Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives/Archive 31

Jo Gabrielo

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Don't write an article about yourself. If you're notable, someone else will. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:49, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

179.210.86.1

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * User inactive, last edit was on February 17th of 2013, went to blank entire page and replace with but then I couldn't save because of the crap abuse filter


 * Date and time
 * 12:05, 1 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * There is probably no need to mark it as such. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:51, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

68.83.19.34

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 14:26, 1 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

i was fixing the name beacause it was speled wrong
 * Not a false positive. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:28, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

EdConley

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was trying to add a cover version of this song that exists - I emulated the code already published, and added my bit - see the bit starting "Also in 2012"


 * Date and time
 * 14:28, 1 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Please don't add links to YouTube. Many items on YouTube are copyright violations, and we don't link to them - see External links #1. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:33, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

101.109.234.32

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Trying to revert soapboxing/spam/irrelevant content


 * Date and time
 * 20:24, 1 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

There is unfortunately no easy way to prevent this sort of false positive, but someone else has made the edit on your behalf. Thank you for reporting the issue. Someguy1221 (talk) 21:19, 1 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Actually, I take that back. The filter is supposed to permit you to do this once an hour. Will investigate why you couldn't do that much. Someguy1221 (talk) 21:20, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

74.192.84.101

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * adding previously-non-existent refs & massive cleanup & will somebody please put these aggressive filters on warn-not-disallow?  :-)


 * Date and time
 * 22:07, 1 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Clarification... first time I submitted I used archive dot eye ess with http at the front, and got the "correct" message (albeit a pretty rude one).

Second time I submitted, I had removed the http from the front, which then gave me the generic 'you are bad' message, with no indication that the problem was *still* archive dot eye ess.

Checking my filter-log here, showed that it was still the archive dot eye ess filter that was tripping... just with the generic, rather than the indicative-of-the-problem, errmsg.

Please fix the regex, so that *all* triggers of the anti-archive-dot-eye-ess abuseFilter, actually print the errmsg which *says* what the problem is. Danke. p.s. Also, checking for SGML comments might be nice. :-)   &mdash; 74.192.84.101 (talk) 22:17, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, due to the way the filter system works, this is how "warn+disallow" work - they first display the warning (which can be set for individual filters), then the generic "disallow" warning on the second try. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:18, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * MediaWiki:Abusefilter-disallowed‎ is the warning that is given when an edit is disallowed (even after a warning). You could modify that and add a parser function to detect which filter is being triggered ($1 is the description, $2 is the filter ID, so you probably want to use $2). 88.113.145.84 (talk) 18:05, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Louis Leo111

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * The guy Twsx is blocked from editing this page.. Tell your guys not to block..You guys may probably don't know about me..Tell your lazy staff that I am a trillionaire...Next time I will mean to death of your staff


 * Date and time
 * 14:55, 2 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I would say both the "description" of your report as well as the edits reported to AIV ( 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ) speak for themselves. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 15:01, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * User has been blocked indef. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 15:12, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

95.68.71.79

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Have tried to add one more review and the reference to it. Haven't been been able to save even after I had deleted the reference.


 * Date and time
 * 17:29, 2 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Edit blocked by filter 16 -- Alexf(talk) 17:58, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I've refered the issue to a user who knows this filter. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 04:59, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, it is a false positive - however, it appears that the edit was done already. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 15:56, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

103.251.188.73

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 17:28, 3 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * False positive. I have made the edit for you. Black Kite (talk) 18:37, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Shah manthan

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 05:30, 4 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * If you are trying to create a new article, please see WP:AFC. However, your proposed article does not look notable. Black Kite (talk) 11:52, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

122.161.228.215

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Promotional content.


 * Date and time
 * 11:43, 4 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Instead of blanking the page, you needed to add the speedy deletion template (which I see you have now done). I have deleted the page. Black Kite (talk) 11:50, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Raresugar

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Tried to add "Allulose" article as "Allulose" should come before "Psicose" as "Psicose" used be "Allulose" and "Psicose" is over writting "Allulose" by redirect. OR change "Psicose" to "Allulose(Psicose)".


 * Date and time
 * 02:05, 7 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The filter you ran into is a "warn" filter, not a "disallow" filter. If you had simply hit 'savepage' a second time the edit would have gone through. Someguy1221 (talk) 03:01, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * However, this looks like a "copy&paste" move. We do have a page moving feature - see Moving a page. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:52, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

79.7.47.229

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I tried to add some new informations about the author with links about his new pubblications.


 * Date and time
 * 15:35, 7 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Don't type in ALL CAPS – that's what's tripping the edit filter. —Bruce1eetalk 15:39, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Casualtyfan2014

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was trying to reference a change I tried to make which was changing s character's surname to the correct name. I also tried to reference another change I tried to do which was change the date of the characters arrival. The reference was the URL of BBC Casualty's website.


 * Date and time
 * 23:11, 7 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You're right- this is a false positive. I did the edit for you. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:29, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

67.85.29.23

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 00:37, 8 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Not a false positive. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:30, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Macs pizza

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 04:34, 8 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Clearly vandalism. User warned. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:33, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

76.107.171.90

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Someone had censored a quote; I was trying to restore its original vulgarity.


 * Date and time
 * 21:31, 8 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Yeah, unsurprisingly the filter blocks that, I've fixed it. Black Kite (talk) 21:37, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

72.213.186.12

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 04:00, 9 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The edit appears to be vandalism. Can you give some source for that use of the word? עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:01, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

66.87.128.162

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 22:20, 11 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

I see no relevant edit filter hits here. Can you give me more details? עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 17:23, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

User:Pheartheceal

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was just trying to add some userboxes and text to my user page.


 * Date and time
 * 20:39, 13 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I guess the "ASCII art" filter was objecting to the "( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)" string. (Is it necessary for the filter to be active in user space?) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 20:31, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

אסף רזון

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Trying, on a private draft page for now, to create a new article about Checkmarx.


 * Date and time
 * 15:46, 14 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I see that there actually was an article about Checkmarx, but it was deleted. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 17:15, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

105.228.5.187

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 22:11, 14 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

If you are Coomaad online, feel free to log in and do it. Otherwise, please leave the page alone. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 17:17, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
 * That said, I have deleted the user pages as editing experiments. (Instead of blanking the user page, you could mark it with db-test or any other appropriate speedy deletion criterion.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 18:05, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

72.138.246.238

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 23:49, 14 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Obvious vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 17:18, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

User:AleksandraAndzic

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * This woman is claiming to be Russian royalty, which is false.


