance, this example I came across yesterday. Lexham (disambiguation) (currently speedied). Thanks. -France3470 (talk) 14:11, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I see you have now made changes. Much appreciated, -France3470 (talk) 14:14, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

86.160.133.204

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User:Lugnuts


 * Description
 * Trying to remove the UI spoofing fake new message box.


 * Date and time
 * 00:11, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Is there any reason why you didnt want to bring it up on his talk page as he requested you do? — Soap  —  00:30, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * Yes, he ignores it.

68.231.70.38

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 3rd Ranger Battalion (United States)


 * Description
 * i wasnt trying to do any thing i was trying to click the exit windoe button and the mouse glitch and cliked edit i tryed agin it glitch and hilights and i pressd back space by accedint! SRRY :O!


 * Date and time
 * 00:54, 14 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * No worries, these things happen. The edit filter caught it, so no harm was done. 28bytes (talk) 01:04, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Ancient Apparition

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * [[Template:Editnotices/Page/Death of Osama bin Laden]]


 * Description
 * When I try to change the edn about references to:

I'm tripping an edit filter
 * Date and time
 * 11:51, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

It appears that someone (User:Prodego) has disallowed the ability to create edit notices in the Template namespace. I'm leaving for work in a few minutes and can't really help piece out what led to this but my guess is that there is a reason behind it somewhere.  — Soap  —  12:00, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * It seems that edit notices have been traditionally restricted to admins and account creators, despite the fact that there is an [edit] link at the top of the page even for IP's. If this change was discussed then I think the message should be changed, if not I think more discussion is needed.  —  Soap  —  12:02, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The discussion seems to have originated here and here.  — Soap  —  12:08, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I am an account creator, this is what puzzled me... :S — James (Talk • Contribs) • 12:04pm • 02:04, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * What I'm getting is that now even account creators cannot edit edit notices... am I correct? — James (Talk • Contribs) • 12:06pm • 02:06, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

99.109.80.121

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Liberty Medical


 * Description
 * I was trying to edit the pop culture part, because the YouTube videos are not called mashups, they are called poops. Seriously, look it up.


 * Date and time
 * 16:04, 14 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I know what they're called, and unfortunately it's why you keep tripping the filter (usually, edits involving the string "poop" added by IPs are vandalism). —<font color="228B22">Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 21:51, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Pickleman321

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Doom (video game)


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 03:02, 15 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

i was just adding something i accidentally erased it.
 * Filter worked as planned. Your edits were blatantly unsourced.Jasper Deng (talk) 03:10, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Woahthatwasclose

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 17:42, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

With no explanation given in the "description" I can only assume this is just another vandal.  — Soap  —  17:45, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

76.243.180.234

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Green Initiative


 * Description
 * User made an constructive edit that got disallowed.


 * Date and time
 * 00:03, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Crazymonkey1123 public (talk) 00:03, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * That was nowhere close to a constructive edit. Did you look at it? 28bytes (talk) 01:09, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

99.66.19.91

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao


 * Description
 * in the section describing the selected references, it says that the Spanish word "puta" means "pussy" in English. since i am fluent in Spanish, being a native Spanish speaker, i tried to change it to the correct translation of "whore, or slut," so that people would have factual information.


 * Date and time
 * 02:10, 17 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

✅ for you <font color="#4B0082">Tb <font color="#6082B6">hotch * <font color="#006600"> ۩ <font color="#DAA520"> ۞ 02:18, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

218.186.16.248

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Accelartion


 * Description
 * was tryin gto add info


 * Date and time
 * 04:15, 17 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

Not a false positive. <font color="#4B0082">Tb <font color="#6082B6">hotch * <font color="#006600"> ۩ <font color="#DAA520"> ۞ 05:59, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

184.153.8.156

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 13:13, 17 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

2^3x3^2

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Talk:1000000000_(number)


 * Description
 * Added comment. Filter caught on the number.


 * Date and time
 * 16:35, 17 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Yep, that's a false positive. Try again using commas or scientific notation, it's the repeating zeros that's tripping it. 28bytes (talk) 16:45, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

71.115.95.219

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Wikipedia Sandbox


 * Description
 * I was trying to save the sandbox. Nothing bad was in it, just a link to a linux ubuntu forum page. It would not save because it said it was unconstructive. Thank you for your time. I won't be correcting any pages from now on because I know it will not save. You have just lost a valued customer.


 * Date and time
 * 00:21, 18 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * No, the filter saw it and assumed it was vandalism because of the random characters. I wish these filters would only check the sandbox when absolutely necessary. —<font color="228B22">Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 02:04, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

24.44.217.103

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Theodore Dreiser


 * Description
 * His short story about the lynching is not called "Cracker" its called "Nigger Jeff". Read the reference. This mistake has been on the page since 13:09, 17 November 2009!!!!!!


 * Date and time
 * 06:53, 18 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

Sltrib

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Elizabeth Smart kidnapping


 * Description
 * Attempting to add related links to The Salt Lake Tribune trial archive and original transcripts of Smart's testimony which WE reported and everyone else copied.


 * Date and time
 * 16:54, 18 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * COI. Filter worked properly.Jasper Deng (talk) 19:37, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

24.44.217.103

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Theodore Dreiser


 * Description
 * His short story about the lynching is not called "Cracker" its called "Nigger Jeff". Read the reference. This mistake has been on the page since 13:09, 17 November 2009!!!!!!


 * Date and time
 * 00:34, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

OK, thank you for reporting this. It was the edit summary, by the way, that tripped the filter; the edit itself would have gone through otherwise as there is nothing preventing "Nigger" by itself from being typed in an article.  — Soap  —  01:39, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

VickyPezza

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Walking the Room


 * Description
 * Trying to create a page for the podcast Walking the Room. All information is truthful, accurate and cited, but was blocked from posting.


 * Date and time
 * 14:08, 19 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I'm going to wager that it has to do with the phrases "idiot" and "is an ass" in the title listings. —<font color="228B22">Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 18:40, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

98.100.172.92

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Hi!


