Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives/Archive 2

Susan118

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User_talk:Susan118/Archive_1


 * Description
 * Archived my talk page for the first time, creating the archive page triggered the Michael Jackson vandalism filter. (I have participated in discussions on the Michael Jackson articles, but there are no links to or mention of them in my talk page)


 * Date and time
 * 16:59, 30 June 2009 (UTC) (This actually happened 23:13, June 28, 2009)


 * Comments

The filter is 'inherently' broken. I removed the tagging function. Cenarium (talk) 18:19, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Lavenderx

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Ghost in the Shell 2: Innocence


 * Description
 * Making the word "Avalon" italicized and adding its date of release (2001). Was given the message: "An automated filter has identified this edit as potentially unconstructive, and it has been disallowed. If this edit is constructive, please report this error."


 * Date and time
 * 02:21, 30 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I have now done the edit for you (see here). Due to a single word in the paragraph you were changing, this edit looked to the Abuse filter like a specific sockpuppeteer who we are trying to stop; I don't think I should give any more details. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:44, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Erik9

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * [ User:Erik9/edit list]


 * Description
 * Does filter 194 identify any new page which includes the substrings "Michael" or "Jackson" as "Possible Michael Jackson vandalism", as its record of false positives [] [] [] [] [] indicates? If so, the filter would be ripe for immediate decommissioning. Indeed, the filter appears to be malfunctioning to such an extent that it flags new pages with no discernible connection to Michael Jackson at all [] [] []; a flood of false positives renders the abuse filter feature useless, as well as insulting new editors who may perceive that they are being accused of "vandalism" in page histories. Erik9 (talk) 23:17, 28 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 23:08, 28 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

Snek01

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Iberus gualterianus


 * Description
 * I tried to add into the wrong page. Snek01 (talk) 23:02, 27 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 23:02, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

So I added the delete template to the discussion page. --Snek01 (talk) 23:08, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments


 * The correct procedure is:
 * Move the page to the proper title, or list it at WP:Requested moves if you can't.
 * If the page is relatively new, and the old title is an "implausible typo", then tag the redirect with a db-redirtypo tag.
 * עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:56, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Brian Eetar

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Sagan 4


 * Description
 * The page had some formating problems causing texts which shouldn't be on the same line, to be on the same line, I was inserting blank lines between them in order to seperate them 89.138.198.129 (talk) 20:15, 26 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 20:15, 26 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I restored your autoconfirmed status, so, you can edit normally now. Ruslik_ Zero 12:34, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Dylant2011

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Bayarena


 * Description
 * I was editing the Bayarena page and i put some new organisation to the stub article and it told me i had excesive white space Dylant2011 (talk) 02:12, 26 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 02:12, 26 June 2009


 * Comments


 * I see you aligned the parameters so the equal signs would line up. In so doing, you included several spaces before most of the parameter names.  You may have to tolerate the whitespace filter if you are going to do that.   Wknight94  talk  12:53, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

spencerz

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * List of Parental Advisory albums


 * Description
 * I was adding entries to the article. I clicked save changes and a filter came up stating that the changes I made were unconstructive. I only added albums, and did nothing more. I believe the unconstructive filter may have been activated by the names of some of the albums.


 * Date and time
 * 13:22, 24 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Your abuse log is empty. I do not any evidence that you was stopped by a filter. Ruslik_ Zero 19:00, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * From this, I'd guess you edited as an IP. You may need to create an account and gain more experience here before such edits are allowed.   Wknight94  talk  12:56, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I added "Come Poop with Me" to exceptions. Ruslik_ Zero 14:30, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

98.154.26.247

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Washroom


 * Description
 * Trying to revert apparent vandalism and blanking made by other IP user. Unable to revert and the vandalism remains on the article as of now.


 * Date and time
 * 00:30, 24 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Fixed the vandalism, but I can't do anything about the filter.&mdash;Kww(talk) 00:35, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I added "shampoo" to exceptions. Ruslik_ Zero 10:03, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

67.149.31.144

 * Username


 * Pages you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Bagdasarian Productions, Nelvana


 * Description
 * Removed sections that really don't belong in a Wikipedia article since it adds nothing to the article whatsoever; they even took up much of the articles I edited.


 * Date and time
 * 23:45, 24 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * If the edit is constructive, simple press 'save' next time. Ruslik_ Zero 10:06, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

runs_on_empty

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * I Am... Tour


 * Description
 * It says I removed content when I did not. I removed bad citations and deleted images. If anything, I added more constructive contentRuns on empty (talk) 23:46, 23 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 23:46, 23 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The filter triggered because the overall change in the article's size as a result of your edit was very high and in the negative direction. The filter is unable to distinguish between removing large sections of an article and weeding out a large amount of unnecessary text. The bottom line, then, is that this was not a false positive, as you did remove content - you just put it back in in a way that was considerably shorter. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 19:06, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
 * To clarify further, if you know your edit is constructive, ignore the warnings and hit save. This particular filter will never be terribly accurate, and so it will never prevent you from editing. It's intention is to advise new users that there may be concerns from real editors later if their edit is not constructive. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 19:09, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

58.8.10.170

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)


 * Description
 * Fixing redirects. Please see also Abuse filter/False positives (#2) for which the comment (reply) was "The filter only warns. You can save your edit, if it is constructive." - so now a question: the message says "If this edit is constructive, please click 'Save page' again, and report this error." (my emphasis) - please confirm, am I correct to continue reporting these false positives? Or is it a waste of time for this type of edit? Thanks.


 * Date and time
 * 15:10, 21 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I disabled warning. Ruslik_ Zero 16:15, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Just to clarify - I wasn't asking you to do that (I don't know enough to suggest if it's a good idea or not), I was only asking if I should continue to report the warning or ignore it. I presume if the warning is disabled, this type of edit will still be tagged for review? Thanks. 58.8.10.170 (talk) 16:28, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I disabled warning and enabled tagging instead. This particular filter probably should not warn, because it is very difficult to separate bad edits from good ones. Ruslik_ Zero 07:38, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Sounds good. Thank you, keep up the good work! 58.8.10.170 (talk) 10:03, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

82.6.108.62

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * JAD_(JAva_Decompiler)


 * Description
 * Adding just one link to archive.org, was told "It appears you are adding external links to many different Wikipedia pages in rapid succession", which I had not been doing as my user history plainly shows. I run a TOR node but it's middle-man only, not an exit node so should not be relevant.  82.6.108.62 (talk) 20:38, 20 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 20:38, 20 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Resolved. Prodego  talk  21:09, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

79.101.174.192

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Foreign policy of the Barack Obama administration


 * Description
 * added statement with a reference-link 79.101.174.192 (talk) 20:30, 20 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 20:30, 20 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I expanded the warning. You may wish to read WP:References. Ruslik_ Zero 07:58, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

たろ人

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Leesong Hee-il


 * Description
 * Because I mistakenly used the film-stub instead of the film-director-stub filter, the robot has idiotically identified the director as if he were a movie, and put a "tireless sock" jacket on me. Is there any way an admin can remove the tag from the edit history?


