Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives/Archive 23

91.74.158.226

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Adding a date for a quote


 * Date and time
 * 09:56, 27 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Yes, it is a false positive. I've asked the user who made the filter block this edit to fix the filter. 10:30, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Najtrows

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * i wanted to add info about a punkband called Deny. When trying to save the edit i get a message that tells me that my edit is unconstructive.

But it is just a translation on the swedish wikipedia page also called Deny.
 * Date and time
 * 10:52, 27 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * For one thing, one of the words in one of the album titles is a slang term for bodily waste in English. When a user who has not yet demonstrated familiarity with the policies and guidelines of English Wikipedia adds this word to an article, especially in all capital letters, it ends up being vandalism far more often than not. For another, the inclusion criteria for bands in English Wikipedia tend to require either citation of professional reviews of the band's work. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 14:11, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

85.167.98.60

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 12:24, 27 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments

173.2.66.136

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 21:05, 27 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Do you have a valid reason for blanking discussions?Jasper Deng (talk) 06:07, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

DobbsheadVenerator

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * adding significant detail to filmography, for which it happens that her first awardwinning performance was in a film called "Fuck Slaves". Yes, honest to God.


 * Date and time
 * 01:14, 28 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments

70.24.251.71

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * making the documentation work with documentation


 * Date and time
 * 08:50, 28 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments

70.24.251.71

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * trying to write template documentation


 * Date and time
 * 08:53, 28 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments

JamesBWatson

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * This is actually a report on three separate false positives. First of all, DPL bot tried to post a message to a user talk page, and was stopped by an edit filter, as you can see here. Since this was a false positive, I tried to inform the user, and was stopped by the same edit filter; see here. I successfully posted the same message to the user's talk page, without the wikilinks. I then tried to insert one of the wikilinks; see here. In the past I have quite frequently posted text that an edit filter had blocked in a false positive, without problems. Surely this edit filter could be modified so that it is not so indiscriminate: does it prevent anyone from posting any link to the disambig page "George Bush", or what? Could it take into account factors such as whether the user is fairly new?


 * Date and time
 * 12:37, 1 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments

68.55.112.31

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * The above template is a sandbox, so edits to it shouldn't be characterized as "unconstructive."


 * Date and time
 * 01:11, 2 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Unfortunately, making the filter check this would slow it down significantly. There is no simple way for it to detect sandbox pages. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:36, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

193.60.199.39

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Please replace this with a description of the edit you were trying to make.


 * Date and time
 * 11:41, 2 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:39, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

70.124.221.114

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 22:54, 2 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments

Valdalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:40, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

70.187.188.211

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 00:24, 3 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:41, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

92.25.203.170

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 00:38, 3 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments

ustengrav :)

90.210.165.76

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was the author of this page but I have lost my login details. I am not comfortable with so much info being available to everyone anymore and I want it removed but I can't remember my password and I no longer have the same email address that I registered the account with. Please accept this edit. Thank you.


 * Date and time
 * 19:42, 4 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:23, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Wydram

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I attempted to add that George Carlin was promoting his comedy special "You are all diseased" on his February 1999 appearance of the Daily Show, as per http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-february-1-1999/george-carlin


 * Date and time
 * 22:23, 5 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments

75.38.152.43

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I removed an apostrophe from a plural non-possessive noun for grammatical reasons.


 * Date and time
 * 05:46, 6 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Try not using an edit summary like that, as a specific vandal commonly used summaries like that to move pages to obscene titles. Edit summaries should decribe what was done (e.g. "fixing grammar"). Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:29, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

BarakZ

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Seek Advice about the vandalization of my account.


 * Date and time
 * 13:59, 6 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Hi, what tripped the edit filter was the comment about shit and cunts. The filter thought you were attacking User:Shrike. Next time, you should just mention that somebody vandalized your user talk page. (And I see User:Bongwarrior reverted the vandalism relatively quickly and blocked the offending IP.) Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:32, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

JoshKovac

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * tried to enter a link for a book review about a book by the author


 * Date and time
 * 22:06, 6 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Try now, and see if it happens again. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:33, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Cecilia13

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * (reported by User:Waggers):
 * Looks like the user is trying to make a fairly harmless edit within their sandbox, which is triggering a filter and resulting in them being reported to WP:AIV.


 * Date and time
 * 15:44, 7 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments

24.184.97.245

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was adding 2008 into it's own paragraph with added information based on the artist's personal biography.


 * Date and time
 * 19:29, 9 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments

50.32.67.230

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 01:25, 10 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:50, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

89.100.150.198

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Removing a personal webpage.