 * Description
 * Parables of Jesus


 * Date and time
 * 14:34, 19 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

I wanted to add a word that would fit positively to this document but it didn't allow me.
 * Yeah, right. I see no false-positive here. —<font color="228B22">Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 18:41, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Howl56

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Suas Educational Development


 * Description
 * The information on this page is either out dated or incorrect, it needs a great deal of updating to be correct and in line with the reference websites.


 * Date and time
 * 16:39, 19 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I am deferring to an edit filter manager on this one because you tripped a long-term abuse filter. —<font color="228B22">Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 18:42, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

71.185.49.174

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User:Jbedell


 * Description
 * I was trying to remove some kind of personal attack from User:Jbedell. The "PSTD" section I believe is an inappropriate use of user page to disparage certain individuals.  User:Jbedell has vandalized the Sigma-Aldrich page too, so his intentions here are clearly not constructive.


 * Date and time
 * 11:31, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

It seems like a light hearted joke among colleagues, particularly since the list of people with PSTD includes himself. But his userpage seems to be causuing some confusion so I would like to see him explain what it is.  — Soap  —  12:02, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

95.144.126.6

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Casual relationship


 * Description
 * add the term 'fuck-buddies' to the other names section in the first paragraph, after "friends with benefits"


 * Date and time
 * 21:01, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

I would like a second opinion on this; that it's not there is not necessarily because no one has thought of it before but may be because they considered it inappropriate. — Soap  —  23:44, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * It's a perfectly valid, verifiable term. This is a genuine false positive, although I'm not sure the filter necessarily needs to be modified. <span style="font-family: Palatino Linotype, Book Antiqua, Palatino, serif;" color="#BBAED0">Feezo <font size="-2">(send a signal | watch the sky) 23:55, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

65.95.13.213

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User:So Records/Danny and the Champions of the World


 * Description
 * Trying to save a copyedited version of a draft article that the original author requested to be moved to namespace, by cleaning up dupe refs, fixing bad external link formatting, copyediting, moving bad talkpage template placement to talk page. No idea what the problem is, the filter is not telling me anything about what the problem is which doesn't help me FIX the problem since it doesn't say anything.


 * Date and time
 * 04:29, 22 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The filter you're hitting commonly produces false positives - it's set to automatically disallow unregistered users from making massive removals of content from userspace. Tweaking this filter would render it useless; I'll redo your edit for you. —<font color="228B22">Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 04:33, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Edit redone. —<font color="228B22">Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 04:38, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I made an exception for subpages, as most vandalism tends to be to user and user talk pages themselves. Userspace drafts are too common to disallow. -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 16:51, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

71.203.66.120

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Frasier


 * Description
 * removed just one inaccurate word from the second paragraph


 * Date and time
 * 03:49, 23 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Yeah right. A LARGE part of the article was removed by this IP. Would-be vandal thwarted.Jasper Deng (talk) 03:58, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure what happened. The first time, I just removed the word "uncredited," but somehow that caused a huge problem.  I went back to the revision before mine and made the exact same edit, but this time it worked properly.  I don't know why. 71.203.66.120 (talk) 04:01, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Tone.itdown1901

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Sydney Faculty of Science


 * Description
 * change title to University of Sydney Faculty of Science. Reason: this is in line with the convention of other faculty pages of major universities such as Cornell University and University of Pennsylvania. This change is also in line with the official nomenclature of the University of Sydney's Brand Project.


 * Date and time
 * 09:51, 23 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

Tone.itdown1901

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Sydney Faculty of Health Sciences


 * Description
 * change title to University of Sydney Faculty of Health Sciences. Reason: this is in line with the convention of other faculty pages of major universities such as Cornell University and University of Pennsylvania. This change is also in line with the official nomenclature of the University of Sydney's Brand Project.


 * Date and time
 * 09:56, 23 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Thanks for the report. You should be able to make the page moves now. <span style="font-family: Palatino Linotype, Book Antiqua, Palatino, serif;" color="#BBAED0">Feezo <font size="-2">(send a signal | watch the sky) 10:12, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

213.246.81.40

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Template:Atheism Sidebar


 * Description
 * Trying to tidy it up


 * Date and time
 * 15:35, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

There is a vandal who has been inserting shock images into various templates and in order to stop him we've been forced to create an unusually harsh filter. I've pasted the text, but it is still not possible to change it further. I apologize for the disruption (note that I had no part in creating this filter, but I don't think it would be a good idea to delete it. Perhaps someone with more knowledge can figure out a way to let good edits through and not bad ones.) —  Soap  —  01:47, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

88.153.36.238

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Hekatonkheires


 * Description
 * Tryed to add a reference to the adaption-section


 * Date and time
 * 18:30, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, I've added the edit for you. — Soap  —  01:36, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

Spm1122

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Nancy Kates


 * Description
 * Attempting to add content and citations, including film summaries, as well as delete offensive description of TSA incident.


 * Date and time
 * 22:50, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Do you still have the filter text saved? The filter does not allow the word GAY in all capitals, but it appears in the URL of one of the pages you were using as a reference. This particular filter has not been edited since October, but I will try taking the word GAY off for now and see what happens. If it gets added in again later, there may be trouble, but for now you should have no trouble.  — Soap  —  01:40, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments


 * I think that would address filter 225, thank you. The edit also triggered filter 410: blog added to BLPs.

Casacooper

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Ichimaru Gin character from animé Bleach


 * Description
 * all observations about character are written from male POV. Adding female observation of character and support for some behaviors

I do think this is a minor edit, since it changed nothing and added a paragraph, but I could easily be wrong.
 * Date and time
 * 23:50, 23 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Minor edits are reserved for things like typo fixes. Adding a paragraph is definitely a major edit. See WP:MINOR for more info. <span style="font-family: Palatino Linotype, Book Antiqua, Palatino, serif;" color="#BBAED0">Feezo <font size="-2">(send a signal | watch the sky) 00:15, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

24.115.26.63

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User:MonkeyPieMan9


 * Description
 * I was trying to edit my own page to explain to people my life and how I came to be a PC lover.


 * Date and time
 * 00:07, 24 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You can log in to avoid triggering this filter on your own page. <span style="font-family: Palatino Linotype, Book Antiqua, Palatino, serif;" color="#BBAED0">Feezo <font size="-2">(send a signal | watch the sky) 00:14, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Danstan12

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Nasty As I Wanna Be


 * Description
 * I ran out of time to continue editing this page so I think that due to the small length of the article it was flagged as unconstructive. its a work in progress.