 * Date and time
 * 13:58, 18 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The only way I know is WP:Oversight. Ruslik_ Zero 15:17, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
 * So what exactly is the point of reporting a false positive if no one can do anything to correct the situation?
 * My concern isn't just my reputation, but also the article. For a long time, its origin will have that black cloud over it on the very first screenful of history that shows up. たろ人 (talk) 21:03, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * We can delete that one edit, if you agree, たろ人. We need your agreement because you will no longer be attributed for creating the article, although I'll place a null edit in the article history to clarify it. Stifle (talk) 11:55, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * That's fine by me. I didn't bring in any sources that hadn't been used in related articles anyway. Rather tahn creating anything new, I just filled a void that should've already been filled anyway. たろ人 (talk) 22:49, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I think, it is better to suppress the edit summary and the summary in the log. Ruslik_ Zero 12:39, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Whatever you guys think is the most efficient way to remove the black mark from the article history is fine by me. If I have to accept some sort of demerit as a user, I would be OK with that. たろ人 (talk) 21:11, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

98.26.168.111

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Mescalyne


 * Description
 * Stub sorting. Somebody added it directly to a stub category instead of using a template. You're not supposed to do this.


 * Date and time
 * 13:56, 18 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I added "stub}}" to exceptions. Ruslik_ Zero 07:47, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

74.15.55.180

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * New York Rangers


 * Description
 * This article clearly suffers from recentism. Just the 7 games from the 2009 playoffs take as much as the expensive acquisition section which is 10 years. I was just shortening it because all the details are very unnesessary. But the abuse report says I am blanking! 74.15.55.180 (talk) 13:17, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

The edit was: (cur) (prev) 13:13, 18 June 2009 74.15.55.180 (talk) (71,552 bytes) (→2008–09 season:  ridiculous recentism) (undo) (Tag: blanking)
 * Date and time
 * 13:17, 18 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * No automatic filter can distinguish "bad large deletions" from "good ones". If you think your edit is constructive, press save button. Ruslik_ Zero 07:50, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

michaelmanghisi

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Zolpidem


 * Description
 * Search and Replace editing Michaelmanghisi (talk) 02:18, 18 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 02:18, 18 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * This is not a false positive. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked. Ruslik_ Zero 08:00, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

andrewcmurphy

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Andrew C Murphy


 * Description
 * I need to create a page for myself because the link in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oz_Squad, which was not created by me, currently links to a different Andrew Murphy. That's not too much to ask, is it? Andrewcmurphy (talk) 16:07, 17 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 16:07, 17 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

Not a false positive; you shouldn't really be creating an article about yourself. See WP:AUTO. Stifle (talk) 11:56, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

62.147.39.186

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * What's On TV


 * Description
 * I added to a redirect the normal R from other capitalisation (diff), got an abuse-warning I shouldn't edit redirects. Addition of any of the tags (or a category) shouldn't trigger an alarm.


 * Date and time
 * 19:57, 16 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I added an exception for this type of edits. Ruslik_ Zero 07:07, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

71.147.56.247

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Palmer House (University of Chicago)


 * Description
 * Switched redirect from the University of Chicago to Broadview Hall.


 * Date and time
 * 18:15, 16 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I made some adjustments. Ruslik_ Zero 18:33, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

199.125.109.126

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Talk:2009 CONCACAF U-17 Championship squads


 * Description
 * Removing old multimove templates.


 * Date and time
 * 17:09, 16 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I do not see false positives. All filters worked as intended. Ruslik_ Zero 18:25, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

67.100.125.17

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Polycletus (and two other related spellings/names)


 * Description
 * I combined two related disambig pages into one by changing Polycletus to be:
 *  #REDIRECT Polyclitus 
 * In Special:AbuseFilter/28, the definition of "existing substantial page" needs to be improved to allow overlapping disambig pages to be combined into a single, shared page with redirects for alternate names and spellings. 67.100.125.17 (talk) 09:24, 16 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 09:24, 16 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * It appears that the filter rule assumes that you should be logged in if you want to edit redirects. Yes, it's only a warning, but it needs to be improved to assume good faith when its clear that we're dealing with redirects and not an "existing substantial page". 67.100.125.17 (talk) 09:38, 16 June 2009 (UTC).
 * I increased the threshold for this filter to 500 bytes. Ruslik_ Zero 13:13, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

mwandishiman

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dickfor


 * Description
 * I was trying to make edits to an article I wrote, which I think was prematurely/unfairly flagged for neologism. I am unable to make further edits because "An automated filter has identified this edit as potentially unconstructive, and it has been disallowed. If this edit is constructive, please report this error." The edits are on the article's talk page.


 * Date and time
 * 03:17, 16 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

Until It Sleeps

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:169.227.254.128 (twice), User talk:121.212.240.106, and User talk:169.227.254.128


 * Description
 * Apparently Filter 58 has been known to block Huggle from warning people..., as evidenced by this


 * Date and time
 * 00:43, 16 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * This filter has been heavily changed in the three months since it triggered. Is it still an issue? Stifle (talk) 13:00, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

129.94.30.7

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * The_Game:_Penetrating_the_Secret_Society_of_Pickup_Artists


 * Description
 * Moving the "plot summary is too long relative to the rest of the article" template down to the plot summary section


 * Date and time
 * 06:40, 15 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You added "#REDIRECT Target page name", which should not appear in the articles. So the filter worked as intended. Ruslik_ Zero 18:56, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

189.27.0.69

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)


 * Description
 * I tried to create a new statment in granting to the famous character of the Simpsons, Nelson Muntz. The Nelson's Law is a derivation of the Murphy's Law. Thak you Gilbertow (talk) 02:29, 15 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 02:29, 15 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * What page was you editing? I can not do anything, if I do not know the page. Ruslik_ Zero 18:58, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

58.8.12.172

 * Username


 * Pablo the Safety Mexican (don't wikilink)
 * Abuse filter/False positives


 * Description
 * trying to revert this edit: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAbuse_filter%2FFalse_positives&diff=296299571&oldid=296272885 - attempts to revert were passed into an endless loop of false positive, CAPTCHA, false positive, CAPTCHA, "Wikimedia Foundation servers" error message, CAPTCHA, false positive, CAPTCHA... and so on, over and over, again and again. Eventually someone else reverted it - but they made a mess of the revert and deleted my previous false positive report (below), so I had to come back again and restore it...


 * Date and time
 * 14 June 2009


 * Comments

58.8.12.172

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Dek (news)


 * Description
 * revising redirect from #REDIRECT News style to #REDIRECT News style


 * Date and time
 * 05:15, 14 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The filter only warns. You can save your edit, if it is constructive. Ruslik_ Zero 19:03, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Scarletspeedster7
Hey! this is funny stuff. have a sense of humor about yourself!
 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Deaths in May 2009


 * Description
 * Attempting to report deaths from May 10 2009


 * Date and time
 * Scarletspeedster7 (talk) 19:04, 10 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Since you are autoconfirmed now, you, therefore, can edit without interference from the filter 30. Ruslik_ Zero 13:07, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Botflyrocks

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Botfly_(band)


 * Description
 * Adding information about a band named Botfly


 * Date and time
 * 02:57, 10 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Please look over WP:COI and WP:N. Your band does not meet our standards for notability and the filter acted appropriately in this case.   Wknight94  talk  03:25, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

203.218.193.116

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Radeon R800


 * Description
 * Reverting possible vandal: one edit dated June 3, with a load (2,867 bytes) of newly-added information without any source. Saw the abuse filter warning. 203.218.193.116 (talk) 18:58, 7 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 18:58, 7 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * This filter only warns. If you think your edit is constructive press save. Ruslik_ Zero 19:23, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

82.198.235.242
82.198.235.242 (talk) 19:39, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Username
 * Date and time
 * 19:39, 6 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * What was the reason for this large deletion? Ruslik_ Zero 17:56, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

87.194.117.80

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Rope (computer science)


 * Description
 * Added a table, got told off for "excessive whitespace". I think it's reasonable to use whitespace within a wikitable, as it's a lot easier to get the markup right if the cells are lined up. 87.194.117.80 (talk) 22:05, 5 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Date
 * Comments


 * It is just a warning. Ignore it, if you think you are right. Ruslik_ Zero 17:50, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Candid Op

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User:Legalnotes, powerbrokes


 * Description
 * declinging his block


 * Date and time
 * 19:11, 5 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * This user was blocked indefinitely. Ruslik_ Zero 17:47, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

213.152.239.2

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Lünen


 * Description
 * Was just adding further clarifaction on the biogass plant including it's potential output and completion date together with a reference for this information 213.152.239.2 (talk) 10:58, 5 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 10:58, 5 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I added an exception for "poo power". Ruslik_ Zero 12:24, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Lelguea

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Services_over_the_Messenger


 * Description
 * write address from Services over the messenger, not emails.


