Wikipedia:Edit filter/False positives/Archive 4

Andydavis1010

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Brielle Gerardi


 * Description
 * What you were doing Andydavis1010 (talk) 05:15, 30 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 05:15, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, but looking at the article you were creating, I don't really think we can use it because of our notability guideline. The trigger that set off the alarm was the word "poopy" near the end, however, not the content of the rest of the article. -- Soap Talk/Contributions 14:03, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments

Carlos1888

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Off_our_backs


 * Description
 * Any additional info


 * Date and time
 * 09:46, 30 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I only see true positives. Please, do not remove reflists, categories and do not add all cap words like 'RACISM'. Ruslik_ Zero 13:10, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

492star

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * List of Qin's Moon Characters


 * Description
 * I merged something wrong and

was trying to fix it, so i deleted 3 or 4 categories in the article.
 * Date and time
 * 06:10, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

I don't actually see anything in the edit filter log for that article. Your username shows a couple of other tags on other articles, but those are just notices that someone is creating an article about a movie, and isn't meant to be a sign of "bad" behavior. Thanks for reporting here nonetheless; every bit helps. -- Soap Talk/Contributions 14:05, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments

Ben Ginsburg

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Town Idiot25


 * Description
 * I got permission from the deleting admin to remake this page, which I procceded to make a legitimate page for, but it wouldn't let me. Ben Ginsburg (talk) 03:28, 30 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 03:28, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

It was because you wrote "YouTube Poop" in the article, which trips a filter that watches for the word "poop". I see you've managed to get the article up without YouTube Poop in it, though it has been nominated for deletion as being possibly non-notable. Also, I've added an exception for "youtube poop" now, as it seems to be tripping the filter quite a lot and is unlikely to be used in a vandal's edit. -- Soap Talk/Contributions 04:25, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments

gth867d

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Split-brain


 * Description
 * Massive update on page; contents in previous version of page were moved to other parts of the page


 * Date and time
 * 02:00, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

It looks to me like you made a mistake in your edit and accidentally removed some text that you didn't mean to. For example, you removed the links to the versions of the article on other wikis such as de:Split Brain. So in this case it would not be a false positive. I'll go ahead and restore those links and leave the rest of your edit unchanged. -- Soap Talk/Contributions 02:38, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments

Merlion444

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:86.143.158.122 What the user was trying to do


 * Description
 * Trying to give a Huggle Warning. NW ( Talk ) 19:31, 29 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 14:08, 29 November 2009


 * Comments


 * [[Image:Pictogram voting keep.svg|18px]] Fixed -- zzuuzz (talk) 19:44, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

MisterBroadway

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Jennifer Cody


 * Description
 * Adding page for actress of noteworthy interestMisterBroadway (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 00:49, 28 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Do you have the text saved? If you create the article again without the word "Poopsie" (just leave that line blank) it should be okay.  The only reason I'm reluctant to create the article myself is that if I did I'd be considered the creator of the article and all notices about it would go to me instead of you.  Note also that this particular filter only triggers on users who aren't autoconfirmed, so once your account is 4 days old and has 10 edits or more, you won't have to worry about it anymore. -- Soap Talk/Contributions 00:57, 28 November 2009 (UTC)


 * YesSoap, I do have the text saved. Thanks! I understand now what you mean by autoconfirmed. I will continue to make small edits and try again in 4 days? Or you can feel free to be the creater, I wouldn't be offended, unless you don't want to recieve the notices. I just feel that the page is notweorthy. thanks for your help, as I am a NEW editor. MisterBroadway (talk) 01:08, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Cjx360

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Pocket God


 * Description
 * None


 * Date and time
 * 00:32, 28 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * All i was doing was doing was adding an idea section so people would stop posting lies on the episode list saying those episodes were gonna come out so i just added a section where people could tell their ideas instead of lieng about their ideas
 * It's because the edit contained the word "pooping". If you removed that word it would go through.  I don't think your edit is a good idea, however, because Wikipedia articles aren't generally meant to contain suggestions for things for people to put there.  If you really want to it I would use the talk page Talk:Pocket God.  -- Soap Talk/Contributions 00:38, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

99.35.128.68

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Wikipedia talk:Glossary


 * Description
 * I simply tried to add " :Deleted it, as it was clearly vandalism. ~ " after actually having deleted the "Wikipedophile" entry from Wikipedia talk:Glossary. Since the edit went through when I cleared the section name in the edit summary, I gather the filter triggered on "Wikipedophile" because it was the section name auto-filled in the edit summary. Can filters be made smart enough to not trigger on the auto-filled section name of the edit summary?