 * Date and time
 * 04:49, 10 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * If you are, in fact,, feel free to log in and remove this text. Otherwise, you have no buisness doing it. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:53, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

91.195.232.87

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was trying to add full soundtrack of the game, I have a proof from EA page: https://help.ea.com/article/fifa-street-soundtrack . But it identifed my edit as potentially unconstructive.


 * Date and time
 * 14:10, 10 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments

Visit2000

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * removing comments from Rangoon11 talk page


 * Date and time
 * 17:53, 11 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments

24.113.144.248

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was trying to type genuine information regarding sister chromatids.


 * Date and time
 * 20:38, 11 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:02, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

92.15.142.228

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 21:27, 11 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments

If you are, in fact,, feel free to log in and do this. Otherwise, you shouldn't be doing this. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:05, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Peterrumley

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I'm trying to remove all the inofmration I put on against the peterrumley user name due to a mistake in the way that Wikipedia works. I should have created an article instead. This was my mistake as i didn'y understand how wikipedia works. I'd therefore be grateful if yuo would remove all published inforamtion aganist user name peterrumley. Thank you.


 * Date and time
 * 21:45, 11 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments

Helder.wiki

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * On this update, shouldn't all \1{6} have been changed to \1{6}? The first part is still detecting only 6 characters in the current version of the filter.


 * Date and time
 * 01:35, 12 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * This is the wrong place to ask this question - please either try at the user's own talk page User talk:EdoDodo (probably not this time, since the user appears to have been inactive since November), or at Wikipedia talk:Edit filter. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:15, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

205.222.248.163

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 15:58, 12 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Attempted vandalism, filters working properly. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:59, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

93.14.235.16

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 22:58, 12 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments

75.23.218.207

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Trying to edit information/description on the page


 * Date and time
 * 02:19, 13 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Without being able to look at your edit filter log's details, I can still say that your article fails the notability guideline. Your website link is broken.Jasper Deng (talk) 02:45, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Monleg

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * this is the page to describe wala lang as a Filipino expression. Included in this article are examples how this expression is used in blogging.


 * Date and time
 * 09:20, 13 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You were editing in a non-English language, and you were using it to link to your own website. Both are no-nos on the English Wikipedia. You can look at http://www.wikipedia.org and find the language you'd like to contribute in. Someguy1221 (talk) 01:32, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

84.75.50.17

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I fixed a blatantly incorrect assertion that ADP-ribosylation is a form of glycosylation. It most definitely is not. I also added various forms of post-translational modification that were not yet included.  I'm not a wiki person. I don't understand exactly what a bot is, or why it should be able to automatically revert correct additions by a human back to blatantly incorrect garbage.  So much for Wiki being an encyclopedia rather than just another pathetic "online community" for a bunch of petty little tools who take out their frustrations from behind the protection of a computer screen.  It is assinine that this is allowed.  I can see "bots" being used to correct vandalism in very obvious instances.  How on earth is it EVER acceptable for them to edit content changes other than random interjection of curses, slander, and other juvenile behavior?

Furthermore, the user who apparently controls this "bot" has a page that is all Spanish (I think). Hardly the person to be the omnipotent bureaucratic pissant guarding an English langauge science related article he clearly has no expertise in.
 * Date and time
 * 21:50, 16 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Try not to curse so much in your edit summaries and your edits will go through. Someguy1221 (talk) 01:28, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Light-Cheerful

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 14:05, 17 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I don't know what you were trying to write for, but it's not for Wikipedia. Someguy1221 (talk) 01:30, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

JourneyMan4242

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I tried to delete several sentences in the final paragraph of the History section. The sentences in question suggested that the M27 had a significant advantage over the M249 system it replaces due to its compatibility with STANAG magazines.  While it is true that the M27 is compatible, the M249 is also compatible, as stated on the M249 page here on wikipedia, and from my own experience with the system.  As such, the statements are misleading, and should be removed.  When I tried to submit the edit, it got flagged as potentially unconstructive.


 * Date and time
 * 01:05, 18 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I don't really see a way to fix that one, so I just made the edit for you. It was a rare problem with your edit summary. Someguy1221 (talk) 01:17, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Redahe

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Trying to issue a warning for vandalism


 * Date and time
 * 05:24, 18 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Hm; not exactly sure why that one hit you, but it's definitely a false positive. Anyway, don't worry about it. Pretty minor issue, and I've given him the warning for you. Someguy1221 (talk) 05:32, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

AwgyDawg

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Introduce into Wikipedia some information about Aguimac.