 * Date and time
 * 03:57, 5 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * E-mails generally should not be added to articles. If you think you edit is constructive you can press save button. Ruslik_ Zero 12:33, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Bizjournals

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * American_City_Business_Journals


 * Description
 * Under the Book of Lists section on the page, I added a new section called "Interactive Book of Lists" which was not mentioned anywhere on the American City Business Journals wiki page. Since this was not previously mentioned, I was contributing this information to further add factual value to wiki readers.  Bizjournals (talk) 15:24, 4 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 15:24, 4 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * This is not really a false positive, as the filter 149 was created to warn editors of a potential conflict of interest. Your username matched the link that you tried to add to the article. If there is no any conflict of interest, press save button. I also advise you to change your username (See WP:CHU). Ruslik_ Zero 12:46, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Markhurd

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Troll (Internet)


 * Description
 * Adding a newsgroup reference, which includes a message-id that looks just like an email address and that is the filter that matched. Mark Hurd (talk) 00:43, 3 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 09:55, 2 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

63.252.23.200

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Expletives


 * Description
 * I was replacing "sh-t" and "fuc-" with the correct words (since the article is about expletives and so-called "bad language"). I felt that censorship here detracted from the article (as it does everywhere else), given that such words are cadent to it. Since this was all I changed, it is reasonable that a swear filter caught me and assumed I was vandalizing the page, but it was a legit edit.


 * Date and time
 * 15:52, 2 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * If you want to help enforce the policy, you might want to create an account first. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 22:59, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

TimStilson

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Pioneertown,_California


 * Description
 * The coordinates given for Pioneertown, CA actually point to what appears to be a swapmeet in Yucca Valley, CA. I was attempting to update the coordinates to point to Pioneertown (in this case based on the location of the town's label in Google Earth).


 * Date and time
 * 18:54, 1 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Woops, you matched a pattern of one of our long-term abuse cases. I have tweaked the filter which will prevent you from seeing that again.  Apologies.   Wknight94  talk  00:56, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

70.29.208.129

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 2009_swine_flu_outbreak_in_the_United_States


 * Description
 * merging another page into it


 * Date and time
 * 08:00, 1 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

The whitespace filter is excessively sensitive. 70.29.208.129 (talk) 08:01, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

AltaV

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Moustachette


 * Description
 * Adding more detailed information about the movie in general and the characters, adding the names of the producers, adding references and external sources


 * Date and time
 * 05:43, 1 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The filter is choking on a four-letter word for elimination of waste from the body. New Wikipedia editors often use this word to vandalize Wikipedia. First just call it a "snake so big it ate a whole town of people", and then fill in the rest of the quotation after you have contributed to a dozen other articles. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 23:05, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Jud Newborn

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Hans Scholl - biography


 * Description
 * changing incorrect, outdated biographical information and updating it with the newest scholarly research, adding full citations to several scholarly sources.PLEASE NOTE: the citation to Dr. Newborn's article via his webpage is not advertising, but necessary because these findings are contained in an essay written in 2006 but not published yet in a book, magazine or newspaper, and only available as a pdf download via this site. The essay had originally been intended for incorporation into the updated edition as an "afterword" to Newborn's co-authored book of 2006, but could not be included because of the publisher's urgency in keeping to a drastically shortene,d publication schedule (2 and 1/2 months), which had reduced space for the intended Afterword. However, it has been distributed in booklet form since early March 2006 through lectures given nationally and internationally, as well as through attachment postings to scholarly listservs. THe essay in this way has been made widely available to scholars and the public. The reference is necessary to establish the copyright date of Newborn's research and written findings, which provided major breakthroughs in the history of the White Rose, particulary answers to long-sought questions about why the group chose its name (White Rose), and why brother and sister Hans and Sophie Scholl transformed from being avid Nazi Hitler Youth leaders into outraged anti-Nazi resisters. Dr. Newborn--Ph.D. with Distinction, University of Chicago, Founding Historian and Curator of New York's Holocaust Museum, the Museum of Jewish Heritage--is an expert on the White Rose and co-author of a widely known and respected book about the entire White Rose movement, including the role of Hans Scholl within it.  The book is cited by many scholars, readers and wiki editors/authors of entries relating to the White Rose.  See bio of Jud Newborn on wiki and website for credentials.


 * Date and time
 * 19:21, 30 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

These reverts were correct - this editor appears to be the author of the book he is citing and it is therefore WP:OR and he has a WP:COI.

129.237.215.47

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Batman


 * Description
 * I was editing the page to make it have the new status quo after the major Batman event Battle for the Cowl. The site told me that the edit was "potentially unconstructive, and has been disallowed." Why?


 * Date and time
 * 21:39, 28 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * New Wikipedia editors often use a short form of "Richard" to vandalize articles. Some of the filters will assume more good faith once you have created an account and established yourself as a trustworthy editor. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 23:13, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

ASmartiepants

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Robert Gould Shaw


 * Description
 * changing a link that the page had been deleted - the link was Anna Kneeland Haggerty I made it so it wasn't a link anymore because it doesn't lead anywhere


 * Date and time
 * 23:18, 27 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * A notorious Wikipedia vandal used to vandalize various pages with a word similar to that woman's surname. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 23:18, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

76.214.147.56

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * List of characters from The Night Angel Trilogy


 * Description
 * adding minor characters not on list


 * Date and time
 * 23:55, 25 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Wikipedia is not censored, but vandals like to exploit this and add slang terms for the anus to articles. To make it clearer to the Wikipedia software that your change is in fact constructive, please consider making an account. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 23:29, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

bestfranchisebooks

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Franchising


 * Description
 * I was adding something that was incorrect. The UFOC will state in Section 6 whether or not there are additional fees to be paid for training; and if so, the amount and when due. I outline this in my book in Chapter 3, perhaps I should have referenced it differently? Let me know. Thanks.


 * Date and time
 * 16:28, 25 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * When you cite your own book, you have to be very careful that you don't violate the guideline on conflicts of interest. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 23:31, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

cancuen

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Santa Catarina La Tinta


 * Description
 * Says, too many whitespaces or new lines. I added only a table


 * Date and time
 * 05:52, 25 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Actually, the problem doesn't appear to be the table itself. According to the diff, there appear to be 4 blank lines preceding the table; 1 is enough. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:36, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

207.237.41.202

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megalomania


 * Description
 * I transferred this section to the delusion of grandeur page.