 * Date and time
 * 07:12, 27 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * It does not make sense to add such an exception because section names containing "Wikipedophile" are rare (this was probably the only one). Ruslik_ Zero 13:47, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, it is possible to make it not trigger on edit summaries, but I think this filter was designed specifically for that purpose, because some vandals realize that it's more difficult for an administrator to hide an edit summary than to hide something else, and so they use their edit summaries to vandalize. This filter is not publically accessible, so I can't read it, but I gather it was designed mainly to stop people from writing things such as "[editor name] is a pedophile" (and this would include people innocently replying in a section name with that title).  -- Soap Talk/Contributions 13:59, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

jakey1999

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Rahi Poop


 * Description
 * Creating an article


 * Date and time
 * 03:16, 27 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

That's not really a false positive, sorry. This is the very sort of article that this filter was meant to prevent. -- <B>Soap</B> Talk/Contributions 03:27, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Jeffwegener
Username:Jeffwegener | Editing: Every Time I Die | Description: Attempting to add newest DVD, "Party Pooper," released with special edition of New Junk Aesthetic (2009), to list of DVDs released. Apparently the word "poop" is a red flag.
 * Thanks for reporting that; I've gone ahead and added your edit to the page. This particular error has come up before, as here; I think it should be added as an exception. At any rate, this particular filter only triggers on users who aren't äutoconfirmed, so once your account is 4 days old and has 10 edits or more, you won't have to worry about it anymore. -- <B>Soap</B> Talk/Contributions 23:08, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

216.59.225.251

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Death of a Salesman


 * Description
 * Attempting to remove a series of questionable edits by multiple other IPs, by reverting to the last good version. I made my edit, attempted to save, got the CAPTCHA, answered it, attempted to save, got the "Removing large amount of material" warning, attempted to save, got another CAPTCHA, answered it, got the "Removing large amount of material" warning, attempted to save, got another CAPTCHA... it appears that this excess-removal warning interacts badly with the CAPTCHA system such that if they both trigger, then it is impossible to actually save the page. 216.59.225.251 (talk) 21:55, 26 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 21:55, 26 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

I'm not sure why that is. I'll let the people who manage the filters know about this; in the meantime all I can say is that I recommend you register an account so you won't have to deal with captchas and won't have to deal with most of the edit filters either. Also, I found the edit history of that page confusing, but it seems to me that although you removed the vandalism, you removed some good content too and so I've restored it. I'm confused only because I'm not sure where that good content came from, as I don't see it anywhere in the edit history except on that one vandal's edits. -- <B>Soap</B> Talk/Contributions 22:27, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I didn't remove anything. The system wouldn't let me edit the page. 216.59.225.251 (talk) 22:39, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, the edits that get filtered show up in a log file, so they're saved and are viewable, they just don't appear on the actual page. -- <B>Soap</B> Talk/Contributions 03:29, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Known defect. Because the edit filter doesn't carry over the CAPTCHA-solved state, and the CAPTCHA page doesn't carry over the edit filter warned state, anonymous and new users are completely prevented from making an edit that adds external links and triggers a filter set to warn. If you will be reverting vandalism often, please consider creating an account and editing unrelated articles for about a week; then most of the edit filters won't bother you. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 07:36, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Damian Yerrick, could you please share more details when exactly this defect happens? If it was like this all the time then it seems we wouldn't see any IP edit after triggering spam-related filters, like Link spamming. — AlexSm 04:00, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

kwik3h

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * One light out (band)