 * Date and time
 * 05:21, 25 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I recreated the article at User:Danstan12/Nasty As I Wanna Be. The name of one of the tracks is a common vandal phrase, which triggered the abuse filter. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:15, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Blackmomba21

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 18:29, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

An unexplained deletion like this is never legitimate. — Soap  —  13:39, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

4.154.217.99

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description
 * The last time I tried to do this, this was my justification, followed by the editor's response:

Username 4.156.228.142 (talk · contribs) (filter log) Page you were editing (don't wikilink) Comintern (filter log) (redo) Description Made the English more precise. Removed slang, awkward terms, or unnecessarily figurative or lurid descriptions. Corrected some errors.

Did not change any quotes. Did not change the general sense, or factual information such as names or dates.

Date and time 22:11, 17 January 2011 (UTC) Comments Apologies for this, you should be able to do the edit now. —Soap— 01:57, 18 January 2011 (UTC) --- So now I'm back again. Did I wait too long? Is there a time limit, or does my username become unrecognizable after I close a session?
 * Date and time
 * 23:04, 25 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

4.154.217.99

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description
 * False + again.


 * Date and time
 * 23:22, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

All I did last time was to make the edit filter more lenient; I didn't change the underlying detection code, which isn't really possible in this type of filter. Nor did I add an exception for your IP, which wouldn't have worked anyway since you seem to change IP's a lot. I'm afraid all I can do is ask you to start editing from a registered account so that at least your username will be the same everytime you want to make an edit.  — Soap  —  13:33, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

Armaansantana

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 20:08, 26 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I see no false positive here. Wikipedia is not MySpace. —<font color="228B22">Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 21:17, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

110.174.152.72

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User:Jana.l


 * Description
 * It is a page about myself. No idea who wrote it and the information is false.


 * Date and time
 * 07:45, 27 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Tagged for speedy deletion under criteria G10. Reaper Eternal (talk) 10:32, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
 * <FONT COLOR="#313F33">Catfish</FONT> <FONT COLOR="#313F33">Jim</FONT> <FONT COLOR="#313F33"> (ex-soapdish)</FONT>  14:01, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

86.63.2.14

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User:Jackamo


 * Description
 * Removing my personal info from user page as it is out of date an no longer being used.


 * Date and time
 * 15:43, 27 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I assume you can't log into your account? That would be the easiest way to verify that you are this editor. If you can't, I've left a message at User talk:Jackamo, and will delete the page if there is no objection in a reasonable time. <span style="font-family: Palatino Linotype, Book Antiqua, Palatino, serif;" color="#BBAED0">Feezo <font size="-2">(send a signal | watch the sky) 16:19, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Ah, looks like we edit-conflicted... I blanked the page. 28bytes (talk) 16:22, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
 * No worries. I've deleted it. <span style="font-family: Palatino Linotype, Book Antiqua, Palatino, serif;" color="#BBAED0">Feezo <font size="-2">(send a signal | watch the sky) 19:54, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

98.212.75.212

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * ¿Dónde Jugarán las Niñas?


 * Description
 * I was trying to change the translation of a song title, Chinga Tu Madre, from the incorrect 'Go Fuck Yourself' to the correct 'Fuck Your Mother' and the filter flagged the change as unconstructive.


 * Date and time
 * 04:40, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

✅ for you. <font color="#DAA520">۞ <font color="#4B0082">Tb <font color="#6082B6">hotch <font color="#555555"> ™ & <font color="#006600">(ↄ), <font color="#2C1608">Problems with my English?  04:42, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

68.10.162.88

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description
 * I was trying at first to make a joke and then change it back, promise. Now, I simply would like to complement the family friendly show, Good Luck Charley. I'm a good person.


 * Date and time
 * 05:00, 30 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

213.246.82.177

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Template:State of Israel


 * Description
 * Converting it to "Sidebar with heading backgrounds".


 * Date and time
 * 01:44, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Due to vandalism it has been necessary to put a filter on many templates that makes them effectively semi-protected. I've pasted in your text from the HTML source of the diff, but the filter remains on and therefore the page is still uneditable. If you plan to do a lot of edits like this it would be good to create an account since I don't think this filter will ever be deleted. (If it is, we're likely to just semiprotect the templates.)  — Soap  —  03:08, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

Esquilo

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Template:User Stockholm


 * Description
 * Unable to change to a better CoA


 * Date and time
 * 15:12, 31 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

Due to vandalism it has been necessary to put a filter on many templates that makes them effectively semi-protected. I've pasted in your text from the HTML source of the diff, but the filter remains on and therefore the page is still uneditable.  — Soap  —  15:47, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

83.227.105.198

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * The Amplifetes


 * Description
 * I was editing the Remix and Promotion video credits portion of the page; adding the 3 sentences: "Blinded by the moonlight - Little Majorette Remix", "Blinded by the moonlight - FUKKK OFFF Remix" and "Blinded by the moonlight(FUKKK OFFF Remix Edit) - Directed by Mattias Johansson". My suspicion is that this perhaps was denied due to the name of the Remixer called "FUKKK OFFF". If so, I can hereby confirm that this is valid enter as it is the name of a famous german music producer/artist/remixer. If not, I have no idea what caused the block.


 * Date and time
 * 20:16, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Is it really capitalized? If you type it in lowercase there will be no filter.  — Soap  —  00:20, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

Aignatiev

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Resistance Movement named after Petr Alexeev (DSPA)


 * Description
 * inserting infobox political party


 * Date and time
 * 09:04, 1 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

The filter has now been adjusted and you should be able to make that edit. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:17, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

121.7.244.197

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Template:Singapore general election, 2011 comprehensive


 * Description
 * Update of results of Singapore General Election 2011, with votes casted both locally and overseas.


 * Date and time
 * 13:11, 1 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I'll quote from above: "Due to vandalism it has been necessary to put a filter on many templates that makes them effectively semi-protected. I've pasted in your text from the HTML source of the diff, but the filter remains on and therefore the page is still uneditable." Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:33, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

75.170.132.88

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 2011 in film


 * Description
 * I'm trying to move Apollo 18 from August 26 to September 2, as its source now indicates.


