Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives/Archive 29

84.92.189.154

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Attempting to change ‘f..k’ to ‘fuck’ as per http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_censored


 * Date and time
 * 01:02, 2 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Usually, edits that add profanity are vandalism. In your case, though, you're right, and the change has since been made for you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:36, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

96.55.25.141

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Trying to add her connections and involvement with the comedy and political activist group Shit Harper Did


 * Date and time
 * 06:27, 3 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments

190.131.157.240

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Sandbox


 * Description
 * I was doing some experiments in the wikipedia sandbox and the filter disallowed my edits for no reason!190.131.157.240 (talk) 00:42, 4 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 00:42, 4 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments

111.248.83.136

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I stumbled upon this page and saw that the way it was written made it hard to read. I tried to make it slightly more approachable and edited the section under "Processing" but it I received the text "An automated filter has identified this edit as potentially unconstructive, and it has been disallowed. If this edit is constructive, please report this error." The only changes I made to the article were grammatical changes so I can see why it may not be completely constructive in terms of content, but I think that making things easier to read is quite constructive. If the way I've edited it is not up to the standards, please get a normal wiki-contributor to fix that page up. Thanks.


 * Date and time
 * 13:30, 4 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Well, the filter correctly detected vandalism, but since you were describing it, not creating it, I'll make the edit for you. Kilopi (talk) 03:44, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

202.188.50.213

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Add the song "Powerless" by Linkin Park in the singles chronology.


 * Date and time
 * 05:47, 6 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments

71.199.125.210

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I reverted a spambot's edit, and I ended up tagged as a possible spambot myself.


 * Date and time
 * 02:18, 7 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * No question that you're right; this is close to being the biggest example of a false positive I can imagine. Nyttend (talk) 00:18, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

175.38.96.1

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Trying to edit the controversy section to include the latest articles from The Courier Mail (referenced) as well as updating the information regarding recent drug scandals and the GPS Memes Facebook Page from a third party perspective.


 * Date and time
 * 06:31, 8 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments

It's because you made a comment about drugs. It's been seen as potentially libellous.--5 albert square (talk) 22:56, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Ciera Brigance

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was adding a note about how what Al was doing in a scene was violating neutral point of view(One scene shows Yankovic vandalizing the Wikipedia page for Atlantic Records, replacing it with the words (in excessively large type) "YOU SUCK!")


 * Date and time
 * 23:00, 8 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Unfortunately, I don't think there's any way around this one. You were clearly trying to help, but I can't remember ever seeing anyone else add such text helpfully — in several years of editing Wikipedia, everyone else whom I've seen adding "YOU SUCK" has been vandalizing pages, so I don't think it would be good to adjust the filter.  Nyttend (talk) 00:16, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Dorjaynima

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I just observed Dorjaynima's edits and was confused because none of the tagged edits appear problematic. The following edits are the ones in question: 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5; #1 adds a chunk of text, but I don't see anything that would set off the filter, while #2-#4 just change a little punctuation and #5 adds a link.  Can't imagine why any of these would set off filter 39, but they all did.  Nyttend (talk) 00:38, 9 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 00:38, 9 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * He's editing a paragraph that previously contained an innocent usage of "little boys". A lot have filters use a condition like  to avoid this kind of fp, but an EFM removed that from this filter with the comment "removed the old_content check; missing too much existing vandalism and BLP problems. --zzuuzz", so maybe ask User:zzuuzz about it. Kilopi (talk) 03:54, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

216.210.86.80

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I'm trying to make my a Wikipedia page about myself for a documentary that I'm working on. It's going to be big, so I'm preparing a page about myself so that some knucklehead doesn't write falsehoods about me.


 * Date and time
 * 19:40, 9 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I only see your attempt to edit Malik Shabazz's talk page. But whether you're writing an WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY about your WP:UPANDCOMING self or abusing the admin who deleted it, it's just as well the filter stopped you. Kilopi (talk) 03:59, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

94.234.170.36

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * /* External links */ Added link to a insightful article on alistapart.


 * Date and time
 * 20:25, 10 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments

(non-edit filter manager observation) The edit filter disallowed it because the link added contained words that are blacklisted on the filter page. I'll add it for you, since it does seem relevant. — SamX‧☎‧✎‧ S  16:57, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

195.252.32.227

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * StayFriends.de


 * Date and time
 * 05:37, 12 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments

An another scam; Google it and the truth will be reveiled
 * Looks like a bad-faith (vandalistic) report. That's no valid reason to blank the article.--Jasper Deng (talk) 05:40, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

65.3.194.98

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Update the movie list for upcoming D-Box motion-enhance theatrical films


 * Date and time
 * 16:55, 16 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * This was a false positive, and the change has since been made for you. I don't think there's any changes that can be made to the filter, though. Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:36, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Nevermind cupcake

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Flint Truck Assembly


 * Description
 * I was trying to add the year the plant opened.


 * Date and time
 * 20:15, 17 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments

John khng wai kun

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 08:10, 18 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * You need to be logged in as User:Gloous.singapore to blank that user's page. —Bruce1eetalk 08:16, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Doncristos

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Delete page


 * Date and time
 * 14:57, 18 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Why are you trying to blank this page? If you have questions about the article's content, please raise them on the article's discussion page. —Bruce1eetalk 15:08, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Hard2bit

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was adding a reference showing a proof of concept of how to recover some data after a secure erase has been performed on the disk. I think it is relevant due to the lack of other references, and because it shows exactly what the problem is when some areas of the disk become inaccessible.


 * Date and time
 * 11:53, 19 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The reference you added included your own name (which is disallowed) but appears to be ablog anyway (which is also disallowed per WP:V). Black Kite (talk) 12:42, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Danny Cook (actor)

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Don't show this again.


 * Date and time
 * 10:47, 20 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments

Sorry, you can't create fake biographies in userspace. Black Kite (talk) 12:42, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

88.91.109.191

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * In the Reactions part of the article Idefag School is misspelled Idefagd School.