 * Date and time
 * 00:40, 25 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

94.192.118.70

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * 2009 Formula One Season


 * Description
 * Bot reverted to page containing wrong information in Constructors Championship. BMW Sauber, AT&T Williams F1 and Scuderia Toro Rosso were in wrong placeson table and I corrected this


 * Date and Time
 * 16:22, 24 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * But almost blanketed the page, so, the filter worked as intended. Ruslik (talk) 09:23, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

False positive for repeating characters
This edit is tagged for repeating characters but the user changed only one character. Possibly triggered by a string of 0's already in the paragraph edited (in the cite web template).  Sp in ni ng  Spark  16:08, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Headbomb

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * WikiProject Oregon/Maintenance/Article alerts


 * Description
 * Blank + db the page (bot created an uneeded page)


 * Date and time
 * 13:54, 24 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I advise you against using 'crap' word, which triggers this filter. Ruslik (talk) 15:08, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah. I thought rollbackers were excluded from these triggers. If not, perhaps they should be. Headbomb {{{sup|ταλκ}}κοντριβς – WP Physics} 01:10, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Having rollback doesn't imply any greater level of clearance; you just have one extra button that makes reverting vandalism easier. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 16:46, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

72.244.200.166

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Talk:Swindle


 * Description
 * It appears that Special:AbuseFilter/33 doesn't like me "removing harmless vandalism from last year (and its autosign from SineBot" (to quote from my edit summary)


 * Date and time
 * 06:46, 23 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * It is not a false positive, because the filter worked as intended. If you think that your edit is OK, press save button (no filter can be perfect). Ruslik (talk) 15:13, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
 * No, it's an abuse filter, and since my changes didn't constitute abuse, it's a false positive. I didn't engage in "Talk page blanking by unregistered user" because I removed autosigned garbage from a minimal talk page; I didn't blank it--I left the wikiproject header in place.  So at a minimum the check to see if it was really a case of talk page blanking failed.  Want some more ideas?  Inspect the edit summary or the old page wikitext and make judgments from that. Or factor in the case that the old page size is small, and/or it contains junk.  In short: bend over backwards to Assume good faith, even for a change made by an editor who isn't logged in.  Thanks  72.244.203.231 (talk) 08:11, 26 May 2009 (UTC) (I was 72.244.200.166 before)

63.117.244.94

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * List of 90210 episodes


 * Description

I had been given a warning that the removal of the category List of animated television series category from the page for the CW drama 90210 would be considered vandalism. Why?--


 * Date and time
 * 00:17, 23 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The reason is that you were, in fact, removing all the categories from the page. Suh actions are frequntly, but not always, vandalsim. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:01, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

WaltCD

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * []


 * Description
 * Adding the word "he" between "Cabin Boy when" and "hosted the Academy" under the "In Popular Culture" section


 * Date and time
 * 19:02, 22 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

Freilach

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Klezmer


 * Description
 * Editing External links: fixing some, adding mdashes, added 1 link to a NY Klezmer Festival (not in any way associated with it).


 * Comments
 * Going to edit more this article as well as corresponding Russian translation.

lexib23

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Carol's Daughter


 * Description
 * Editing Lisa Price Biography


 * Date and time
 * 19:53, 20 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Actually you were rewriting the entire article. Please make smaller careful edits.   Wknight94  talk  00:17, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Geology1001

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Danielle Ofri


 * Description
 * Addressing resume/POV problem as tagged by previous user


 * Date and time
 * 00:49, 22 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

User talk

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * User_talk:Tintagel67


 * Description
 * Why won't you let me add a header to my talk page? Am I doing something wrong?


 * Date and time
 * 10:41, 20 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I don't understand what "position:fixed" means, but aparently this is what triggered the problem. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:11, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Knickerbockervillage

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Knickerbockervillage


 * Description
 * I was trying to add a link to my blog about Knickerbocker Village


 * Date and time
 * 18:26, 20 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Please read WP:EL and WP:COI. We'd prefer you not add that link.  Thank you.   Wknight94  talk  00:20, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

10.1.80.73

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * List of Dexter episodes


 * Description
 * Giving better episode descriptions


 * Date and time
 * 22:09, 19 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * After reviewing the log I think that the filter worked as intended. Ruslik (talk) 12:34, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

LaFolleCycliste

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Elizabeth filkin


 * Description
 * About to undo my first attempt at subject categorisation


 * Date and time
 * 10:56, 19 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * This is just a warning. If you are sure that your is edit correct (in this case it appears such) ignore the warning. Ruslik (talk) 15:08, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Daclyff

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Dust Devil (Madness song)


 * Description
 * Fixing a bloody typo


 * Date and time
 * 20:05, 18 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Sorry, one of the patented vandal tricks is to make numerous small edits in order to get more privilege. I've gone ahead and fixed your "orginally" typos everywhere I could find.   Wknight94  <sup style="color: blue;">talk  02:51, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks.

Ciutti

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Orofacial myological disorders


 * Description
 * I am the certified orofacial myologist who gave the original information that was inputed incorrectly on this webpage. As the incoming president of the International Association of Orofacial Myology I was asked to fix this webpage by correcting the information and adding a bibliograpy


 * Date and time
 * 21:41, 17 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * There are a couple problems here. For one, you almost completely rewrote the article.  You might want to try smaller edits as a newer user.  Second, there is a problem with the word "sucking" in that article.  We may have to tweak the filter slightly for this special case (you are not the first to be warned over "sucking" - a word often used in childish vandalism).   Wknight94  <sup style="color: blue;">talk  00:27, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

79.154.236.26

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Talk:St. Petersburg paradox


 * Description
 * I was adding a Python script I made in case anyone was interested, along with a link to the results. The filter complained there was too much whitespace. (Python scripts must have whitespace)


 * Date and time
 * 20:01, 16 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

Rajm26

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Tony Schwartz


 * Description
 * Creating Disambiguation page. Looks like I should have renamed the page vs copy and paste?


 * Date and time
 * 16:02, 15 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * If you want to move an article, you should use the move button (see WP:MOVE for details). Copy and paste moves shouldn't be used because it doesn't duplicate the existing page history.  [ジャム] [ t  -  c  ] 16:50, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Dabomb87

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Backstreet Boys


 * Description
 * I was fixing dashes and unlinked one country, which triggered the abuse filter message.


 * Date and time
 * 02:58, 15 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Seemed to be a valid edit to me. Can't quite work out from the given regexs and the diff quite how you triggered this filter, but I wouldn't worry too much - it is only set to warn so you should have been able to continue regardless.  [ジャム] [ t  -  c  ] 06:04, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The offending text is ==7th Studio Album (2009–present)==", which is interpreted as the announcement of a hypothetical album by the filter. Ruslik (talk) 09:50, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Da Killa Wabbit

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Barakc_Obama


 * Description
 * Barakc Obama


 * Date and time
 * I was attempting to add what I felt was a plausible spelling error to redirect to the current US President, after mis-typing the name myself. The page then came up with a error about something to do with an auto-filter, any information that could be given on my talk page would be appreciated.


 * Comments


 * It appears that spammers have been creating fake BLP articles, and this filter is designed to prevent it. If you think it is a valid redirect, please put in a request at WP:REQUEST.  [ジャム] [ t  -  c  ] 06:06, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

MicheleHaro

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * MicheleHaro


 * Description
 * Unknown - previous description not relevant to messages given in filter log  [ジャム] [ t  -  c  ] 06:09, 15 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 15:27, 14 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * From the logs in the filter, it seems you were trying to create a page for yourself. This is not allowed per WP:COI.  [ジャム] [ t  -  c  ] 06:09, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Aardwulf2010

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Chuck de Caro


 * Description
 * Trying to save a major edit to correct damage by hackers. Added new content and additional links to old material.  Save page took me to the Abuse Filter page.


 * Date and time
 * 22:34, 13 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Looks more like you were trying to replace the entire article - removing all maintenance tags and categories and inserting external links instead. As a new user, you would be better off editing more slowly and carefully.   Wknight94  <sup style="color: blue;">talk  01:00, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

hellonerd345

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * tim the idiot


 * Description
 * there is nothing wrong with making a bad article on my classmate.


