Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives/Archive 21

99.57.20.144

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 01:48, 17 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Let's try to use as clean language as possible.Jasper Deng (talk) 04:33, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Blahblah123456753

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 07:53, 17 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The filter was workig correctly, and prevented vandalism from getting into the article. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:05, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

86.188.183.146

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 10:32, 17 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

I was being a silly banana
 * Even a silly banana isn't allowed to replace the text of an article wit the word "Lol". עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:38, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

46.166.128.110

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was trying to insert "germanic ethnic group" in the among others articles above and i got stopped by Edit Filter 439, i do not know where to post this but i request that Edit Filter 439 is to be removed because inserting facts or non-vandalism text cannnot be censored or filtered and removed automatically (that is NOT what edit filters in wikipedia are for) , atleast tell how long this edit filter is going to last ?!


 * Date and time
 * 11:37, 17 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Us blocking all your accounts and creating an edit filter to stop you is designed to give you a clear message - you shouldn't be doing any edits here. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:19, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

216.79.193.52

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 16:34, 17 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Clearly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 19:57, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

71.175.53.239

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I reverted the previous IP's edit as vandalism, and checked the page history to see if the edit got through, but apparently I triggered filter 364, "Changing the name in a BLP infobox". See Special:AbuseLog/5776895 and . Note: I have a user account but did not log in, apparently, when I edited. Can the issue with the edit filter be addressed? Thanks!


 * Date and time
 * 18:48, 17 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The filter was working correctly. Checking for a revert is not practical, and even if it were, it might be a bad idea - keep in mind, for example, that some IP hoppers will create a version which they prefer, and then undo anyone who reverts them. Keep in mind that merely having edit filter entries, or tagged edits, doesn't immediately mean anything - any possible consenquence goes through human users (usually admins) before any action is taken. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 20:01, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

174.57.146.172

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I am trying to make the plot more detailed and specific. That is all.


 * Date and time
 * 00:55, 18 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * You deleted the entire article, repeatedly, and the filter will no longer allow you to edit this article. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  22:01, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

INTI.edu

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * updated external links


 * Date and time
 * 21:52, 18 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * The filter quite properly stopped you from adding spamlinks to a Facebook "fanpage"; it is functioning as it should. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  22:03, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

DatPersonUDontKno

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * marine reverted my edits, im trying to revert my edits back


 * Date and time
 * 04:35, 19 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You are abusing multiple accounts right now. Warning you for that.Jasper Deng (talk) 04:40, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

TattelTales1

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * im trying to make "African immigration to Puerto Rico" redirect to "Afro-Puerto Rican", simply because they are not African immigrants if they lived there for centuries, they Afro-Puerto Ricans, it isnt allowing to redirect it though


 * Date and time
 * 05:38, 19 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Abusing multiple accounts.Jasper Deng (talk) 05:39, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

68.36.86.15

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Tried to add the word "motherfucking", with reference to Merriam-webster entry verifying it as a word.
 * Even as a piece of information? It has no vulgar context, and merely appears as a jumble of letters among other jumbles of letters.
 * So a profane quote from history would be acceptable; but this instance of a legitimate word, devoid of any context, which is of interest to fans of logology and the like, is not acceptable? Please excuse me if I am not using this "Report" correctly.
 * Some quotes can be justified because they are quotes.Jasper Deng (talk) 23:23, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * For goodness sake, there is an entire list of ethnic slurs on Wikipedia! And some of those words have entire articles dedicated to them. I have provided this entry with just as much justification (a reference to a legitimate source) as any of those words. By the precedent set by that list existing, my edit must be allowed, or, you must dismantle that list.
 * Those articles are different from this. This page isn't about slang.Jasper Deng (talk) 23:33, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Correct. The page is about words that do not have repeated letters, of which this word fits the description. One of these pages is a concentration of hateful language, while the other, is an enumeration of lexical oddities: words that are only interesting for the arrangement of their letters. Both pages are justified as collections of facts and history.