 * Date and time
 * 15:03, 18 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Seriously? Someone found an appropriate use of the phrase, "tiny cock"? Just call it "miniature", or "scale", or "small", or really, anything but tiny. Sorry for the false positive. Someguy1221 (talk) 10:01, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

InsuranceBrokerLady

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * add source information by using the named references tab


 * Date and time
 * 15:53, 18 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * While I appreciate your good intentions, Wikipedia is not a how-to site. Someguy1221 (talk) 10:02, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

66.140.47.226

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 04:01, 20 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You did not cite your source, nor did you conform with the manual of style.Jasper Deng (talk) 04:05, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

24.243.4.206

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Added a link to another Wiki article that described the same idea using an American English term.


 * Date and time
 * 04:39, 20 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments

203.193.134.220

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * inserted a table

trying to delete it not allowing
 * Date and time
 * 06:05, 20 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Please log in if that is you. Otherwise, please leave his userpage alone. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:08, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

82.11.200.99

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 10:07, 20 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments

Spanish Fig

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * inserting translated text with web addresses not email addresses


 * Date and time
 * 12:34, 20 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * In the authorlink field, you included the author's email address (*********@ole.com) rather than a link to the author's Wikipedia page. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:07, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

StephenCarrsABluenose

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * HULL KR

CHANGE INFO WANKERS
 * Date and time
 * 14:09, 20 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Clearly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:44, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

149.153.4.102

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 14:57, 20 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Clearly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:47, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

173.15.197.230

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 15:46, 20 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Clearly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:50, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

142.227.236.1

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 17:01, 20 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Clearly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:51, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Tim Goddard

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Trying to correct their quote. The current article contains a different quote from the cited source, rephrasing to censor the content. My belief based on reading the What Wikipedia is not page is that censorship at the expense of factual accuracy is against Wikipedia policy. The quote from the source is:

"We always get the same six questions. We should put on our Wiki page 'we fucking hate it when journalists check this page to ask us questions.'"
 * Date and time
 * 22:57, 20 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I don't actually know whether or not your edit ios correct, however I can state:
 * Most times when new users add these words, it's vandalism.
 * The fact that you removed the reference makes it look less likely that you're correct in your edit.
 * עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:31, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

24.61.27.189

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 12:38, 21 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Clearly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:32, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

87.42.28.16

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 14:25, 21 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments

Clearly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:33, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

92.238.162.192

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Trying to change the school prayer as someone had been playing jokes and it was wrong.


 * Date and time
 * 17:21, 21 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * While the first part of your edit (the part in the &lt;blockquote&gt; tag) looks like it's possibly correct, the seconmd part is clearly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:38, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

24.254.59.202

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 17:49, 21 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Probably vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:40, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Madt25

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 19:50, 21 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The article you created doesn't belong on Wikipedia. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:43, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

109.154.127.37

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 20:10, 21 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Clearly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:44, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

174.112.56.18

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * edit


 * Date and time
 * 20:56, 21 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Blanking the whole article - clearly not a false positive. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:46, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Giginator

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was trying to expand the stub for a class project.


 * Date and time
 * 03:01, 22 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments

Francisxaviervazquez

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * the page directs to an animal instead of the Head of State President of Costa Rica, Ms. Laura Chinchilla


 * Date and time
 * 06:36, 22 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * What you should have done was restore this version - simply found it in the article history by checking out the links to the revisions; found the correct one, clicked on the "edit" link of that revision, entered an appropriate summary, and clicked "Save". The fact that someone had replaced the correct article with something unrelated doesn't mean that the entire page can't be restored. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:53, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

91.1.169.233

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Important


 * Date and time
 * 08:24, 22 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * It isn't important, it's a test edit or vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:54, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Vatolocoforever

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 19:13, 22 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments

Vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:45, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Michalazar3.0

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 19:56, 22 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments

It won't let me edit ANYTHING!!!!!

Michalazar!!


 * What it won't let you do is vandalise. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:46, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

162.84.149.83

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * trying to poop


 * Date and time
 * 01:32, 23 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Replacing a significant block of text, especially from a featured article, with the line "hello... dont belive this site...", could hardly be anything but vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:48, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Astrovisioncochin

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was trying to include astrology website's relevant page links to the appropriate page of the Wikipedia.


 * Date and time
 * 10:42, 23 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Wikipedia is not a collection of links—or in other words, this wasn't a false positive. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 07:26, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

184.184.116.219

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Motionless in White are referred to as Homosexuals in White sometimes, shitcore is a nickname for metalcore or deathcore and Motionless in White are poser goths


 * Date and time
 * 18:24, 23 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I doubt it. It's almost certainly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:50, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

190.118.87.137

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Reporting false positive in Shining Path article, about removing a word as per referenced in the talk page.