 * Description
 * What page you were creating band page


 * Date and time
 * What you were doing creating band page


 * Comments

I would recommend creating this article in your userspace first. Not only would it prevent triggering the abuse filter, but I'm afraid if you put the article up "live" it might get nominated for deletion. The band seems like it might meet the notability requirements, but the article in the state that you were trying to create it is not very encyclopedic. -- <B>Soap</B> Talk/Contributions 16:08, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Anyway, here it is, 2007 and we're older, fatter, balder and are still unsigned playing dives and getting drunk, which really ain't so bad... Shit.. We really do take this stuff seriously, and we love PUNK ROCK, so give us a hand buy a disc or a shirt or something and spread the word about OLO. AND COME TO SOME FUCKING SHOWS... We love you

I'm sorry, text like that is not appropriate for an encyclopedia.  Triplestop  x3  21:41, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree; I would leave that out. I note though that it seems to be a quote from a band member, not intended to be part of the article main text.  -- <B>Soap</B> Talk/Contributions 21:53, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

96.19.148.63

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * The Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentleman


 * Description
 * Converting references section to cite format. I am an experienced editor with many contributions. 96.19.148.63 (talk) 17:10, 25 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 17:10, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

no username here: The filter appears to be objecting to the word "cock" in the title of a journal article: "Sterne's Cock and Bull Story". Temporary fixed in article by using spelling "(ock".
 * Comments


 * You're correct; that's a genuine false positive. I recommend registering an account so that you will not have to worry about problems like that in the future. I've gone ahead and fixed the edit for you (I did it yesterday, actually, but forgot to reply here). -- <B>Soap</B> Talk/Contributions 16:03, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Krupkina

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Terentia


 * Description
 * Had to repaste the whole article because my session had timed out and I could not remember what I saved and didn't save. Instead of going through and reading every part again I simply pasted in the complete copy which I was keeping on the side just in case the session gets timed outKrupkina (talk) 09:30, 25 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 09:30, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for reporting this. The filters seem to be working just as they should, and there's really no way that a filter will ever be able to tell the difference between a "malicious" deletion and the kind that you had made. But don't worry about it, because even well established editors sometimes accidentally delete content from a page (I did it the other night, but quickly caught the mistake and fixed it). As a side note, this particular filter only triggers on editors who are not yet autoconfirmed, which means that in 4 days you won't have to worry about it anymore. -- <B>Soap</B> Talk/Contributions 13:37, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments

mBallethist_2

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Western Stereotype of the Male Ballet Dancer


 * Description
 * Adding info


 * Date and time
 * 12:51, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

This is one example where I can't tell exactly what caused the filter to trigger, but I do know that it definitely shouldn't be, so I'm going to bring this up with the edit filter managers and see if they can fix the behavior so that things like this won't happen in the future. I'm sorry your article had to get deleted. It looks like a good article to me. I'd go ahead and create the article for you, but from looking at the details of the filters, that might not solve the problem, since you wouldn't even be able to edit it. Nonetheless, I will paste the article into your userspace for now. Im sorry this had to happen and I hope you dont get discouraged. -- <B>Soap</B> Talk/Contributions 13:15, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * The article right now is at User:MBallethist 2/Ballet. As I said before, I don't even think you can edit it right now, which is an unfortunate problem that I'm going to try to bring up with the administrators in the hope that this won't happen in the future.  At any rate, if you want to wait 4 days and make 10 edits to Wikipedia within that time, you'll be considered autoconfirmed and can go back to editing the page.  -- <B>Soap</B> Talk/Contributions 13:27, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Interesting that it doesnt seem to trigger when you build the article by piece as you're doing now. You might be okay from this point on.  -- <B>Soap</B> Talk/Contributions 13:32, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Chowdertheshow

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Mashup (video)


 * Description
 * There is a type of mashup called a "YouTube Poop" and I was trying to add it as such, but apparently, calling that type of mashup by its proper name of "YouTube Poop" is considered vandalism. Chowdertheshow (talk) 23:09, 23 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 23:09, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Yes, we had the same problem on this same page a few days ago. This particular filter only triggers on users who aren't autoconfirmed, so if you were to edit for four days and make at least 10 edits in that time, you would be free to talk about YouTube Poop or any other kind of poop without worrying about the filter. I apologize that it has to be this way, as this filter has triggered three false positives just today, but on the other hand it has also caught hundreds of true positives. -- <B>Soap</B> Talk/Contributions 23:24, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * I've gone ahead and added the edit for now, though as I've said twice before, there's no reliable source for it; the best I can do is Wikia YouTube. -- <B>Soap</B> Talk/Contributions 23:33, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Lately, the "poop" and "is gay" filters have gotten so bad that I felt the need to add a paragraph about the edit filter to Profanity. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 06:12, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