 * Date and time
 * 22:09, 13 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The account is blocked indefinitely. Ruslik (talk) 09:57, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Rakrupski

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Zeller's congruence


 * Description
 * Adding assembly language source example


 * Date and time
 * 18:06, 13 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The filter worked as intended. In my opinion, it is not a good idea to add the program code to this article, as Wikipedia is not a user manual, after all. Ruslik (talk) 18:55, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Thekings8907

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Milton, WV


 * Description
 * Updating the Article


 * Date and Time
 * 3:35 AM, 11 May 2009 (EST)


 * Comments
 * Just trying to update our town's article. It seems I don't have the hang of this editing thing. I think it kind of screwed the page up. Sorry! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thekings8907 (talk • contribs)
 * Somehow your edit removed links all over the page including the categories and interwikis. How did all of those ]'s and ['s?   Wknight94  <sup style="color: blue;">talk  01:06, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

jpsgill

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * mullanpur


 * Description
 * I was Correcting the wrong information put forth by some people who entered the wrong information such as eliminated the information about two cities. Someone changed the information that is not correct and is politically motivated


 * Date and time
 * 15:33, 9 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

173.51.115.6

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Black raspberry


 * Description
 * I was removing, as it is not needed on disambiguation pages, and my action was a part of this page's cleanup.


 * Date and time
 * 04:29, 8 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * This seems like a valid trigger of the filter, but obviously for the wrong reasons (you were cleaning up vandalism to the page). Best way to avoid this filter would be to register for a user account.  [ジャム] [ t  -  c  ] 06:14, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

WOCCU

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * my talk


 * Description
 * I was posting the copied text as instructed that was automatically generated so that administrators could review the block placed on my account. Here is the instruction: Blocked editor: Please paste the contents of the block infobox (screenshot) below to help administrators locate your block in the logs. Administrators should not unblock without attempting to discuss with the blocking administrator (see the blocking policy).


 * Date and time
 * 21:26, 7 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Account has more than likely been abandoned as admins won't unblock/rename it.  [ジャム] [ t  -  c  ] 06:16, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Aliza250

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * E-mail address


 * Description
 * I added an email address @example.com to this page and got a spam-protection warning. Any spammer whose robots feed them addresses @example.com deserves what they get.


 * Date and time
 * 03:37, 7 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

209.6.223.221

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Jarndyce and Jarndyce


 * Description
 * removing empty ref section (contents were linkspam)


 * Date and time
 * 01:19, 6 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Your edit wasn't rejected, it was merely flagged for review by other editors. Since I'm not knowledgeable in this area, I'll leave it for someone else to review.  [ジャム] [ t  -  c  ] 08:09, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, it appears that the relevant entry in the abuser log is this, where the user actually did get a warning. This matches filter 79. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:34, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Sinhat

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Bhima_%28moth%29


 * Description
 * Replacing erroneous reference to category:Pandavas


 * Date and time
 * 13:03, 5 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You are only experiencing this because you are a new editor, and we often see removal of all categories by new editors. Once your account is autoconfirmed, you shouldn't experience this again.  [ジャム] [ t  -  c  ] 08:15, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Letdorf

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Sinclair Research


 * Description
 * added a Template:cite newsgroup citation to article, the USENET news message ID was erroneously interpreted as an e-mail address.


 * Date and time
 * 14:39, 4 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

Hatoulah

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Fuck You Heroes


 * Description
 * Performing a merge in accordance with the guidelines here Merging_and_moving_pages, I had copied and pasted the text to here Glen_E._Friedman and was deleting it from the source page as per instructions


 * Date and time
 * 14:37, 4 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I have now done your attempted edit based on the abuse filter log. I think there is usually not much we can do to prevent similar issues in the future. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:57, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, it seems like a possible cause is the fact that you did a malformed redirect. Please see here. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:59, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

72.244.200.224

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Mother's Day


 * Description
 * As noted in the edit summary, I moved text to Mother's Day (North America)


 * Date and time
 * 1824, 3 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

Eric Ward

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Eric Ward


 * Description
 * Updating correct information


 * Date and time
 * 12:49, 29 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

Masterchef604

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * UserPage:Masterchef604/Questionable Sauce


 * Description
 * Saving a future article about a local band as a user page to save/track/preview changes. The band is a shock rock band, and song titles probably tripped the filter


 * Date and time
 * 17:25, 29 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

77.183.126.62

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Chromosome 6 (novel)


 * Description
 * Can't revert addition of bogus content copied from I am legend


 * Date and time
 * 16:25, 29 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

Fredvs79

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * anal bleaching


 * Description
 * Adding info


 * Date and time
 * 10:59, 28 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

I'm not sure what set off the filter, I was just adding stuff. I think one of the links I inserted had the word "assh*le" in it.
 * No, it was the "poopreport" web site. And that's hardly a reliable source so I'm inclined to say this was a good stop.   Wknight94  <sup style="color: blue;">talk  11:40, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Aetheling

 * Username (Peewee Herman)


 * Page you were editing
 * Lebesgue monotone convergence theorem


 * Description
 * I was trying to create this redirect, but I was falsely accused of trying to create a very short page.


 * Date and time
 * 01:13, 26 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

Your redirect was malformed. Needs to be "#REDIRECT [[...", you left off the "#".  [[User:Dragons flight|Dragons flight]] (talk) 01:24, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

My apologies! —Aetheling (talk) 01:28, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

paulbrock

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Roy Keane


 * Description
 * undoing some old vandalism required re-adding a quote, which true to Keane's style had a fair amount of expletives; flagged when I was editing without logging in, passed when logged in. No surprise really, not sure how this sort of edit can be treated differently to coarse vandalism.Also included external link to a news site as a ref


 * Date and time
 * 21:55, 25 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

Strange. Maybe I'm doing this wrong but I don't see any filters triggered for Roy Keane. Wknight94 <sup style="color: blue;">talk  11:51, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

AfterFX

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Kingsclere


 * Description
 * I removed a large amount of unencyclopedic content from the Kingsclere page. The edits were needed as the page was in incredibly poor condition, and much of the content was unsuitable for Wikipedia. For proof, please look at the diff links on the page's history.


 * Date and time
 * 21:14, 25 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

Apparently I tripped Filter 30, "large deletion from article by new editors". It hasn't prevented me from making the edits, but I have been "warned" according to the abuse filter log. What exactly does this mean? Thank you in advance to anyone who answers. --AfterFX (talk) 01:44, 26 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Large deletions are usually acts of vandalism (more than 95% of the time). By having a warning we find that >50% of the childish vandals will abandon the edit, which leaves less to cleanup for the rest of us.  If your edit was well-intentioned, just ignore the warning.  Incidentally, filters targeting childish vandalism are automatically turned off for editors once they have a certain degree of experience, so if you keep editing you are unlikely to see this issue in the future.  Dragons flight (talk) 01:54, 26 April 2009 (UTC)


 * I see. Thank you for your help! --AfterFX (talk) 02:42, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

bythelake

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * []


 * Description
 * Editing: Copy/paste in the correct information


 * Date and time
 * 22:32, 24 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Filter working properly, please see our conflict of interest guideline. Nakon  22:55, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

deisenbe

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Comte de Lautréamont (section)


 * Description
 * adding reference to a published encyclopedia article on him


 * Date and time
 * 12:01, 25 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

Your URL includes your username. You are clearly a reputable published author but, unfortunately, you will have to expect pushback when adding references to your own publications on your own web site. We cannot programmatically distinguish between that and some teenage garage band spamming their "wicked cool" myspace page. Wknight94 <sup style="color: blue;">talk  12:15, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Canaccord

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Canaccord Capital


 * Description
 * writing information about the company and linking to another write-up that someone else did about another branch of the firm, Canaccord Adams. Is this possibly being flagged beacuse of user name? Thanks


 * Date and time
 * 19:23, 23 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Filter working properly, please see our conflict of interest guideline. Nakon  22:59, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

mrcolj

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Endowment_(Latter_Day_Saints)


 * Description
 * Trying to clean up the redundancy of "the penalty section was removed in 1990." As you'd guess, this article is controversial, written by Mormons and people who hate Mormons and few else.  So the latter party always sneaks in many references to the assertion that previous to 1990 the ceremony had a hand signal in it that apparently derived from the equivalent of "cross my heart and hope to die, stick a needle in my eye."  There's no image where I'm trying to delete.