 * Date and time
 * 15:02, 1 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

The filter has now been adjusted and you should be able to make that edit. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:13, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

110.169.137.240

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Template:Bermuda Triangle


 * Description
 * Sort list by date of incident per target articles & List of Bermuda Triangle incidents (which lists exact same 10 items as template)


 * Date and time
 * 15:21, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Fixed — Soap  —  14:25, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

218.250.143.16

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Template: Government of Portugese Macau


 * Description
 * Cannot edit the content as
 * Date and time
 * 16:05, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Fixed — Soap  —  14:25, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

Swise23

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User_talk:Swise23


 * Description
 * Trying to create an article for a notable NJ architects. I've cited various sources indicating this is a leading architects in the education and healthcare fields.  I've noticed that many other similar architects have articles on Wikipedia, and I can not figure out how this one differs.  Thank you.


 * Date and time
 * 18:17, 1 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

The filter has now been adjusted and you should be able to make that edit. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:15, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

DoughboySG

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description
 * Im a member of Skull Gang.. Doughboy..I was adding my name.


 * Date and time
 * 19:25, 1 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

The filter has now been adjusted and you should be able to make that edit. -- zzuuzz (talk) 20:11, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

67.242.18.206

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Ziltoid The Omniscient


 * Description
 * I tried updating the information based on a recent interview. The source I cited was located here. The article title (and URL) included the word "gay", which might have triggered an obscenity filter, but the content is legitimate.


 * Date and time
 * 23:41, 2 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

62.235.141.139

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User:Scarface181268


 * Description
 * I just corrected some spelling errors and the references: odd


 * Date and time
 * 11:08, 3 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Sorry, but I know that user personally and he doesn't mind at all in fact: quite on the contrary really, hence. 62.235.141.139 (talk) 21:00, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but I know that user personally and he doesn't mind at all in fact: quite on the contrary really, hence. 62.235.141.139 (talk) 21:00, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

79.143.177.207

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Spanish profanity


 * Description
 * Provide English translations of profane statements in Spanish


 * Date and time
 * 14:16, 3 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * While not strictly a falsepositive, the edit would have been reverted. Wikipedia is not a dictionary or thesaurus. —<font color="228B22">Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 00:00, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Iliekfreezies

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Skate4Cancer


 * Description
 * I was editing the Skate4Cancer page because most of the information on there was outdated and poorly written. I just fixed it up and tried to add what I could. Which was easier for me just to start from scratch.


 * Date and time
 * 18:18, 3 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Replacing with doesn't work. You need to use  or . Anyway, they do essentially the same thing. Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:15, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

62.235.141.139

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:62.235.143.77


 * Description
 * I can't edit my own talkpage anymore => http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog/4859244 => please: this is not blanking, let alone vandalism


 * Date and time
 * 21:07, 3 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Hi, the talk page you were trying to blank may have been your talkpage before, but your IP hopped from 62.235.143.77 to 62.235.141.139. Thus it appears to the abuse filters that you were trying to blank somebody else's user talk page. I have blanked it for you. Registering an account will help prevent these problems. Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:21, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I didn't blank it though: I deleted stuff and replaced too, but he called it "blanking". 62.235.141.139 (talk) 22:23, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The abuselog seems to show a large section of ~20-30 lines being erased; this is likely why the filter keeps tripping. —<font color="228B22">Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 23:58, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

86.17.84.109

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Parry Ray


 * Description
 * On behalf of Parry Ray and her Management (Dave Fowler from Capital Artists UK) I was trying to delete all info about her on Wikipedia. She will work on her new biography and all needed informations. We will work on her new Wikipedia Page soon. Please delete all informations from her Wikipedia Page ASAP. Thank You


 * Date and time
 * 01:32, 4 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * If you want to delete an article, you will need to use the deletion process. I can assist you with this process if you like. 28bytes (talk) 15:59, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Mhm2504

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Names Database


 * Description
 * I put a wikilink to Gabriel Weinberg, and corrected a spelling error in DuckDuckGo.


 * Date and time
 * 14:58, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Strange. Your edit was passed, and your edit wasn't tagged either. Island Monkey talk the talk 15:15, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

BewarePETeacher

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Template:Archived Talk page


 * Description
 * All I'm doing is creating this archive template, and this filter says it's unconstructive! It's not vandalism at all.


 * Date and time
 * 20:49, 5 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Thanks for reporting the false positive. No, your edit wasn't vandalism. I'm looking into the filter now. 28bytes (talk) 21:06, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Looking a little closer at this, the filter probably could be tweaked to allow this, but I will defer on doing that until I talk with its creator. In the meantime, I recommend going a little slower with the archiving stuff; I'm not sure I see the point of the template you're trying to create, as it essentially duplicates Talk archive navigation, but I'm happy to discuss it further in case there's something I'm missing (I've also left you a message on your talk page). 28bytes (talk) 21:31, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

24.186.230.153

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 16:47, 6 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

cannot edit the page I was on; trying to add new info about the school and budget. Will not let me.
 * You're removing the page's categories to add a URL. No false positive here. —<font color="228B22">Jeremy v^_^v Components:V S M 17:00, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

217.43.251.18

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Mephardone


 * Description
 * I was trying to make all of the slang names bold as only some are bold and others not


 * Date and time
 * 17:57, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mephedrone#Meow_meow, as this is a long running content dispute not possible to be resolved here. (but thank you for reporting the false positive)  — Soap  —  03:37, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

173.195.49.126

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Guyang Zhang


 * Description
 * Due to the recent abuse/exposure of my personal information and image, I stopped my research and all the work related to wiki editor. I intended to remove this page permanantly or hide this page from the general public.


 * Date and time
 * 18:02, 6 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

If you are Zhang log in and add db-U1. <font color="#DAA520">۞ <font color="#4B0082">Tb <font color="#6082B6">hotch <font color="#555555"> ™ & <font color="#006600">(ↄ), <font color="#2C1608">Problems with my English?  18:09, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

68.228.12.212

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:Lokinjo


 * Description
 * My former usertalk page. I wanted to delete it.