 * Date and time
 * 20:58, 15 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Page deleted, per WP:FAKEARTICLE. Black Kite (talk) 08:45, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

184.244.38.188

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Trying to add "Fagg, Virginia" to list. It has its own Wikipedia page and is a real place: Fagg, Virginia


 * Date and time
 * 21:47, 15 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Yes, false positive, I see the edit has already been made. Black Kite (talk) 08:47, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * It should be obvious, though, why the filter caught that. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 17:23, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

24.183.174.153

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Modify certain sentences to sound more neutral (removing things like "somewhat tarry") and remove redundancy (alleged ... possible corruption). It now sounds less like it was written by employees of Diamond Ranch Academy trying to do damage control.


 * Date and time
 * 23:04, 15 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Edit already made. Black Kite (talk) 08:48, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

86.143.217.31

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * update 2010-2013 performance credits


 * Date and time
 * 12:35, 16 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * This is a false positive, but as it is only a warning note the edit went through OK. Black Kite (talk) 08:49, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Ben stas

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * adding and updating information about the festival, which I work for.


 * Date and time
 * 19:36, 16 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The problem is "SLUTTT". Leave that out and the edit should go through fine.  You can leave an edit-request on the talk page to have that added, if it is correct and sourced. Black Kite (talk) 08:50, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

64.235.69.80

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Canned ravioli causes horrible bouts of diarrhea!!!


 * Date and time
 * 02:09, 18 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

I hope you aren't serious. Even if what you said is factual at face value (which it is more silly than factual), deleting the entire article and replacing it with the word "diarrhea" is most definitely vandalism. —Josh3580talk/hist 02:16, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

2605:E000:4C40:EA00:E6CE:8FFF:FE1B:7CB0

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 06:04, 18 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You cannot make that edit as an unregistered user. That edit should be made by the editor whose userpage it is, or another registered user following policy.  The article has been blanked as a WP:FAKEARTICLE. Black Kite (talk) 08:52, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

71.125.224.160

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * added data and dates into the table as shown below and I removed two air lines since (Arctic Circle Air Service & Arctic Transportation Services) one was no longer operational and one is operating under a different name.


 * Date and time
 * 05:39, 20 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Not a false positive, although your edit was not vandalism. The trigger was your addition of "Huff Daland Dusters" to the Delta entry.  We have a very persistent vandal who continually tries to change all references to Delta on Wikipedia to "Huff Daland".  So please try your edit without that change, and it should go through.  Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 15:51, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

DomCooper123

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Give an example, to the appealing male. BTW ADD ME ON FB< Dom Cooper, have a safe pp&you should like it:)


 * Date and time
 * 18:36, 20 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Clearly vandalism. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:35, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

71.105.105.132

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Tried to update page to include the insurance on a pornstars penis. was not allowed http://www.globalpost.com/dispatches/globalpost-blogs/wanderlust/porn-star-insures-penis-1-million


 * Date and time
 * 07:30, 24 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The best course of action here is to suggest this change on the article's talkpage. Black Kite (talk) 23:44, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Cloudchased

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was attempting to add sources to my article sandbox, User talk:Cloudchased/Sandbox/Cyclone Winifred, and somehow tripped the filter. Note that I am under editing restrictions by the Ban Appeals Subcommittee, but it seems strange that I'm the one tripping filter 602. Looking at it, it seems a lot of recent edits have.


 * Date and time
 * 23:04, 24 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Given this and the report below I'll raise this issue at the filter discussion page. Black Kite (talk) 23:44, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
 * . AGK [•] 23:48, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Neko-chan

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Discussing vandalism with another user on my talk. It popped the arbitration discretionary sanctions box up. What.


 * Date and time
 * 23:07, 24 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * See above report. Black Kite (talk) 23:44, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
 * : this was due to an error in the filter. AGK [•] 23:48, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

User:Alexandraandzic

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * This woman is claiming to be royalty, which is NOT true


 * Date and time
 * 20:20, 25 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The page has now been deleted. Black Kite (talk) 23:44, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Bernard Hughes

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I corrected a quote from a cite article, which had been given as "excrement", to "shit", which was the actual word used in the article. While this corrected the quote, I can see why it hit an automated block.


 * Date and time
 * 00:43, 26 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Made the edit for you. Black Kite (talk) 23:33, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

71.181.24.73

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Talk:List of villages depopulated during the Arab–Israeli conflict

Your stupid filter on the talk page of Depopulated Arab villages in Israel blocked this comment I was trying to make in reply to someone who made a ludicrous request to delete an article:


 * Bwhahahahaha! So basically your argument is that because it's controversial we should pretend it didn't happen at all. Yeah good luck with that. Doubt you'll be able to convince enough of even the most douchebag Wikipedia editors that we should be deleting articles that are subject to controversy, on that basis alone.

Apparently it was because I used the word "douchebag." Profanity in and of itself should not result in an entire comment being considered "unconstructive" nor should we be required to write like academics or bureaucrats or "polite society" in the Talk section simply because that is some peoples' preference. These stupid bots do more harm than good, and, are, in effect, a perfunctory and somewhat arbitrary censorship device based on language style rather than meaningful content. You Wikicrats who create and maintain these things are some truly sorry people.
 * Date and time
 * 19:33, 26 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Wikipedia is not censored, but that doesn't mean be civil isn't a policy. Given your clearly considerable linguistic skills, it should not be a major task to fashion a talk page response that doesn't involve the word that tripped the filter. Black Kite (talk) 23:37, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Jeep dude89

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 05:57, 27 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Page deleted. Black Kite (talk) 23:18, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Hjjarrett

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 23:02, 27 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * That's almost certainly a false positive, though you probably shouldn't be trying to create an article on your user page anyway. See WP:AFC. Black Kite (talk) 23:18, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

213.246.85.251

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Attempted to edit the "Medicine" section of this page thus:

Medicine

 * Coronavirus, a virus which, under the microscope, resembles a solar corona.
 * Corona of glans penis, a feature of the glans penis that resembles a corona.
 * Date and time
 * 15:00, 29 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I've added it for you – the filter interpreted it as vandalism. —Bruce1eetalk 15:09, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I suddenly realized why the edit had been rejected. Whither real AI... 213.246.85.251 (talk) 17:50, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Jcollomosse

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Fixing dead links to computer graphics papers authored by this individual.


 * Date and time
 * 15:03, 29 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

88.104.96.231

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Inserted Russian Cyrillic native name of the company EuroChem, triggered filter 271 (Potential spambot) and proceeded with the edit because I'm human.


 * Date and time
 * 21:14, 29 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Yes, this is a false positive, but as you say it's only a warning so the edit went through. Black Kite (talk) 01:10, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

108.251.229.202

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 01:14, 30 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Page deleted. Black Kite (talk) 01:10, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Eranmaster

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I deleted the content, has this content is false offensive and used for not legal purposes


 * Date and time
 * 19:34, 30 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * This is a user page, not an article. You may not blank another user's page. Black Kite (talk) 01:10, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

164.77.97.181

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Call out person using my friend's name.