 * Date and time
 * 15:06, 23 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

This is filter 131 and may be the same problem Kww reported immediately below-- Birgitte SB  17:36, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Kww

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Temple garment


 * Description
 * Attempted to remove an external link. For some reason, it tripped the filter guarding against image removal. Log entry is "13:58, 23 April 2009: Kww (talk


 * Date and time
 * contribs) triggered filter 131, performing the action "edit" on Temple garment. Actions taken: Warn; Filter description: Removal of controversial images (details) (examine)"


 * Comments

Alexandru.rosu

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Blazing Angels 2: Secret Missions of WWII


 * Description
 * Wanted to add a list of planes present in the game, very much like that from Secret Weapons Over Normandy, but got an excessive ammounts of whitespace error


 * Date and time
 * 10:11, 23 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

Roobie Breastnut is the founder of Party Porn music for B films and erotica films such as "The Gun," which the film made it to the 2003 Montreal Film Festival in Canada. From there, Roobie Breastnut's music has been reoccurring in Jim Wynorski's erotica films such as "The Lust Connection," "The Witches Of Breastwick," and most recently, "Cleavagefield," playing on HBO. Ironically enough, over twenty years prior from producing music for Jim Wynorski's films, Roobie had played a prostitute main extra in a film directed by Jim himself called, "Big Bad Mama Part 2." However during those twenty years, Roobie is well known in the Burlesque industry for re jumping the vaudeville craft. Building drivable props like "The Pooper Scooter" a drivable toilet. And a "Boob Mobile" driven at the old Exotic World out in Helendale. Roobie Breastnut is also a certified clown, trained by a master boss clown. And has streamed the first 60 minute movie ever to be played on ifilm.com'Italic text'

Patrick Giraudi

I was just writing a truthful article about Roobie Breastnut.

serene_skies

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * UCF_Victim_Services (ctrl-click)">UCF_Victim_Services (ctrl-click)">UCF_Victim_Services (ctrl-click)">UCF_Victim_Services (ctrl-click)">UCF Victim Services


 * Description
 * I am not done creating the page, so I do have "white spaces" in some places-but only necessary to separate between sections/PS How do u title a page from your own user name?


 * Date and time
 * 01:50, 22 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * [[serene_skies ]]

I do not know

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * [[Jane Eyre ]]


 * Description
 * A quote on the page misspelled "vampire." In the novel it is spelled "Vampyre" and for continuity it needs to be changed.


 * Date and time
 * 10:19, 21 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

Unknown
Page you were editing;Ok lol i am sorry xx
 * Gail Riplinger


 * Description
 * I was removing false and misleading information from the Gail Riplinger post.I also added new information regarding her newest work.


 * Date and time
 * 4/13/2009 1030PM

Wcp07

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Heights of United States Presidents and presidential candidates


 * Description
 * I was moving the reference for WH Taft's height from his listed height to his name to make it consistent with how the other presidents' heights have been referenced. The abuse filter prevented me from doing this


 * Date and time
 * 02:18, 19 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Filter 58 was broken just now; try again and you should be able to make the edit. <em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue">Hers <em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:gold">fold  (t/a/c) 02:19, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

JJL

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Articles for deletion/Waterloo Central Railway


 * Description
 * Adding the Redirect !vote that now appears there.


 * Date and time
 * 02:14, 19 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

Enigmaman

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * User_talk:Ohnoitsjamie


 * Description
 * I was linking to a user's contributions and asking for help with a situation


 * Date and time
 * 02:10, 19 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

65.60.213.203

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Phil Cuzzi


 * Description
 * I was attempting to add a reference to the sentence "In the regular season, he was home plate umpire for the second home game at the New Yankee Stadium, a 6-5 Yankees victory ending in a controversial at bat for Mark DeRosa including two contested calls by Cuzzi." The reference is a link to the article at "http://cleveland.indians.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20090417&content_id=4310718&vkey=recap&fext=.jsp&c_id=cle".


 * Date and time
 * 02:09, 19 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

Template:Computing law
I got the erroneous error message when I attempted to add just the tag to transclude a standard template and start a new template navbox. -Stevertigo 21:34, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

William R. Buckley

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * My user page


 * Description
 * Adding detail


 * Date and time
 * 02:10, 19 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

Gargomon251

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Mixed Messages (video game)


 * Description
 * The game is based on Eat Poop You Cat, which it would not allow me to edit.


 * Date and time
 * 19:35, 18 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The logs do not show that you've tripped any abuse filters while logged in; what exactly was the message you received? <em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue">Hers <em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:gold">fold  (t/a/c) 20:12, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

80.98.255.228

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Knight Online


 * Description
 * I have removed a section which lists monsters and their drops, which I think is irrelevant detail for those not playing the game. Also I have removed a section on private servers, which are illegal according to Knight Online's terms of service, and a section which seems to be a review of the game and therefore doesn't belong here.


 * Date and time
 * 12:01, 17 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

71.126.97.124

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Samurai


 * Description
 * Putting in more information on the Kamakura Bakfu


 * Date and time
 * 20:09, 16 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

Metajam

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * [[User_talk:203.116.30.239 ]]


 * Description
 * Adding a "please don't vandalize" message referrring to recent edit of Overseas Family School


 * Date and time
 * 03:04, 15 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

Breck

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Uwe Boll


 * Description
 * Was trying to revert the page to something meaningful. Currently it redirects to Belial.


 * Date and time
 * 00:46, 15 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

UCVcreate

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * ElliePooPaper


 * Description
 * I was trying to create a page for the Exotic Paper Company, also known as Ellie Poo Paper just because I think they are an interesting company. They make paper out of the least likely things, like banana peel and as the name suggests, elephant dung!


 * Date and time
 * 23:05, 14 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

Not giving out my IP address to public

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * the Country Gentlemen


 * Description
 * I was deleting information that wasn't supposed to be in there and you keep denying my edits. I have sources and legal documents showing that certain information does not belong, and I want Randy Waller information taken off the page when it has no relevance to The country gentlemen and he is using this site to promote himself


 * Date and time
 * 19:14, 14 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * This is not a false positve. Whatever else you think of the guy, describing his actions as "douchebaggery", etc. is not appropriate for an encyclopedia.  It may also help to explain your concerns at Talk:The Country Gentlemen.  Dragons flight (talk) 19:32, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Prompted by this report and amused by the thought that "Not giving out my IP address to public" thought he could hide his IP address, I did some clean up on the article, based on a bluegrass museum source. I know this comment is only peripherally related to the purpose of this page, but I had to comment anyway. :-)  72.244.207.146 (talk) 22:09, 14 April 2009 (UTC).
 * For future reference, when you are not logged in, every edit you make is logged in the page history under your IP address. If you're concerned about people seeing your IP address, you should create an account. It took all of five seconds to find your IP address and fix the links above, which we need to help investigate your report. <em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue">Hers <em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:gold">fold  (t/a/c) 22:15, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Valerian456

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Talk:Cattle


 * Description
 * I was reverting vandalism made by an anon editor.