 * Date and time
 * 15:03, 20 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Yes, this is obviously a false positive. I fixed the article. — This, that and the other (talk) 02:18, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

65.188.150.32

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Trying to update current information. The school has changed and is not a "degree mill" it is recognized the the State of CO. as a legitimate University.


 * Date and time
 * 22:34, 20 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments

Paul2013BSG

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Continuum became a hit quickly with Canadian audiences. The series was also connecting with the country's television arts organizations who give out awards for a living. On January 15, 2013, the day after the U.S. launch, the Canadian Screen Awards (now one group in the aftermath of the merger of the Genie and Gemini Awards) nominated Continuum for 5 'Screenies'; Best Drama Series, Writing, Direction, Music and Visual Effects (its lone win).

On February 20, 2013, Continuum was cited by the Academy of Science Fiction, Fantasy and Horror (“Saturn Awards”) for Best Television Presentation. This category represents the best TV show of 10 episodes or fewer. There was a special circumstance here; the Saturns' eligibility period is always every calendar year (from 1/1 to 12/31). Since Continuum didn't debut in the U.S. until 2 weeks afterward, an exception was made to include it in the TV Presentation lineup. It lost, however to Breaking Bad on June 26.

It was followed later that week by a nomination for the season 1 finale from the Writers Guild of Canada, only to be upset April 23 losing to 'The L.A. Complex'. On the morning of May 13, the most vivid proof yet Continuum had arrived as one of North America's best TV series, period, took shape.

The show was showered with an all-time record 16 Leo Award nominations. The Leo's are from the Motion Picture Arts & Sciences Foundation of British Columbia. It would have been closer to 20 or 21 if the Leos didn't have in their rules that only BC residents qualified for consideration. The awards were handed out June 6 and 7th, as Continuum beat back challenges from The CW's 'Arrow', and moreso by CBC's 'Arctic Air', which trailed behind with 14 Leo notices. Here is a list of Continuum's nominations with winners noted and the episodes that they were cited for:

Best Dramatic Series (winner)

Best Direction: William Waring, Family Time (winner)

Best Direction: Patrick Williams, Endtimes

Best Screenwriting: Simon Barry, Endtimes (winner)

Best Cinematography: David Pelletier, Endtimes

Best Editing: Allison Grace, Family Time (winner)

Best Editing: Allan Lee, Endtimes

Best Production Design: Chris August, Endtimes

Best Costume Design: Maya Mani, A Stitch In Time (winner)

Best Stunt Coordination: Kimani Ray Smith, Wasting Time

Best Male Guest Performance: Jesse Moss, Matter of Time

Best Male Guest Performance: Ian Tracey, Endtimes (winner)

Best Supporting Actor: Richard Harmon, Family Time (winner)

Best Supporting Actor: Brian Markinson, Endtimes

Best Supporting Actress: Jennifer Spence, Playtime

Best Supporting Actress: Lexa Doig, Endtimes

On March 9, the Canadian equivalent to the Saturns, the Constellation Awards, now 7 years old, further validated the show's quality, nominating it for 4 awards and ultimately, on June 22, winning 3: Best Sci-Fi TV Series, Best Sci-Fi Film or TV Script, and the first-ever acting award of any kind for Rachel Nichols (Best Female Performance in a Sci-Fi TV Episode).
 * Date and time
 * 04:05, 21 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments

121.219.101.232

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Having a capital S in a place.


 * Date and time
 * 07:34, 23 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * That filter is designed to have a high false positive rate, which is why it let you save your edit. Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:36, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

77.180.206.150

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * WYSYWIG editor is detected as a false positive


 * Date and time
 * 08:54, 23 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments

So, I have been editing the page, did a small change, and after giving description and clicking save, I get this "An automated filter has identified this edit as coming from a potentially automated source." thing... I sure use no automation tools... 77.180.206.150 (talk) 08:54, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * It thought you were a spambot for some reason. It's definitely a false positive, but it let you save your change, so no harm done. Jackmcbarn (talk) 18:00, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

ManWithBeard2

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * The joke description of me has been there for too long. So its not funny any more, and it is the first thing that comes up with a search for my last name.


 * Date and time
 * 01:44, 25 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Why can't you log in to your account to edit the userpage? Why create a new one? Someguy1221 (talk) 02:04, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

71.167.157.25

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * correction spelling "prevetion" → "prevention"


 * Date and time
 * 15:16, 25 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * That filter has a lot of false positives. If you hit save a second time, it will let you save your changes. Jackmcbarn (talk) 18:00, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

66.68.52.224

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 19:13, 25 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments

For the entry on Kay Granger, someone added a factually true statement that she voted on July 24th, 2013 to continue NSA funding of surveillance of U.S. citizens who are not suspected of committing any crime. Then someone else erroneously REMOVED that note. I felt that was a mistake, so I went to undo it. My undo included the message "This was factually correct and neutral. Reword it if you want, but don't just delete it." But my undo was AUTOMATICALLY FILTERED OUT. Which led to me here posting about this false positive.

66.68.52.224

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * the note added by the other user (regarding the NSA bill) WAS factual and neutral. Re-word it if you want, but don't just censor it.


 * Date and time
 * 19:25, 25 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments

Bruestle2

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * In the Tenure section of Charlie Dent's page, I was adding how he has voted on defunding warrantless surveillance programs. I believe his views on civil liberties is relavent to this section. The line below is exactly what I was attempting to add:

On July 24, 2013, Dent voted to continue funding surveillance of U.S. citizens who are not suspected of committing any crime.
 * Date and time
 * 00:08, 26 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments

Slochman

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyrsten_Sinema

Adding her vote recorded in the roll call for:

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2013/roll412.xml

Adding:

On July 24, 2013, Sinema voted to continue funding NSA surveillance of U.S. citizens who are not suspected of committing any crime, in violation of their Fourth Amendment rights.
 * Date and time
 * 00:18, 26 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments

75.62.132.167

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was writing him a comment telling him that I moved one of my discussions to my archives because he hadn't answered it so if he wanted to answer it, to go to my talk page which is at User talk:75.62.135.134, click on "Archives of old discussions can be found here" and that it's the first one there so he can respond to it there. That's all. Thanks!