 * Date and time
 * 23:05, 19 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I don't think we need that.Jasper Deng (talk) 23:06, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The f-word should not be used except when necessary.Jasper Deng (talk) 23:15, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

85.23.32.64

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Linking to an external JPEG with &#123;&#123;Citation | url=… | format=JPEG&#125;&#125; resulted in an unnecessary warning. The same URL was already there without the template.


 * Date and time
 * 12:40, 20 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

76.70.50.26

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * i was editing the controversies


 * Date and time
 * 01:01, 21 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Right. Vandalism warning is on your talk page.Jasper Deng (talk) 01:03, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

134.191.232.69

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Changed the capitalization of the 'i' in iptables - Iptables (incorrect)->iptables.


 * Date and time
 * 09:55, 21 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Unfortunately, even the best filters can have false positives. On the other hand, this filter doesn't prevent the edit - if you save it after the warning, it does update the page (as I see you did). עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:18, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

95.252.246.223

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * cannot revert a section blanking by restore an old version


 * Date and time
 * 16:01, 21 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

92.24.196.238

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 17:41, 21 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Clearly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 17:43, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Adam gazey

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * adam gazey


 * Date and time
 * 19:29, 21 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

trying to create a document on the decomposing of rocks and cell walls


 * Your comment is clearly inconsistent with the edits that the filter caught. What I see in the filter log is a series of inappropriate page creation attempts. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 03:50, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

91.52.164.64

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * enter this toolserver link for a bug report
 * and/or enter this result for the same bug report: Time taken to execute command: 1 NaN secondss.


 * Date and time
 * 21:53, 21 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

Now I successfully managed to enter my bug report after 4 tries, leaving out the base information and referring to here instead ... -- Juergen 91.52.164.64 (talk) 22:09, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I have fixed the report for you the way you wanted it. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:25, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you.
 * But what could have been the reason(s) for my inability to enter it that way ? Are they fixable ? -- Juergen 91.52.190.87 (talk) 08:31, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Due to the nature of these filters (they are designed against specific users who create lots of accounts to cause trouble), I can't give you much details; however, I don't think that we can fix these. Please note, however, that most of our filters effect only anonymous users or new users ("new" being defined differently for different filters); if you create an account, you will hit many fewer filters. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:51, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
 * In fact, I have an account that I use for protected pages only (mainly dewiki). Changing the IP every day keeps my interest profile (pages that I read and edit) private.
 * Does Prolific sockpuppeteers mean that there are many sock puppets generated on the English Wikipedia from here, Germany, near Duesseldorf (this is where 91.52.0.0/16 is located) ??
 * Those filter rules should be public so I can read and work around them. -- Juergen 91.52.190.87 (talk) 00:10, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Then vandals can find ways around it too. Wikipedia is very open, and your editing activity is something the community needs to be able to see. Changing IP addresses this often does not allow that. No-one, however can see your reading history.Jasper Deng (talk) 00:13, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Reading history becomes editing history for me as most pages contain any typos. Using an accout for everyday work would mean to reveal my interest profile. -- Juergen 91.52.168.83 (talk) 22:59, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

BJ23

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 01:13, 22 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * For this frivolous report and your disallowed vandalism attempt, you have earned a vandalism warning. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 03:16, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

12.219.49.66

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 14:02, 22 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Your recent editing attempt did not appear to be helpful; therefore, the filter acted correctly. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 18:48, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

129.11.231.83

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * wanted to change "sex act" to "removed thong and licked penis". Sex act isn't descriptive and is a rather pointless and misleading euphemism, in my opinion. It doesn't tell you what happened, and is abstract and vague. Plus, it doesn't appear that it was a sex act: licking a penis doesn't always have to be.


 * Date and time
 * 15:50, 22 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

199.235.148.232

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 16:07, 22 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

I was trying to educate the world on how evil David Irving really is please approve of the edits otherwise you are helping the Holocaust deniers


 * [[Image:Stop hand.svg|30px]] Per Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, we cannot accept any controversial or negative statement about a living person that is not directly supported by a reliable source. Furthermore, the falsification of quotes (in part or in whole) is a big no-no. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 18:12, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

168.8.212.133

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * i was trying to add to the page do make it more descriptive.