 * Date and time
 * 03:08, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

As above, youre supposed to log in and delete the page that way so that we know it's you. But for an editor who hasnt edited since 2007 I think it is reasonable to blank the page if you have forgotten the password.  — Soap  —  03:28, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

86.0.41.189

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Pedophilia


 * Description
 * I was trying to make a new section on the discussion page, questioning the content of the "Neurohormonal explanation" and whether scientific evidence that contradicts the psychologist's opinion should be indicated along side it.


 * Date and time
 * 13:23, 7 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

I can confirm that this was a false positive. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:24, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Jdcod

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Joe budden


 * Description
 * copy of existing page


 * Date and time
 * 14:16, 7 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Fixed. Thanks for the report. 28bytes (talk) 14:20, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

110.164.159.59

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Template:Bermuda Triangle


 * Description
 * per Edit filter/False positives/Reports


 * Date and time
 * 19:15, 7 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

Crazymonkey1123 public

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Impossible colors


 * Description
 * I was reverting a user adding WP:OR, and I saw it tripped Filter 368, but I did not get the warning. Perhaps it should only get users below autoconfirmed by adding !"autoconfirmed" in user_groups to it.


 * Date and time
 * 22:46, 7 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * That edit wasn't exactly minor. Per WP:MINOR, a minor edit is one that "...the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute". Reverting apparent original research, while acceptable, is likely to trigger dispute. Also, a reversion is not usually considered minor, except when done to blatant vandalism. Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:56, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Additionally, you did not get the warning because Twinkle probably bypassed it and saved the page again. Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:57, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

75.170.132.88

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 2012 and beyond in film


 * Description
 * FilmDistrict has just announced new dates for Playing the Field and Lockout according to http://admin.boxofficemojo.com/schedule/?view=changes&p=.htm. I can't make the changes here.


 * Date and time
 * 17:02, 8 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

Nebulaculture

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 18:42, 8 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

Twitbook34

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Ben Newton


 * Description
 * I was trying to create the page and it said that my edit was unconstructive but it wasnt


 * Date and time
 * 05:59, 9 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * It looks like you're trying to create a bunch of pages that just say "Is an AFL player." That's not really very helpful. 28bytes (talk) 06:06, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

121.54.76.14

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * []


 * Description
 * They say its unconstructive, but its not


 * Date and time
 * 12:56, 10 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Wikipedia is not a place to host your own analysis of video games. Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:32, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

HarrySkc

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Suck! Clothing


 * Description
 * when I try to put on my page, wikipedia say: "An automated filter has identified this edit as potentially unconstructive, and it has been disallowed."


 * Date and time
 * 18:10, 11 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * The triggering factor was that you spelled "suck!" in all-caps one of the times you mentioned "Suck! Clothing". However, I would advise you to not create that article unless you can find enough reliable sources to demonstrate notability, or the article may be deleted. Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:28, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

MN.Gruber06

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 173rd Airborne Brigade


 * Description
 * Attempting to add the 2009 - 2010 Afghanistan section...not allowed for some reason.


 * Date and time
 * 00:28, 12 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I fixed the edit filter, but you still need to have reliable sources when you re-add your content. Reaper Eternal (talk) 01:34, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Altriscott4

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Ben Newton


 * Description
 * I was trying to create the page and it said that it was unconstructive


 * Date and time
 * 01:40, 12 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

76.179.3.42

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Glenn Cummings


 * Description
 * I was trying to edit my friends page, to include that he is the President and Executive director instead of just a worker. I included a website in which it stated that.


 * Date and time
 * 02:27, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

I added the info, but the link you pasted doesnt seem to work so I didn't add that in, instead I used http://gwh.org/AboutGWH/SeniorAdministration.aspx  —  Soap  —  02:33, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

Zollman

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Talk: School Science and Mathematics Association (SSMA)


 * Description
 * I was trying to ask Jac16888 for help with the page he deleted, as per the Wikipedia instructions. I do not understand why this message tagged potentially unconstructive.


 * Date and time
 * 01:09, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Ive pasted a link to the log for you, that should hopefully get the issue to his attention.  — Soap  —  04:06, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

Linguardia

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Sheep–goat chimera


 * Description
 * Removing the references section.


 * Date and time
 * 21:57, 16 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * ...and why would you want to remove the references section? I noticed you removed the categories and interwiki links too, so I've undone your change. 28bytes (talk) 22:15, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see what you were trying to do now. All you needed to remove was the Mammal hybrids line. I've done that for you. 28bytes (talk) 22:18, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

132.3.57.68

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User:Geerfan


 * Description
 * Filtered when editing page to remove information that is harrassing by the individual "Geerfan" impersonating the true individual.


 * Date and time
 * 03:39, 18 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You will need to first prove that you are this person. If you think this is an emergency, please email emergency@wikimedia.org.Jasper Deng (talk) 03:41, 18 June 2011 (UTC) (Stricken, as everything about this reply is incorrect.) Reaper Eternal (talk) 10:34, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Hello, I have removed the nonsensical and blatant attack-page-style content. However, I have left the user's userboxes, as they are not inappropriate as far as I could tell. I hope this helps. (And no, contrary to the user's statement above, you do not have to prove you are "David Greer" to ask to have that type of offending content removed.) Reaper Eternal (talk) 10:34, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * @Jasper Deng: The correct e-mail for a subject of an article who feels he is being defamed is [mailto:info-en-q@wikipedia.org info-en-q@wikimedia.org]. Reaper Eternal (talk) 10:34, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

81.108.78.139

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * La_Coupole


 * Description
 * The HISTORY section explains that the site became operational, was staffed by an Artillery Detachment, then the next sentence immediately states that permission was given to stop using the 'heavily damaged' site. The train of description here is missing an explanation of what caused the site to become 'heavily damaged', given that it was meant to be bomb-proof.

I proposed an insertion explaining that the site was frequently bombed, and that the revolutionary 'earthquake bomb' theory was proven to work against this hardened bunker. This provides the required explanation, and adds cross-references in to explain how a supposedly bomb-proof structure could be damaged in this way. I believe that this improves a shortcoming in the original description.