 * Date and time
 * 18:21, 14 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Looking into this. <em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue">Hers <em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:gold">fold  (t/a/c) 22:20, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Someone's signature is formatted so that it sets off this filter. When you tried to replace the content of the page, it included that signature and assumed you were vandalising the page. Sorry about that, I've removed it from the filter for the time being. <em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue">Hers <em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:gold">fold  (t/a/c) 22:26, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

68.167.252.230

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Boston Red Sox Hall of Fame


 * Description
 * replace placeholder with.


 * Date and time
 * 04:28, 14 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * In the spirit of strict scrutiny, consider having Filter 79 detect the case like mine, where there is a <tt> </tt> without any <tt> </tt>. 68.167.252.230 (talk) 04:39, 14 April 2009 (UTC).


 * I would argue that this is not a false positive, since you did in fact remove the reference templates/tags; while I understand you were being constructive, in removing the reflist template (etc.), you've made it a little more difficult to tell when references do get added if someone forgets to put it back in. <em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue">Hers <em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:gold">fold  (t/a/c) 22:35, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Wilko5092

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Euan Caborn


 * Description
 * Writing the article about myself


 * Date and time
 * 11:09, 13 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * This was not a false positive; the filter correctly triggered, because you added an image gallery without changing any of the default values. In any event, we strongly discourage autobiographies for a long list of reasons, most notably that you have a clear conflict of interest when editing about yourself. <em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:blue">Hers <em style="font-family:Bradley Hand ITC;color:gold">fold  (t/a/c) 22:37, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

DetroitRebirth

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * The Detroit Project


 * Description
 * I edited the entire page in Microsoft Word and then pasted the new stuff into the page (in the process, overwritting all of the old information). This was caught by the Abuse Filter as a large deletion, but in fact I provided a net increase in information and also made the information more up-to-date/less biased


 * Date and time
 * 17:16, 12 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Try changing only one section in each edit. This way, editors can more easily track your changes with the "diff" tool in each article's edit history page. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 15:59, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Your username

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Static Shock Mutated Monsters


 * Description
 * This is a cartoon series.


 * Date and time
 * 13:58, 12 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

Anonymous

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Kalri village


 * Description
 * Remove someone's resume from and . This edit preventor software is pretty idiotic IMHO. Not exactly the best thing for attracting contributions.


 * Date and time
 * 09:05, 11 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Can't find anything for that username, but if you mean you weren't logged in, then it sounds like you triggered the filter for removing a lot of content. Stifle (talk) 13:11, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Incognito1980

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Abul Manzoor


 * Description
 * Iwas trying to move redirect the page


 * Date and time
 * 08:51, 11 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

--Incognito1980 08:51, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Trevor37 (talk) 22:00, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

 * Username
 * Trevor37


 * Page you were editing
 * Cinnamon budgerigar mutation


 * Description
 * I use a template to set up the basic page structure of a series of similar pages, so there is just a single line containing the substr:template command when the page is created


 * Date and time
 * 22:00, 9 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

72.244.207.160

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Scotch whisky


 * Description
 * Multiple changes, here's my edit summary: "add infobox, move list of types up, favor SWA over secondary sites in some places, annotate and clean up several existing refs, use columns, mark some unref'ed statements, copy-edit." Don't know which of my changes triggered 135, so it might be hard to diagnose.


 * Date and time
 * 09:39, 9 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I disabled the filter for having too many false positives. —Wknight94 (talk) 13:38, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

RamseyPalace

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * What page you were editing/moving - sandbox


 * Description
 * What you were doing - I wrote -Ramsey is a town with 125 independent shops and a lovely work ethic


 * Date and time
 * 08:40, 9 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Filter 135 should exempt the other sandboxes (subpages of Tutorial/Editing). Stifle (talk) 13:10, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

smwark

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Added an "About Us" page


 * Description
 * Added writen material that is 'About Us"


 * Date and time
 * 18:35, 8 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and thus is not a place to promote a music festival. Strictly a false positive but the edit was unconstructive anyway.MER-C 01:16, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Farahato

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Northern_High_School_(North_Carolina)


 * Description
 * I edited a spell check of demographics and placed a space between bandroom to be band room


 * Date and time
 * 10:43, 8 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

PurpleRain666

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Amorphis: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amorphis


 * Description
 * Tried editing "The Karelian Isthmus and Tales from the Thousand Lakes" section along with adding a legitimate reference. Most of my entry turned into italiacs and my reference along with two others (which were not in original section) are now displayed below this section instead of at the bottom.


 * Date and time
 * 15:56, 7 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * This was mostly appropriate. What happened is that you added a spot to list references (with a tag) even though there was already such a spot further down the page (a Reflist tag).  When you tried to remove the duplicate, the abuse filter got confused.  Perhaps a new rule is needed to prevent the duplication in the first place.  —Wknight94 (talk) 20:06, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

ApparenzA

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * ApparenzA/Sandbox


 * Description
 * Trying to post a draft to a user sandbox


 * Date and time
 * 13:14, 7 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I changed filter 135 to only look at the article namespace. A few other tweaks will be coming soon as well.  Sorry about that.  —Wknight94 (talk) 13:54, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Ravidevulapalli

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * N/A


 * Description
 * See here, the user couldn't create that account because of filter 102, and I can't find out why not. --Conti|✉ 13:00, 7 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 13:00, 7 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The name has "evula" in it - the username of a commonly-attacked administrator. —Wknight94 (talk) 20:17, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Mistake in page Vishal Krishna

 * sucharithan


 * vishal krishna
 * Vishal_krishna


 * Description
 * Shreya Reddy dies in thimiru (TAMIL) due to unexpected electric shock.


 * Date and time
 * 19:33, 5 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Shreya Reddy dies due to electric shock in the film thimiru [TAMIL]. But, i don't know about telugu.The mistake is found in CAREER column

Upstater9

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * []


 * Description
 * Update publication credits and insert blurbs for new book


 * Date and time
 * 12:14, 2 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

margaritametzger

 * Username
 * margaritametzger


 * Page you were editing/moving
 * Logicomix


 * What you were doing
 * I deleted a but was replacing it with another, replacing the same one and adding another one. Because I deleted the one, I was not allowed to edit the page.


 * Your edits moved the references that were in the article to a position below the tag. That tag automatically collects all references that are mentioned in the article so far. By moving them to the other location you caused the tag to no longer recognize them. So the filter was right in warning you, though perhaps it should make it clearer the edit was wrong for a different reason. - Mgm|(talk) 17:48, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

204.52.215.135

 * Username
 * 204.52.215.135


 * Page you were editing
 * Kinship


 * Description
 * I would like to report a false negative AND a false positive. I think filter 32 ought to have triggered on my first edit, thus disallowing the edit and saving me some embarrassment. In addition, when I deleted the nonsense edit, I triggered a filter for the removal of the bad edits! ... w00t for filter 30, I guess.