X-N2O

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Advanced_Encryption_Standard


 * Description
 * Contributing to external links with ORIGINAL LICENSED content X-N2O (talk) 15:50, 23 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 15:50, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

It's because the link you were adding contains "x-n2o", which is the same as your username. A silly little rule, but it actually helps us stop spam more often than not. Since you've been here for a year I'm going to assume you're not intent on spamming us, or you would have done it a long time ago. This particular filter triggers until you have 100 edits so in this case I can't say "make a few more edits and you'll be OK". -- <B>Soap</B> Talk/Contributions 16:02, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * On second thought, it looks like your edit went through, although it was "flagged" as suspicious. Thanks for reporting it. -- <B>Soap</B> Talk/Contributions 16:07, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Every single one of this user's edits is adding a site with his own username in the domain name. Today he has been repeatedly adding a blog post written yesterday. The tagging is completely fair. Haakon (talk) 16:43, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Agreed. He's edit-warring to try and keep a link in the Advanced Encryption Standard article which three editors (so far) have removed.  I wouldn’t have caught this without the tag.  I just gave him a 3rr warning. Samboy (talk) 19:07, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

davidkelliher

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * EMMA_(accelerator)


 * Description
 * Clarifying the type of accelerator from non-scaling FFAG to linear non-scaling FFAG


 * Date and time
 * 15:45, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Even though you didn't actually type FAG, the way the MediaWiki software handles diffs means that inserting a word on a line means that anything after it on the same line is treated as "new" text. I don't know if there's any way to fix this problem currently, but thank you for reporting it. This particular filter will stop bothering you as soon as you reach 10 edits (right now you have 7). -- <B>Soap</B> Talk/Contributions 15:58, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * I've gone on to make the edit for you. -- <B>Soap</B> Talk/Contributions 16:07, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

cm0n3y34

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Is It a Good Idea to Microwave This?


 * Description
 * Adding the list of episodes to the page.


 * Date and time
 * 23:04, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

It's because one of the episodes contained the word "poop". I would add the edit, but I don't think the article really needs a list of 180 episodes, particularly since it's up for deletion at Articles for deletion/Is it a good idea to microwave this. However, if it survives its deletion attempt, you should be able to add the episode list in a few days, because you will have achieved autoconfirmed status. -- <B>Soap</B> Talk/Contributions 01:15, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments

98.21.188.187

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * page


 * Description
 * Adding info


 * Date and time
 * 21:01, 21 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

I was editing Solon High School as all references to Anthony Sanson is all incorrect. I went to the high school and know that the mascot is not a ribeye steak. I am trying to clean up the site.
 * The edit was denied because you wrote "is gay" in the alma mater section. If this was a mistake, please be more careful next time.  I've gone ahead and reverted the vandal edits that you were trying to clean up. -- <B>Soap</B> Talk/Contributions 21:12, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Sirakhwiki

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Marc Swanson


 * Description
 * The Wikipedia entry for Marc Swanson is out-of-date, inaccurate, and missing vital information. I was adding more information (all properly documented and footnoted) and correcting the various errors found in the entry. Not sure what I could have done to trigger the autofilter. Please help! I want this entry to be good. Sirakhwiki (talk) 17:57, 21 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 17:57, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

I don't see any hits on the Edit filter from your name. Were you editing while logged out? -- <B>Soap</B> Talk/Contributions 18:02, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments
 * If you are, I think the filter triggered because you added the word "gay" to the article, even though it was a legitimate. There is currently no way to distinguish between legitimate and illegitimate uses of this word.  -- <B>Soap</B> Talk/Contributions 21:17, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Paspche

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Mashup (video)