My proposed addition was to place, as a new paragraph directly after "...launch up to 50 rockets daily from Wizernes":

"The site immediately attracted heavy bombing. When conventional bombing had failed to damage the dome, the RAF used their Tallboy bombs. These immediately rendered the site inoperative, providing a classic justification of Barnes Wallis's Earthquake Bomb theory."
 * Date and time
 * 14:46, 18 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Filter repaired, feel free to make your edit again. Sorry about that. Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:57, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

98.254.245.113

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 19:25, 19 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

Wikipedia cannot delete articles just because the company is going out of business, if that's what your argument is. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Contact_us/Article_problem/Delete_or_undelete. The deletion request has already been processed and not resulted in deletion of the article.  — Soap  —  16:49, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

98.163.75.189

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Janko Nilović


 * Description
 * adding references is unconstructive? do you have a problem with ; i find your bad faith assumption troubling, but not surprising.


 * Date and time
 * 20:17, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

No explanation? I can only assume you were typing in capitals because that's what the source was, but we don't ordinarily type anything in all caps.  — Soap  —  16:50, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

Mäkirömpe

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Nürburgring lap times


 * Description
 * I was trying to edit a mistake on wich driver made the hotlap with Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution IX.The driver who made this, is Takayuki Kinoshita, not von Saurma. I was trying also to make the laptime sharper.To be honest the time was 8.11.16. Please someone edit it successfully for me.If someone want to verify these informations just tipe "evo ix nurburgring" on google and see the video on youtube. Thanks.


 * Date and time
 * 08:30, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Filter adjusted. I would recommend watching both videos before adding either of them as a source.  — Soap  —  16:45, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

Mjroots

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * MV Kollbjørg


 * Description
 * Tripped filter 402 (New article without references). A shipindex page does not need references. Can the filter be tweaked so that it does not trip when shipindex or dab are used.


 * Date and time
 * 10:20, 22 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * added to the list of ignores for the abuse filter. Dabs are already ignored in the filter. Reaper Eternal (talk) 10:29, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

188.80.227.245

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism


 * Description
 * Want to remove the URL that's behind the IP. I accidentally added it and now can't remove it. Thanks.


 * Date and time
 * 17:34, 23 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I think I've fixed the filter now. Your name was showing up as getting removed from the page, and it tripped the filter which is designed to prevent vandals from removing themselves. Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:49, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

72.153.214.40

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User:Operaconnoisseur


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 18:35, 24 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * What are you trying to do? Is User:Operaconnoisseur you? If so, please log in before making changes to that page. 28bytes (talk) 22:04, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

128.59.169.46

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Talk:Tired light


 * Description
 * removing edits from a banned user.


 * Date and time
 * 22:08, 24 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

219.90.144.201

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:Pdfpdf


 * Description
 * I wish to replace pages User talk:Pdfpdf and User:Pdfpdf with:
 * My beloved pet unexpectedly and suddenly died on Saturday morning.
 * I am currently on indefinite wiki-break.

An automated filter will not allow me to do this.
 * Date and time
 * 12:05, 26 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * If you are not Pdfpdf, then you should not be editing their user page. If you are Pdfpdf, log in with that account, and post a request on your talk page that someone make these changes. 28bytes (talk) 17:33, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

98.228.248.208

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description
 * I was trying to remove a section on the 2011–12 Calgary Flames season talk page because i don't want to see that argument up there.


 * Date and time
 * 18:40, 26 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Hi, if you want to show that you retract your arguments on a talk page, you can always add ... tags around them which makes them look like this . Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:50, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

202.182.85.234

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description
 * Cameron Bruce has been placed on the indefinite injury list


 * Date and time
 * 06:07, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

This filter has been turned off now, you should be able to make the edit.  — Soap  —  13:02, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

72.224.2.174

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Marist Brothers International School


 * Description
 * Was trying to add more information onto the page.


 * Date and time
 * 15:12, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Added for now, but for future guidance, you need to put in a references section when you add references. — Soap  —  13:05, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

67.101.6.212

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * National Audio-Visual Conservation Center


 * Description
 * Attempted to reduce the 40+ external links that caused the article to fail the WP:EL guideline ("they should be kept minimal, meritable, and directly relevant to the article"); tried multiple times before realizing I needed to enable cookies, but it was too late. A good-faith case could be made that I could have kept a few more external links as opposed to limiting it to just the subject's official website, but I suspect in this case it still would have triggered the edit filter.  A check of Special:AbuseFilter/30 suggests that this is a false positive because an exception isn't being made for the case where the text is being removed from a large external links section.


 * Date and time
 * 01:27, 28 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * As the filter only warns and then tags, you could just hit "save page" again and ignore the warning. While I know how to detect the removal of many links, it could just as easily be somebody deleting all the references, which would be inappropriate. Reaper Eternal (talk) 10:28, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

67.185.251.75

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Some User Talk


 * Description
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purchasing_Managers_Index

Can you check this for errors?
 * Date and time
 * 03:54, 28 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I've copied your message to User talk:C.Fred. I'll look into the edit filter to see what triggered it. Reaper Eternal (talk) 10:34, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The reason this got caught is because the previous line contains a word blocklisted by this filter. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:49, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

12.10.173.2

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description
 * Tre cool was the drummer for green day for 15 years now


 * Date and time
 * 21:13, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Please give a better explanation for the changes you made, or otherwise there is no reason to believe they're legitimate.  — Soap  —  13:31, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

Herachor

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 22:09, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Writing in Spanish is of no use on the English wikipedia. If you want to help out it would be nice to either write in English from the beginning, or if you cant speak English well you can use a subpage of your userpage and request that someone translate it over when you're done.  — Soap  —  13:43, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

204.249.193.67

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * The White Ribbon (section)


 * Description
 * I was updating some information within the plot summary of the movie "the white Ribbon". Specifically, I was clarifying the actions of one character, who, within the movie, was sexually molesting his daughter. Based on how few words I added to the text, I suspect that the words "sexually" and/or "molesting" set off this trigger. However, these words are unambiguously accurate for the character in question.