 * Date and time
 * 02:34, 26 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The filter thought you had blanked the entire page for some reason. Jackmcbarn (talk) 18:00, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Really? I wouldn't do that. How come it thought that? 75.62.130.94 (talk) 02:06, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The filter you triggered is private, so I can't see the details. When an edit filter manager sees this, they'll know exactly why. Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:10, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay, can you get a edit filter manager to see the details and tell me why the filter thought that? Thanks. 75.62.132.179 (talk) 22:51, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
 * They go through this regularly and will see it at some point. Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:18, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks Jackmcbarn! When they see it please tell them to notify me here. 75.62.130.144 (talk) 02:14, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Papasfritasthefood

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Inform the public of how Frank Wolf voted on H.R. 2397 Dept. of Defense Appropriations Act Defund the NSA Amendment


 * Date and time
 * 03:49, 26 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments

2602:304:CE24:4CA9:253C:84E9:F0A7:4B00

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was just trying to tag the page for deletion as vandalism, and the abuse filter disallowed the edit. Please tag it for deletion or (admins) delete the page.


 * Date and time
 * 12:50, 26 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments

69.114.128.203

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 16:50, 26 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * If you want to blank another user's user page, you need to be logged in as that user. —Bruce1eetalk 07:55, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Pseudonymous Rex

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * This edit triggered filter 132, which tagged it as "categories removed", but no categories were removed.


 * Date and time
 * 05:31, 28 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Anyone know what's going on here? Half the article is showing up in removed_lines, yet the dif shows that it wasn't removed. Seems to be a bug in the system. — This, that and the other (talk) 07:53, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The pattern I see is that mobile edits don't seem to include non-modified sections in the new wikitext. I noticed that with filter 30 here. Jackmcbarn (talk) 16:44, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

79.97.155.218

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Update references to Trinity LGBT to accurately reflect that the society renamed itself "Q Soc" in 2012 and also that it reached its 30th anniversary in that year (currently the page mentions its 25th anniversary in 2007.)


 * Date and time
 * 19:53, 28 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * That filter false-positives a lot. If you hit save a second time after you see the warning, it will let you save your edit anyway. Jackmcbarn (talk) 18:00, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

70.72.87.219

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * updating the attachment theory to include the content from another prominent attachment theorist who enjoys alot of attention particularly in Europe.


 * Date and time
 * 23:26, 28 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * There don't appear to be any filter log entries for your IP or this article. Are you sure it was an edit filter error message that you received? Black Kite (talk) 00:12, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * May it have actually been a spam blacklist notice? They can look very similar. Jackmcbarn (talk) 00:17, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Mark l anderson

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was trying to incorporate the Half Cock Safety which renders the pistol inoperable until the hammer is either drawn to full cock, or to full cock and then manually lowering the hammer. I was also trying to describe the conditions that would allow the magazine to release accidentally from a damaged magazine.


 * Date and time
 * 07:08, 29 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Definitely a false positive. Not sure how (if at all) to modify the filter, since most appearances of "cock" are obscenities, but I've added the changes that you weren't allowed to add.  Nyttend (talk) 23:39, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Theopolisme

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * In this diff, the "speedy deletion template removed" tag was triggered, although the user did not remove the speedy deletion template.


 * Date and time
 * 04:24, 30 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Comment The user in question is Mishra.rohan.1983, not Theopolisme. Nyttend (talk) 23:35, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * This is a weird one. I'm going to flag it up.  I wonder if it's a VE issue? Black Kite (talk) 23:52, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

2001:18e8:2:1020:30f4:f313:6d39:fa4

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Simply adding a request for a pair of redirects. I got a filter warning, "An automated filter has identified this edit as coming from a potentially automated source. If you are human and your edit is constructive you may continue to save your edit."  Perhaps this isn't an edit filter thing, since my log is completely empty, and there's no tag in the page's edit history, but I figured there was somewhere that it should be reported.


 * Date and time
 * 19:56, 31 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments

EP1961DT6

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Trying to add an entry to the Culture section. Within the text there would have been a hyperlink to http://www.bridporthatfest.org/


 * Date and time
 * 14:13, 1 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments

69.143.227.155

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Vienna Offensive.

I was trying to provide a better introductory summary.

Also "German-occupied Austria" is not a good description of the situation. The Austrians welcomed the Germans and supported the Anschluss. Austria was not an occupied country in the same sense as Poland, Denmark, Norway, Belgium, France, etc.
 * Date and time
 * 09:41, 2 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Don't type NAZI in ALL CAPS, the edit filter is interpreting that as vandalism. —Bruce1eetalk 09:47, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

107.0.114.53

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was adding an alumni from Sacramento city college, Sasha grey, actress and former porn star as listed on her Wikipedia page and known by the public.


 * Date and time
 * 06:26, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

I've added Sasha Grey to Sacramento City College for you with a citation. —Bruce1eetalk 07:20, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Comments

Bonaldostringa

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I tried to create a page on SCYPRI, a research project funded by the European Union within the FP7 Program (similar pages are already there on wikipedia, e.g MyOcean, Mossclone, TIMBUS etc), but I got the message "An automated filter has identified this edit as potentially unconstructive, and it has been disallowed. If this edit is constructive, please report this error."


 * Date and time
 * 16:21, 4 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * It doesn't like one of the words in all upper case, probably one of the partner names. Try making all of them lowercase and seeing if it works. Jackmcbarn (talk) 18:00, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

69.113.243.2

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was trying to remove some personal content. Its my old account, but its been inactive for nearly two years.