 * Date and time
 * 20:19, 22 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Yeah right.Jasper Deng (talk) 23:42, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Secretmodigliani

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * adding a complete source for paintings year by year, a new biography, crital essay, etc. etc.


 * Date and time
 * 22:04, 22 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Not a false positive - you did add a URL containing your username. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:30, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

46.246.240.232

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I tried to put the stamp to the infobox. If putting a stamp for the main image is not allowed please tell me. The log says "Long-term pattern abuse". And then when I went to put the stamp to its old position it again prevented me from doing it and now the stamp is not in the article.


 * Date and time
 * 23:09, 22 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The problem is that the filename of the stamp happens to match what appears to be a "Long-term pattern abuse" patern. An other user did what you had tried to do; and if you had moved it in a single edit, the edit would have been fine. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:51, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

128.114.59.178

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Tried to undo the vandalism of this edit.


 * Date and time
 * 23:13, 22 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Unfortunately, people editing anonymously adding these words to articles, especially articles about living people, are almost always vandalism. Note, however, that the revert you tried to do was done later on. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:56, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

216.59.230.156

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 23:13, 22 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Frivolous report.Jasper Deng (talk) 23:39, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

106.71.21.112

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description they have removed important details about their child rapist band manager


 * Date and time
 * 12:49, 23 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Absolutely not a false positive, edit was vandalism - TBloemink (talk) 12:50, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

71.221.181.76

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I tried to voice my descrption


 * Date and time
 * 23:12, 23 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * It had better stay off Wikipedia though. Vandalism warning is on your talk page.Jasper Deng (talk) 23:13, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

69.234.27.127

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * To show, with references to substantiate my assertions, that the the idea that woman can become a divining priest, which requires initiation in the presence of the deity Odu (whom does not allow women in her presence), by virtue of having a womb, is not traditional.


 * Date and time
 * 05:25, 24 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

Jasonisanahole

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 13:58, 24 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Clearly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 15:05, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Colour King

 * Username


 * Page you were editing

I was trying to post a note explaining I am the new account of a username softblocked user.
 * Description
 * Date and time
 * 21:43, 24 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * If your other account has a username soft block, you don't need to announce that account here. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:42, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

89.243.219.80

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 19:23, 25 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

i am sorry i did notin wrong
 * No you did. Vandalism warning is on your talk page.Jasper Deng (talk) 19:34, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

173.81.144.39

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I ws tellin the truth brah


 * Date and time
 * 19:58, 26 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Nothing but pure vandalism. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 04:31, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Rileymcgurn

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 02:28, 27 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The edits in question did not appear to be helpful. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 04:22, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

67.148.129.98

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 03:07, 27 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

i wanted to edit and it wouldn't let me so im kind of pissed so im going to sleep bye for now! But im not goinng to sleep well


 * [[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=|link=]] This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- SoCalSuperEagle  ( talk ) 04:13, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Polar568

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 21:40, 27 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Advertising is prohibited.Jasper Deng (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Tim25013

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 00:44, 28 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Nope. Vandalism warning is on your talk page.Jasper Deng (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

77.23.161.117

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 10:07, 28 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Not a false positive. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:43, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

166.249.192.212

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was trying to indicate that Uncle Kracker dissed Faygo brand soda, by saying in the song "If Heaven Ain't Alot Like Detroit.", "Fuck Faygo bitch we pound cans of Strohs.". Now he is featured on the Faygo website. I pointed out the hypocrisy of the situation. Not that my opinion matters, I wasnt going to express it, but he does not deserve to be featured on their website, the Insane Clown Posse is the reason why there company does so well, its unjust that someone like Uncle Kracker is on there.


 * Date and time
 * 19:40, 28 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * This violates Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy.Jasper Deng (talk) 20:42, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

168.11.60.243

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 20:14, 28 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * [[Image:Stop hand.svg|30px]] Your pure vandalism attempts have just earned you a warning. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 20:24, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

68.55.112.31

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Express disagreement with User:Dan653's determination that one of my other edits was unconstructive


 * Date and time
 * 22:31, 28 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Your  tag triggered the filter. Try  instead.Jasper Deng (talk) 23:00, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

99.236.209.80

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * In the last cell of the table under Timing of generations and turnings, I tried to change "Global Finnacial Crisis" to "Global Financial Crisis", fixing the misspelling in the second word. This is especially important as this was supposed to be a link.