 * Date and time
 * 22:37, 1 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Since the page is four years old and the user has no other edits, I have deleted the page. Black Kite (talk) 00:06, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Chriscp9be

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 23:49, 2 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

== Poop cake
 * Page deleted. Black Kite (talk) 14:49, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

24.255.237.74

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Tried to add a disambiguation reference to urinal cake (= urinal deodorizer block), which was immediately tagged as 'unconstructive'.


 * Date and time
 * 09:43, 3 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I've added it for you – the edit filter was interpreting it as vandalism. —Bruce1eetalk 09:54, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Miriam Bat Hokmah

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * add a external link to a related article


 * Date and time
 * 10:05, 3 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

172.9.22.150

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * The edit filter prevented the removal of a proposed deletion tag from a redirect that was ineligible for proposed deletion. Since any editor in good standing can remove a proposed deletion tag for any reason, the edit filter must not prevent the removal of proposed deletion tags. In any case, it should not prevent the removal of proposed deletion tags from pages which are not eligible for proposed deletion.


 * Date and time
 * 16:28, 3 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

I see that you were able to make the edit after all. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 21:08, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

209.68.139.250

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was adding a section of famous quotes from the film, which are widely known by the cult fanbase. It contains a decent amount of quotes from the film, and they are all really funny if you read them in Tommy Wiseau's obscure European accent.


 * Date and time
 * 18:05, 3 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

138.162.8.59

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was attempting to add the following reply to Village pump (policy) and your edit filter blocked me for no other reason than because I am an IP stating it may be unconstructive. Here is what I was trying to post:

":::::::Here is the post I tried to load a minute ago, lets see if it works this time. I'm familiar with the useage and availability of those servers but I still think its a mountain out of a mole hill and there are other ways of gaming the system if that's what they want to do. I also still don't see any proof that the problem is as big as you describe. You say you have procedures in place to allo wthem to edit but do they know what they are? Probably not. Most people aren't going to spend 2 hours to search about how to make a change if they see a typo that needs correcting and they are restricted. Their just going to say screw it and walk away and tell all their friends that Wikipedia sucks and doesn't meet their mandate as the Encyclopedia anyone can edit. And rightly so. If anyone has to either create an account or search for 2 hours on instructions to submit a change then anyone doesn't apply. Anyway, I digress. The point of my posting wasn't to argue the merits (or lack of merit) of preemptively using a bot to block ips that have never edited, it was to argue the merits of reviewing the IP blocks to allow more editors to edit. Particularly those range blocks which include several very large groups, several universities and colleges and even a couple countries if I am reading them correctly. Many of which have been in place for a more than 3 years, some for as long as 10 years. Anything more than a year is unnecessary in my opinion. If we unblock it and are flooded with vandals then extend it for another year, but this indefinate blocking is abusive and needs to be restricted. Maybe even limited to Arbcom or Steward action only. 138.162.8.59 (talk) 22:04, 3 February 2014 (UTC)"

What in that post is unconstructive or needs to be filtered? I tell you, nothing, this is all because Wikipedia does not want IP's to edit and it goes to great lengths to ensure that IP editing is as painful as possible in a petty and misguided attempt at forcing the users to create accounts. I don't need an account. 138.162.8.59 (talk) 22:04, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Date and time
 * 22:04, 3 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Oh I see it failed for common vandal phrases. Way to go Wikipedia, way to go!. 138.162.8.59 (talk) 22:06, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

72.244.206.13

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * My changes prompted filter 351 to claim "Your edit appears to have added content to the end of the article"

In retrospect, that message may have been technically accurate, though it was not visible in the source. The way I thik I addressed the problem was to remove a single extra square bracket on one of the lines of text specifying the article's categories. The extra bracket was not at the end of the article.

I just tried twice to recreate the problem but I wasn't able to. Consider this an unreproducible false positive
 * Date and time
 * 03:40, 4 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Yes, I can't replicate it either. Still, the issue appears sorted now. Black Kite (talk) 23:00, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Victoriajames1212

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 18:46, 4 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The part causing the problem is "DJ FUCK". Either leave this out, or suggest the edit on the talk page. Black Kite (talk) 22:59, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

BluPlanetViews

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Trying to bring page back into alignment with Wiki rules by removing promotional language and bringing objective tone to the reporting.


 * Date and time
 * 02:18, 5 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * The page you're trying to blank (User:Sabinebalve) is been considered for deletion here. —Bruce1eetalk 05:02, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Smokymountains

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was adding valuable information to the page concerning the museum. Specifically regarding the Grand Staircase. I am unaffiliated with the museum -- just an area expert.


 * Date and time
 * 18:01, 6 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

It's because you added a link containing your username, which may of course indicate a connection with the material added. This filter log is only a warning, however; the edit is not disallowed. Black Kite (talk) 22:57, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Globalr2p

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I edited the text under How does the responsibility to protect differ from humanitarian intervention?, when I got the warning that I may be doing advocacy, rather than just information. This may have happened because I juxtaposed two different ideas (the Responsibility to Protect versus humanitarian intervention). However, I only gave information, without taking "sides" or advocating one idea over the other.


 * Date and time
 * 21:24, 6 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * It's because you added a link containing your username, which may of course indicate a connection with the material added. This filter log is only a warning, however; the edit is not disallowed. Black Kite (talk) 22:56, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Lyn508mr

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Delete my page - Opt out of web.


 * Date and time
 * 22:23, 6 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Done. Black Kite (talk) 22:55, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

74.176.10.179

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * HA


 * Date and time
 * 00:21, 8 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Not a false positive, user warned. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 21:14, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

94.15.121.210

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 03:18, 8 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

The account User:Kuruma matrimony telugu community has been blocked for spamming. You have attempted to post the material on the user's talk page, which has been blocked by the edit filter. Not a false positive. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 17:04, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

99.162.59.21

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I wanted to remove the quotation marks as they made it seem more like an editorialization than documented facts.


 * Date and time
 * 08:33, 8 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * This looks like a false positive; I see that you were able to make the edit after all. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 17:11, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Festal82

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was trying to begin a listing of notable metamodernists in various genres. UPDATE: I just realized that two of the pieces of artwork I was trying to provide links to have expletives in their titles; the first is a Reggie Watts album that is already a Wikipedia entry, the second is a book of poetry by Steve Roggenbuck. I really apologize for any inconvenience. I have deleted the expletives and I swear I only put them in in the first instance because they are from the actual titles of these works. The page appears to be working now. Again, I apologize for any confusion.


 * Date and time
 * 19:06, 8 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Michael Bailey- Planetviews

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Sabinebalve, I Michael Bailey- Planetviews, have just provided an edited page which is in keeping with WIkipedia guidelines, and such has been flagged as a false positive. Efforts are being made to correct the user page Sabinebalve ,


 * Date and time
 * 04:05, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Not really a false positive (why were you overwriting another user's page?). In fact, neither version was really appropriate (since Wikipedia is not a hosting service), and - ultimately - the page has been deleted. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 17:18, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Comments

96.49.78.204

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I would like to remove this page. This was a joke user page that was made 8 years ago. I am currently trying to advertise myself as a freelance professional, and this is currently the first thing that comes up when you search my name on google. - Elliot Langford


 * Date and time
 * 05:13, 10 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I have deleted the page. You could have logged in as the user and marked it for deletion with db-user. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 20:53, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

93.193.21.194

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Patti Smith song title

I was trying to correct the song title from "rock & roll" to "rock & roll nigger" but the website wouldn't let me. help! it IS the correct song title. it even has its own wiki page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rock_N_Roll_Nigger
 * Date and time
 * 18:56, 10 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

96.226.22.43

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Making it easier to understand.


 * Date and time
 * 05:55, 11 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

213.119.73.62

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 16:36, 11 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Dear wikipediauser,

I want to report this page because its full of bullshit. Me and my friend Dries Thijs found out that
 * What will happen if you attempt to vandalize an article? The edit will be blocked or reverted. And what will happen if you bring attention to yourself by complaining about it as a false alert? (Three guesses?) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 21:02, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

NETA-CET

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * We’ve noticed that you have been reverting our entry, so thanks for the opportunity to clarify. We posted a brief factual description of the program with a link to the website. Unfortunately, the alternative entry is not accurate and I am not sure where it originated. The curriculum was not created by Hebrew University of Jerusalem. In addition, while we did grant permission for the research study cited, the study has number of factual inaccuracies, some methodological deficiencies and a tiny sample size.

We respectfully request that our entry be allowed to stand and not be replaced with unsubstantiated content.
 * Date and time
 * 19:47, 11 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Wikipedia is not a vehicle for self-promotion; you were attempting to re-write the article with promotional material and removing referenced information. If you believe the article is inaccurate, see Contact us - Subjects. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 17:23, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Messalonskee High School
The Messalonskee High School page is full of lies, and I am trying to edit it with the truth.
 * See the filter log of User:72.224.205.210. Your edit was a blatant vandalism attempt, so don't complain that it was blocked. (No point in blocking right now, but I am going to warn the user.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 17:31, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

PantherTheCat

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I am unable to save the Univore page after creation. It keeps getting filter blocked, however all I have done is attempt to expand to add notability.


 * Date and time
 * 04:04, 12 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Looks like a false positive to me. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 17:26, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

41.204.74.50

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * talk page with spam

I deleted spam from the talk page @ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Blue_Card_%28Australia%29
 * Date and time
 * 08:04, 12 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Your edit appears to have worked (thanks). The message must just have been a warning. —Bruce1eetalk 08:18, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Rocky635xx

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 21:26, 13 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Sameen cemk

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 08:42, 14 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

2605:A601:2B0:A401:A814:B2C4:40E6:280B

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Attempting to change "Bot Lane" to "Ass". Bot Lane is vandalism, it's suppose to be ass.


 * Date and time
 * 02:04, 15 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

✅, I've restored the title to "Own My Ass" is is supported by the source. Thank you for your report. — &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (t • e • c) 19:07, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

BillHouston1957

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I added a transcript of newspaper accounts of the trial. Someone deleted it and I think it should be included.  I want to add it back.


 * Date and time
 * 21:45, 15 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

110.22.21.71

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Edit Summary: Removed redundant information. Sorted names for ease of reference. Inactive/active status is no longer relevant.


 * Date and time
 * 02:50, 16 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Attempting to remove information from another user's userpage, filter working correctly. Black Kite (talk) 01:07, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Occupy Wall Street
Attempt to undo unintentional blanking unsuccessful. Be— —Critical 05:17, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
 * For some reason, the filter was objecting to the re-addition of the archive.is link. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 17:36, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

BrentSwag44

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 05:18, 16 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Addition of unsourced/non notable material, filter is working correctly. Black Kite (talk) 01:07, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

121.217.205.233

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was trying to change the quote "I am the Second Coming!" and was removed. It is also reported that he exclaimed, "This is how he did it, Paula! This is how he died!" to "This is fucked Paula, this is fucked. Michael is dead".

I should know, I was the person he pushed out of the way as he screamed it.
 * Date and time
 * 10:24, 16 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Unfortunately, whether true or not, that information is not supported by the given source. Black Kite (talk) 00:58, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

69.143.137.254

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Hello, trying to add http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=LugsJevx to the article and it got blocked. Please unblock 4 me thx.


 * Date and time
 * 17:11, 16 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Sorry, this domain is blacklisted as it is user-generated and contain unreliable information or malicious code. Black Kite (talk) 00:58, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Jsackerman94

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was trying to propose a significant revision and expansion of the page by supplying my proposed bibliography for review on the talk page.


 * Date and time
 * 21:31, 17 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * This is a false positive. I would suggest placing the bibliography on your own talkpage and linking to it from the article's talkpage. (When your account has more edits, the error will not occur, however). Black Kite (talk) 01:03, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

62.173.9.66

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Adding findnotice triggers a false positive for unlogged in users


 * Date and time
 * 08:07, 20 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Your edit was blocked because it also would have removed all the talk page messages (see here). —Bruce1eetalk 08:18, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
 * That was standard archiving, see here. The block would have been for adding findnotice, as that creates external links. It appears to be set up to block any IP edit that involves external edits, even when the IP edit is adding a recognised template. There is no difference between an IP or logged in editor using the template as the links generated cannot be manipulated.  SilkTork  ✔Tea time  16:31, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Ah, you're right. I logged out and managed to add a findnotice to an article after having to twice complete a captcha. But I was not able to complete an archiving action, and was prevented from doing so with a red flag.  SilkTork  ✔Tea time  16:44, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Sanmartins

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * error removing the main "Combinatória Enumerativa(combinatorics enumerative)", because it is a translation of an English text where references were cited.


 * Date and time
 * 00:20, 21 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You were adding large chunks of non-English text, and removing valid information, including categories. Black Kite (talk) 01:03, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

108.245.146.223

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Description
 * Please Delete user page User:Michael J. Vella. This was a joke page made years ago. It shows up the first thing you search for and is really hurting my forward progress. Thanks
 * Please Delete user page User:Michael J. Vella. This was a joke page made years ago. It shows up the first thing you search for and is really hurting my forward progress. Thanks


 * Date and time
 * 00:45, 21 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Already deleted by me. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 17:38, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

99.247.162.199

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 19:02, 21 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

I'm trying to edit a certain page to provide people with efficient information about certain topics, and I keep getting rejected, as the current information is false
 * Thanks for reporting yourself! (The IP address is already blocked for vandalism.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 19:36, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

119.160.118.219

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 20:21, 21 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Sorry, there are no entries in the filter log for this IP address. Black Kite (talk) 01:03, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Bunniebeakat

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 05:15, 22 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

I was simply writing everything I know about the name Trinity and everything that all 30-50 Trinity's I have spoken to had in common.
 * It's lucky that the edit filter is designed to catch the addition of such nonsense, then. Black Kite (talk) 09:49, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

24.5.122.13

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Discussing the possible origin of a Russian idiom concerning "plywood over Paris"


 * Date and time
 * 09:42, 22 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * False positive, but only a warning so the edit should have gone through. Black Kite (talk) 09:50, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Bergstein

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I tried to update the page based on the groups homepage and social media - I think the problem was with me moving content from the introduction to the new section or adding a new band member.

I was trying to update the page and add additional years, I cleaned up the introduction and moved content to the new year section down the bottom.
 * Date and time
 * 12:16, 22 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The problem is the introduction of sources from archive.is. The rest of the edit will go through OK. Black Kite (talk) 18:36, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Nathan leyland

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * i want to remove this page, it is my old page. and i could not remember my login that i had the page under so i made a new account and wanted to try and get rid of the page.


 * Date and time
 * 17:57, 23 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Page deleted. Black Kite (talk) 18:35, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Struway2

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * generally updating the page. Attempted to introduce a link to archive.is, which is apparently now blocked. Replaced it with a link to NewsBank, and attempted to save again, but was disallowed as "potentially unconstructive". I'm impressed. It's the first time this has happened to me in 47,000 edits.


 * Date and time
 * 19:29, 23 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Hi, yes, you replaced one of the archive.is links, but not the addition of two others in the "He has also played in Australia..." paragraph - that's why it was blocked again. Black Kite (talk) 20:30, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Olavie16

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Please replace this with a description of the edit you were trying to make.


 * Date and time
 * 13:42, 24 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Stop typing in all caps. Someguy1221 (talk) 10:49, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

149.160.173.71

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Requesting the creation of a redirect for Генеральна губернія, and I was told An automated filter has identified this edit as coming from a potentially automated source. If you are human and your edit is constructive you may continue to save your edit.


 * Date and time
 * 21:35, 26 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Billisame

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 14:47, 27 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

YOUSUCKYOUSUCKYOUSUCKYOUSUCKYOUSUCKYOUSUCKYOUSUCKYOUSUCKYOUSUCKYOUSUCKYOUSUCKYOUSUCKYOUSUCKYOUSUCK

Alecc98

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I JUST WANTED TO HELP


 * Date and time
 * 14:53, 27 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

78.21.35.158

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * jan hoet is really dead, i'm sure


 * Date and time
 * 19:21, 27 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

70.50.151.11

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * "An automated filter has identified this edit as coming from a potentially automated source. If you are human and your edit is constructive you may continue to save your edit."

I have no idea why lodging an opinion would constitute being ocnsidered a bot.


 * Date and time
 * 21:14, 27 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

It seems to be your use of the word A****T which seems to trigger a spam filter. Try again, but get round the use of that word somehow. Peridon (talk) 15:15, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The edit filter (I assume the same one) also triggered on which doesn't include that word. Is it possible it's filtering on non-Latin-letter headers? (or the WP:RFD discussions are hitting on a lot of banned words being used as redirects) Though I don't see why a chemical name  would be banned. So I think it's because the edit filter is complaining about non-Latin headers... -- 70.50.151.11 (talk) 00:59, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
 * A non-Latin header should not trigger a spambot edit filter tag, since many Wikiproject discussions involve such headers. This is not a rare thing, and article talk pages on subjects that involve non-Latin languages also can include such headers. -- 70.50.151.11 (talk) 05:46, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Djdiggla

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was trying to expand the page for D-styles so it no longer just redirects to /Invisibl_Skratch_Piklz but I was auto flagged. Thanks for any help.


 * Date and time
 * 23:44, 27 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You were trying to add large amounts of information without any reliable sources (see WP:V - blogs, wikipedia and wikia are not reliable sources). Black Kite (talk) 17:33, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Aliceleuchte

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Adding a link to an official letter from the Secretary of the organization.


 * Date and time
 * 05:33, 28 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The edit was rejected as the link contains your own username; you should find third-party sources on this subject. Black Kite (talk) 17:31, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Rockboxzy

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Editing early history of chamba. but it reported error.


 * You were attempting to add large amount of information without any sources. Black Kite (talk) 17:29, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Eric abiog

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 01:03, 1 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The Italian chart you tried to include is not a reliable source, and is thus disallowed. Black Kite (talk) 17:28, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

82.19.13.93

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was trying to edit a page, when it said I used an archive.is source, or something, and I didn't


 * Date and time
 * 17:33, 1 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Your edit did indeed include an archive.is reference. Black Kite (talk) 17:25, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

FreeRangeFrog

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Attempting to revert removal of sourced information. See diff.


 * Date and time
 * 04:30, 3 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * It seems the problem was that the material I was restoring included a link to archive.is... but that particular warning only came up in my third attempt. Not sure if that's relevant here - the original issue only showed up as a warning about the filter, but no information about which filter or why. Not very helpful. § FreeRangeFrog croak 04:44, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

82.125.147.188

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Updating the "Discography" part with other records and changing the columns to a simple list.


 * Date and time
 * 08:55, 6 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Quebec99

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Added punctuation at end-of-line "ultimately demolished in March 2007"added title and tried to add a url to the only reference on the page, blocked as not a valid archiving service"Attempted to just comment out the offending url, and got this "unconstructive" notice


 * Date and time
 * 18:05, 6 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

163.41.109.143

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Put in helpful, needed information that was not included in the article


 * Date and time
 * 21:58, 6 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

72.89.172.80

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Adding the following link as reference:

http://www.mail-archive.com/cryptography @ metzdowd.com/msg09997.html (I had to put spaces around the at symbol, because it is blocking me the link EVEN HERE)
 * Date and time
 * 22:35, 6 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

2607:F140:400:B007:3136:F0F6:8361:6F95

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Added Lisa Jervis, founding editor and publisher of Bitch: Feminist Response to Pop Culture (with link to the magazine's wikipedia page), to the notable alumni section


 * Date and time
 * 23:14, 6 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Corti45

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description

Cortana may refer to:

Virtual Assistant Program

 * Microsoft Cortana, virtual personal assistant program from Microsoft

VG Character

 * Cortana (AI character), artificially intelligent (AI) character in the Halo video game series

Gastropoda

 * Cortana (gastropod), the fossil gastropod genus

Ceremonial Sword

 * Curtana, the ceremonial sword


 * Date and time
 * 23:16, 6 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Alaa ubo

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was trying to add the website of Tartous City to the articles of Tartous


 * Date and time
 * 00:19, 7 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

199.219.138.234

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * buildings on campus

building plans have changed, so I am updating info. In fact, I'm updating a lot of information on the City Tech page that is outdated or inaccurate
 * Date and time
 * 21:29, 7 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

108.227.207.108

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 11:18, 8 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

2010== juin ==2014

90.25.21.187

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 13:24, 8 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Kiesha93

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 06:41, 9 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

I am Ian Singer one of the persons identified in this article. The original version was nothing close to factual. I would like to have the truth posted if my name is to be on it. I've had people from work and else where reference this document. Allow my edit or do remove the entire thing please.

106.66.155.32

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 07:01, 9 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I've tagged the page you're trying to blank (User:Futureindiaconstructions) for deletion (spam). —Bruce1eetalk 07:08, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

74.192.84.101

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * added list of sources earlier today. while I adjusted the formatting, the other person commented inline, hence, e/c when I tried to save.  I force-overrode their one-line change with my 100 changes, but the abuseFilter prevented this.  Change the abuse-filter setting from 'deny' to be 'warn', please, so others are not similarly forced to do out-of-browser workarounds.


 * Date and time
 * 18:38, 9 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Unfortunately, as part of your changes you were removing some material from the page; the filter does not allow unregistered editors to do that to other user's talk pages. Black Kite (talk) 00:23, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Right. That part is clear.  And, the backlog in dealing with all these false-poz reports about abuseFilters is also clear.  Which is why I redid my 100 changes, manually, already.  But the problem of over-aggressive abuseFilters remains, for myself in the future, and for anybody else bitten by them.  See above, where the anon was trying to get rid of WP:NOTPROMOTION, and was prevented by the abuseFilter.  See my own abuseFilter log, where I'm trying to help new users, who often have very little clue on how our idiosyncratic talkpages work.  This particular abuseFilter has never bothered me before the last few weeks, so it is either a new abuseFilter, or a new wrinkle in the regex of an existing abuseFilter.  It is set to deny-with-no-useful-message-and-no-workaround, just like many other abuseFilters (see elsewhere on this page for people that are trying to revert vandalism, but because archive.dot.eye.ess happened to be in the vandalism-reversion-content, get bitten by the abuseFilter).  Is there any point in reporting false-poz, with the recommendation that the level of abuseFilter-aggressiveness be changed, to warn-not-deny?  Or are we so short on editor-count, that cleaning up the warn-alerts, would overwhelm the guardian-resources we have?  You are pointing out that the abuseFilter (aka the editors who write and maintain the regex of this particular abuseFilter) does not allow me to edit, as and when needed. , I'm asking why the abuseFilters are set to not-allow, as oppose to warn-n-flag.  HTH.  p.s. And no, please don't remind me that the dreaded WP:FLOW is coming, which will make editing talkpages effectively impossible in general; I fail to view that as a "solution" of any stripe.  ;-)   &mdash; 74.192.84.101 (talk) 02:22, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Hirasol

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was trying to add a lead, since I saw on top of the page that it might need one.


 * Date and time
 * 02:56, 10 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * This is undoubtedly a false positive, but your changes were so extensive that it is difficult to determine where the issue lies. I would suggest adding the sections one at a time and reporting back. Black Kite (talk) 00:23, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

TTKK

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I have been doing some major additions to this page over the past month or two - including references and pictures. I am genuinely puzzled what in the present addition infringes any rules. Do please let me know. Thanks!


 * Date and time
 * 07:22, 10 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You were adding a link to archive.is, which is disallowed. Please try to find an alternative source. Black Kite (talk) 00:23, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Nageshbhardwaj1

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 12:32, 10 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You were trying to add an invalid image to the page. However, since the page is obvious spam, I have deleted it. Black Kite (talk) 00:23, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

NaturaTek

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * This page has a sexual harassment section. It is applicable and documented with sources. A user 'Rjmail' removed the entire section and claimed it sounded tabloid like, "he said/she said." It is not tabloid. She has written an article in a reputable science magazine that sent damaging waves. Sources are documented. I can't undo the edit that the 'Rjmail' user did, which was removing the entire section. I get an error that states my undoing of his/her edit is possibly unconstructive due to an automated filter and disallowed. Someone kindly undo that edit. Thanks.


 * Date and time
 * 05:47, 12 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Melonkelon

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was changing date formats to dmy, but it said I was attempting to add material from anonymous blogs.


 * Date and time
 * 23:13, 12 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * This is a false positive with Filter 554 and I have informed the filter manager. Black Kite (talk) 11:51, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Momoneymoproblemz

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Worked for quite a few hours to improve the article's history section with more recent information (most info verifiable with citations), added a photo within this section of the university's first president, cleared the listing of colleges under the academics section (this is probably why my edit's being reported), but instead, chose to alphabetically list the different schools and colleges into a table with all the founding dates I could find (so far). From my reading on other university wikipages, I noticed this practice as fairly common and gives the page a more encyclopedic feel. I also added various bits of information about the academic programs with citations and added other missing info, or just general improvements to other sections of the page. I should also note that I tried saving two times prior to this latest edit, all three of which I was blocked. The latest edit has the most extensive improvements.


 * Date and time
 * 06:40, 13 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * See the report below this. Same issue. Black Kite (talk) 11:46, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

ADHZ07111989

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * /* China, Hong Kong and Macau */ Table's fixation. Major fix from lastest revison, with data re-checks already done with current good datas.


 * Date and time
 * 08:37, 13 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * This is a false positive. I have passed it over to the filter editor concerned. Black Kite (talk) 11:45, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

{ziad jreij

 * Username
 * {{user|{ziad jreij}} ({{plainlinks|URL=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:AbuseLog?title=Special:AbuseLog&wpSearchUser={{urlencode:{ziad jreij}}|NAME=filter log}})


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Please replace this with a description of the edit you were trying to make.


 * Date and time
 * 17:13, 13 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * page =


 * description =

}}


 * Wikipedia is not a place to write an autobiography or talk about what you are like. Someguy1221 (talk) 22:54, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Swaller67

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was trying to add "Mr. Poop" to his list of nicknames/aliases/what have you, because in "Take Your Daughter to Work Day" (S2E18), Meredith's son repeatedly calls Dwight "Mr. Poop", but it kept telling me the edit was bad. Is it only because it said "poop"?


 * Date and time
 * 19:58, 13 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * New editors are not allowed to say "poop" in an article. I'd recommend you go to the article's talk page and ask someone else to add it. Someguy1221 (talk) 22:52, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

72.244.204.73

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * copy-edit and regroup into sections; mark some issues with missing refs


 * Date and time
 * 21:04, 13 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * This has been fixed. Thank you for reporting the error. Someguy1221 (talk) 22:51, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

2602:306:3676:69D0:6572:45B8:68A4:9F0C

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was trying to add a page for musician / record producer Michael Miller but the automated system said the article was "potentially unconstructive".


 * Date and time
 * 21:10, 13 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The filter has been fixed. Thank you for reporting the problem. Someguy1221 (talk) 22:51, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

Shyxcx

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Adding more informations such as songs that were recorded but not released and album appearances, and remove fake songs and unsourced content


 * Date and time
 * 03:37, 14 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You were attempting to add either archive.is entries, or sources that included blog charts, which are unreliable. Black Kite (talk) 15:09, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

KaterinaKaterina9013

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I tried to create a page about the film director from Cyprus Andreas Pantzis, upon his will.


 * Date and time
 * 15:46, 14 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Writing in all capitals is the problem here. Write in the correct case and the edit will be accepted. Black Kite (talk) 15:08, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

84.40.67.47

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was trying to update information about tonight's episode of the knock out rounds as it has been officially released by the BBC.


 * Date and time
 * 12:13, 15 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * This is a false positive - sorry. You may enter all the information except the "Take Your Mama" item; you could ask a registered editor to do this on the talk page. Black Kite (talk) 15:07, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Mirkwoodian

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Add the updated correct information


 * Date and time
 * 14:43, 15 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I'll leave others to review his attempts to vandalize my user page. —C.Fred (talk) 14:47, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Blocked indef. Black Kite (talk) 15:04, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

68.2.66.165

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I am trying to add information to the space, time, and modality. I put some tables in but it does not allow me to save to the page


 * Date and time
 * 22:17, 15 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Prajwala Info

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I added over 70 references and completely updated the information with new format and layout.


 * Date and time
 * 10:29, 16 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

123.243.130.202

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was adding in Craig Melville's credits that he directed the music video for Tism's "I Might be a Cunt, But I'm Not a Fucking Cunt" which he directed in 1998.


 * Date and time
 * 11:53, 16 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Suggest this edit at the article's talk page; someone will make it for you if it's valid. Black Kite (talk) 18:50, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

71.224.44.15

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Re-added the names of deceased staff members credibly accused of sexually molesting students (as documented in the citations). Someone saw fit to "protect" the public from this information by deleting it.


 * Date and time
 * 15:13, 17 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * While it's fine to state that there was an issue at the school, if you're going to name people individually you need to source each one credibly; you didn't. Black Kite (talk) 18:48, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

50.59.198.162

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I am editing the introductory passage for this article. For some reason it was flagged as potentially "unconstructive," probably because I did make several changes and deleted a couple of full sentences. Regardless, have a look, and you'll see that it is not vandalism or any kind of bad faith editing.


 * Date and time
 * 18:43, 17 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * This is a false positive, but the filter is only set to warn, so your edit should be accepted. Black Kite (talk) 18:47, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

181.46.65.223

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I am trying to creating this article. For some reason it was flagged as potentially "unconstructive", and i think that this message is in error. Please, have a look, and you'll see that it is not vandalism or contain a link to the archiving service archive.is.


 * Date and time
 * 19:20, 17 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

75.109.214.207

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * mariya ocher

the name of the patti smith song covered is "rock & roll nigger" and not "rock & roll" - but the filter wouldn't let me correct that!
 * Date and time
 * 03:39, 18 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

OI-13-jaizpurua

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was trying to create the article about Evaristo Paramos. Evaristo is one of the most important artists among the basque culture. This article is completly verifiable.Please, fix this error. I would like to finish my article.


 * Date and time
 * 10:11, 18 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

OI-13-jaizpurua

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Creating an article about Evaristo Páramos. WHY IS THIS UNCONSTRUCTIVE?


 * Date and time
 * 16:27, 18 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Viraatinn

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 02:51, 20 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

ERAU WIKI

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was trying to update and add content information about the university. It would not allow me to update the page. All of the information is verifiable through the University website and is constructive for the page.


 * Date and time
 * 18:29, 20 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

117.241.56.23

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 11:02, 21 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Josve05a

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was trying to revert to this rev. due to vandalism.


 * Date and time
 * 12:17, 21 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

147.69.137.58

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Attempted to archive talk page Talk:Rollercoaster (song) to Talk:Rollercoaster (B*Witched song)/Archive 1 and succeeded, but cannot clear the main talk page now.


 * Date and time
 * 14:49, 21 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Snuffks

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Attempted to hyperlink, tagged as unconstructive


 * Date and time
 * 22:35, 21 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Brentharley

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Add references to confirm that the resort has documented masterplan and approvals


 * Date and time
 * 00:14, 23 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The filter is correctly warning you against, but not stopping you from, adding links to your own website. Someguy1221 (talk) 01:09, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

2601:2:4880:4C8:94D1:A80A:7BAA:DF80

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Delete the page because a creepy stalker made it about me and it is entirely factually incorrect.


 * Date and time
 * 23:19, 23 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I've deleted the page. Someguy1221 (talk) 01:06, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Gredits

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I'm just trying to erase the embedded code I've attached a while ago. The only purpose of that embedded code is just to insert an image for that page but when I save the code only appeared no image and when I'm trying to delete that certain code and save again but it automatically popped this message "An automated filter has identified this edit as potentially unconstructive, and it has been disallowed. If this edit is constructive, please report this error." please help me fix this. Thank and more power!


 * Date and time
 * 00:56, 24 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Jarkyloun983

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 09:05, 24 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Declined, sockpuppet, user blocked. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:09, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Lp0001

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * edits to page to provide factual information about the company


 * Date and time
 * 15:52, 24 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You removed the categories at the bottom of the page; that's not allowed. Black Kite (talk) 22:20, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Jcomptonac

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Updating bio to Jeffrey Docking


 * Date and time
 * 17:13, 24 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You removed the categories at the bottom of the page; that's not allowed. Black Kite (talk) 22:20, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Fluxarchivist

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Page was previously flagged as lacking sources, having a promotional tone and written from a fan's point of view, rather than a neutral point of view, this iteration adds chapters, details and sources as a start to a more comprehensive biography However, a wikibot prevented me from publishing my new edits, citing that they were not constructive. All 94 sources are from various reputable newspapers, journals, publications, websites etc, hence I believe the wikibot has registered a false positive. As this is my first time editing a Wiki article, I appreciate advice on how to overcome this. I have integrated salient points from the previous entry, but I am concerned that perhaps I should not have pasted over the previous entry? Please advise. Thank you. ;Date and time
 * 08:26, 25 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Try decapitalising everything, and giving it another try; filters are notoriously leery in accepting large changes that include allcaps sentences. Black Kite (talk) 22:18, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks Black Kite. Appreciate your speedy assist. I've removed all caps as you suggested and have submitted it into the sandbox for review. Fluxarchivist (talk) 00:52, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

SoledadKabocha

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * My attempt to revert a partial blanking to [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Telecommunications_relay_service&oldid=589552074 oldid=589552074] was denied because one reference used an archive(dot)is archive. I know the reason this filter exists, but why doesn't it have any exception for reverting vandalism? I did manage to find and scrub the offending archiveurl ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Telecommunications_relay_service&diff=601270749&oldid=589552074 compare]), so I admit there is no admin attention needed on the article.


 * Date and time
 * 23:37, 25 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

24.96.210.230

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Explaining why the link I removed (to a definition in Wiktionary, but NOT a definition of the sense used in the article) was innapropriate. Now I'm wondering if the linking was done not by a stupid human but by a stupid robot. If you've got a robot randomly linking words to definitions in Wiktionary, this is a good example of wyy that is a bad idea. Somebody looking to show what clever programmers they are would be better employed to write something to keep track of how many times people start to edit something and get put off the the rediculous hoops you make people jump through just to do something positive they aren't going to be paid for. I swear this is the last time I try to improve Wikipedia in the least. You've made it too much trouble.


 * Date and time
 * 07:54, 26 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Ziwei1234

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Was editing and tried to save progress. Unable to do so.


 * Date and time
 * 09:55, 26 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

MisterDub

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Add information and sources explaining the relation between libertarianism and the Occupy Movement


 * Date and time
 * 20:15, 26 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

User error... I copied a REF tag that had an 'archive.is' link, which is explicitly prohibited. I removed this link and the edit was permitted. Sorry for the false report.

67.54.191.225

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was fixing a spelling error. The filter blocked me.


 * Date and time
 * 14:14, 27 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I've fixed it for you – thanks for spotting that. —Bruce1eetalk 14:22, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Jose shawn natis

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 20:38, 27 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * You need to be logged in as User:KGAOGELO ANDRAYK NATIS to blank that page. —Bruce1eetalk 04:45, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

71.20.250.51

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was inquiring about a strange edit by a user (not a bot) which removed several user posts without explanation. I included link to diff and username.


 * Date and time
 * 07:31, 28 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

71.20.250.51

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I made a legitimate correction: changing pull-quote to standard quote template -per MoS and description on template documentation.


 * Date and time
 * 07:43, 28 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Tlhslobus

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I'm not reporting a false positive, but an apparent problem/bug with your message. The link to "Wikipedia Co-Founder Speaks Out Against Jimmy Wales" (author:Nicole Ferraro) is dead. I replaced it, but was told (correctly) that my change was rejected as my new link was from the banned Archive.is. So I went to look for an alternative link, but found none, so I decided to re-enter the Archive.is url so I could once again get the same message so I could check out what had been said in the RFC. But instead it rejected it with a completely different message that didn't offer any link to the RFC. As it happens I got lucky and was able to find the RFC by other means. But it nevertheless seems to me that this is a bug as it should have given me the same message as it did the first time. So I'm reporting this apparent bug here, because I don't know where else to report it.

Afterthought: I don't know whether this is relevant or not, but I'll mention it just in case it is: shortly after my attempt to get the same message again (as mentioned above), Windows gave me a message saying it had just blocked an attempt to add a new Toolbar (presumably to my browser, though I'm not 100% sure of that). As I presumably accessed Archive.is shortly beforehand, as well as other sites on the same Google search that turned out not to have the desired archived article, it may also suggest that malware may be coming from that banned site, or from non-working pseudo-competitors of that banned site perhaps intended to convey the impression that our ban is dangerous for us (though I have no proof of any of this speculation).
 * Date and time
 * 13:18, 28 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

74.248.63.109

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Blank Vandal revert that failed because it "included external links".


 * Date and time
 * 19:12, 28 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

206.71.238.90

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * This page was extremely out of date. Made overall changes to the page, updates about the history of the event, current world rankings, and general knowledge about the event.


 * Date and time
 * 22:04, 28 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

71.20.250.51

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I've been tagged for "Repeated attempts to vandalize"  I encourage that my edits be scrutinized and analyzed; comments are welcome and encouraged.


 * Date and time
 * 04:43, 29 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Sadam1bapar

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 05:15, 29 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Not a false positive. There is almost never a reason to start an article with a lower-case letter because sentences always begin with capital letters.--Jasper Deng (talk) 17:37, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Videogrunge

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * fucked up filter says "Long-term pattern abuse", wtf does that even mean


 * Date and time
 * 18:01, 29 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * ✅ Removed offending code from filter 58. -- Sh i r ik ( Questions or Comments? ) 08:00, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

MatchooB

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Trying to add the 2014 recruiting class through the prescribed template. Out of 23 entries, the last two are being blocked.


 * Date and time
 * 20:19, 29 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * That looks like a false positive to me; please suggest the edit at the talkpage for another user to make. Black Kite (talk) 11:24, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

75.142.30.100

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was gonna ask to move Commando (film) to Commando (1985 film). Disambiguation against Commando (1988 film) and Commando (2013 film)) per WP:NCF.


 * Date and time
 * 01:57, 30 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Filter repaired.&mdash;Kww(talk) 04:15, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Miss X-Factor

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Moving sourced information from my usersandbox page User:Miss X-Factor/Alison DiLaurentis in order to provide a sourced page for an main character
 * 30 March 2014


 * Comments

2.125.224.31

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * adding to "see also" Rape Culture - 1975 Film - The film features the prison, inmates and the work of PAR (Prisoners Against Rape Inc) at the prison. The Prisoners were working with the DC Rape  Crisis Centre.


 * Date and time
 * 22:22, 30 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Lothariolex

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Dwight is referred to as "mr poop" in the episode take your daughter to work day! this is a valid edit!


 * Date and time
 * 05:41, 31 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Please read our biographies of living persons policy and if you still believe that is correct, supply a better source than that. Nicknames are not attached by single episodes, it's what fans say after episodes that matters.--Jasper Deng (talk) 07:13, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Varskann1993

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Creating a page for L33t language.


 * Date and time
 * 11:39, 31 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The use of expletives in the text is disallowing this. Suggest you try WP:AFC. Black Kite (talk) 11:28, 1 April 2014 (UTC)