 * Date and time
 * 22:26, 4 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * You need to be logged in as User:AlmightyGameGuy to blank that user page. —Bruce1eetalk 04:57, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Chronomaster5779

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * moving a referance from ==developers== to ==referances==


 * Date and time
 * 23:30, 4 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments

71.32.192.165

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * i was trying to inform the American people of Nelson Walker


 * Date and time
 * 23:36, 4 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Please read our policies on living people (especially with regards to attack pages), notability (in particular, this), and hoaxes.--Jasper Deng (talk) 23:39, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

213.55.95.91

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 18:56, 5 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You were attempting toblank a user talk space. Filter working correctly. Black Kite (talk) 16:22, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

shahabaslamkhan1

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * forgot my password for my first account shahabaslam and created new one shahabaslamkhan1 and i am trying to edit my page to remove the current content and replace it with  . Please help. thanks.


 * Date and time
 * 00:19, 6 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You can't edit another user's userspace with a new account, which of course is what the filter thinks you are now doing. Black Kite (talk) 16:22, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Bonaldostringa

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I have been trying to create a page on SCYPRI, a research project funded by the European Union within the FP7 Program (similar pages are already there on wikipedia, e.g MyOcean, Mossclone, TIMBUS etc). The first time I wrote the name in all caps and the page was disallowed as "potentially unconstructive". After reporting the false positive - to no avail - I tried to create the page again, this time writing Scypri, but still it was blocked. Could you please give me some feedback this time? Thanks a lot!"


 * Date and time
 * 10:00, 7 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The amount of all-caps information is still triggering the filter. Also, the article has no references. I would suggest fixing this problem and submitting the new article at Articles for Creation. Black Kite (talk) 16:22, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

77.86.117.208

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Link this article http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/10130346/Student-suspended-after-reporting-alleged-rape.html


 * Date and time
 * 12:50, 7 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments

This is clearly a good faith edit, but I'd suggest you discuss it on the talkpage of the article first. Black Kite (talk) 16:22, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Jay Cook (actor)

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Never show this again!


 * Date and time
 * 15:58, 7 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * FFS, not again. Blocked. Black Kite (talk) 16:13, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

68.112.131.174

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 07:09, 9 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Deletion policy describes how you're supposed to request an article be deleted. But I have just gone ahead and done that, in this instance. Someguy1221 (talk) 07:23, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

149.254.183.165

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Talk:Lineal championship


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 10:59, 10 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Why were you trying to clear the talk page? Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:31, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

120.19.111.17

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Trying to roll back to last unspammed version (from many years ago)


 * Date and time
 * 04:14, 12 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Usually, anonymous editors blanking talk pages is vandalism, which is why the filter caught you. I've requested that the page be deleted for you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 04:16, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

168.12.253.66

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I attempted to redirect a page marked for proposed deletion to DVD ripper, which the PROD tag correctly identified as a substantial duplicate. The edit was disallowed.


 * Date and time
 * 16:07, 12 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You've done that too many times in a row, so the edit filter made you slow down. Upon looking more closely at them, here are my thoughts:
 * Runescape merching Left as a redirect for now, also tagged for deletion.
 * Chuck cunningham syndrome Unredirected. The article is about an effect, not the character himself.
 * Network banking Unredirected. It's talking about a different kind of networking.
 * DVD Backup I agree with you. I've redirected it to DVD ripper.
 * Jackmcbarn (talk) 16:25, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Enl public

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Added friction type followers and definition in line with common engineering practice. Page had only included commercial roller followers.


 * Date and time
 * 20:08, 13 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * This is a false positive. If you can copy the version you want to create into a userspace (i.e. User:Enl public/Cam follower), we can copy it over for you.  Thanks, Black Kite (talk) 22:29, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

2001:18E8:2:1020:394A:B524:DC74:9E3A

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Removed one sentence and linked to ru:Категория:Депутаты Государственной думы Российской Федерации I созыва in my edit summary, and the filter told me that I was making an automated edit, but I could go ahead if I were a human.


 * Date and time
 * 12:49, 14 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Yes, it's working correctly - as you say it's only a warning, albeit a false positive. Black Kite (talk) 22:25, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Selenag322

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 22:09, 14 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You're trying to create an article about yourself. The filter is working correctly. Black Kite (talk) 22:28, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

76.89.139.175

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 19:12, 15 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * That's a userpage, not an article, and unregistered editors cannot remove large parts of other user's pages. Black Kite (talk) 18:59, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

72.219.233.94

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 20:30, 15 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * That's a very large, dubious, and unsourced section, and as such cannot be added by an unregistered editor. You should discuss this issue on the article's talkpage. Black Kite (talk) 19:00, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

86.56.71.208

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * add Russian "Кёнигсберг"


 * Date and time
 * 15:26, 16 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * This is a false positive, but should allow you to make the edit anyway. Black Kite (talk) 19:03, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Jonnysheppard

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I received n warning about spamming multiple web pages which i`m not, i`m just adding relevant link to a hyperlocal website which serves each of the communities served by the website.


 * Date and time
 * 21:34, 16 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * This is only a warning from the filter, which is working correctly. You should be able to make the edit. Black Kite (talk) 19:04, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

86.176.50.209

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 13:49, 17 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Regardless of people's views of the EDL, it should be fairly obvious why Wikipedia has a filter which disallows that type of edit. Black Kite (talk) 19:06, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

IvanaBalieu

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Page should not be on the Web. It was a trial page I started years ago as a test page. It obviously should not be in Wikipedia


 * Date and time
 * 01:57, 18 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I've removed the page, which fails a number of our policies. Black Kite (talk) 19:08, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

124.178.128.115

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * normal editing, adding references. I did NOT add an email address - unless accidentally. I checked the page- can't find anything wrong. please help!