 * Description
 * I was adding a section of text that was not vandalious in any way, shape or form. It directly stated the truthful names of the most common video mashups, techniques, and the profile names of the most well known mashup makers. Text that was used is here: "The bulk of these "mashups" are also referred to as "Youtube Poops" or YTPs. YTPs often utilize a wide range of different techniques, including the ones mentioned above, to create their "poops". Some of the most well known (and in some people's opinions, the most well liked) "Poopers" include: WalrusGuy, Deppercut, BMATF (or bigmarioandtailsfan), SSBMEXPERT, thechairman45, wikiwow, boogidyboo, captpan6, oiramapap (also known as igiulamam), Vorhias, Youtubepoop, StegBlob, MeiAIDS, IkwaylxZ, Jaklub, and IAMGOOMBA just to name a few. YTP has gone under many slogans and pictures, though most pictures incorporate the YouTube logo(often modified) and the words poop somewhere in the picture, and are often accompanied by the line "Where there's smoke, they pinch back." Also, an under-promoted news group, YTPNews, headed on the profile YTPnews1, has been on youtube for some time now, and provides sources, a "poop of the week", and often random bits of information relating to YTPs." There is nothing malicious about this block of text. The term "Youtube Poop" is commonly used on YouTube (Don't believe me? do a video search of Youtube poop and you will come up with thosands, maybe even millions, of videos that are "Youtube Poops". The rightful name of these videos should be capable of being utilized in Wikipedia, to prevent censorship. (Does the recent incident where a German murder filed a lawsuit against Wikipedia, causing Wikipedia to object, calling it censorship, ring any bells here?)


 * Date and time
 * 00:12, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

I'm familiar with YouTube Poop, yes. I'm not sure if the edit you attempted to make is verifiable enough to stand, but you can bring it up on Talk:Mashup (video) if you like, because the talk pages of articles aren't watched in the same way the articles themselves are. Also, this particular filter only triggers on users who aren't "autoconfirmed", so if you were to register an account and edit for four days with it and make at least 10 edits in that time, you would be free to talk about YouTube Poop or any other kind of poop without worrying about the filter. I apologize that it has to be this way, as this filter has triggered three false positives just today, but on the other hand it has also caught hundreds of true positives. -- <B>Soap</B> Talk/Contributions 01:55, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments

206.126.170.20

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Burger World (Beavis and Butt-head)


 * Description
 * The last edit seems to be mangled, either the last editor was trying to replace or delete something, but I couldn't figure out the intent, since the article is somewhat mangled now, I tried to revert to the previous version, but was prevented from doing do. 206.126.170.20 (talk) 01:26, 18 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 01:26, 18 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * The edit was disallowed because it contained the phrase "Dr Poop", and currently the filter is set to block the word "poop" except in certain exempt phrases such as "poop deck". I've gone ahead and reverted the other edit now so it should be OK.  Thanks for reporting this here. This filter may need to be pacified a bit since it has triggered at least three false positives just today, though I'm not sure if this is typical.  -- <B>Soap</B> Talk/Contributions 01:51, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

71.121.115.243

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Template:SpongeBob SquarePants


 * Description
 * trying to revert to an ealier non-vandalized version, your bot seems to think that i am the vandal  (note: this edit was added by 71.121.115.243  -- <B>Soap</B> Talk/Contributions


 * Date and time
 * 16:49, 17 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

gaw, sorry about that. It reverted you because the word "poop" was (legitimately) part of your edit. I really think "party pooper" should be an exception to this rule. -- <B>Soap</B> Talk/Contributions 18:45, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

JBoucher220

 * Username


 * Page you were editing(don't wikilink)
 * Fanboy_and_Chum_Chum


 * Description
 * Adding info to page.