I tried to edit the article by removing one potentially non-neutral word (insurgent) used in the mentioned article, however the system catched it as a potentially nonconstructive editing; therefore I report it as a false positive. I would also like to mention that unlike previous editings, the system did not offer a captcha.
 * Date and time
 * 20:19, 23 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Actually, you removed a huge chunk of text, including the categories and wikitext, from the end - and that's what the filter was complaining about. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:52, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

SALBAaf

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 21:55, 23 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Clearly an attack page. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:55, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Awmcneill

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * updating the songs he co-wrote and produced from 50 to 60


 * Date and time
 * 02:00, 24 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments

Wrichik1999

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I cant edit it it.


 * Date and time
 * 12:14, 24 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Could you explain why you made 4 attempts to blank out that particular article? -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 18:20, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

94.10.123.97

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was not allowed to make an article one of my favorite YouTubers.


 * Date and time
 * 13:28, 24 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The page that you attempted to submit to the Articles for creation project would have been declined because it did not cite any reliable sources and it did not sufficiently indicate how or why its subject is important or significant. Please see Notability to learn about Wikipedia's notability guidelines. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 18:04, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Lukini

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was removing the " [sic]" at the end of a quote. Someone decided to mark it as such because the quote said "pedophilia" and the page happens to be in British English which spells it as "paedophilia".  This is incorrect usage of sic and confused me for a good minute on what the mistake was.


 * Date and time
 * 20:05, 24 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments

75.0.187.84

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was just trying to remove my ASCII art of my username (I wasn't logged in at the time) because of the ridiculous amounts of userboxs, and I got a warning that might not be constructive.


 * Date and time
 * 15:41, 25 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Then log in.Jasper Deng (talk) 18:37, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

124.248.128.81

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * This information is actually accurate and relevant. If you visit the site then you will see that I am correct.


 * Date and time
 * 23:22, 25 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Feel free to explain your long history of vandalism and spamming. Dswislow (talk) 23:31, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

69.110.156.178

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Fuck you


 * Date and time
 * 05:50, 26 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:00, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Rapmixtapelyrics

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 06:25, 26 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments

This article would have been speedy deleted under CSD A3 as an article with no content. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:03, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

109.127.229.67

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 07:20, 26 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Not a false positive - the user did blank the article. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:04, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

86.180.147.3

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * delete the entire page. I am Luke Sarre and I made this page a number of years ago, it's quite embarassing so I wanted to delete it.


 * Date and time
 * 15:55, 26 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Log in, and then either blank it (if you want users to be able to see the content in the history) or place a db-user on it. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:01, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

99.91.235.189

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I WAS JUST BEING HELPFUL AND DIDNT THINK IT WOULD BE FALSE MY APOLOGIES


 * Date and time
 * 01:04, 27 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments

I don't see how your edit could possilby be helpful. It's clearly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:03, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Grapefruit1818

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 15:45, 27 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Clearly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 17:04, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Jonburgan95

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * edit the false information and add true info


 * Date and time
 * 16:32, 27 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Clearly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 17:05, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Proupdater

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Made edits like corrected work history and birth place . Also added source links.


 * Date and time
 * 22:16, 27 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments

Ilivehi

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was trying to type in some Hawaiian and Samoan words, but the filter kept saying it could not be published because of some sort of problem....


 * Date and time
 * 01:53, 28 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Bogus report by a would-be vandal trying to add a mass of silliness. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  17:27, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

131.109.147.105

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * edit the article on bonsai tree


 * Date and time
 * 17:02, 28 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another ersatz report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  17:29, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Littlecasey

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 17:22, 28 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Another ersatz report by a thwarted would-be vandal. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  17:32, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

124.176.37.164

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 07:00, 29 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Clearly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 20:17, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

97.102.165.191

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 07:01, 29 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Messages of this sort belong on User talk:Ceyockey. And statements like "they were the shit" are frequently blocked byt various filters. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 20:20, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Lee.Mchenry

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 07:25, 29 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments

The information about alleged abuse is incorrect and exaggerated. If the links are followed I find tabloid information not facts.


 * That doesn't xplain what ou did actually remove from the page - the categories. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 20:22, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

50.128.91.251

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 16:46, 29 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Comments

I desire to edit wikipedia just as much as Sam Z. and i am cooler than him. So, let me edit wikipedia.


 * No one is telling you not to edit Wikipedia - just not to replace an article with obscenities. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 20:23, 29 March 2012 (UTC)