 * Date and time
 * 12:40, 20 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * This is almost certainly a false positive, though it should not stop you making the edit. Black Kite (talk) 19:12, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

77.1.168.131

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description

I tried to replace "will be murdered" by "is to be assassinated", because Bernard's last words are "a statesman is to be killed assassinated".
 * Date and time
 * 23:28, 20 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Yes, that's a false positive - I have made the edit for you. Black Kite (talk) 14:44, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

130.216.58.48

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 01:41, 22 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Why were you trying to delete content from another user's talk page? If that is your own talk page, you can log into your account and remove it. Someguy1221 (talk) 02:10, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

38.69.34.173

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Add to list of song covers.


 * Date and time
 * 02:55, 22 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * It's definitely a false positive. If you give a source for it, I'll add it for you (the filter only applies to new and unregistered users). Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:58, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Neosane against insanity

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 11:52, 23 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments

"Neoliberalism is generally used these days by Marxists"? I think it's fairly obvious why including that sentence isn't going to be allowed. Black Kite (talk) 12:02, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
 * This is banned User:Runtshit a/k/a Steven Plaut. Account blocked.  NawlinWiki (talk) 14:06, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

108.95.130.150

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I removed this article from the "parkour" category because the human flag move doesn't really match up with parkour. Parkour is about clearing obstacles efficiently, while this particular move is a feat of strength. The filter considered this vandalism, because it just happened to be the only category to which this article belongs. This should be reconsidered.


 * Date and time
 * 00:31, 24 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * That filter does false-positive once in a while, so it let your edit go through after the warning. You're right that it warned you because the page now has no categories at all. Jackmcbarn (talk) 01:20, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I agree with Jackmcbarn. We need to discourage disruptive edits, which is what this sort of edit usually is when done by an anonymous or new user. However, we do understand that occasionally it's a correct edit, so we allow it after the warning. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 18:15, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

74.46.67.25

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * changed link for Fingerlakes publication that had expired. Not able to do so. working link is: http://www.foothillspublishing.com/2005/id73.htm


 * Date and time
 * 20:02, 25 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Usually, IPs editing others' user pages are vandalizing it, but you're not, so I've made the change for you. By the way, that page isn't a real article, which I've now made clear. Jackmcbarn (talk) 20:14, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Davey2010

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was giving a barnstar and I apparently triggered filter 423, performing the action "edit" , But never clicked edit as my signature appeared perfect, Thanks


 * Date and time
 * 15:31, 26 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Filter 423 triggering for barnstars is correct. Unless you received a warning or were unable to save the edit, there's no problem here. Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:41, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Nope no warnings, Brilliant! Thanks Jack :). →Davey 2010→  →Talk to me!→  21:48, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

109.152.4.84

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 13:10, 27 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * If you are, feel free to log in and edit. Otyherwise, leave that page alone. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 19:11, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

MillieBatgirlSkittles

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was trying to create this page. After spending several hours searching for the list of these when I discovered I couldnt find them on wiki.


 * Date and time
 * 06:00, 30 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments

MillieBatgirlSkittles

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was trying to create this page. After spending several hours searching for the list of these when I discovered I couldnt find them on wiki.


 * Date and time
 * 06:03, 30 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * This appears to be more of a joke rather than an attempt at a serious article, and as such, I don't consider this a false positive. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, and only notable topics can be covered. --Jasper Deng (talk) 06:31, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

TheSawyerBean

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was trying to make a Wikipedia page for YouTuber Colleen Ballinger, as a separate page from the Miranda Sings page.


 * Date and time
 * 16:32, 30 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * There are a number of reaons why your edits were disallowed, but frankly any attempt to create a separate page for this person is simply going to be redirected to her character anyway, as that is all she is notable for. Black Kite (talk) 00:19, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

71.253.121.30

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I made an edit of the Cemetery Run section. After saving I realized I formatted something incorrectly and re-edited to fix my mistake. Upon attempting to save the correction, the warning occurred so I followed the instructions to report the false positive.


 * Date and time
 * 22:10, 30 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Yes, this is only a warning about incorrect formatting (in this case starting a line with a lowercase letter), so your edit will still be saved. Black Kite (talk) 00:20, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

205.154.255.247

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was removing unnecessary parenthesis around a name ("Gary Hudson") in a sentence.


 * Date and time
 * 21:17, 31 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * A malicious browser extension added extraneous code to your edits (the extension's name appears to be Evernote Web Clipper or Clearly). You should uninstall this before editing Wikipedia further, to prevent further problems. I've made the edit for you in the meantime. Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:12, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Stromare

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I'm trying to replace this ( [[File:Osos en el Parque de la naturaleza de Cabárceno (5) - 2013-Aug-18 - by Stromare.JPG|thumb|European brown bear in Carbárceno]] ) with this ( Gallu pedres.jpg ), as there are too many bear images in the article


 * Date and time
 * 23:00, 31 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * It's disallowing due to the word "cock" in your image caption. Can you re-word that? Black Kite (talk) 23:13, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

71.182.224.206

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Most fictional computers have author credits. The description of the computer FUCKUP from the Illuminatus! series lacked author attribution, so I added it and was told my contribution was "unconstructive". I have no idea why.


 * Date and time
 * 00:23, 1 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Yes, this is a false positive. The filter looks at the entire line you are editing, with predictable results.  I have made the edit for you. Black Kite (talk) 00:30, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Maryloosemore

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * another user had added a link to one of my Flickr photos of the mountain in the External Links section (Nilgiri South daytime). They had used a link that takes you to the Flickr page which include links to your photo in different sizes (see the link used for Nilgiri South at night). I changed the link to take the user to the normal Flickr photo page which has narrative and tags etc.