 * Date and time
 * 22:17, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Ive removed "sexually molests" from the list of stopwords and the edit should be able to go through now (there may still be another filter triggered, but it won't be "disallow" and won't be considered suspicious. )  — Soap  —  13:34, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

Bryce53

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Zee Gold Awards


 * Description
 * 1) I didn't mark the edit as minor, Twinkle did.
 * 2) I made a 'minor' edit by reverting the page blanking the troll did.
 * Date and time
 * 05:12, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * 05:12, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Strictly speaking this isn't a false positive, but you can start a discussion on Wikipedia talk:Edit filter if you think the filter should be modified or disabled. (e.g. by ignoring Twinkle edits)  — Soap  —  13:29, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

FinnsDeal

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description
 * I was trying to edit a section of the Nokia phone series article, particularly Nokia Tseries, but I cannot add the picture of the phone due to the file name of it. What am I going to do with it?


 * Date and time
 * 05:20, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

That's not a proper filename and shouldn't be included. Moreover the file itself may be a copyright violation since there is no evidence attached that Nokia released the copyrights to it. Regarding your own file uploads, I can't read Chinese, but I hope you've made sure that the pictures you;re uploading have had all rights released by Nokia, or else they will have to be deleted as well.  — Soap  —  13:37, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * I also cannot read Chinese but I've used Google Translate to do all the work. I'll try my best to look after the object's copyright. FinnsDeal (talk) 15:10, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Hurricanefan25

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * The International School Bangalore


 * Description
 * I was trying to undo some vandalism but it stopped me. Or maybe someone reverted it ahead of me or I misread the diff :/

I figured it out. I undid the wrong edit :/
 * Date and time
 * 14:47, 29 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Yep, you were reverting to the wrong version (note the word "shit" at the bottom). No harm done. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:08, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

97.87.97.168

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Yip Man


 * Description
 * Under the legacy section of notable students I intended to include the name "Man Hee Han". He was a student of Yip Man who has successfully opened several martial arts schools in America.


 * Date and time
 * 00:38, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

I added it, thanks for reporting this. I wouldn't be surprised if the whole list was trimmed in the future though, as generally we discourage giving lists of names that are not themselves notable enough to have an article.  — Soap  —  02:57, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

194.85.204.12

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Yip Man


 * Description
 * Currently stating both William Cheung and Leung Ting as Ip Man's students. It needs to be modified as they have both been confirmed by the other Grandmasters, including Chu Shong Tin, Ip Chun and Ip Ching, that they were not taught by Great Grandmaster Ip Man, at any time. William Cheung was actually taught by Chu Shong Tin and Wong Shun Leung, and he only learnt the first form, not the others, which he actually learnt from "the Red Society Wing Chun School". Leung Ting is actually a 4th/5th generation student, taught by some of the students of students of the current grandmasters.


 * Date and time
 * 07:54, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Done. Proof of the other statements would be necessary to add them in anywhere. — Soap  —  23:48, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

68.231.184.217

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * neon sign transformers(discussion)


 * Description
 * editing my comments


 * Date and time
 * 13:30, 2 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

Theregionaltourism

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 17:02, 4 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

74.176.79.5

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description
 * Hi I edited my wiki user page(Arindam Khan). The earlier entry had too much personal information about me. So, I wanted to reduce it and just link it to my homepage at Georgia tech.


 * Date and time
 * 20:15, 4 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * If that is really you, please log in to make the changes. Island Monkey talk the talk 20:18, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

60.47.80.176

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 08:20, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

What were you trying to do and why?  — Soap  —  23:02, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

NetLib

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description
 * adding a legitimate external link. If mine isn't legitimate then remove all other specific company external links


 * Date and time
 * 12:03, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

This link appears to be a software product not necessary for readers' understanding of the subject of the article. If you feel the product is notable you can write a page for it but I don't see any reason why it should be linked from the bottom of a page about something else. By all means if you see other inappropriate links in an article, feel free to remove them.  — Soap  —  23:09, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

Mattmill30

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * irish wolfhound


 * Description
 * Use "bitches", in replacement of "females", when refering to a dog. The context is currently dogs and females, but it would be better for the two terms to be opposites. Either dogs and bitches, or males and females should be used.


 * Date and time
 * 13:31, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

OK, I did that, and if anyone changes it back I'll make sure "dogs" is switched to "males" as well. Thanks for reporting this.  — Soap  —  14:56, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

BenedettaV

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Portal:Mediterranean


 * Description
 * I was only trying to insert a table.


 * Date and time
 * 13:51, 6 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Could you manage to make the table without all the tags? I don't think they would be necessary, but I could be mistaken. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:15, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

75.146.178.58

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * []


 * Description
 * Transcopying notations between different tables.

It's a test article from my user page, but I'm not logged in.
 * Date and time
 * 20:50, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, there's not really any way to get around this filter. Please just log in. It's due to the "nowiki" tags, by the way, not the fact that you're editing "someone else's" subpages.  — Soap  —  22:11, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

115.84.248.66

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 07:33, 7 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

Hi,

I am updating my page so please allow the final edits.

Thank you,
 * Hi, if you log in, this won't occur, as the filter thinks you are trying to damage another user's userpage. (Or have you forgotten your login?) Reaper Eternal (talk) 10:35, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Renosweeneytodd

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Sleep No More (2011 theatrical production)


 * Description
 * I was trying to create a new article.


 * Date and time
 * 22:13, 7 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * You will need to list the title not in ALL CAPS. That is triggering the filter. Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:26, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Abatolola

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * United Nations General Assembly Resolution 377


 * Description
 * Attempting to edit the page as shown at <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog/5020174>


 * Date and time
 * 16:41, 8 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I've removed the condition that was triggering the false positive. Can you make the edit now? Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:12, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, it appears so. See <http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=United_Nations_General_Assembly_Resolution_377&diff=438440751&oldid=438436191> - Abatolola (talk) 17:17, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

KotsuKilljoy

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Violent Things


 * Description
 * Under "The Brobecks chronology" it says the 2010 album is "TBA". But on The Brobecks page, it states that the 2010 album was intitled "Your Mother Should Know EP #1", so I thought that I should edit it. I think the filter may have mistaken this as a joke. I apologize if this information is wrong.