 * Date and Time
 * 17:05, 16 November 2009

Thanks for reporting that here. I've gone ahead and added your edit to the page, and standardized the spelling to "Poopatine". Once you make 10 edits with this account, you should be okay and not have to worry about most of the edit filters. -- <B>Soap</B> Talk/Contributions 02:08, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Comments

channelwatcher

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Institute for Historical Review


 * Description
 * Inserting a paragraph and making a link. I was unsure how to make the link and had to try several times Channelwatcher (talk) 00:21, 14 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 00:21, 14 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

I think you clicked a "link" button and then forgot to remove the [link title] code that it generated. -- <B>Soap</B> Talk/Contributions 22:54, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

60.240.126.92

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Jessica Drake


 * Description
 * Fixing the name of a film the actress won an award for from "FU*CK" to its uncensored title, "FUCK"


 * Date and time
 * 07:19, 13 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I suppose that * symbol was put to avoid problems with filters. It was a bad idea to remove it. Ruslik_ Zero 13:37, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Since "FUCK" apparently is the correct title, it was/would've been a good idea to remove it, per WP:NOTCENSORED. I've therefore removed the asterisk. --Conti|✉ 14:13, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

ratson

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * External links


 * Description
 * add external link to http://www.ratson.com for adding more information about landing craft


 * Date and time
 * 02:29, 11 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The filter correctly warned you for adding a link to your own website. This is considered spam. Someguy1221 (talk) 03:06, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

cubbiegirl14

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Fixer Chao


 * Description
 * Created literary page


 * Date and time
 * 20:03, 10 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * It caught the description of William Paulinha's sexual orientation. Too many new users of Wikipedia vandalize pages with possibly defamatory comments related to a living person's sexual orientation. Wikipedia takes defamation of living people very seriously, and this edit filter errs on the side of safety. If you spend a week editing unrelated pages before writing about sexual orientations, the filter will assume you are serious about improving the encyclopedia. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 22:26, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

69.247.170.20

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * St. James Academy


 * Description
 * Adding info


 * Date and time
 * 16:50, 9 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I was just adding info about our state championships when I received the error.
 * I do not see any false positives in logs. Ruslik_ Zero 14:33, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Bezoar
I've changed ox to ox. The edit was not accepted... 01:20, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I changed the filter so that shouldn't happen again. Sorry for the inconvenience.   Wknight94  <sup style="color: blue;">talk  02:29, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

65.92.126.95

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Wayside School Gets A Little Stranger


 * Description
 * There was actually a chapter that was called "Mr. Poop" in that story, but the abuse filter caught that even though my edit was constructive.


 * Date and time
 * 22:27, 5 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The filter was triggered by "Mr. Poop". Ruslik_ Zero 09:00, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Town9

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Town Nine Times


 * Description
 * Town9 (talk) 13:54, 5 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 13:54, 5 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * When you create an article directly in the mainspace you do not need to use {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} template. Ruslik_ Zero 08:55, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Hooligandrift

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Driftboarding


 * Description
 * What you were doing Hooligandrift (talk) 20:17, 4 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 20:17, 4 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Your edit was blocked because it contained the word "poop". While this may have been a false positive, the article would have been deleted anyway for being on a non-notable topic. Someguy1221 (talk) 03:45, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Theuniverseisfalling

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Theuniverseisfalling


 * Description
 * trying to create a new page. it said it was potentially unconstructive. it was small yes but so?!?


 * Date and time
 * 06:36, 4 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You were creating an article about yourself. Not only is this strongly discouraged, the article would have been immediately deleted anyway as non-notable. Someguy1221 (talk) 07:38, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

98.113.187.11

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Sex toy


 * Description
 * General copyedit/cleanup 98.113.187.11 (talk) 10:01, 2 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 10:01, 2 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * It is dangerous to edit articles about sex. Ruslik_ Zero 09:14, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Yet it is entirely appropriate around here, even for anons. The filter "just" warned, but it didn't disallow, as far as I can see. I'm not sure if it'll be possible for such edits not to hit the usual profanity filters. --Conti|✉ 14:15, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
 * By "dangerous" I meant that it triggered three filters simultaneously, one of which (9) would have disallowed the edit if the user attempted to save it. Anyway, due to a known bug the "warn->tag->warn" sequence is an equivalent of "disallow". Ruslik_ Zero 14:35, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh, I didn't know that. Filter 9 should probably be modified accordingly, then. Maybe so it excludes articles in Category:Human sexuality or something. --Conti|✉ 14:45, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
 * whatever the problem, the edits i attempted were all, i believe, constructive and...while they might perhaps trigger a warning filter (it is rather difficult to edit article ABOUT sex without using sexual terms)...should not have been disallowed when i hit "save" again. if anything, it should have hit a pending hopper whereby a registered user could review and approve or disapprove of pending edits.   (i had not looked at this "false positive" page for some days following the "it is dangerous to to edit articles about sex" rather dismissive response.)--98.113.187.11 (talk) 10:35, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Kbdixon