 * Date and time
 * 11:46, 1 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * It's simply warning that you're adding or editing a link which contains your username. This may well be valid sometimes,  but of course we have the problem of users trying to link to their own blogs, etc, as sources. Black Kite (talk) 12:24, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

72.73.74.155

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Add "shit tickets" to the list of euphemisms and slang terms for toilet paper


 * Date and time
 * 12:31, 1 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I think it's pretty obvious why the filter rejected that. I suggest proposing the edit on the talkpage of the article. Black Kite (talk) 21:56, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

91.117.48.167

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was removing personal information about myself, having lost the password and email address for the user Eulen.


 * Date and time
 * 21:25, 1 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The filter is correct to reject your edit (it is of course to stop anonymous editors blanking pages); however since the user is long-gone from Wikipedia I have removed the information from their page. Thanks, Black Kite (talk) 21:58, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

82.39.146.11

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 05:58, 2 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I have gone ahead and deleted that page, but for future reference, see Deletion policy for an explanation of how and when to request deletion of entire pages from Wikipedia. Someguy1221 (talk) 10:24, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

68.113.198.24

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 22:32, 2 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You blanked the page and replaced it with nonsense. Working as intended. Jackmcbarn (talk) 22:49, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Penny virus

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 03:30, 3 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Obvious attempt at vandalism, warning issued. Monty  845  03:42, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Catienoa

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Trying to change our distributor from RED distribution to ADA


 * Date and time
 * 15:44, 3 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Some code ended up in the edit that you didn't intend to have there, probably as a result of copying and pasting (or some other issue) with Visual Editor. If you want to make the change, I recommend you use the regular editor, though since you have a conflict of interest, you should consider posting what you want to do on the talk page instead of doing it yourself. Also, ADA is a disambiguation page. You should specify the exact name instead of using it. Jackmcbarn (talk) 16:05, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

35.46.10.172

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Tried to add valid extension(.bitch) under Documents but it was flagged


 * Date and time
 * 21:50, 3 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * This looks like it may be vandalism (this report was in fact originally flagged as such). If you provide a reliable source confirming that file extension is real, I can add it for you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:36, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Christine Pedi

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was updating my bio. I AM the CHRISTINE PEDI described on this page (altho other people have accessed and changed it without my consent)


 * Date and time
 * 18:52, 6 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Typing things in capitals is your problem. And none of your addtions are sourced. Black Kite (talk) 18:54, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Also, assuming you are Christine Pedi, not only do you not have any special say in what goes into your article, you actually have less say than all other editors do (see WP:COI and WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY). Jackmcbarn (talk) 18:56, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
 * What he said. What you've been adding is promotional and would be removed straight away regardless.  Have a read of WP:COI. 18:58, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

KudpungMobile

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Editing the page from my mobile account, KudpungMobile. Removing a bot message (signpost).


 * Date and time
 * 10:50, 8 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Add confirmed to that account from your real account, or make some dummy edits to make it autoconfirmed, and that should stop happening. Jackmcbarn (talk) 14:40, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
 * That's a good idea.Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:50, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
 * You could also remove it in multiple edits. Because the filter is for some reason hidden, I can't see the edit delta, but you should, since you're an admin. Also, to Jackmcbarn, how did you know that the filter is based on whether the user is confirmed or not (and not for example, editcount)? Did you just guess, or do you have access to info about the filter? Ginsuloft (talk) 22:30, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The filter's description says "New or unregistered user", and I'm assuming it's right. Jackmcbarn (talk) 22:33, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
 * And I was actually trying to find the filter ID. Ginsuloft (talk) 22:37, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

99.155.58.197

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * request to delete user page. Trying to remove my user page as dont need it as well as lost the log-in details.


 * Date and time
 * 21:22, 8 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * If you can't log in, the software will always think you're trying to trash a registered user's page. You're stuck.-- Jim in Georgia  Contribs  Talk  23:18, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

109.79.92.243

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Hi. This business is subject to current legal action, can you restore the page to the version as of 07.09.2013, and lock it down for a few days?


 * Date and time
 * 18:27, 9 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * We do not protect articles (or allow them to be blanked) just because their subject is having legal troubles. Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:51, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Marshall.niles

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * My name is Marshall Niles, and I own a business, Marshall Niles Photography, in Juuka, Finland. Last month, at the Koli Forum, which is a forum on climate change, three individuals, Dr R.K Pachauri, Heidi Hautala (Finnish Minister), and Tarja Cronberg (Finnish Minister) presented their opinions. I was their hired photographer, and my job is to replace their old images on wikipedia with current existing images. I add "photograph taken by Marshall Niles" and link it to my website as identification of the photographer. This is where I got the warning. I dont intend to spam or advertize, and my goal is to keep wikipedia with updated and present information. Have a great day!


 * Date and time
 * 14:24, 10 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Don't put your name or link to your Web site in the caption (that's what triggered the filter). Users who care about that can click the image to see the description page with the source. Also, you should read WP:COI if you are editing a Wikipedia article on behalf of its subject(s). Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:20, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I've fixed all of the images you already added. If you add more, make sure to add them the way the ones you already uploaded are now. Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:26, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Jacobmiesling

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 14:51, 11 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Please read WP:COI. Jackmcbarn (talk) 14:55, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

207.161.75.236

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Was trying to add how Robotnik had created an Internet meme (the "NO" used in videos) I mentioned YouTube Poops, and my edit was blocked.


 * Date and time
 * 03:46, 15 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * It doesn't like the word poop. If you give a reliable source for what you tried to add, I'll add it for you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:48, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

AJ YOUNG (KASHMIRI RAPPER)
thumb|AJ Young Aka Ahmer Javed

Ahmer Javed (Born 06 May 1995) Known by his stage name "AJ Young" is a Kashmiri Rapper. Shk Sahil Another Kashmiri Rapper And DJ Got Inspired By AJ Young In 2012 And Began To Produce His Mixtapes.
 * This looks like blanking to the filter. I'll take care of the page for you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:38, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

168.12.253.66

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Reverted an obvious test or vandalism edit.


 * Date and time
 * 18:42, 16 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Since you blanked the talk page, it warned you, but it did let you save the edit, so nothing to do here. Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:44, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * If the filter is smart enough to recognize the edit I was reverting as unconstructive (see log), it ought to be smart enough to allow the reversion. 168.12.253.66 (talk) 15:56, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
 * All the filter knew was that the page had a lot less content after you edited it. It isn't smart enough to take into account previous edits. You're fine. It was just a warning. You should consider creating an account; established editors don't trigger that filter at all. Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:46, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

216.11.222.26

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was just adding a section to the noticeboard and the filter disallowed the edit.


 * Date and time
 * 17:41, 17 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Unfortunately it's an unavoidable false positive. Thanks for your report, in the future you can use WP:AIV to report these obvious socks/LTAs. Legoktm (talk) 23:39, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

UscAngel

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I clarified some information and made the page more concise, as well as, adding references. I would like it published as is.


 * Date and time
 * 21:30, 17 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * That's not an article; it's a user page, and the filter thought you were blanking it since you removed so much from it. It's tagged for deletion now, so no sense worrying about trying to edit it further. Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:18, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

173.63.110.158

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 23:53, 18 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments

Not a false positive. - The edit in question was indeed vandalism. Triplestop (talk) 04:44, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

204.102.218.122

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 19:59, 20 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments

i was adding the inclusion of YouTube poop which is a popular form of parodying qoutes and material from animated cutscenes.
 * It doesn't like the word poop. If you have reliable sources that back up your claim, post them and I'll add it for you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 20:09, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Therealizzywestbury

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * The person on this page is only a minor cricket player, and doesn't warrant such a detailed Wikipedia page. The person in question has asked for the page to be cut down or removed.


 * Date and time
 * 00:51, 21 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * People are either notable enough to warrant an article, or they're not. Being barely notable doesn't mean you can't have as long as an article. Also, if you are Izzy Westbury, please make that clear and stop speaking about yourself in the third person. If not, please request a change of username, as you're impersonating a specific living person. Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:13, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Djewels

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * The Reference Link Section provides a Link http://www.djewels.org/ring_size_conversion_chart.asp which is longer functional.

Therefore I have provided the New Link from the same Website - http://www.djewels.org/index.php/ringsizechart. This is nothing of my interest and is a necessary required correction.
 * Date and time
 * 05:07, 21 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Not a false positive - Adding self-promotional links is considered spamming. Your username implies affiliation with the website you are adding; because of this you will receive this notice on your talk page soon, please read it carefully. Triplestop (talk) 05:21, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Matsopp

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I tried to add a new external link (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TqBE9EvKCSI) to the Oselvar page which shows a youtube video of an oselvar sailing in Austevoll on the west coast of Norway. I'm the owner of the video on youtube.


 * Date and time
 * 17:31, 21 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I've added the link, I'll leave you a better explanation on your talk page. Monty  845  17:41, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Victorian92

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Trying to include a video reference to the topic in popular media.


 * Date and time
 * 18:06, 21 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The filter was reconfigured since you posted your report. Try your edit(s) again. Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:54, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Aranaheath

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 17:47, 22 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I assume you were trying to remove that page (correct me if I'm wrong). Blanking is not the correct way to remove a page; rather, it should be tagged for deletion. I have now done this for you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 17:51, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

RobotEthanMars

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was trying to add a quote of the person, pertaining to his game design, and to his opinion on game design, using both his quote and a video from an older game which shows his game design in action. I believe this error was due to other users trying to make more humorous edits to this page, whereas I was trying to add a more critical, and constructive, piece of information to the article.


 * Date and time
 * 21:05, 22 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I can't see the full details of your edit, but I assume you added a link to YouTube. Try saving the edit again without that link. Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:10, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Huperkut

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 21:34, 22 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The filter was reconfigured since you posted your report. Try your edit(s) again. Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:52, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

27.4.225.241

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 04:31, 23 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * You need to be logged in as User:Monica.gambhir to blank that user's user page. —Bruce1eetalk 05:35, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I've nominated the page for deletion. Jackmcbarn (talk) 14:42, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

70.72.176.175

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Attempting to add comments Rabois was quoted as making during his time at Stanford, specifically homophobic slurs directed at an instructor, provoked a false positive.


 * Date and time
 * 17:39, 23 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Since re-written with the actual wording used described as "homophobic slurs". Black Kite (talk) 18:40, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

70.80.23.98

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Trying to insert the term "Jewish" just as the source provides. The article seems to allow the village to be referred to in terms of the "Roman Period", the "Arab Period", and even the "Crusader Period", yet despite the source's reference to its "Jewish" period, any such mention is apparently forbidden. Are we just completely erasing 500 years of history here?


 * Date and time
 * 18:08, 23 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * No - unfortunately the insertion of the word "Jewish" is the basis of much vandalism here. I have made the edito for you, since the source supports it. Black Kite (talk) 18:37, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Ahdevor

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Some of the info on the page was not referenced to original sources. I gave citations to the original sources instead of a source that took pretty much everything in it from the original sources that I cited.


 * Date and time
 * 05:49, 24 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments

122.179.170.96

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Testudo formation


 * Date and time
 * 13:29, 24 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Edit Filter working properly, warning issued. Monty  845  21:51, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

107.3.117.228

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was moving old discussions to my current ip talk page archive and placing a notice of that my ip was reassigned


 * Date and time
 * 21:47, 24 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Unfortunately, we have no evidence that the other IP addresses are actually yours. You should consider creating an account to avoid this problem in the future. Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:42, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Rad777z

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * add Idiot-Savant as a reference for covering Sympathy for the Devil on Idiots on Fire at http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/idiotsavant2 and the video at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qWg-v1KQlg


 * Date and time
 * 22:30, 24 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Although this is a false positive for this filter, the links to a nonnotable band's version on cdbaby and Youtube aren't appropriate for this article. NawlinWiki (talk) 00:42, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

HKafeman

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was trying to seek clarification on the MPE Graphs added by the Hankwang to the page "Laser safety" in 2007.