 * Date and time
 * 03:42, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

I've added an exception to this filter the "your mother" filter) to account for this album. (To others reading this page: It's been a while since I did any edit filter management, so please let me know if I made any mistakes.) —  Soap  —  23:40, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

85.180.22.114

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Violin concerto No.2(Bartok)


 * Description
 * I tried to add a link on my website about 20th century violin concertos: www.violinconcerto.de, to be more accurate I tried to set a link to the website which contains information and a discography of the second violin concerto by Bartok. Its a free of charge and free of advertisment database containing the most comprehensive resource for this topic and is so a good addition to the Wikipedia entry.


 * Date and time
 * 18:11, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

I can find no such page. Regardless, as far as I know, there is no filter that stops external links, except if you paste too many of them in an hour. It's good to lay back and make sure other people are going to be OK with the additions before adding more. It's very unusual, in any case, that a single site will need to be linked from more than one or two pages.  — Soap  —  23:37, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

Fedeapu

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 20:12, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

The edits should go through now; apologies for the inconvenience.  — Soap  —  23:38, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

86.145.9.142

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 


 * Description
 * I am trying to remove the notice that I left on my user talk page when I left Wikipedia. I am looking for a ob and would appreciate the notice not being there, in case potential employers decide to search for "Francs2000" on the web.


 * Date and time
 * 22:40, 9 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * ✅ I'm going to take your word for it that you are that user. I wish you luck in your job search! Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:47, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

220.100.14.12

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Italian profanity


 * Description
 * I was reorganising the contents and adding references, also removing some inappopriate use of ref tags, whose contents was anyway wrong in some cases. I never bumped into this filter, and I find it extremely against the spirit of wiki. Please reconsider/turn off.


 * Date and time
 * 22:50, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, there's not much that can be done here except to ask you to log in with a named account to get past the filter. In the past Wikipedia was more lenient, but with declining editing activity it's been necessary to assign bots to do much of the anti-vandalism work and bots make mistakes. It is not possible with the software currently to allow exceptions in filters in a way that would allow this page to be edited but not others.  — Soap  —  23:42, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * Thanks. However, I expect a full investigation as to what exactly triggered this false positive, and possibly improving the bot, which is the whole point of my raising it here. Otherwise you might as well have a bot leaving comments here. I was able to re-add everything piece by piece, and even proceeding by bisection I could not work out what it has been that the bot did not like.
 * As for "declining editing activity" at Wikipedia, I must disagree. The project is just getting started, as the very poor state of the article I was editing highlights. 220.100.14.12 (talk) 23:54, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
 * You can start a discussion on Wikipedia talk:Edit filter if you like, but as I said, the software is limited and I don't think anything can be done with this filter that has not been done already. I am not simply being stubborn. Even if the filter was disabled there would still be User:ClueBot which runs separate software. It would be easier if you plan to repeat edits like this for you to create an account and then you won't have to worry about the antivandalism bots.     —  Soap  —  00:03, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
 * What exactly triggered this false positive? 220.100.14.12 (talk) 00:37, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Apparently something in your edit was seen as a personal attack. It probably is somewhere near the bottom where you have sentences like "..Mary is a bitch". I admit I dont understand regex very well, even with a rulebook, so it's possible there's something Ive missed.  —  Soap  —  01:07, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Ah OK, in that case I tend to agree that this was probably a once-in-a-blue-moon false positive after all. Thanks. 220.100.14.12 (talk) 01:55, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

220.100.14.12

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Italian profanity


 * Description
 * Actually given the above discussion, I'd like to report a false negative, more out of curiosity than anything else. Why did this change not trigger filter 9? The same line apparently triggered the filter many times before... Thanks.


 * Date and time
 * 05:49, 10 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

Wlgrin

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Screenwriter


 * Description
 * I merged 5 identical citations into one (using named references) and saved with the minor edit flag, since the change only affects formatting (change id=438721718). Automatic filtering incorrectly determined that this probably was not a minor edit and issued a warning.
 * [EDIT] Sorry, I forgot to mention that one of the references (number 4) had a typo in it (Marksting instead of Marketing), making it not 100% identical to the others. Therefore, even a smart filter might determine that one of the references had been “replaced” (though even that might perhaps still pass for a minor edit).


 * Date and time
 * 10:26, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Aside from whether your edit fits or does not fit the criteria of WP:MINOR (we could argue about it for hours, I'm sure), this filter doesn't seem to be doing much but creating an annoyance, so I recommend it be turned off, or if it's being used to track something, reduced to just a log entry. I'm disabling it for now, and will let the people involved with it know.  — Soap  —  16:25, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

75.76.162.50

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User:Ryouseiken


 * Description
 * I'm trying to remove some nonsense scorekeeping chart from this user's user page. It's also on their talk page. Somebody please remove that. Thank you.


 * Date and time
 * 00:28, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Unregistered users are not allowed to remove content from other people's talk pages. If you want to get involved with this you should do it as a named user.  — Soap  —  16:25, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments


 * I couldn’t help peek at the incriminated user page and it first appeared to me as utterly unrelated to Wikipedia (as the original poster remarked). Well, sure, enough, a Google search pointed me... right back at this Wikipedia article: Big Brother 13 (U.S.). The chart is obviously for draft editing purposes (scroll down the article to see it). One could argue that User:Ryouseiken could have included an explanation along with the draft chart (or, better, placed it on a sub-page), but the real morale of the story is that one should not rush into deleting apparent non-sense from other people’s user pages. Wlgrin (talk) 08:05, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

70.226.168.144

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Trying to redirect what appears to be a non-notable fictional character to the article about the series where the character appears.


 * Date and time
 * 19:16, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

You should be able to make the edit now.  — Soap  —  16:25, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

24.149.52.6

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I tried to delete the categories that list this user as a Wii Video Game and make his page show up in those category listings such as Category:Wii-only games


 * Date and time
 * 01:57, 12 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * ✅ Removed categories and interwiki. Tb hotch .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it!  See terms and conditions.  02:05, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

189.119.160.209

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I noticed this edit by an anonymous user triggered the "possible BLP issue or vandalism" tag for no apparent reason. They were just moving the persondata around on the page.


 * Date and time
 * 00:28, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

I believe that filter goes off whenever you edit an infobox in an article that is in a BLP category, or a template that contains their name. The tag has a "possible" in front because many of the hits it generates will be helpful edits.  — Soap  —  00:36, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments