Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives/Archive 32

Dangingent



 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 11:17, 1 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You are trying to create a page about a non-notable Youtube video - again. Please see your talkpage. Black Kite (talk) 11:23, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Loopylew87

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was purely putting the actual facts of what happened, as what was put into Wikipedia was not the truth, I merely stated that actual events and a more detailed version.


 * Date and time
 * 15:31, 1 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The filter was onjecting to the "kiss my ass" phrase (which wasn't sourced anyway). Black Kite (talk) 20:56, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Haifromellie

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 17:43, 1 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

create a page but it kept saying stuff when i tried to save my progress.
 * That's because you were adding complete nonsense. Black Kite (talk) 21:00, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

2.125.224.31

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * adding to "see also" Rape Culture - 1975 Film - The film features the prison, inmates and the work of PAR (Prisoners Against Rape Inc) at the prison. The Prisoners were working with the DC Rape Crisis Centre.


 * Date and time
 * 19:53, 1 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * False positive - I have made the edit for you. Black Kite (talk) 21:00, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

75.171.218.169

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * There is no coherent explanation of the process in the article. I have been requested by several, to share my explanation on the Talk Page. I have done this, then I have critiqued my own work, again, as requested, to show how I am unable to properly reference things, as this is not a well referenced subject. This is ONLY intended to be on the Talk Page, as an aid to other editors' working on the article. I mention many times, in this post, that my explanation does not meet Wikipedia standards, as it is not referenced properly, and I draw conclusions in it, which I myself, point out. Again, this is ONLY meant to be posted on the Talk Page, as a possible aid to other editors working on this. I do not intend to use any of it in the article, itself, nor do I intend to edit this article. I am leaving this to others. It is a bit long, but I do not understand what, in anything that I have written, could possibly have triggered a filter. Perhaps you can help me out, here. If I have written something inappropriate in some fashion by accident, I will be more than happy to remove it, if you can point it out to me.


 * Date and time
 * 23:25, 1 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Our apologies. We have fixed the issue affecting your edit, so please attempt it again. -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:12, 2 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Thank you. It posted just fine, this time.75.171.218.169 (talk) 00:32, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

72.39.122.224

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Just changing the phrasing of some sentences to make them clearer. Didn't really change the content or meaning of anything that I am aware of.


 * Date and time
 * 04:17, 2 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Kruntappe

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Editing the page to comply with Wikipedia rules. Work in progress, will like an editor to review and supply feedback if there is more non compliance on which specific part.


 * Date and time
 * 11:12, 2 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

John of Reading

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I'm trying to revert spam, first with Twinkle then manually. It seems I cannot save the edit even after enclosing the archive.is part of the URL inside HTML comments? Or is the filter objecting to the edit summary?


 * Date and time
 * 11:30, 2 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

There's no way to add text to an article that refers to archive.is. That's per design of the filter.&mdash;Kww(talk) 23:12, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm experiencing the same issue. If there's project-wide consensus to never link to the archive.is website I guess it's OK to have the software disallow links to it, but why can't the text "archive.is" be included in an article if it's not a link, or even if it's inside a comment? SiBr4 (talk) 16:58, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
 * What would the purpose of such text be aside from subverting the consensus not to link to the site?&mdash;Kww(talk) 16:28, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I used an archive.is site as a reference in my userspace draft, which I couldn't move to mainspace because of the filter. Therefore I converted it to a comment like, but the filter wouldn't allow that either. SiBr4 (talk) 17:08, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm trying to understand the RfC but it's still not really clear to me why links to archive.is are not allowed. SiBr4 (talk) 17:11, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

2601:E:9600:311:D69A:20FF:FE55:3BD0

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Write a informative one-sentence summary about George Washington. I used information that I have learned in school. Some words might be in a foreign language. I am from Bangledick, a town in East Asia.


 * Date and time
 * 12:05, 3 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Not a false positive. The filter correctly blocked your vandalism. —Bruce1eetalk 13:42, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

DJHangedman

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I am a band member attempting to update a long overdue page with old information. My edits are significant and for some reason I'm getting an error. Not sure why.


 * Date and time
 * 21:26, 4 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Paolosarpi

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * accurately updating the section repertoire list


 * Date and time
 * 16:21, 5 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Arijeet Takkar

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description

SOURCE-TRANSLATION OF ORIGINAL MAHABHARAT OF KRISHNA-DWAIPAYANA VYASA (VEDA VYASA) BY KISARI MOHAN GANGULY & WHICH IS THE ONLY PRECISE & COMPLETE CROSS LINKED WORD TO WORD TRANSLATION OF ORIGINAL VED VYAS MAHABHARATA AVAILABLE ON PUBLIC DOMAIN:

Incident 1:Karna fled from battlefield from Arjuna(Virata Yudh):

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m04/m04060.htm

Incident 2:Karna defeated by Gandharwa chitrasena:

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m03/m03239.htm

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m03/m03240.htm

Incident 3:Arjuna defeat Ghandarwas & rescued Duryodhan & Kurus:

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m03/m03243.htm

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m03/m03244.htm

KARNA HIMSELF ACCEPTING BEFORE DURYODHANA THE FACT THAT HE FLED THE BATTLEFIELD FROM GANDHARWAS IN FRONT OF DURYODHANA'S EYES:

Narrative:

"As regards myself, assailed by all the Gandharvas, I fled before thy eyes, unable to rally our flying host. Assailed by the foe with all his might, my body mangled with their arrows, I sought safety in flight. This however, O Bharata, seemed to me to be a great marvel that I behold you all come safe and sound in body, with your wives, troops, and vehicles, out of that super-human encounter. O Bharata, there is another man in this world who can achieve what thou, O king, hast achieved in battle to-day with thy brothers."

Vaisampayana continued, "Thus addressed by Karna, king Duryodhana replied unto the ruler of the Angas in a voice choked with tears."

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m03/m03245.htm

Incident 4:Karna defeated & freightened by Abhimanyu in chakruvyuhu:

Narrative:

Hearing these words, Karna, afflicted with the shafts of Arjuna's son, once more said unto Drona, 'Exceedingly afflicted with the shafts of Abhimanyu, I am staying in battle, only because (as a warrior) I should stay here. Indeed, the arrows of this south of great energy are exceedingly fierce. Terrible as they are and possessed of the energy of fire, these arrows are weakening my heart.'

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07045.htm

KARNA AGAIN FLED FROM BATTLEFIELD..THIS TIME FROM ABHIMANYU:

NARRATIVE:

Karna, O monarch, was filled with pain. Meanwhile, the son of Subhadra, causing Karna by means of his arrows to turn away from the field, quickly rushed against the other great bowmen. Then Abhimanyu of fierce energy and great fame, filled with wrath, broke that host of diverse forces abounding with elephants and steeds and cars and infantry. As regards Karna, afflicted by Abhimanyu with countless shafts, he fled away from the field borne by swift steeds.

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07038.htm

Incident 5:Karna's defeat at Draupadi Swayamvar by Arjuna!

Narrative:

"And incensed at finding the strength and energy of Arjuna's arms unequalled on the earth, Karna, the son of Surya, fought with greater vigour. And parrying all those impetuous arrows shot at him by Arjuna, Karna sent up a loud shout. And this feat of his was applauded by all the warriors. Then addressing his antagonist, Karna said, 'O thou foremost of Brahmanas, I am gratified to observe the energy of thy arms that knoweth no relaxation in battle and thy weapons themselves fit for achieving victory. Art thou the embodiment of the science of weapons, or art thou Rama that best of Brahmanas, or Indra himself, or Indra's younger brother Vishnu called also Achyuta, who for disguising himself hath assumed the form of a Brahmana and mustering such energy of arms fighteth with me? No other person except the husband himself of Sachi or Kiriti, the son of Pandu, is capable of fighting with me when I am angry on the field of battle.' Then hearing those words of his, Phalguna replied, saying, 'O Karna, I am neither the science of arms (personified), nor Rama endued with superhuman powers. I am only a Brahmana who is the foremost of all warriors and all wielders of weapons. By the grace of my preceptor I have become accomplished in the Brahma and the Paurandara weapons. I am here to vanquish thee in battle. Therefore, O hero, wait a little.'

"Vaisampayana continued, 'Thus addressed (by Arjuna), Karna the adopted son of Radha desisted from the fight, for that mighty chariot-fighter thought that Brahma energy is ever invincible."

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/m01193.htm

INCIDENT 6-KARNA'S DEFEAT BY PANCHALA KING DRUPADA:

NARRATIVE:

"But the mighty bowman, Prishata's son, invincible in battle, though very much pierced with the arrows of the enemy, instantly began, O Bharata,to afflict the hostile ranks with greater vigour. And careering over the field of battle like a fiery wheel, king Drupada with his arrows smote Duryodhana and Vikarna and even the mighty Karna and many other heroic princes and numberless warriors, and slaked their thirst for battle."

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/m01141.htm

Arjuna later defeat Panchala King Drupada!!

INCIDENT 7:Karna Vanquished in battle by Arjuna:

Narrative:

Sanjaya said, Upon the fall, O king, of the ruler of the Sindhus, thy son Suyodhana, his face bedewed with tears, and himself filled with grief and breathing hot sighs like a snake whose fangs have been broken, that offender against the whole world, viz., thy son, experienced bitter affliction. Beholding that great terrible slaughter of his troops caused by Jishnu and Bhimasena and Satwata in battle, he became pale, dejected and melancholy, and his eyes became filled with tears. And he came to think no warrior existed on the earth that could be compared with Arjuna. Neither Drona, nor the son of Radha, nor Aswatthaman, nor Kripa, O sire, is competent to stand before Arjuna when the latter is excited with wrath, And Suyodhana, said unto himself, 'Having vanquished in battle all the mighty car-warriors of my army, Partha slew the ruler of the Sindhus. None could resist him. This my vast host hath almost been exterminated by the Pandavas. I think, there is no one that can protect my army, no, not even Purandara himself. He, relying upon whom I have been engaged in this passage-at-arms in battle, alas, that Karna hath been defeated in battle and Jayadratha slain. That Karna relying upon whose energy I regarded Krishna as straw who came to sue me for peace, alas, that Karna hath been vanquished in battle.'

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07146.htm

INCIDENT 8:Karna again defeated by Arjuna:

Narrative:

"Sanjaya continued, 'Beholding the son of Pandu rushing towards him like an elephant towards a rival elephant, Karna fearlessly proceeded

p. 365

against Dhananjaya. Partha, however, soon covered Karna who was thus advancing with great impetuosity, with showers of straight shafts, equipped with wings of gold. Karna also covered Vijaya with his shafts. The son of Pandu then once more shrouded Karna with clouds of arrows. Then Karna, filled with rage, pierced Arjuna with three shafts. The mighty car-warrior, Arjuna, beholding Karna's lightness of hand, could not brook it. That scorcher of foes shot at the Suta's son thirty straight shafts, whetted on stone and equipped with blazing points. Endued with great might and energy, he also pierced him, in rage, with another long arrow on the wrist of his left arm, smiling the while. Karna's bow then dropped from that arm of his, which had thus been pierced with great force. Then the mighty Karna, taking up that bow within the twinkling of an eye, once more covered Phalguna with clouds of shafts, displaying great lightness of hard. Dhananjaya then, O Bharata, smiling the while, baffled with his own shafts, that arrowy shower shot by the Suta's son. Approaching each other, those two great bowmen, desirous of counteracting each other's feats, continued to cover each other with showers of shafts. The battle that took place between them, viz., Karna and the son of Pandu, became exceedingly wonderful, like that between the two wild elephants for the sake of a she-elephant in her season. Then the mighty bowman Partha, beholding Karna's prowess, quickly cut of the latter's bow at the handle. And he also despatched the four steeds of the Suta's son to Yama's abode with a number of broad-headed shafts. And that scorcher of foes also cut off from the trunk the head of Karna's driver. Then, the son of Pandu and Pritha pierced the bowless, the steedless, and the driverless Karna with four shafts. Then that bull among men Karna, afflicted with those shafts, specially jumping down from that steedless car, mounted upon that of Kripa. Beholding the son of Radha vanquished, thy, warriors, O bull of Bharata's race, fled away in all directions.

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07155.htm

INCIDENT 9:Karna saved by Ashwathama from Arjuna:

Narrative:

Then the ape-bannered (Arjuna), urged by Kesava, shot at the Suta's son, O king, many shafts whetted on stone. Those arrows adorned with gold, shot by Partha's arms and issuing out of Gandiva, entered Karna's body, like cranes into the Krauncha mountains. With those arrows shot from Gandiva which entered Karna's body like so many snakes, Dhananjaya drove the Suta's son from Bhimasena's vicinity. His bow cut off by Bhima, and himself afflicted with the arrows of Dhananjaya, Karna quickly fled away from Bhima on his great car. Bhimasena also, O bull among men, mounting upon Satyaki's car, proceeded in that battle in the wake of his brother Savyasachin, the son of Pandu. Then Dhananjaya, with eyes red in wrath, aiming at Karna, quickly sped a shaft like the Destroyer urging forward Death's self. That shaft shot from Gandiva, like Garuda in the welkin in quest of a mighty snake, quickly coursed towards Karna. The son of Drona, however, that mighty car-warrior, with a winged arrow of his, cut it off in mid-air, desirous of rescuing Karna from fear of Dhananjaya. Then Arjuna, excited with wrath, pierced the son of Drona with four and sixty arrows, O king, and addressing him, said, 'Do not fly away, O Aswathaman, but wait a moment.' Drona's son, however, afflicted with the shafts of Dhananjaya, quickly entered a division of the Kaurava army that abounded with infuriated elephants and teemed with cars. The mighty son of Kunti, then, with the twang of Gandiva, drowned the noise made in that battle by all other twangings of bows, of shafts decked with gold. Then, the mighty Dhananjaya followed from behind the son of Drona who had not retreated to a great distance, frightening him all the way with his shafts. Piercing with his shafts, winged with the feathers of Kankas and peacocks, the bodies of men and elephants and steeds, Arjuna began to grind that force. Indeed, O chief of the Bharatas, Partha, the son of Indra, began to exterminate that host teeming with steeds and elephants and men.'"

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07135.htm

INCIDENT 10: Karna again defeated by Arjuna & was rescued by Ashwathama again who took Karna on his chariot after Karna's cart was destroyed & his steeds were killed by Arjuna!

Narrative:

"Then the mighty-armed Phalguna, in that battle, pierced Karna, the son of Vikartana, in all his limbs with a hundred arrows. All his limbs bathed in blood, the Suta's son of great prowess and bravery, pierced Phalguna in return with fifty arrows. Beholding that lightness of hand displayed by him in battle, Arjuna brooked it not. Cutting off his bow, that hero, viz., Dhananjaya, the son of Pritha, quickly pierced Karna in the centre of the chest with nine arrows, Then Dhananjaya, with great speed at a time, when speed was necessary shot in that battle a shaft of solar effulgence for the destruction of Karna. Drona's son, however, with a crescent-shaped arrow, cut off that shaft as it coursed impetuously (towards Karna). Thus cut off by Aswatthaman, that shaft fell down on the earth. Endued with great prowess, the Suta's son, then, O king, took up another bow, and covered the son of Pandu with several thousands of arrows. Partha, however, like the wind dispersing flight of locusts, dispelled with his own arrows that extraordinary shower of arrows issuing out of Karna's bow. Then Arjuna, displaying his lightness of hands, covered Karna, in that battle, with his arrows, in the very sight of all thy troops. Karna also, that slayer of hosts, desirous of counteracting Arjuna's feat, covered Arjuna with several thousands of arrows. Roaring at each other like two bulls, those lions among men, those mighty car-warriors, shrouded the welkin with clouds of straight shafts. Each rendered invisible by the other's arrowy showers, they continued to strike each other. And they roared at each other and pierced each other with their wordy darts, saying, 'I am Partha, wait'--or, 'I am Karna, wait', O Phalguna! Indeed these two heroes fought with each other wonderfully, displaying great activity and skill. And the sight they presented was such that other warriors became witnesses of that battle. And applauded by Siddhas, Charnas and Pannagas, they fought with each other, O king, each desirous of slaying the other. Then Duryodhana, O king addressing thy warriors, said, 'Carefully protect the son of Radha! Without slaying Arjuna he would not abstain from battle. Even this is what Vrisha told me.'

Meanwhile, O monarch, beholding the prowess of Karna, Arjuna, of white steeds, with four shafts shot from the bow-string drawn to the ear, despatched the four steeds of Karna to Yama's domain. And he also felled with a broad-headed arrow, Karna's charioteer from his niche in the car. And he covered Karna himself with clouds of shafts in the very sight of thy son. Thus shrouded with arrows the steedless and driverless Karna, stupefied by that arrowy shower, knew not what to do. Beholding him made carless, Aswatthaman, O king, caused him to ride on his car, and continued to fight with Arjuna."

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07141.htm

INCIDENT 11:Karna alongwith other kaurvas unable to stop arjuna from reaching jayadratha..Arjuna vanquished alone 7 akshohinis of kaurav army out of 11 in 1 day to revenge abhimanyu death!!

Narrative:

"Sanjaya continued, 'Thus urged by Bhima and Kesava, Savyasachin prevailing over Drona and Karna, began to resist the foe all round. Many foremost of Kshatriyas (among the Kurus), putting forth all their prowess, failed to withstand Arjuna who advanced at the very van of his troops, and who, like a raging conflagration, was consuming the foremost ones among his foes. Then Duryodhana and Karna, and Sakuni, the son of Suvala, covered Kunti's son, Dhananjaya, with showers of shafts. Baffling the weapons of all those warriors, that foremost of all persons well-skilled in weapons, O monarch, covered them (in return) with his shafts. Aiming at their weapons with his (and thus baffling them all), Arjuna, endued with great lightness of hand and possessing a complete control over his senses, pierced every one of those warriors with ten keen-pointed shafts.

www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07183.htm

INCIDENT 12:Karna unable to stop arjuna from slaying jayadratha:

Narrative:

"Then Pandavas, O monarch, and the Panchalas, celebrated for their prowess, beholding the mighty- armed Karna, loudly shouted, saying, 'There is Karna,' ' Where is Karna in this fierce battle.'--' O thou of wicked understanding, O lowest of men, fight with us!"

www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07155.htm

INCIDENT 13:Arjuna jointly attacked by Karna,Drona,Ashwathama,Kripacharya,Vrishasena,sons of Somadatta,Shalya,Jayadratha & Arjuna resisted single handedly entire Kaurava Host:

Narrative:

"The son of Drona struck Vasudeva with three and seventy shafts, and Arjuna himself with three broad-headed shafts, and his standard and (four) steeds with five others. Beholding Janardana pierced, Arjuna, filled with rage, struck Aswatthaman with hundred shafts. Then piercing Karna with ten arrows and Vrishasena with three, the valiant Dhananjaya cut off Salya's bow with arrows fixed on the string, at the handle. Salya then, taking up another bow, pierced the son of Pandu. And Bhurisravas pierced him with three arrows whetted on stone, and equipped with golden wings. And Karna pierced him with two and thirty arrows, and Vrishasena with seven. And Jayadratha pierced Arjuna with three and seventy shafts and Kripa pierced him with ten. And the ruler of the Madras also pierced Phalguna in that battle with ten arrows. And the son of Drona pierced him with sixty arrows. And he, once more, pierced Partha with five arrows, and Vasudeva with twenty. Then the tiger among men, viz., Arjuna owning white steeds and having Krishna for his driver, pierced each of those warriors in return, displaying the lightness of his hand. Piercing Karna with a dozen shafts and Vrishasena with three, Partha cut off Salya's bow at the handle. And piercing the son of Somadatta with three arrows and Salya with ten, he pierced Kripa with five and twenty arrows, and the ruler of the Sindhus with a hundred, Partha struck Drona's son with seventy arrows. Then Bhurisravas filled with rage, cut off the goad in Krishna's hand, and struck Arjuna with three and twenty shafts. Then Dhananjaya, of white steeds, filled with rage, mangled those enemies of his with hundreds upon hundreds of arrows, like a mighty tempest tearing masses of clouds.'"

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07100.htm

Ashwathama & Kripacharya exposing Karna's bravery:

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m04/m04049.htm

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m04/m04050.htm

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07154.htm

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07155.htm

what Lord Krishna think of karna's bravery in encounter with Abhimanyu:

Krishna said(To Arjuna):.I swear by Truth to thee, O friend, that my limbs are burning at the thought that while the son of Subhadra was thus advancing,consuming the hostile army with his shafts, even on that occasion the wicked-souled Karna was engaged in acts of hostility to that hero,Unable, O Partha, to stay in that battle before Abhimanyu's face, mangled with the shafts of Subhadra's son, deprived of consciousness, and bathed in blood, Karna drew deep breaths, inflamed with rage. At last, afflicted with arrows, he was obliged to turn his back upon the field.

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m08/m08073.htm

& Finally karna himself accepting Arjuna's supeority:

Narrative:

"'Karna said(about Arjuna), "As far as I have heard, such a superior car-warrior has never been born on earth! Behold my prowess, since I will contend in battle with even that Partha who is such. This prince of Kuru's line, this foremost of car-warriors, careers in battle, borne by his steeds white in hue. Perhaps he will despatch me to Yama's abode today. Know, however, that with Karna's death, these all will be exterminated. The two arms of this prince are never covered with sweat. They never tremble. They are massive and covered with cicatrices. Firm in the use of weapons, he is possessed of great skill and endued with great lightness of hands. Indeed, there is no warrior equal to the son of Pandu. He taketh a large number of arrows and shooteth them as if they were one. Quickly fixing them on the bow-string, he propelleth them to the distance of two miles. They always fall on the foe. What warriors is there on earth that is equal to him? That Atiratha, endued with great activity, with Krishna as his ally, gratified the god Agni at Khandava. There, on that occasion, the high-souled Krishna obtained his discus, and Savyasaci, the son of Pandu, obtained his bow Gandiva. There that mighty-armed one, endued with might that knows no decay, also obtained his terrible car unto which are yoked those white steeds, as also his two great celestial and inexhaustible quivers, and many celestial weapons, from the God of Fire. In the region of Indra he obtained his conch Devadatta and slew innumerable Daityas, and all the Kalakeyas. Who is there on earth that is superior to him? Possessed of greatness of soul, he gratified Mahadeva himself in fair fight, and obtained from him the terrible and mighty weapon Pasupata that is capable of destroying the three worlds. The several Regents of the world, united together gave him their weapons of immeasurable energy, with which that lion among men quickly destroyed in battle those united Asuras, the Kalakhanjas.

So also, in Virata's city, moving on a single car he vanquished all of us, and snatched from us that wealth of kine, and took from all the foremost of car-warriors (portions of) their garments. Challenging that foremost of Kshatriyas, that hero having him of Vrishni's race for his ally, that warrior who is endued with such energy and such attributes, I regard myself, O Shalya, to be the foremost of persons in all the world in point of courage. He is, again, protected by that Keshava of great energy, who i Narayana himself and who is without a rival, that high-souled Vasudeva, that ever-victorious Vishnu armed with conch, discus, and mace, whose attributes all the world united together, cannot (in narrating) exhaust in 10,000 years. Beholding the two Krishnas together on the same car, fear entereth my heart together with courage. Partha is the foremost of all bowmen!

Source:origial mahabharat by vyas..trans by km ganguly!

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m08/m08079.htm

FINAL KARNA ARJUNA BATTLE(DAY 17 OF MAHABHARATA):

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m08/m08089.htm

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m08/m08090.htm

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m08/m08091.htm

ACCORDING TO MY ANALYSIS OF THIS TRANSLATION IN THE FINAL BATTLE OF MAHABHARATA,ARJUNA & KARNA ASSAULTED EACH OTHER 35 TIMES WITH NUMEROUS, THOUSANDS & LAKHS OF ARROWS ………8 TIMES THEY NULLIFIED EACH OTHER ARROWS ,12 TIMES BOTH KARNA & ARJUNA PIERCED EACH OTHER BUT THE REMAINING 15 TIMES ARJUNA PIERCED KARNA IN EVERY PART OF HIS BODY & KARNA’S LIMBS,YOKE,STANDARD,STEEDS,CHARIOT WERE RIPPED APART & KARNA WAS LEFT MANGLED BATHED IN BLOOD & KARNA HAD NO ANSWER FOR ARJUNA’S ARROWS!!!AT THE TIME KARNA'S CHARIOT WHEELS WAS SWALLOWED BY BHOOMI,KARNA HAS SUFFERED A CLEAR DEFEAT!!

KARNA'S SERIES OF MILITARY DEFEATS BY OTHER WARRIORS APART FROM ARJUNA & THAT TOO WHEN KARNA HAD THAT MUCH HYPED KAVACH KUNDAL WITH HIM!

1.)KARNA DEFEAT BY BHIMASENA:

NARRATIVE:

Struck by Bhimasena, O perpetuator of Kuru's race, the Suta's son, that commander (of thy forces), sat down senseless on the terrace of his car.The ruler of the Madras then, beholding the Suta's son deprived of his senses, bore that ornament of battle away on his car, from that fight.

Then after Karna's defeat, Bhimasena began to rout the vast Dhartarashtra host ike Indra routing the danavas.'"

http://sacred-texts.com/hin/m08/m08050.htm

2.)KARNA DEFEAT BY BHIMASENA(2ND TIME):

NARRATIVE:

Dhritrashtra said to Sanjaya:

"Hearing, however, of the repeated defeat in battle of Karna by Bhimasena of terrible deeds, a swoon seems to come upon me, I think, the Kauravas to be already slain, in consequence of evil policy of my son. Karna will never succeed, O Sanjaya, in vanquishing those mighty bowmen, viz., the sons of Pritha. In all the battles that Karna has fought with the sons of Pandu, the latter have invariably defeated him on the field. Indeed, O son, the Pandavas are incapable of being vanquished by the very gods with Vasava at their head"

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07129.htm

PLEASE NOTE THAT KARNA WAS ALSO DEFEATED SEVERAL BY BHIMASENA IN RAJASUYA YAGNA DURING DIGVIJAY CEREMONY OF KARNA!

3.)Karna's defeat by Bhimasena(3rd Time):

Narrative:

"Sanjaya, said, 'While the mighty car-warriors Bhimasena was uttering those roars, mighty Karna, unable to bear them, rushed at him with a loud shout, stretching his bow with great force. Indeed, the mighty Karna, desirous of battle, displayed his strength and checked Bhima's course like a tall tree withstanding tempest. The heroic Bhima also, beholding Vikartana's son before him, suddenly blazed up in wrath and sped at him with great force many shafts whetted on stone. Karna received all those shafts and sped many in return. At that encounter between Bhima and Karna, hearing the sounds of their palms, the limbs of all the struggling combatants, car-warriors, and horsemen, began to tremble. Indeed, hearing the terrible roars of Bhimasena on the field of battle, even all the foremost of Kshatriyas regarded the whole earth and the welkin to be filled with that noise. And at the fierce peals uttered by the high-souled son of Pandu, the bows of all warriors in that battle dropped on the earth. And steeds and elephants, O king, dispirited, ejected urine and excreta. Various frightful omens of evil then made their appearance. The welkin was covered with flights of vultures and Kankas during that terrific encounter between Bhima and Karna. Then Karna struck Bhima with twenty arrows, and quickly pierced the latter's charioteer also with five. Smiling the while, the mighty and active Bhima then, in that battle, quickly sped at Karna four and sixty arrows. Then Karna, O king, sped four shafts at him. Bhima, by means of his straight shafts, cut them into many fragments, O king, displaying his lightness of hand. Then Karna covered him with dense showers of arrows. Thus covered by Karna, the mighty son of Pandu, however, cut off Karna's bow at the handle and then pierced Karna with ten straight arrows. The Suta's son then, that mighty car-warrior of terrible deeds, taking up another bow and stringing it quickly, pierced Bhima in that battle (with many shafts). Then Bhima, excited with rage, struck the Suta's son with great force on the chest with three straight shafts. With those arrows sticking at his breast, Karna looked beautiful, O bull of Bharata's race, like a mountain with three tall summits. Thus pierced with mighty shafts, blood began to flow from his wounds, like torrents of liquid red-chalk down the breast of a mountain. Afflicted with those shafts shot with great force, Karna became agitated a little. Fixing an arrow then on his bow, he pierced

Bhima, again, O sire! And once more he began to shoot arrows by hundreds and thousands. Suddenly shrouded with shafts by that firm bowman, viz., Karna, the son of Pandu, smiling the while, cut off Karna's bow-string. And then with a broad-headed arrow, he despatched Karna's charioteer to the abode of Yama. And that mighty car-warrior, viz., Bhima, deprived the four steeds also of Karna of their lives. The mighty car-warrior Karna then speedily jumping down, O king, from his steedless car, mounted the car of Vrishasena. The valiant Bhimasena then, having vanquished Karna in battle, uttered a loud shout deep as the roar of the clouds.

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07125.htm

Narrative:

"Dhritarashtra said, 'How raged that battle, in the neighbourhood of Arjuna's car, between those two mighty car-warriors, viz., Bhima and Karna, both of whom are endued with great strength? Once before Karna had been vanquished by Bhimasena in battle."

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07127.htm

4.)Karna's defeat by Bhimasena(4th time):

The mighty-armed Bhima could not brook that conduct, in battle, of the mighty-armed Karna. Rolling his eyes ill wrath, he pierced Karna with five and twenty long shafts. Thereupon, Karna looked like a white mountain with many snakes of virulent poison (hanging from its sides). And once more, Bhimasena, endued with the prowess of a celestial, pierced the Suta's son who was prepared to lay down his life in battle, with six and then with eight arrows. And, again, with another arrow, the valiant Bhimasena quickly cut off Karna's bow, smiling the while. And he slew also with his shafts the four steeds of Karna and then his charioteer, and then pierced Karna himself in the chest with a number of long shafts endued with the effulgence of the sun. Those winged shafts, piercing through Karna's body, entered the earth, like the rays of the sun piercing through the clouds. Afflicted with arrows and his bow cut off, Karna, though proud of his manliness, felt great pain and proceeded to another car.'"

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07127.htm

KARNA START WEEPING AFTER GETTING DEFEATED BY BHIMASENA:

NARRATIVE:

Then Karna, weeping in grief, circumambulated that son of thine, who, adorned with ornaments, lay on the earth, writhing like a snake. Bhima then, having made that deadly foe of his, viz., Karna, carless, smiling by covered him with shafts and made him look like a Sataghni with numberless spikes on it. The Atiratha Karna, however, that chastiser of foes, though thus pierced with arrows, did not yet avoid the enraged Bhima in battle.'"

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07129.htm

Karna accepting he had been owned big time by Bhimasena..No other warrior has harassed Karna so much as Bhimasena:

Narrative:

Thus addressed by thy son, O sire, the son of Radha replied unto Duryodhana, that foremost one among the Kurus, in these words, 'Deeply hath my body been pierced in battle by the brave bowman Bhimasena, capable of striking vigorously with repeated showers of arrows. O giver of honours, that I am yet present in battle is because that one like me should be present here. Scorched with the powerful shafts of Bhimasena, every limb of mine is suffering from torturing pain I shall, however, for all that, fight to the best of my

p. 315

powers. My life itself is for thee. I shall strive my best so that this foremost one of the sons of Pandu may not succeed in slaying the ruler of the Sindhus. As long as I shall fight, shooting my whetted shafts, the heroic Dhananjaya, capable of drawing the bow with even his left hand, will not succeed in getting at the ruler of the Sindhus.

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07141.htm

KARNA'S DEFEAT BY PANCHALA KING DRUPADA:

NARRATIVE:

"But the mighty bowman, Prishata's son, invincible in battle, though very much pierced with the arrows of the enemy, instantly began, O Bharata,to afflict the hostile ranks with greater vigour. And careering over the field of battle like a fiery wheel, king Drupada with his arrows smote Duryodhana and Vikarna and even the mighty Karna and many other heroic princes and numberless warriors, and slaked their thirst for battle."

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m01/m01141.htm

6.)KARNA'S DEFEAT BY SATYAKI:

NARRATIVE:

"Although all those warriors headed by Karna made strong efforts for slaying Satyaki, yet those foremost of car-warriors, failed to slay him. Drona's son and Kritavarman and other mighty car-warriors, as also hundreds of foremost Kshatriyas, were all vanquished by Satyaki with only one bow. That hero fought, desirous of benefiting king Yudhishthira the Just, and of attaining to heaven. Indeed, Satyaki, that crusher of foes, is equal to either of the two Krishnas in energy. Smiling the while, he vanquished all thy troops, O best of men! In this world, there are only three mighty bowmen, viz., Krishna, Partha, and Satyaki. There is no fourth to be seen."

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07143.htm

Satyaki again harassing Karna:

Narrative:

Smiting the great host of Karna with whetted arrows, Satyaki penetrated into the vast and limitless army of the Bharatas.

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07109.htm

Karna again saved by Duryodhana,Jayadratha & Drona from Satyaki:

Narrative:

The king Duryodhana, and Drona and Jayadratha, rescued Karna from the

Satyaki-ocean, as the former was about to sink into it.

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07030.htm

ALSO SEE WHAT LORD KRISHNA THINK ABOUT KARNA'S STRENGTH:

Narrative:

"Thus addressed by Savyasachin, the mighty-armed Kesava, endued with great energy, replied in these opportune words, 'The mighty-armed Satyaki is singly a match for Karna, O son of Pandu!"

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07143.htm

7.)KARNA DEFEATED BY GANDHARWA CHITRASENA:

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m03/m03239.htm

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m03/m03240.htm

8.)KARNA DEFEATED & FRIEGHTENED BY ABHIMANYU IN CHAKRAVYUHU:

Narrative:

Hearing these words, Karna, afflicted with the shafts of Arjuna's son, once more said unto Drona, 'Exceedingly afflicted with the shafts of Abhimanyu, I am staying in battle, only because (as a warrior) I should stay here. Indeed, the arrows of this south of great energy are exceedingly fierce. Terrible as they are and possessed of the energy of fire, these arrows are weakening my heart.'

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07045.htm

Furthur defeats of Karna by Abhimanyu:

Narrative:

Then Abhimanyu, excessively pierced by those great bowmen with their straight shafts, shot shafts at Karna which was capable of piercing through every armour and body. That shaft, piercing through Karna's coat of mail and then his body, entered the earth like a snake piercing through an anthill. Deeply pierced, Karna felt great pain and became perfectly helpless. Indeed, Karna began to tremble in that battle like a hill during an earthquake.

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07035.htm

Narrative:

"Sanjaya said, 'Phalguni's son once more pierced Karna in the car with a barbed arrow, and for angering him still further, he pierced him with fifty other shafts. The son of Radha pierced Abhimanyu in return with as many shafts. Covered all over with arrows, Abhimanyu, then, O sire, looked exceedingly beautiful. Filled with rage, he caused Karna also to be bathed in blood. Mangled with arrows and covered with blood, the brave Karna also shone greatly. 2 Both of them pierced with arrows, both bathed in blood, those illustrious warriors then resembled a couple of flowering Kinsukas. The son of Subhadra then slew six of Karna's brave counsellors, conversant with all modes of warfare, with their steeds and charioteers and cars.

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07045.htm

9.)KARNA AGAIN FLED FROM BATTLEFIELD..THIS TIME FROM ABHIMANYU:

NARRATIVE:

Karna, O monarch, was filled with pain. Meanwhile, the son of Subhadra, causing Karna by means of his arrows to turn away from the field, quickly rushed against the other great bowmen. Then Abhimanyu of fierce energy and great fame, filled with wrath, broke that host of diverse forces abounding with elephants and steeds and cars and infantry. As regards Karna, afflicted by Abhimanyu with countless shafts, he fled away from the field borne by swift steeds.

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/m07/m07038.htm

KARNA WAS DEFEATED DESPITE HAVING THESE ADVANTAGES:

1.)KARNA HAD THAT MUCH FAMED "IMPENETRABLE KAVACH" WITH HIM!

2.)KARNA WAS FIGHTING WITH LOWER CLASS WARRIORS AS COMPARED TO ARJUNA!

3.)NO CURSE OF BRAHMAN OR PURSHURAM WAS INTERFERING WITH KARNA'S CAMPAIGN!

4.)NO SO CALLED "LORD KRISHNA HELP" WAS PROVIDED TO KARNA OPPONENTS!

5.)KARNA WAS CARRYING THE MIGHTY 'VIJAYA DHANUSH' & VARIETY OF DIVYASTRAS PROVIDED BY PURSHURAM UNLIKE HIS OPPONENTS!

Authenciaty of vyas original mahabharat by km ganguly:

http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/maha/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kisari_Mohan_Ganguli

http://bharatadesam.com/spiritual/mahabharata/index.php

http://mahabharata-resources.org/ganguli-roy.html

http://www.aryabharati.org/mahabharat/mahabharen.asp

http://www.gutenberg.org/files/15474/15474-h/15474-h.htm

https://archive.org/details/TheMahabharataOfKrishna-dwaipayanaVyasa

http://www.columbia.edu/itc/mealac/pritchett/00litlinks/lit_epics.html

http://www.nptel.ac.in/courses/109104050/33

GUTENBERG.COM IS THE BRITISH GOVT'S SITE OF THE LARGEST E-BOOK COLLECTION,MAHABHARATA-RESOURCES.COM IS THE OFFICIAL WEBSITE OF ALL REGIONAL,CULTURAL,FOLKLORE,RETELLINGS & ORIGINAL VERSIONS OF MAHABHARATA & THEIR DETAILED INFO ARE CONTAINED IN THIS SINGLE WEBSITE,ARYABHARATI.ORG IS THE WORLD'S LARGEST DATABASE OF VEDIC & HINDU EPICS MANAGED BY INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY & PUBLIC TRUST (I.S.P.T) FOUNDED IN 1998 & ARCHIVE.ORG AS WE ALL KNOW IS THE WORLD'S LARGEST ARCHIVE DATABASE COLLECTION OF HISTORY!
 * BHARATDESHAM.COM IS AN INDIAN GOVERNMENT SPONSORED SITE,NPTEL IS THE "e-education" WEBSITE PORTAL OF IIT (INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY) & COLUMBIA.EDU IS THE WEBSITE OF UNITED STATES' TOPMOST UNIVERSITY:COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY,WHILE SACRED-TEXTS.COM IS THE WORLD'S LARGEST LIBRARY OF ALL RELIGIOUS SCRUPTURES & HOLY TEXTS OF ALL RELIGIONS & CULTURES AROUND THE GLOBE,

ALL THESE SITES RECOGNISE KMG TRANSLATION AS THE ONLY AUTHENTIC & MOST COMPLETE TRANSLATION OF ORIGINAL KRISHNA-DWAIPAYANA VYASA'S(VEDA VYASA'S) MAHABHARATA!

Moreover KM ganguly was THE FIRST & TILL NOW,THE ONLY ONE WHO HAD DONE THE COMPLETE TRANSLATION OF ORIGINAL MAHABHARATA OF VEDA VYASA IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE & IS THE ONLY TRANSLATION OF ITS KIND THAT FOLLOWS CROSS LINKED WORD TO WORD TRANSLATION OF SANSKRIT LANGUAGE INTO ENGLISH!Till date no one except KM Ganguly has managed to do the complete translation of Mahabharata in English Language & you can verify yourself!

Arijeet Takkar (talk) 07:02, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Date and time
 * 07:02, 6 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Peterstigander

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Trying to type "shared the room with Tancredi Parmeggiani". Having experimented, I have found out that it is the word "Tancredi" that makes the edit be rejected.


 * Date and time
 * 09:27, 6 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Nissepo

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I made that post quite some time ago out of anger. I would like to have it removed as it is associated with my name.


 * Date and time
 * 19:43, 6 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You have to login to that account in order to blank it on your own, but I've requested deletion of it.--Jasper Deng (talk) 17:44, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Number232

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 11:13, 7 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Why are you trying to blank Batman Begins? It's a Good Article. —Bruce1eetalk 11:29, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Kadin21lightel

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 18:44, 7 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Attempted vandalism, filter working properly. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:45, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Ohkitamah

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Delete it, please. I don't know how anonymous has my name, maybe someone from school. I need help deleting it, my life shouldn't be public. This is not by me, and it is totally fake. Life is not all like this, I don't even know how that individual got some-what of my information, it needs to be all deleted please and the User who made it not be able to do this again. Very intensive and creepy.


 * Date and time
 * 15:06, 8 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Page deleted. Thanks for pointing this out.  Black Kite (talk) 15:11, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

180.183.7.57

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * adding an request


 * Date and time
 * 22:39, 8 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Yeah it's a false positive, doing the edit for you.--Jasper Deng (talk) 17:42, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

H2O Delirious

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 11:09, 9 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * WP:BLP violations removed, not a false positive since you aren't sourcing those. Please read WP:GARAGEBAND.--Jasper Deng (talk) 17:39, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

152.42.213.119

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I tried to add information about the Music Department at Davidson College, particularly about our music ensembles.


 * Date and time
 * 19:34, 9 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * A false positive, but you should not ever need headers that long. Also WP:PSCOI is relevant to you because you are affiliated with the subject.--Jasper Deng (talk) 17:40, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

58.9.238.30

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * tried to remove that sentence repeated over and over (hundred times) "THIS USER HAS QUITTED EDITING WIKIPEDIA!" in order to have only one left.


 * Date and time
 * 01:59, 10 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Arguably, it's incivil because it is shouting, but in general, users should not mess with other users' userpages.--Jasper Deng (talk) 17:46, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I have done the edit for you. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 17:59, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

210.213.146.176

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Please fix this page I really can't edit it anymore. Every time I will attempt to edit the page wikipedia will automatically popped a message that my edits are nonconstructive. Why? I'm really sure that my edits are true. Please help me. God speed!


 * Date and time
 * 08:25, 10 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I've tagged the page for deletion, Wikipedia isn't a free webhost. Still, users should not be editing others' userpages, in general.--Jasper Deng (talk) 17:45, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Efli6758768

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 14:36, 10 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * A false positive, but headers that long are unneeded.--Jasper Deng (talk) 17:38, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Tdepke

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Editing and adding content to a page that remains incomplete based on first hand experience participating in this event


 * Date and time
 * 21:20, 10 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * This is technically a false positive, but we cannot accept original research.--Jasper Deng (talk) 05:52, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

TFGC27

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was condensing what was originally written by removing un referenced information. I also added references and what I felt was more relevant information.


 * Date and time
 * 12:15, 11 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You were in fact editing the user page of User:Bob stork, which I have now deleted as promotional. Feel free to re-create the draft at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rob Heron & The Tea Pad. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 17:57, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

107.1.39.55

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 15:09, 11 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Gorgeous is a disambiguation page listing Wikipedia articles with that title; it's not a chat board. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 17:53, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

86.1.101.187

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 10:36, 14 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

ITwriter47

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * Create a new page for HP OneView


 * Date and time
 * 22:24, 14 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Technically a false positive, but notability guidelines do not appear to have been met and the tone is overly promotional.--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:26, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Sir.Tiddlesworth

 * Username


 * Page you were editing


 * Description
 * I was trying to update the GLSL shader example, as it contains several functions that have been removed from OpenGL 3.1 on wards. However, it keeps coming up with the following message: "An automated filter has identified this edit as potentially unconstructive, and it has been disallowed."


 * Date and time
 * 05:52, 15 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * No need to include such a long line of equal signs (which triggers the filter). Use a different block, or if you really want them in the same block, a multiline comment with words.--Jasper Deng (talk) 06:14, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Kwestmoreland

 * Username
 * Kwestmoreland (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * 


 * Description
 * I didn;t delete all of the information on a page, when the article told me that I did.


 * Date and time
 * 06:39, 16 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You removed all the categories, though.--Jasper Deng (talk) 06:52, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

ScotXW

 * Username
 * ScotXW (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Page not specified


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 10:00, 16 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

What a f*kinc waste of my time.

Bellemora

 * Username
 * Bellemora (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * The Little Mermaid (statue) ( filter log )


 * Description
 * I was trying to replace "men's private part" with "dildo" - this isn't something I'd normally advocate, but in this case it is appropriate. (on the plus side I don't suppose I anything I do on Wikipedia now will be more embarrassing than insisting on my right to insert a dildo).


 * Date and time
 * 12:27, 17 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Don't worry about it, I tried again and managed to insert it. (though this report should probably kick in the "Carry On" filter)

76.15.69.222

 * Username
 * 76.15.69.222 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Editing Wikipedia: Biographies ( filter log )


 * Description
 * The Jeane Dixon bio is a blatant hatchet job that does not contain (and does not even allow on its talk page) investigative reporting from perfectly respectable sources.  Under the Jeane Dixon Effect I have suggested this addition, based on on Denis Brian's book on Dixon for Doubleday:

How much of that effect applies to Dixon herself in relation to the presidential death prediction needs to be weighed against the further predictions she made just preceding Kennedy's assassination. According to Eleanor Bumgardner Wright, an executive secretary to Supreme Court Justice Frank Murphy and assistant to President Kennedy's sister, Eunice Shriver, Jeanne Dixon was extremely upset a few months before the assassination, saying "All I can see is the casket over the White House." [4] And Estelle Friedrichs, administrative assistant in the White House during the Roosevelt and Truman administrations "remember[ed] distinctly" that "nine days before the assassination" Jeanne Dixon had asked her to contact Grace Tully (Franklin Rosoevelt's private secretary) "to tell her to tell the President not to go down South. He will be assassinated." [5]

Can we at least get this on the talk page for now?
 * Date and time
 * 18:37, 17 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Sportpty

 * Username
 * Sportpty (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Edgar Crespo ( filter log )


 * Description
 * I am trying to edit and add information about this athlete from my country


 * Date and time
 * 19:09, 17 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

ITwriter47

 * Username
 * ITwriter47 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * HP OneView ( filter log )


 * Description
 * I want to create an article on HP OneView. I attempted to do this on April 14th, but was not allowed. The reason given in the log is "Long-term pattern abuse," which is very confusing and groundless, because I created my Wiki account on April 14th as well. I wrote the HP OneView article and I included well-established, third-party sources for all the factual statements and opinions. In the talk section of Jasper Deng, Jasper states that unlike this page he created, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Server_2012, the HP OneView article is not about one software product (not true; HP OneView is one product); and that the article is not arranged around features. These reasons do not seem to fall within the bounds of Wikipedia article creation and attribution guidelines.

I would appreciate a second opinion on the legitimacy of the HP OneView page, other than Jasper Deng's.
 * Date and time
 * 21:52, 17 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * This filter is troublesome to deal with, I can't even see why you triggered it. Keep editing the existing article.--Jasper Deng (talk) 01:39, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

88.193.48.125

 * Username
 * 88.193.48.125 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Pete Sampras ( filter log )


 * Description
 * I tried to change 'ihere' to 'here' but was blocked from doing so.


 * Date and time
 * 08:10, 18 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

85.116.197.207

 * Username
 * 85.116.197.207 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Clerestory ( filter log )


 * Description
 * in section "Modern Usage", replacing "the F*** word" with "the word 'fuck'" as per WP:NOT section 2.11


 * Date and time
 * 19:52, 18 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

jhnkdcnbjdftgbunjgfdruuuuuuuuuuuuuugnbbbbbbbbbbbbbukcghnk

Binsurur

 * Username
 * Binsurur (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Page not specified


 * Description
 * The caption 1 photo described as mosque in stone town is actually a museum in stonetown located outside Zanzibar central hospital called MNAZI MMOJA HOSPITAL


 * Date and time
 * 15:48, 20 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

NullCrewFTS

 * Username
 * NullCrewFTS (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * NullCrew ( filter log )


 * Description
 * I was attempting to add a new section, update my wiki logo, and change my motto; I don't understand how that is vandalisim when I am the creator and editor of this wikipedia page. And now I have been threatened to be blocked if I continue updating my wikipedia, because it's supposedly vandalisim? Please, help.


 * Date and time
 * 15:22, 21 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

You're only supposed to report problems with the edit filter here, but yes, it was a false positive, though it took me a little while to realize it. I've added the information you were trying to add back to the page. Lugia2453 (talk) 15:30, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Zero5503

 * Username
 * Zero5503 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * [[zero5503

Dominic11121]] ( filter log )
 * Description
 * I was trying to make a page about my friend Dominic and it says it was non constructive but I was trying to make a page about him


 * Date and time
 * 23:01, 21 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Jonathan lampe

 * Username
 * Jonathan lampe (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Articles for creation/Checkmarx ( filter log )


 * Description
 * Just trying to create a page for a security tool I use at work. Page has 5 resources and a software block I see a few other pages.  Error is "An automated filter has identified this edit as potentially unconstructive, and it has been disallowed. If this edit is constructive, please report this error."  I've been using Wikimedia for years but am a newbie on Wikipedia - please help.


 * Date and time
 * 03:48, 22 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Does anyone remember why Checkmarx was added to the filter? -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 02:24, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

84.104.15.46

 * Username
 * 84.104.15.46 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * '03 Bonnie & Clyde ( filter log )


 * Description
 * In the section "Toni Braxton feud" I was trying to replace [sh--] and [f---] by the actual words shit and fuck, as it is not the task of Wikipedia to censor foul language. For obvious reasons this caused the filter to block the edit.


 * Date and time
 * 18:56, 22 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

108.50.164.169

 * Username
 * 108.50.164.169 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Page not specified


 * Description
 * I have added some facts about Jason Derulo and they won't let me add it because they say that it is not constructive!


 * Date and time
 * 00:23, 23 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * It wasn't. Apparently, you were blocked for this attempted vandalism. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 16:45, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

72.43.217.66

 * Username
 * 72.43.217.66 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * I was editing the Micheal Myers page and was very offended when it said that my edits were nonconstructive, for example it said the halloween movies were made by some guy when really it was made by that not famous guy. thank you ( filter log )


 * Description
 * Please replace this with a description of the edit you were trying to make.


 * Date and time
 * 12:55, 23 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Thanks for reporting yourself. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 18:26, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

SymmetryLotusEagle

 * Username
 * SymmetryLotusEagle (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Page not specified


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 18:19, 23 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

hello there i need to make edit wiki on soul eater not so please i fix edit
 * Thanks for bringing attention to your vandalism. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 18:21, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

50.150.44.98

 * Username
 * 50.150.44.98 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Page not specified


 * Description
 * wikipedia sucks


 * Date and time
 * 22:38, 23 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * So does vandalism, so don't be surprised when your edits are stopped. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 05:30, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Spshu

 * Username
 * Spshu (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Toon Disney ( filter log )


 * Description
 * I was cutting and pasting a rewrite of the article from my sandbox. When I go to save, it gives an error: "We are sorry, your edit can not be completed at this time. Your contribution appears to contain a link to the archiving service archive.is. In accordance with Wikipedia:Archive.is RFC, links to archive.is are not allowed to be added to Wikipedia."

I double check twice and I have no Archive.is links (I do have archive.org and google cached.)
 * Date and time
 * 22:21, 24 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

There was indeed an archive.is link in the addition. No false positive here. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 05:55, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Maz132

 * Username
 * Maz132 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Brandon Richardson ( filter log )


 * Description
 * Created an variable article of an actor. I seen there worth numerous article before that was written poorly and dishonorable, I have a reliable sources for this article and would like to continue to share the article.


 * Date and time
 * 08:43, 26 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The filter blocks articles about Brandon Richardson for the good reason that User:Danny.ESQ and his socks have been trying to repost the same article for over two years. As the Wikipedia community has repeatedly decided, this person is not notable per our guidelines.  User blocked as sockpuppet. NawlinWiki (talk) 10:35, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

94.68.235.218

 * Username
 * 94.68.235.218 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Page not specified


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 16:03, 26 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Edits were unconstructive, filters working as intended. Black Kite (talk) 21:35, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

124.185.15.46

 * Username
 * 124.185.15.46 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Evil Boy ( filter log )


 * Description
 * Change a misspelling of peni to penises


 * Date and time
 * 08:09, 1 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * "peni" is correctly quoted in Evil Boy ("clean and strong peni"). —Bruce1eetalk 10:14, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Msittig

 * Username
 * Msittig (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Yang_Rui ( filter log )


 * Description
 * Was trying to revert the series of edits by 221.220.21.232 that removed a lot of *referenced* material from the Yang Rui page that could be interpreted as casting him in a negative light; possible self-edit or edit by a fan?


 * Date and time
 * 06:44, 2 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * False positive, but edit should probably be discussed on the talkpage. Black Kite (talk) 00:30, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

166.216.194.74

 * Username
 * 166.216.194.74 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * User:Itmanfive ( filter log )


 * Description
 * Logged out and blanked my userpage with my signature indicating the IP of my cell. This junky browser seems to have a small buffer for a single input. Maybe, the filter protects against a certain problem, and there is a better way for me to do what I am trying to do with an...


 * Date and time
 * 10:49, 2 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You can't blank a userpage from an IP account. Black Kite (talk) 00:30, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

68.8.229.36

 * Username
 * 68.8.229.36 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Page not specified


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 22:37, 3 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You can't blank a userpage from an IP account. However, since that page is unconstructive anyway, I have deleted it. Black Kite (talk) 00:30, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

75.134.211.63

 * Username
 * 75.134.211.63 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Page not specified


 * Description
 * on the page the ten commandments it is no where mentioned that the commandments in exodus 34 not exodus 20 are called the ten commandments by the bible. i simply added how it is that the church has it wrong. it was said to be nonconstructive. if you truly consider this to be so then this website is perpetuating a lie.


 * Date and time
 * 20:45, 4 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * To be fair, if you're going to add a huge rambling sentence like that with little puinctuation or grammar, it's little surprise that one of the automated filters picks it up. You didn't include any sources or citations either. Black Kite (talk) 11:56, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Mjb1824

 * Username
 * Mjb1824 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Vladimir Kagan9 ( filter log )


 * Description
 * Adding a citation of a web page which coincidentally ended with an email address, specifically (http://calendar.yale.edu/cal/opa/month/20100419/TalksAndReadings/CAL-2c9cb3cc-260adb91-0126-0fede5ed-00004f49bedework @ yale.edu/) [I spaced the email out so I could send this]


 * Date and time
 * 00:30, 5 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Yeah, this is a false positive. Suggest the edit on the talk page and if it's valid (I'd presume it is) someone autoconfirmed will add it. Black Kite (talk) 11:59, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Dpc47

 * Username
 * Dpc47 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * [] ( filter log )


 * Description
 * I was updating the rank column on every line of the primary table to fix a sorting error reported on the talk page. I'm not sure why I was blocked - maybe for changing too many lines? Frustrating.


 * Date and time
 * 06:59, 5 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Yes, a false positive, I have reported it to the filter manager. Black Kite (talk) 12:00, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Diburning

 * Username
 * Diburning (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * List of IATA-indexed railway stations ( filter log )


 * Description
 * I was adding entries to the Q-Z section on the page, from the List of Amtrak stations page on Wikipedia. I only added the ones where an IATA code was listed.


 * Date and time
 * 20:15, 5 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * False positive. Filter manager informed.  You could post the edit at the talk page and someone else will make it for you. Black Kite (talk) 20:05, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Cjwaffles

 * Username
 * Cjwaffles (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Bangla College Killing Field ( filter log )


 * Description
 * Changed "ordinary people" to "civilians"


 * Date and time
 * 06:32, 6 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * False positive. See above report. Black Kite (talk) 20:09, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

209.184.118.158

 * Username
 * 209.184.118.158 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Seige of Yorktown ( filter log )


 * Description
 * Trying to clean it up


 * Date and time
 * 19:10, 6 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Removing large amounts of valid content will always trip the filter. Black Kite (talk) 20:10, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Diggity99

 * Username
 * Diggity99 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Lyndhurst Way ( filter log )


 * Description
 * A series of vandal attacks has been occurring by a number of users.


 * Date and time
 * 19:59, 6 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You deleted the categories at the bottom of the article. This will always trip the filter. Black Kite (talk) 20:11, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

50.9.114.198

 * Username
 * 50.9.114.198 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * WZJZ


 * Description
 * I was trying to say that on some car and truck radios, this station could be received all the way up to Land O' Lakes in Pasco County, and it was constructive and it said no.


 * Date and time
 * 21:40, 6 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Haseebp0

 * Username
 * Haseebp0 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * na ana is des laado ( filter log )


 * Description
 * i am trying to revert this page back due to extreme vandalism. more than 21000 characters were removed recently, the information was very useful and clearly lots of hard work went into it. I would like for the information to be restored before the vandalism and I will clean it up. It is shameful that some user thinks its okay to delete so much, his account should be flagged please.


 * Date and time
 * 00:58, 7 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Your edit wasn't precisely what this filter was intended to stop, but that doesn't mean your edit wasn't a bad one. A quick review shows that the 21,000 characters that were removed were an enormous plot summary, which is not permitted in Wikipedia. Please see WP:NOT.&mdash;Kww(talk) 01:46, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

203.12.30.74

 * Username
 * 203.12.30.74 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * List of professional wrestling organisations in Australia ( filter log )


 * Description
 * Should be redirected as the list is already (via the consensus of multiple AfD's deleting a number of promotions) regarded as not notable. I'm not being permitted to restore this correct edit.


 * Date and time
 * 06:25, 7 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

198.110.175.193

 * Username
 * 198.110.175.193 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Page not specified


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 14:02, 7 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Attempted vandalism, filter working properly. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:53, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Hossmccool

 * Username
 * Hossmccool (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Page not specified


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 15:51, 7 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Attempted vandalism, filter working properly. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:52, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

151.213.41.90

 * Username
 * 151.213.41.90 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Page not specified


 * Description
 * I was trying to post a ?ion


 * Date and time
 * 23:52, 7 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You may not blank another registered user's user or talkpage. Black Kite (talk) 23:52, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

WS-ExeCom

 * Username
 * WS-ExeCom (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Page not specified


 * Description
 * Ricky Lee

Editing inaccurate entries, updating information and adding detailed filmography.
 * Date and time
 * 15:20, 8 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Try re-adding this information without ALLCAPS which is usually rejected. Black Kite (talk) 23:53, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

84.104.15.46

 * Username
 * 84.104.15.46 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * '03 Bonnie & Clyde ( filter log )


 * Description
 * In the section "Toni Braxton feud" I was trying to replace [sh--] and [f---] by the actual words shit and fuck, as it is not the task of Wikipedia to censor foul language. For obvious reasons this caused the filter to block the edit.


 * Date and time
 * 18:56, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

It should be fairly obvious why the filter is rejecting these edits. I suggest you make them on the talk page of the article s that a registered user can fix any issues. Black Kite (talk) 23:51, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Comments

Kaveo408

 * Username
 * Kaveo408 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * X-Raided ( filter log )


 * Description
 * Correct false information as well as add missing information


 * Date and time
 * 17:50, 8 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Don't add information in ALLCAPS, this is generally rejected. Black Kite (talk) 23:55, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Noob2the3rdpower

 * Username
 * Noob2the3rdpower (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Page not specified


 * Description
 * I fixed a thing, It said "potential unconstructive edit" your cluebot is a ****


 * Date and time
 * 18:03, 8 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Attempted vandalism, filter working properly. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:05, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

69.181.18.89

 * Username
 * 69.181.18.89 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * California lieutenant gubernatorial election, 2014 ( filter log )


 * Description
 * Add a candidate running for lieutenant governor. She is on the official ballot as a confirmed candidate.

http://www.cagreens.org/press-release/140319
 * Date and time
 * 03:07, 9 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Yes a false positive. Suggest you discuss this on the talk page of the article and an autoconfirmed user should be able to add this 5 albert square (talk) 08:30, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Bryancyriel

 * Username
 * Bryancyriel (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * RETRY


 * Description
 * I can't edited on talk because the error reported on Wikibirds11. I think there is a article with the wiki edits still wanted of Wikipedia Users with reverted me. I know, it deletes from reception and etc. By wikibirds11 after undo the previous editor from me.


 * Date and time
 * 11:47, 9 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

DemolitionTurtle

 * Username
 * DemolitionTurtle (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Unreal Tournament ( filter log )


 * Description
 * Someone vandalised the page and filled it with content about My Little Pony. I was trying to undo this change, so it described the multiplayer computer game again.


 * Date and time
 * 20:49, 9 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Yes a false positive. Thanks for alerting us 5 albert square (talk) 08:33, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

WS-ExeCom

 * Username
 * WS-ExeCom (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Ricky Lee ( filter log )


 * Description
 * Updated and added information as of May 2014


 * Date and time
 * 05:53, 10 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

124.180.170.151

 * Username
 * 124.180.170.151 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Wikipedia talk:Long-term abuse ( filter log )


 * Description
 * I added a comment in a new section suggesting a Long Term abuse page for Mr Wiki Pro and I was blocked. I don't believe it should have been blocked as it was entirely constructive.


 * Date and time
 * 04:20, 12 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Spozito

 * Username
 * Spozito (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * UNITED STATES OF SHEMSHAKI' ( filter log )


 * Description
 * editing and adding correct information about my home town.


 * Date and time
 * 16:51, 12 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

The filter log does not have you editing the above page. The filter log shows that you tried to remove huge chunks of text from another users page. This generally isn't allowed so the filter is correct. Why don't you try discussing this on the user's talk page? 5 albert square (talk) 08:44, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

67.54.191.225

 * Username
 * 67.54.191.225 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Shepard tone ( filter log )


 * Description
 * I was adding another example of a Shepard tone and the filter blocked it. The edit was constructive.


 * Date and time
 * 21:59, 12 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

50.192.125.197

 * Username
 * 50.192.125.197 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Page not specified


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 14:24, 13 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

It got mad at me for npo reason?!?!?!?


 * The edit filter is working correctly – why are you trying to vandalise Ryan Beatty? —Bruce1eetalk 14:28, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

82.254.23.208

 * Username
 * 82.254.23.208 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Page not specified


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 15:38, 13 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

I was adding portraits on many different pages to bring more illustration. Some of these pages didn't even had any portrait of the concerned subject. I thought that this would help to improve the quality of wikipedia content. Thanks for your understanding and to let me know what I actually did wrong. Kindest regards, Anais Chaine

152.157.78.125

 * Username
 * 152.157.78.125 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Page not specified


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 17:05, 14 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

YALL BE COWBOYS jẽǒØĽĽœḸ
 * And you be vandal. Filter working properly. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:12, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

108.25.52.235

 * Username
 * 108.25.52.235 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Soma_mine_disaster ( filter log )


 * Description
 * I tried to erase the page, but it gave me an error. Fix it.


 * Date and time
 * 19:09, 14 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The edit filter worked precisely as it was supposed to. Don't try to erase pages.  Acroterion   (talk)   19:36, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Dukeconover

 * Username
 * Dukeconover (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Page not specified


 * Description
 * Wikipedia removed the Duke Conover entry from its system but it remains on the web and still can be edited. To that end, I am being defamed by anonymous rogue writers. If Wikipedia is not allowing it to be published, it should be removed from the web. The edit I have done simply sanitized the piece to basic information from the original.


 * Date and time
 * 10:36, 15 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Deleted per WP:FAKEARTICLE. Black Kite (talk) 12:08, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

216.126.6.146

 * Username
 * 216.126.6.146 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Page not specified


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 16:10, 15 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

You were vandalising. Filter working correctly 5 albert square (talk) 08:51, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Drchickenbeer

 * Username
 * Drchickenbeer (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Portland Thorns 2014 Season ( filter log )


 * Description
 * Creating page for the Portland Thorns 2014 season. All other teams in the National Women's Soccer League have one.


 * Date and time
 * 20:13, 15 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

182.74.40.18

 * Username
 * 182.74.40.18 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * The Bishop's School (Pune) ( filter log )


 * Description
 * Made grammatical corrections and other changes including adding the name of the honor awarded to the winning house in an academic year. The honor is called the "Cock House". I believe the usage of the word "Cock" has identified the edit as potentially unconstructive. The name of the "title" or "honor" can be verified on this website : http://bishopsboys.com/goldendays.htm

The title is mentioned under several house photographs.
 * Date and time
 * 23:29, 15 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Yes that is what set the filter off. Suggest discussing this on the article talk page and an autoconfirmed user can add it 5 albert square (talk) 09:00, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Mary Mark Ockerbloom

 * Username
 * Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * George Rosenkranz ( filter log )


 * Description
 * I was making a number of edits to the page, and using preview to see the effects. They appeared fine.  When I tried to save, it told me that it wouldn't save because the page referenced something from archive.i* (something) which was not an acceptable source. It wasn't anything I had changed, BTW, it was a link that was already on the page.  I removed the offending URL, and tried to save again, and it told me that it couldn't save the changes because they weren't a "constructive edit". Now it cycles between the two states. Short of trying to add a bogus URL, which doesn't seem like the best idea, I'm not sure there's a way I can save this.


 * Date and time
 * 00:02, 16 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

74.131.114.170

 * Username
 * 74.131.114.170 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * epididymitis ( filter log )


 * Description
 * said epididymitis could be caused by e. coli from sex with homosexual men, when it could be transmitted by men or women via anal intercourse... it's an appropriate use of the word and link to anal sex, and not appropriate to single out homosexual men


 * Date and time
 * 01:52, 16 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Nothing is gained by adding those obscenities and the statement loses generality.--Jasper Deng (talk) 02:16, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

208.116.141.100

 * Username
 * 208.116.141.100 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * User talk:NawlinWiki ( filter log )


 * Description
 * My text is: Ah, thank you for this explanation. I had no idea there was a User:Mr Wiki Pro, so I apologize for that misunderstanding.  (Pro tip: it might help if you put "User" in the description.)  I thought you might have been talking about the business MyWikiBiz, which has advised me on my edits to Reliance Globalcom, which User:Coretheapple is now disrupting the project in his quest to get it deleted.


 * Date and time
 * 16:03, 16 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Looks like putting the text User:My Wiki Pro in the comment triggered the filter. - 208.116.141.100 (talk) 16:13, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

46.226.186.194

 * Username
 * 46.226.186.194 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Brickwork ( filter log )


 * Description
 * Correct typography and units


 * Date and time
 * 20:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

46.226.186.194

 * Username
 * 46.226.186.194 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Brickwork ( filter log )


 * Description
 * Group sections under one heading


 * Date and time
 * 21:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

46.226.186.194

 * Username
 * 46.226.186.194 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Brickwork ( filter log )


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 23:37, 16 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Coo coo pigeon

 * Username
 * Coo coo pigeon (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * User:DRAMAQUEEEEN ( filter log )


 * Description
 * User is ignoring rule of WP:NOTHERE Please address this user somehow (i have tried to blank the page as courtesy)


 * Date and time
 * 16:09, 17 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Emerging power

 * Username
 * Subtropical -man  talk   (en-2)


 * Page you were editing
 * Emerging power


 * Description
 * Error, it is not possible to remove (revert) vandalism (blanking). In article no exist links to "Archive.is", as show in notification.


 * Date and time
 * 00:10, 18 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

46.226.186.194

 * Username
 * 46.226.186.194 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Brickwork ( filter log )


 * Description
 * Trying to fix two titles/headers at once.


 * Date and time
 * 00:15, 19 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

46.226.186.194

 * Username
 * 46.226.186.194 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Brickwork ( filter log )


 * Description
 * Trying to correct one apostrophe in header/title


 * Date and time
 * 00:19, 19 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Hsc98

 * Username
 * Hsc98 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Samejima Incident ( filter log )


 * Description
 * Trying to create a translation of the 사메지마 사건 Korean page into English.


 * Date and time
 * 03:00, 19 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

80.169.196.182

 * Username
 * 80.169.196.182 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * User:Socialdemocrat ( filter log )


 * Description
 * Attempting to remove edits added by User:Hayek79 to this user's user page which effectively allege that this user is Chuka Umunna


 * Date and time
 * 13:48, 19 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

IPs cannot blank user pages 5 albert square (talk) 09:34, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Truthsak

 * Username
 * Truthsak (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Page not specified


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 05:26, 20 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

New or unregistered users cannot blank user pages. Why were you doing this? 5 albert square (talk) 09:38, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

24.193.80.64

 * Username
 * 24.193.80.64 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Stockbridge School ( filter log )


 * Description
 * Added explanation (based on personal experience, and on Chevy Chase main article) to the dubious-sounding final sentence ... of the "Program" section. My purpose was to clarify the speculative-looking existing sentence (to which someone had added inserts requesting specifics/evidence), so at least users could judge for themselves.  The turbulence of the Sixties was common knowledge; I lived through it but it repeatedly made the front cover of newsweeklies and the network TV news.  So I don't believe I was "doing something stupid or something you shouldn't have been doing."

(I've edited over 100 articles before, including this one and the one on Billy Bang today, and never seen a "false positive" warning; so I'm not clear if I'm reporting what you need to know. But I feel clear that I don't merit being banned.  I'll look back here to see if you feel otherwise, because I'd like to learn why.  I also think it would be helpful for Wikipedia to define "false positive" somewhere; I only know the term medically.)
 * Date and time
 * 19:57, 20 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

24.96.210.230

 * Username
 * 24.96.210.230 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Talk:Bernhard Knipperdolling


 * Description
 * I cut a sentence in the main article because it was sufficiently ungrammatical that I couldn't figure out what the writer intended to say or I would have just fixed the sentence. I was calling attention to that edit so that if someone who knew something about the subject, possibly the same writer whose slip of the pen it was, could fix it, if they thought proper. Your robot is to darn touchy and this culture of paranoia is making it no longer worth the effort to make small improvements to Wikipedia. I don't know why I'm supposed to paste in 4 ~s, I'm just following the instructions. 24.96.210.230 (talk) 00:06, 21 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 00:06, 21 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

175.156.155.29

 * Username
 * 175.156.155.29 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Humming Urban Stereo ( filter log )


 * Description
 * I were trying to add information of the new album into the discography section but the system stopped me from saving the changes.


 * Date and time
 * 06:15, 21 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Kpalion

 * Username
 * Kpalion (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Szczerbiec ( filter log )


 * Description
 * replacing dead links with their archived versions:, , ,


 * Date and time
 * 22:22, 21 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Judy Silver-Shapiro

 * Username
 * Judy Silver-Shapiro (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Eliezer Silver ( filter log )


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 22:49, 21 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * This is technically a false positive, but posting a long eulogy or memorial is not appropriate on Wikipedia. See WP:NOTMEMORIAL. NawlinWiki (talk) 11:36, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

84.248.189.125

 * Username
 * 84.248.189.125 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * User_talk:Urjanhai ( filter log )


 * Description
 * IP 85.76.131.75 has done a long-term block evasion on fi-wiki and he spammed same message to many fi-wiki user's talk pages here on en-wiki. I tried to undo all his latest edits on User_talk:Urjanhai by editing some old version of that page. This stupid filter blocked my attempt to clean thos spammy messages from that user talk page.... edit: same problem on user_talk:Ejs-80.... what the ¤%&/£

EDIT: yesterday he was editing with IP 85.76.86.238 --84.248.189.125 (talk) 11:26, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Same spammer now with IP 85.76.86.110... --Texku (talk) 12:59, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Date and time
 * 10:03, 22 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Kdramastars

 * Username
 * Kdramastars (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * KPOPSTARS Inc. ( filter log )


 * Description
 * I got a notice that the original entry was too promotional so I was trying to cut it down and make it less so.


 * Date and time
 * 13:58, 22 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * User:KPOPSTARS Inc. has been deleted. —Bruce1eetalk 14:02, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

BillBohack67

 * Username
 * BillBohack67 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * [] ( filter log )


 * Description
 * I was trying to edit the text by we were advised to write about it on LiveUnitedBlog.org

There are many inaccuracies in his edit, such as I killed my wife, we sell leads to lawyers, reality is we work to process a variety of claims from people affected by Large companies. Here is an email from David Tibbs of Digital Maze. Here are some of David Tibbs emails to Us.

David tibbs Sep 25

to william

Eventually BPClaims.org would get a manual penalty from Google.

Thank You Bill Bohack
 * Date and time
 * 14:02, 22 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The page has been deleted.--Jasper Deng (talk) 03:59, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

ComeSiDiceDoRDinitaliano

 * Username
 * ComeSiDiceDoRDinitaliano (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * All pages on Wikipedia. ( filter log )


 * Description
 * Anything I try editing triggers this filter...


 * Date and time
 * 18:43, 22 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Unsurprising since, all your edits are vandalism or nonsense. Filters are working correctly.  Try being constructive. Black Kite kite (talk) 18:46, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

KristenSurfdog

 * Username
 * KristenSurfdog (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * The Burning of Rome ( filter log )


 * Description
 * I have been trying to create the page "The Burning of Rome" but it keeps coming up with a message saying that it may be unconstructive and won't let me submit for review. I have revised it several times in order to avoid copyright issues, but it continues to do so and I'm not sure what I am doing wrong. PLease help!


 * Date and time
 * 00:31, 23 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * This is a false positive, but if you restrict the use of multiple sections (i.e. too many "=" in a row - for instance "====="), you should be able to post your work. Black Kite kite (talk) 00:35, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

82.52.97.122

 * Username
 * 82.52.97.122 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * 1978 European Cup Winners' Cup Final ( filter log )


 * Description
 * After the words "20 september 1977" there was a request for a "citation needed". I tried to add the link to a page of the sport daily where I draw the news from, but it wasn't accepted. (BTW, I did the same in the page "1978 European Cup Final", the link was exactly the same, but in that case it was accepted)


 * Date and time
 * 23:31, 23 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

B14709

 * Username
 * B14709 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Muwenda Mutebi II of Buganda ( filter log )


 * Description
 * Trying to revert vandalism, but it won't let me and says it's unconstructive.


 * Date and time
 * 02:14, 24 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

118.22.255.1

 * Username
 * 118.22.255.1 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport ( filter log )


 * Description
 * Was trying to revert an opinion-driven edit made by Ohconfucius. Seeing that the edit was made due to the chaotic nature of the map, I first reverted the deletion then decided to make it a map that can only be seen after clicking "view". However, system identified it as vandalism and rejected my edit.


 * Date and time
 * 16:41, 24 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

76.171.115.41

 * Username
 * 76.171.115.41 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Alejandro Estrada ( filter log )


 * Description
 * trying to post a new section in the Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard

The Wikipedia page for Alejandro Estrada is inaccurate and the information listed is fraudulent, libelous and defamatory. In addition, the sources cited are bogus, unreliable and appear to have been manipulated by an individual acting with criminal intent because the real Alejandro Estrada is not a "monkey doctor" and the real Alejandro Estrada is involved with an active legal matter pending in a California Court. Moreover, there is also an active federal investigation into America's Help Center and Alejandro Estrada is a witness in that investigation.

The information provided by Wikipedia slanders the credibility of Alejandro because when someone tries to verify his information, the data found on Wikipedia contradicts factual information thereby creating confusion surrounding the details of the crimes in question. Wikipdeia may or may not be contributing to the crimes being investigated by the FBI however, the tenacity of Wikipedia in attacking factual information and replacing it with disinformation suggests Wikipedia has a motive for protecting the criminals targeting Alejandro Estrada and diluting Alex Estrada in the media.

It is one thing when a group of individuals act in orchestra to manipulate how information is presented in order to deceive the public, and it is an entirely different thing when a victim of a crime seeks retribution for their damages. From my understanding, a victim has the legal right not to be misrepresented with inaccurate information about them, therefore if Wikipedia does not honor the request to correct the disinformation then  Wikipedia may become liable. In addition, Wikipedia may be violating Alejandro's right to publicity among other rights. I am only a layperson, however, I believe it would be in Wikipedia's best legal interest to remove Alejandro Estrada until after the FBI closes their investigation.

Alejandro was born in 1978. Alejandro Estrada published Pandora, her Box and her Daddy's Curse in 2012 which was later republished Alejandro Carbajal Estrada in 2013. In 2009, music artist Lady Gaga released a song named after Alejandro and the hidden meaning behind the lyrics continue to be covered up with convoluted information.

Alejandro Estrada became a Wikipedia page in October 2008 which was created by user Primatesmx suggesting a violation of Wikipedia's policies because from my understanding, it is against Wikipedia's terms and conditions for individuals to create pages about themselves. Furthermore, Michael Goss was allegedly murdered in February 2009 which supports Alejandro's testimony thereby establishing premeditation by his perpetrators..

According to the Library of Congress as of 5/20/2014 these entries could not be found: Frugivores and seed dispersal / edited by Alejandro Estrada and Theodore H. Fleming. New perspectives in study of Mesoamerican primates : distribution, ecology, behavior and conservation / edited by Alejandro Estrada, Paul A. Garber, Mary S. M. Pavelka, LeAndra Luecke

This discrepancy was brought to Wikipedia's attention on 5/23/2014 and in fact, the only reliable records for Alejandro Estrada were Pandora, her Box and her Daddy's Curse and Alejandro Carbajal Estrada, which could explain Wikipedia's motive because when the page for Alejandro Estrada was created, Alejandro Estrada had not yet become a notable individual. Alejandro has since become a notable individual and in over 5 years it is strange that no one editing this page has been able to provide an image of Alejandro Estrada. It is also strange how nothing is referenced to Alejandro Estrada's presence in the media, especially considering his exposure.

So, with all that said, if the Library of Congress records have changed in any way, then it would establish a reason to subpoena the appropriate logs in order to audit the change logs to identity the individual, or individuals, with the authority to manipulate that data. Again, I am only a layperson, however, changing data in order to cover up a discrepancy might be considered an admission of guilt because on this level, doing so would be the equivalent to a Watergate scandal.

Webpage
http://alejandro-ladygaga.weebly.com

Webpage
http://alejandro-ladygaga.weebly.com
 * Date and time
 * 02:13, 25 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Jassoon007

 * Username
 * Jassoon007 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * In Hearts Wake ( filter log )


 * Description
 * Wikipedia has disallowed my edit unnecessarily when I was simply trying to rectify a slight information inaccuracy. I am deeply offended, and now strongly feel the need to end my life immediately. Wikipedia is now guilty of manslaughter.


 * Date and time
 * 13:22, 25 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Vandalism only account which is why you are now blocked 5 albert square (talk) 09:55, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

HMSLavender

 * Username
 * HMSLavender (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * User:HMSSolent ( filter log )


 * Description
 * I was previously - I changed my password back in April in the light of the Heartbleed bug but forgot the last four characters of the new password - further exacerbated by the lack of an email address attached to the old account. Nevertheless, I had checked the 'remember me' checkbox on my old account and kept it logged on until earlier today, when I was logged out of my old account. I was simply attempting to establish a connection between this new account and the old HMSSolent account.


 * Date and time
 * 13:47, 25 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You can't prove that you own that account.--Jasper Deng (talk) 01:05, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Can something not be done with a committed identity? Thanks, Mat  ty  .  007  13:16, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

189.4.15.22

 * Username
 * 189.4.15.22 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Page not specified


 * Description
 * Same Sex Marriage in the United States


 * Date and time
 * 13:57, 25 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

I was trying to organize the Same sex marriage page and it got this text: An automated filter has identified this edit as potentially unconstructive, and it has been disallowed. If this edit is constructive, please report this error.

189.4.15.22

 * Username
 * 189.4.15.22 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * [] ( filter log )


 * Description
 * organization


 * Date and time
 * 14:02, 25 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

i was trying to organize the page putting what happened state by state and it got the message: An automated filter has identified this edit as potentially unconstructive

76.170.88.72

 * Username
 * 76.170.88.72 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * User talk:GinAndChronically ( filter log )


 * Description
 * delete it since I do not need it


 * Date and time
 * 05:41, 26 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * If you are, ferel free to log in and do the edit. If not, please don't remove anything from that page. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:36, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Jackmoumdjian

 * Username
 * Jackmoumdjian (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Knife Party ( filter log )


 * Description
 * Someone vandalized the page to make every instance of the word 'Knife' become the word 'goat.' I'm trying to change them back but it won't let me.


 * Date and time
 * 07:40, 26 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

I can only think it's because the word knife was mentioned. I've changed it. Thanks for alerting us 5 albert square (talk) 10:24, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the edits; looking through the page again I found 6 more instances of the vandalism unchecked.

Schokonuss99

 * Username
 * Schokonuss99 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Knife Party ( filter log )


 * Description
 * I wanted to change "Goat Party" to "Knife Party" because the band is called Knife Party and NOT Goat Party


 * Date and time
 * 10:38, 27 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Intelligent username

 * Username
 * Intelligent username (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * John Green ( filter log )


 * Description
 * I want to make the description more correct by mentioning John Green is "made of awesome." This edit is necessary because it is his symbol of life "Don't Forget to be Awesome." He started Nerdfighteria, which is made of people who are made of awesome.


 * Date and time
 * 20:13, 27 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * "Awesome" is not well-defined. I doubt this is a serious attempt to improve the encyclopedia.--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:42, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Embed lui

 * Username
 * Embed lui (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Page not specified


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 03:12, 28 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Why are you trying to blank another users talk page? 5 albert square (talk) 23:25, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Digitopolis

 * Username
 * Digitopolis (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * A Virgin Among the Living Dead ( filter log )


 * Description
 * I was rewriting the poorly written plot outline as well as correcting information on when the film was shot. The previous editor "hyperboleically" claimed that no sources say that the film was shot in 1971 and I made a clarification. Unfortunately, this silly filter thought that my edit was unconstructive.


 * Date and time
 * 10:16, 29 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Patriot Donbassa

 * Username
 * Patriot Donbassa (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Talk:New Russia Party ( filter log )


 * Description
 * I am a newly registered user who wanted to point out that an article has been written in a emotionally loaded/biased manner. My comment was critical but I believe it to be a legitimate post. I criticized the inflationary use of words such as 'fascist', perhaps this word actually triggered the filter.


 * Date and time
 * 11:25, 29 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Will anything be made? I'm waiting for 2 days! Is this the way new users are greeted here? The filter obviously made a mistake there.Patriot Donbassa (talk) 10:08, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
 * You're obviously not a new user.Volunteer Marek (talk) 10:25, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
 * And you aren't by any chance using proxies to edit, are you? That would explain your "troubles".Volunteer Marek (talk) 10:30, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I'll post my original comment (have saved it in computer). So:

I noticed some problems with the article last week. It's kind of ridiculous to see people denying Svoboda or even the Right Sector are 'far-right' attaching the very label to an organization that was founded only recently. Cheap Soviet style agitprop. It was removed from the infobox, but the main text still reflects such exaggerations.

First, Alexander Prokhanov is strictly speaking not fascist. He was pro-Soviet and still is, blending procommunist and ultranationalist attitudes. But if you want to have a short description, he is not a fascist neither in the Western nor in the Soviet sense. The same goes for the supposed fascist political scientist and Eurasia Party leader Aleksandr Dugin. The best description for Dugin would still be (Neo-)Eurasianist, but because this word is descriptive and not emotionally loaded, the creators of this article of course prefer the curse word fascist used in an inflationary manner.

As for Pavel Gubarev, then it is also tendentious and outright dishonest to label him as 'a figure of the far-right', while his previous more important affiliation was with the Progressive Socialist Party of Ukraine, a hardleft party. All the figures I mentioned here may be thoroughly unpleasant, but really, folks, an encyclopedia should not be written in a primitive style of История Всесоюзной Коммунистической Партии (Большевиков): Краткий курс. Wikipedia can do better than that! Patriot Donbassa (talk) 10:42, 1 June 2014 (UTC).

142.161.166.135

 * Username
 * 142.161.166.135 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * User: Brandon Christopher ( filter log )


 * Description
 * Replace error-filled description of me.


 * Date and time
 * 15:10, 29 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * If that's really you, then log in to the account and you'll be able to edit it. Jackmcbarn (talk) 16:21, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Eduardhanslick

 * Username
 * Eduardhanslick (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Page not specified


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 17:43, 29 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

Paine Ellsworth

 * Username
 * Paine Ellsworth (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Le Silence de la mer (film) ( filter log )


 * Description
 * I was trying to fix a dead link by using a page at "archive.today". I received the pink box about a banned web archive called "archive.is", apparently a different website.  If they are not the same, then the filter may need a tweak.
 * If it helps, I have found that http://www.archive.is/ does redirect to http://archive.today/. So please point me in the right direction to see if I can get the ban removed?


 * Date and time
 * 18:01, 29 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * This report can be closed. Another solution has been found. –  Paine Ellsworth  C LIMAX !  18:35, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

103.14.60.223

 * Username
 * 103.14.60.223 (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * How to Top My Wife ( filter log )


 * Description
 * Adding synopsis, other film details, 2 references


 * Date and time
 * 21:10, 29 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

ConspiracyStuff

 * Username
 * ConspiracyStuff (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * User:ConspiracyStuff ( filter log )


 * Description
 * I was adding additional information about the Web series I enjoy on my own user page when the system stopped me, saying it's a potentially unconstructive edit. This is all because there are mentions of the Illuminati in my edit. I'm not vandalizing anything. I do it on my own profile or page. Thank you!


 * It is particularly the edit that says, "The Illuminati, Part 3: The Conspiratorial Future". The description says, "While skeptics believe the Illuminati disbanded in the 18th century, conspiracy theorists think the organization still exists and has nearly accomplished its ancient goals. But what are these goals?" I have no idea why this cannot be posted.


 * Date and time
 * 11:05, 30 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * UPDATE: This has already been resolved.

TSPkid

 * Username
 * TSPkid (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * F***face Unstoppable ( filter log )


 * Description
 * I Was trying to create a page for Bam Margera's Band, F***Face Unstoppable.


 * Date and time
 * 22:01, 30 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Unsurprisingly the filter rejects edits from new editors containing such expletives. Having said that, the band itself doesn't look notable and I'd suggest any information about it should be in Margera's article. Black Kite kite (talk) 00:05, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikisian

 * Username
 * Wikisian (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * TrueCrypt ( filter log )


 * Description
 * Adding a new section of information. I'm assuming the filter is because I included a citation which contained a YouTube link to a news interview. Everything about this edit is legitimate.


 * Date and time
 * 22:25, 30 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The YouTube link is fine. The problem is the archive.is link. Remove that and it will let you save. Jackmcbarn (talk) 22:29, 30 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Yes I noticed that when I looked at this filter log. The weird thing is, the filter warning specifically said "youtu.be", so I changed it to the full youtube URL and tried again. That's when it blocked the edit. Right after I filed this report and looked at the log and saw it stating the "archive.is" as the problem, I went back to the page to change it, and the text was actually the full url (http://archive.today/w3iQk). In any case I just used a different archive source and replaced that domain altogether. Might be a bug to look into regarding the way Wikipedia software sees that domain. Thanks for the quick response. --Wikisian (talk) 22:38, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

{{subst:Falsepositive |subst=subst:| username=71.234.197.10
 * page = i was trying to say moony22 your bad


 * description = jsj

<

Meowmeowyuhu

 * Username
 * Meowmeowyuhu (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Till Death Do Us Party ( filter log )


 * Description
 * I'm trying to fix this page, because the current edition was a mere copy of RuPaul's Born Naked page.


 * Date and time
 * 01:13, 31 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comments

CeeGee

 * Username
 * CeeGee (talk · contribs) ( filter log )


 * Page you were editing
 * Ebru Topçu ( filter log )


 * Description
 * Expanding International statistics and adding references


 * Date and time
 * 11:54, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Please forget this note. I found the reason in my edit why it didn't work. Sorry. --CeeGee 13:03, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Comments