 * Date and time
 * 04:25, 29 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

False positive. You can make the edit now. Sole Soul (talk) 05:39, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Kdjones23

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was trying to create this page


 * Date and time
 * 08:15, 29 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * , please try again. -- zzuuzz (talk) 08:22, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

68.171.95.241

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 15:10, 29 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Not a false positive. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:25, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

74.73.191.124

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 20:22, 29 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

This report has been determined to be bogus. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Do not continue to make disruptive edits to Wikipedia articles or you may be blocked from editing. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 22:02, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

81.104.144.158

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 21:06, 29 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

Your report has been determined to be bogus. Do not continue your vandalism edits or you will be blocked from editing without further notice, even if the filter stops you again. (A courtesy copy of this message will be placed on your user talk page.) -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 21:47, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Klaasbaas

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was making a page about Mink but, i looked at an other page how to do this. so i coppyd that page, and paste it on 'Mink oude Breuil' page. and then i removed the wrong information.


 * Date and time
 * 10:31, 30 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * [[Image:Stop hand.svg|30px]] The page that you had created was an attack page and has already been speedily deleted. Furthermore, the information that you tried to add in the filtered edits was obviously bogus. After examining your other contributions, I've decided to give you an "only" warning. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 17:56, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

107.0.29.81

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 13:36, 30 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Clearly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 17:13, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Hondo1123

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 16:47, 30 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * [[Image:Stop hand.svg|30px]] Frivolous report; final warning issued to filer. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 17:00, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Gunar89

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was trying to create a page for his newest album.


 * Date and time
 * 19:34, 30 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Look at the name of track 13 - this is used so commmonly by vandals that most new accounts using it are actually vandals. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 05:43, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

78.158.168.89

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I have corrected some incorrect red links but this filter prevented me from saving the correction.


 * Date and time
 * 12:35, 1 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Unfortunately, most new accounts adding words like this are vandalizing. I do see, however, that a couple days later a registered user seems to have done your edit. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:29, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

2.106.167.212

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 15:07, 1 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * False report. The fact that you made a successful blatant vandalism edit after your failed page blanking attempts has made it very difficult (if not impossible) for me to assume good faith. Hence, I have chosen to issue a vandalism warning. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 17:37, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

71.204.62.240

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 00:41, 2 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Clearly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:31, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

99.99.166.46

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was attempting to edit a quote in the "Religion" section of this article for grammatical correctness and fullness of content. My addition to the quote includes a somewhat vulgar phrase, so clearly it was picked up by the automated filter. This is not vandalism. The quote, taken directly from the show in question, does indeed end with a fairly vulgar slang term. The addition of this statement at the end of the quote completely alters the quote's tone and meaning, therefore making its inclusion mandatory if the quote is to be properly understood and not misinterpreted by the reader. Given the nature of South Park and the fact that the word "balls" is already used in a slang manner multiple times on this page, often in episode titles, I do not see a problem with this edit, but clearly the filter is not capable of such reasoning and can only do its job. So I would request that this edit be allowed.

On a side note, I might add that it's a little ridiculous that I cannot write out the "questionable" phrase itself, even on this page. Why would you word censor a page that is meant to be used for reporting false instances of word censoring? Doesn't make an ounce of sense to me, but then again, I'm just a programmer.
 * Date and time
 * 06:01, 2 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

203.81.67.183

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I add Template:Dynamic IP template to my userpage because it really is dynamic IP. And your automatic filter keeps saying me that my edit is nonconstructive. So annoying. What the hell is this?
 * What is more funny is that my edit was disallowed because of "disruptive editor threatening self-harm"????


 * Date and time
 * 10:28, 2 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * , thanks. -- zzuuzz (talk) 10:31, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

142.26.23.30

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 18:57, 2 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Clearly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:33, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

99.72.11.247

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 02:19, 3 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Nothing but pure vandalism attempts. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 08:42, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Isy1995

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Rebecca Ferguson (singer) her album Heaven

I was just placing real reviews of the album with links so it could be verifiable been working on it for 1 hour.
 * Date and time
 * 04:00, 3 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

86.28.255.49

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 02:10, 4 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Nothing but pure vandalism. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 17:40, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

98.249.18.52

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 06:40, 4 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|30px]] Filer already given a 2-week block for attempting personal attacks or harassment per block log. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 17:37, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Mark Henry hoo hoo

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 17:38, 4 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Stop hand.svg Bogus report; final warning issued. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 17:51, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Prapti Naskar

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I typed a whole book titled 'The diary of a young girl' and wanted to give it to wikipedia, but as I copied and pasted it, the error message was shown and that was the end. It was disappointing.


 * Date and time
 * 12:51, 5 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

Typing a whole book would almost definitely be a copyright violation; even when not, the book itself isn't an encyclopedia article. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:38, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

64.18.44.33

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 14:07, 5 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Stop hand.svg Nothing but vandalism. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 18:21, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

193.61.255.84

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 16:10, 5 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Stop hand.svg Quit trying to vandalize Wikipedia. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 18:17, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

108.32.94.36

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Making it available for people to click on a link. This link took them to another wikipedia page of a show that he starred in.


 * Date and time
 * 05:19, 6 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

95.149.238.14

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * removing rude content


 * Date and time
 * 17:09, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Nice try.  HurricaneFan 25  17:10, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comments

Glengrantjones

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Personal Life


 * Date and time
 * 20:53, 6 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

Create my own page
 * If it's about you, please create it at User:Glengrantjones. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 20:59, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

70.137.152.169

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * ==When adding patents, please see below==

When adding patents to articles, please add a link to the appropriate patent database, e.g. for the European and US patents use

this results in a clickable link to the EU patent database. I do not yet know how to deal with JP patents, they seem not to be registered in the EU db. Just copy the above without the nowikis and fill in the fields with real information. Country and number is minimum. Make sure the resulting link resolves in the database. 70.137.152.169 (talk) 23:57, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

I tried to give guidance how to include a patent, using template cite patent. I really cannot imagine what would be wrong here. It is completely innocent and instructive to the purpose of editing the article. I presume the nnnnnn placeholder for a number without dots and dashes triggers "repeating characters" filter. This is dumb. I still cannot see why I would be a "prolific sockpuppet". I am an IP editor with variable IP, this is completely legitimate. I have no named account, so what is going on? I am prolific, all finest edits to improve the quality of the articles, as you may convince yourself. Your filter is paranoid.
 * Date and time
 * 23:57, 6 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

Penguinazul

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * When I was editing the page, I felt that new sections needed to be added to make the article more informative and user friendly, and I removed some sections because I knew I was going to either eliminate them completely because I felt they were unnecessary, or I knew I was going to change them completely.


 * Date and time
 * 06:13, 7 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I'll explain on user's talkpage. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 06:21, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Savnoc

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Wikipedia says that by adding links in "rapid succession" it looks like spamming and my links may all be removed. A manual review of my edits will show that I am adding only official links and relevant information to these pages, and not spamming. Just trying to help out and I don't believe the links are irrelevant. For the last page I edited, the link may be removed since I linked to their page on a former label's site, but the others are definitely fine.


 * Date and time
 * 08:36, 7 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * What's your connection with www.relapse.com? עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:42, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I enjoy the music of several of their bands. I plan to add links missing for bands on other labels as well, but right now I'm not even sure that I am allowed to add more links to pages. Savnoc (talk) 02:12, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

24.20.3.115

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 02:34, 8 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Clearly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:21, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

RockonStudio

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * chang the page because the info was false


 * Date and time
 * 03:15, 8 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Adding the words "I like cheese" can't reasonably be called "chang [sic] the page because the info is false". It's clearly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:23, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

203.97.170.50

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 05:55, 8 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

Revert vandalism by 71.167.21.119, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Charlie_Brown&diff=464691679&oldid=464419614
 * "loser" triggered the filter. Done.Jasper Deng (talk) 05:57, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, there are several words which, when added by anonymous users, are more likely to be vandalism than helpful. You were unluckey enough to try and restore one of them. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:26, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Benjaminw w