 * Date and time
 * 13:15, 25 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You cleared all of their old messages when you tried to post your new one. Add your message to the bottom of the page, leaving old ones where they are, and it should let you save it. Jackmcbarn (talk) 14:42, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Looking at the page again, it looks like you already figured this out. Jackmcbarn (talk) 14:42, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

164.58.113.126

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 21:14, 25 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Thank you for reporting your attempt at vandalism. I'll leave you an appropriate talk page warning. Monty  845  21:20, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

70.80.23.98

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Simply present the entire story. The description of events in the article terribly misleading and filled with nothing but half-truths. The article is clearly "taking sides" by presenting an awfully incomplete account of what actually went on.

Example: "Al-Bassa was situated in the territory allotted to the Arab state. It was then captured by Israeli forces."

Not quite.

The village wasn't captured in some totally unprovoked Israeli offensive into lands allotted to the Arabs as the editors would have the reader believe. Quite the opposite. The Jews accepted such allotment. The ARABS rejected it, and began attacking JEWISH villages in territory allotted to JEWS.

The village was only captured in an Israeli COUNTER-OFFENSIVE, to put an end to the Arab attacks.

Allow me to quote the Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel, proclaimed on THE VERY SAME DAY that the village was captured:

"WE APPEAL - in the very midst of the onslaught launched against us now for months - to the Arab inhabitants of the State of Israel to preserve peace and participate in the upbuilding of the State on the basis of full and equal citizenship and due representation in all its provisional and permanent institutions."

Israel wanted peace. The Arabs wanted Israel destroyed.

Just half a decade earlier, the Jews didn't fight back when they were being ethnically cleansed from Europe. Violence was simply too foreign to Jewish Culture.

Now, a mere 3-4 years later, it was the Palestinians attempting the cleansing.

Only this time they realized that much as they wish they didn't have to, yet again given no other choice, this time they forced themselves to fight back.

"We can forgive you for killing our sons. But we will never forgive you for making us kill yours." - Golda Meir, to Anwar Saddat.

This article, indeed this entire "family" of articles is stuffed to the gills with antisemitic lies and it just plain sickens me.

Now watch this "Zero" person revert my edit that did nothing but attach a simple general time period to the otherwise mysterious and confusing "Early Arab Period"...just to clarify the chronology of events for the reader, who might otherwise be left wondering "just when exactly was this "Early Arab Period"? 1000 BCE? Just when exactly was it?

The answer is clear: Sometime during the mid 7th century.

But Zero doesn't seem to want the readers to know that. That would mean that the Palestinians haven't lived in Palestine since the beginning of time. It would also mean they got their a great deal later than the Jews. And how do we know Jews lived centuries, even millennia, before the Arab's late arrival? Jesus, for one. Jesus was a Jew, no? And his apostles, and the Pharisees, and King Herod, and John the Baptist, and all those supposedly calling for his crucifixion...all Jews. GOVERNED by the Romans, true, but INHABITED pretty much exclusively by Jews.

Yet this is referred to as "The Roman Period". Apparently their never existed any "Jewish Period", a period that existed LONG BEFORE the first Arab stepped on "Palestinian" soil. Or at least many like ZERO would like the word to believe that.

Thing is, it just ain't true!

Still, just you wait and watch her remove my simple "dating" of the "Early Arab Period".
 * Date and time
 * 03:45, 26 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments

117.220.125.232

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I wanted to add this source, which the system disallows saying it is non-constructive:


 * Date and time
 * 11:49, 26 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Modified the filter, so your edit should work now. Thanks!  NawlinWiki (talk) 13:31, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

27.4.225.108

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I am Monica Gambhir and have myself summarised this page. Hence kindly update it. Thanks


 * Date and time
 * 12:29, 26 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You have to be logged in as Monica.gambhir to do that. It really doesn't matter, though, since the page is about to get deleted (see Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Monica.gambhir). Jackmcbarn (talk) 12:49, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Bernardo.siu

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Tried to translate "chinga tu madre, cabron". It is a very vulgar phrase ("fuck your mother, motherfucker"), so of course the automated filter tripped the edit :-)


 * Date and time
 * 01:36, 27 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Yes, it's a false positive. I'll add it for you. Once you've been around for a while, you'll be able to add those kinds of things yourself. Jackmcbarn (talk) 01:49, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Heide-Daniel

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I got a Spam report because I put to many links to external websites in a short time. The spam report is wrong because i put the external links to the official website of the cities in germany like Tostedt, Wulfsen, Jesteburg, Hollenstedt, etc...


 * Date and time
 * 02:17, 27 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments

KudpungMobile 2

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * editing my Kudpung user talk page from my mobile account user:KudpungMobile


 * Date and time
 * 02:51, 27 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * That filter must be based on edit count rather than on being (auto)confirmed. I can't see the exact statistics, since I'm not an EFM. Once you've used the mobile account enough, it should start to work. Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:56, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I seem to remember someone saying that this would not happen to a confirmed account so I gave KudpungMobile confirmed status myself. No worries however, I don't have to use my mobile account very often so it is nothing important. --KudpungMobile (talk) 03:09, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, that was me. Unfortunately, that filter's description lies, and that's all I have to work with. I've requested that it be corrected here. Jackmcbarn (talk) 03:18, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

2620:103:A000:A402:F02E:ABCB:5F30:F724

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Lore about a video game character. Kept being reedited into a list of irrelevant star wars characters


 * Date and time
 * 21:45, 27 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * No, the article is a list of characters. This "lore" has to stay out of it.--Jasper Deng (talk) 22:46, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

MaileMW

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Add information to the Whiting Model section.


 * Date and time
 * 17:43, 29 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments

68.145.72.205

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 23:13, 30 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Comments

it was a mistake I am really sorry.
 * No problem – that's what the edit filter is for. —Bruce1eetalk 06:04, 1 October 2013 (UTC)