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User:Chalant (Musician)


 * Description
 * Adding info


 * Date and time
 * 09:06, 2 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The page I was moving was constructive because I was trying to remove the "user" out of the title, from "User:Chalant (Musician)" to "Chalant (Musician)".
 * The page promotional and was deleted. In any case you are not supposed to move userpages of other users. Ruslik_ Zero 09:01, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

202.61.210.15

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User_talk:Sandbox for user warnings


 * Description
 * Adding to page.


 * Date and time
 * 01:01, 2 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The filter only caught it because you were blanking the rest of the page. I checked, and this seems to be the first false positive caused by that page in the 3000+ edits the filter has disallowed. But I'm adding it as an exception, anyway. Anyone can feel free to reverse my change. Someguy1221 (talk) 01:13, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

69.228.171.150

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:Jakob.scholbach/zeteo


 * Description
 * I left a message there that should have gone on the user's main talkpage, then tried to self-revert it so I could put it in the right place. The edit filter didn't like my trying to blank the page even though it was a self-revert. 69.228.171.150 (talk) 22:11, 31 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 22:11, 31 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Since you created the page, it would need to be deleted, not blanked (you can't undo creation). I deleted it for you. Prodego  <sup style="color:darkgreen;">talk  22:14, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Blanking would have been enough to avoid leaving the message in two places, of course. 69.228.171.150 (talk) 22:20, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

MegaSloth

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Abel (disambiguation)


 * Description
 * Removed a single category, leaving disambig, which places disambiguation pages in the correct category. This was normal category management not removal of all categories and certainly not vandalism.


 * Date and time
 * 00:16, 31 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Well. I added disambiguation templates to exceptions. Ruslik_ Zero 18:37, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Daytonasplendor

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Sheldon Cooper


 * Description
 * There was a simple spelling error (contray) and I fixed it (contrary).


 * Date and time
 * 18:00, 30 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Yes, I have already left a message on the reporter's talk page. I made the edit and hopefully the filter won't cause a problem again.   Wknight94  <sup style="color: blue;">talk  18:01, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

EZDOM24

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * I was replacing the references


 * Description
 * I was re doing my references and accidentally deleted them all and had to re enter Them. I am new to editing wikipedia. sorry. Ezdom24 (talk) 06:22, 29 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 06:22, 29 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * It's OK to make mistakes. Don't worry about it. But as to the edits you made, you may find it easier to not do it all at once. Add the content first, then the references in another edit if it's too complicated. Someguy1221 (talk) 06:34, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

76.15.67.184

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * The_True_Confessions_of_Charlotte_Doyle


 * Description
 * I meant to help clean up the page but I accidentally somehow deleted everything. I am very unfamiliar with Wikipedia editing.


 * Date and time
 * 22:40, 27 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * OK. Just be more careful. Anything you remove from the edit box will disappear from the article. Someguy1221 (talk) 23:43, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Paganutekar

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Nothing New


 * Description
 * was adding a page for a web series. This web series exists and can be found on the IMDb.


 * Date and time
 * 12:48, 27 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You can't use the word "gay" until your account has been registered for four days and has ten edits. Someguy1221 (talk) 18:29, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

64.38.197.208

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * David Rivkin


 * Description
 * was previously a biography stub with no content. I am attempting to turn it into a disamb page


 * Date and time
 * 08:12, 26 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * This one is probably too complicated/rare to code an exception for. But you were able to make the edit, which means the filters that caught you aren't too restrictive. Someguy1221 (talk) 18:14, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Patkenel

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 2010 Olympic torch relay route