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * correcting some mistakes that I had written and adding references and citations


 * Date and time
 * 17:26, 8 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * - there was already an article on this topic, under mindfulness; the title heartfulness has been reverted to a redirect, as there is no purpose in duplicating article content. Your best bet is to work on improving the mindfulness article. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  17:49, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Dupheerich

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * See discussion here: This concerns contributions by User:Dupheerich (but it seems there is no way to remove my name from this automated form. Surely you don't expect a Wikinewb to navigate this process!) Rmhermen (talk) 01:58, 9 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 01:58, 9 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The problem is that in the "Map" parameter in the infobox the user placed a "position: absolute". Note, also, that the filter is now disabled. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:24, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

108.11.191.103

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was trying to write and informational article about a local gang i know about.


 * Date and time
 * 01:59, 9 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Not on that page you're not. That gang, in any case, does not meet our notability guidelines (does the world care?) and your own experience is not considered a reliable source.Jasper Deng (talk) 02:18, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

67.6.163.68

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was trying to add:  == Your comment == Hi, I saw your comment. Did you know you can make suggestions by adding a note to the Talk page of the articles you can't edit yet? If you go to the article you want to edit, click on "Talk", and add a new section with the information you want to add, you can also put  which is a special code to ask that other editors help you add the information you want to put there. Good luck! ~


 * Date and time
 * 03:09, 9 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * There was no indication of why "An automated filter has identified this edit as potentially unconstructive, and it has been disallowed." Can't we at least get rule number error codes so, e.g., the person reviewing this report will know which rule triggered it?


 * The  tag triggered the filter.Jasper Deng (talk) 03:12, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Ok that explains why it triggered in above 70.137.152.169 it triggered. Why didn't you tell me, Jasper. 70.137.152.83 (talk) 09:13, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Please note that if you create an account, most of the filters will have no effect on you - fewer as time goes on. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:27, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

212.189.1.30

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * it is constructive,who determines that it is right?


 * Date and time
 * 08:30, 9 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The last line you wrote looks like a sort of thing we see mostly from disruptive users. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:30, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Thatguy601

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 15:17, 9 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments

i is pissed now bitch
 * Attempted vandalism, filters working properly. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:00, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Robbie 5001

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was trying to send a talk back to C.Fred because he deleted my page when he should not have there was nothing wrong with it but then when i sent the talk it said it was not constructed when it was.


 * Date and time
 * 19:08, 9 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Considering what you were trying to say, it appears that you may have a conflict of interest (COI). COI editing is strongly discouraged; for more information, please read Conflict of interest. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 02:12, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

70.48.0.55

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 00:26, 10 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Filter worked correctly. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 02:01, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Furthermore, your report was clearly misleading. You weren't trying to edit the Talibans page, you were trying to vandalize the Chow Chow article. Do not post a clearly misleading false report again. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 02:21, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

64.134.26.168

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 22:00, 10 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * That was a blatant personal attack. Warning on your talk page.Jasper Deng (talk) 04:05, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

71.63.123.36

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was entering information about frozen yogurt in India and how they make it.


 * Date and time
 * 00:55, 11 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Obvious vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:25, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

173.19.242.161

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was trying to add a slang term to the methamphetamine page, poop is the slang word for meth where i live, because it is poop for you and when it is gone it is brown in the pipe


 * Date and time
 * 03:17, 11 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * In any case, that would not be a notable term for meth. Please find a reliable source.Jasper Deng (talk) 04:04, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

95.144.245.184

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Reverted page back to last good edit 458939398 at 08:03, 4 November 2011 by user Eugene-elgato - user LozUK6 input large amounts of material duplicated from Peter Thornley page as well as commercial material
 * (UPDATE: I was subsequently able to to carry out the revert in several stages - this would seem to suggest that the filter objected to the removal in bulk of the vandalised text and its replacement with the last good version.)


 * Date and time
 * 10:54, 11 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Filter 384 was changed in a response to this report. Thanks. Sole Soul (talk) 00:14, 12 December 2011 (UTC)