 * Date and time
 * 20:44, 30 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Thanks for the report. For future reference, the first edit mentioned is here - Mgm|(talk) 11:46, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The addition wasn't large enough to trip filter 32, the threshold for the filter could probably be turned down safely, but still not to that level. The edit only added ~14,000 bytes to the article, which isn't an entirely unreasonable size change, as it only increased the article size by about 50%. On a larger article, that would barely be a blip. Mr.Z-man 13:23, 31 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I've got an idea of a filter that would trip in these circumstance and still leave reasonable edits alone. It's just the question whether the regex flavor we're using allows it. I'll try to build the filter shortly and report back. - Mgm|(talk) 17:44, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I've designed filter 125 to try to avoid such edits in the future. It is now in testing. - Mgm|(talk) 08:43, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

32.178.157.35

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Brian Kelly (historian)


 * Description
 * 32.178.157.35 was flagged by Filter 29 for removing a deletion tag but it was the closing admin Fritzpoll while the IP added a cat. Both actions were cosidered as one edit and attributed to the IP..--Tikiwont (talk) 12:48, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I've now also dropped a note to Werdna.--Tikiwont (talk) 20:00, 31 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 12:45, 30 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

64.229.58.223

 * Jack & Jill
 * Tried to improve he article but it was flagged as vandalism
 * Date and Time March 29 2009

Neither your IP address nor the article title appear in the filter log. Were you logged on under another name? Did you mean to point to the disambiguation page or a specific article listed there? =- Mgm|(talk) 09:17, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments

AUG

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Big dumb idiot


 * Description
 * This isn't really a true false positive but it would be better if, in this case, an attempted save after recent delete triggers MediaWiki:Deletedwhileediting instead of the abuse filter. I was adding a db-vand (the page was still there when I was in the editing screen) but the page was already deleted after I tried to save. I know this probably isn't that big of a deal but it would be better if Deletedwhileediting is shown rather than a possible abuse message in such a situation.


 * Date and time
 * 19:11, 28 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

192.12.88.7

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Talk:Faggots


 * Description
 * Responding to a discussion with "Huh? I don't understand what's stupid about using "Faggots" as a redirect to "Faggot", and I don't understand this "no other meaning" stuff. Wouldn't the lack of any other meaning be a reason for the page to be a redirect to begin with? 192.12.88.7 (talk) 02:34, 28 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 02:34, 28 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The filter was triggered by the word "Foggots", which in some context may be a personal attack. If you think the edit is constructive, press 'save' button. Ruslik_ Zero 14:02, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

67.100.125.197

 * Username


 * Pages you were editing
 * Supreme Court of the United States, Fairfax Stone


 * Description
 * Fixing problems with use of refbegin/refend/reflist


 * Date and time
 * 22:36, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Source: replacing duplicate/similar references with a link to a named ref, it <tt> </tt> &rarr; <tt> </tt>. Filter needs to be modified to account for this. In the meantime, keep up the good work! <b style="color:forestgreen;">Happy</b>‑<b style="color:darkorange;">melon</b> 23:30, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * BTW, the "save again" didn't work at first (might have been a javascript/cookie issue, or an issue with adding more details to the edit summary--I didn't spend any time trying to figure that out (67.100.125.197 (talk) 22:41, 26 March 2009 (UTC))
 * Got harassed a second time by Fairfax Stone changes (don't know what the problem was this time--check them out if you care). This is getting really annoying. (67.100.125.197 (talk) 22:56, 26 March 2009 (UTC))
 * I and Dragons flight have tweaked the filter that you were tripping, so it should not trigger on the action you were performing (legitimately replacing a duplicate ref with a named ref). Let us know if you still have problems. <b style="color:forestgreen;">Happy</b>‑<b style="color:darkorange;">melon</b> 23:57, 26 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Actually in the logs he tripped both 61 and 79. I believe I've now also patched the other one.  Our apologies.  Dragons flight (talk) 00:10, 27 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The code itself was fine, but it didn't consider the posibility that the article could contain duplicates to begin with. Removing duplicates is now excluded as a filter trigger. - Mgm|(talk) 09:16, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * This comment could be a reference to the false positives I received attempting to re-apply some of the changes to "Fairfax Stone" (Fairfax Stone Historical Monument State Park) mentioned above but reverted by someone. 72.244.204.23  09:24, 27 March 2009 (UTC).

Tungsten

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Cock-a-leekie


 * Description
 * Trying to write Cock-a-leekie, which was filtered as "unconstructive".


 * Date and time
 * 20:26, 26 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Looks like you weren't logged in, so I can't find out which filter you hit. So I can't fix anything :(. Prodego  <sup style="color:darkgreen;">talk  23:53, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Looks like filters 9 and 97.   The actual article is Cock-a-leekie soup.  Powers T 13:04, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Zborov

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Criticisms of the BBC


 * Description
 * The previous reporting of the legal case about the Balen report was much out of date and needed substantial replacement.  Also there was repetition concerning "the independent panel's report".  The separate section headed the Balen report became superfluous and was deleted by way of clean up. I have now  deleted less duplicate material and left the page therefore in need of clean up but have avoided the filter and effected my edit.


 * Date and time
 * 18:06, 26 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You triggered filter 18 (test type edits) because you added link title to the article. In this case you should have replaced 'link title' with the real title of the link. Ruslik_ Zero 14:10, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

71.41.210.146

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * DCF77


 * Description
 * Trying to clarify the explanation of the DCF77 phase shift keying, I replaced "A 0 chip causes a +13° phase advance, while a 1 ship causes a −13° phase lag." with "During 0 chips the carrier phase is advanced +13° phase, while during 1 chips it is retarded −13°." I suspect the word "retarded" triggered the vandalism filter, but this is the technically correct usage, from which the insult is derived. In any case, I want to emphasize that repeated 0 bits do not cause repeated phase advances, but rather the phase is held at +13° as long as the 0 bits last, then changed −26° to −13° when the next 1 bit comes along.


 * Date and time
 * 04:40, 26 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

71.41.210.146 (talk) 04:40, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The filter triggered because you used 'is retarded'. Obviously you used it correctly. I am not sure what to do about it, the easiest thing would be for you to go here and fill out the form. :). Any suggestions? Prodego  <sup style="color:darkgreen;">talk  18:56, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

192.75.48.150

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Heyting algebra


 * Description
 * Date and time
 * 18:44, 25 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

OhioRuthie

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Family Court With Judge Penny


 * Description
 * Trying to remove a article for specific reasons..I've been trying to contact those in charge who are helping the offender but so far they haven't contacted me. Proofreader 77 I think that's his name and EdBever. Ruthie818@neo.rr.com please contact me.


 * Date and time
 * 21:41, 22 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Reviewer's comments


 * Involved in edit warring and blocked. Leave as an administrative matter.  Dragons flight (talk) 01:23, 23 March 2009 (UTC)


 * See the Abuse filter talk page. I think we should improve the warn message on the filter involved. - Mgm|(talk) 11:58, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Alarics

 * Alarics
 * User:Alarics


 * Page you were editing
 * Sekolah Sri Garden


 * Description
 * Removed a vast amount of POV junk. It looked as if it had all just been pasted in from the school's advertising brochure. There was also a great deal of duplication.

21:43, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Date and time


 * There really isn't a lot we can do to address this. A new editor deletes a lot of text... most of the time that is bad and the warning is deserved.  The good news is that the filter in question will turn off once your account is a few days older and you are no longer "new".  Dragons flight (talk) 22:02, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


 * So, do I take it that you are accepting my edit and you agree it was a false positive? Alarics (talk) 22:25, 20 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I accept that the article was not written the way it should have been and your truncation was well intended. I haven't tried to study your changes in detail to know whether I'd agree with all of them.  Dragons flight (talk) 22:47, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

ar:xkfrhume ueyumf jdgumf jegurmcjrgumrcirgjrrkgjrguvrcjecrcjecjetugrkgjrfykdckrfjrtyktcjrgykrcjrfjefghgm jrgumfvjrgkecjrgjr