 * Description
 * Currently working on this exhaustive list


 * Date and time
 * 09:31, 25 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I've adjusted the filter accordingly. You should now be able to make this edit. -- zzuuzz (talk) 10:08, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

riverboat0rocks

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Every Time I Die


 * Description
 * adding 'Paty Pooper' [a dvd that came with their 2009 album 'New Junk Aesthetic]to the DVD section Riverboat0rocks (talk) 05:11, 23 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 05:11, 23 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Yeah, unfortunately this is one you'll have to live with for a short time. Until you get more established, "poop" is going to be disallowed.  The simple fact is that a new/unestablished user adding "poop" to an article - in any form - is 99.9% of the time just childish vandalism.   Wknight94  <sup style="color: blue;">talk  14:20, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Should a mention of broad edit filters like this be made on WP:NOTCENSORED and WP:Profanity? --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 01:55, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The problem is not profanity per se. The real problem is vandalism. So, I do not think it should be mentioned in those guidelines. Ruslik_ Zero 09:17, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

ActiveRecord (PHP)
ActiveRecord (PHP) Sorry, I managed to save this article under the wrong name first. Resulting in 2 articles, please help me clean this up. And sorry again, I tried my best to change the situation to the better. Next time I will start in userspace. Thank you and all the best. --John802 (talk) 21:59, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Why Not A Duck

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Wikipedia:Reference desk/Computing


 * Description
 * 70.167.58.6 added a legitimate seeming comment to the page and somehow it got tagged repeating characters though I don't really see any. Why Not A Duck 22:54, 21 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 22:54, 21 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Yes, unfortunately, the field the filter checks for repeating characters also gets the paragraph before and the paragraph after what was actually added. In this case, the paragraph before had a set of repeating #'s.   Wknight94  <sup style="color: blue;">talk  00:57, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

72.148.44.10

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * List of HIV-positive television characters


 * Description
 * I attempted to add four television series episodes to the list, including one of "St. Elsewhere" from 1983 that was the first scripted TV series episode about AIDS, but an automatic filter rejected it.72.148.44.10 (talk) 00:09, 21 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 00:09, 21 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Your edit mentioned a character's sexual orientation. The edit filter disallowed your edit because too many anonymous editors vandalize articles with personal attacks accusing other people of having a specific sexual orientation. It erred on the side of caution so as not to defame a living person. If you want to write about sexual orientation in an article, please create an account and edit other articles first. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 18:16, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

CUREepilepsy

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Citizens United for Research in Epilepsy


 * Description
 * Adding our Board members' bios from our website. We are not advertising, we are a non-profit organization giving people relevant information about epilepsy. CUREepilepsy (talk) 17:24, 20 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 17:24, 20 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Your username implies that you have a conflict of interest. Ruslik_ Zero 18:19, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Saxaphony

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Imaad Wasif


 * Description
 * Trying to save updated information


 * Date and time
 * 05:54, 19 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Your edit mentioned a record label named after an informal word for defecation. The edit filter disallowed your edit because too many anonymous editors vandalize articles with childish jokes about defecation. If you want to write about organizations named after defecation in an article, please spend a few days improving articles in other subject areas first so that the filter will assume that you are a serious editor. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 15:07, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

TeacherJacob

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Irwin Schiff


 * Description
 * Adding info whoever is saxsphony is a idiot


 * Date and time
 * 13:57, 18 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

This is a biased article. and yesterday I tried to add a segment to provide balance and depth; it was removed by some bigot overnight. I restored it today, but the auto filter was triggered


 * You were injecting your own original research and personal opinions into the article. The edit filter worked just fine. Someguy1221 (talk) 06:26, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Suffusion of Yellow

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Computer network operations


 * Description
 * Reverting spam that was added by 82.127.62.190. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 00:14, 18 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 00:14, 18 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Yesterday you was a new user making multiple reverts in a short period of time. The filter tagged one of your reverts for further review. Tomorrow you will become an autoconfirmed user, and this filter will not tag your edits again. Ruslik_ Zero 08:40, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

98.248.33.198

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Vicki Gunvalson


 * Description
 * Attempting to redirect a badly done stub to the main article. 98.248.33.198 (talk) 20:55, 17 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 20:55, 17 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

76.19.137.40

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Washington Monument


 * Description
 * Adding info; simply adding a Family Guy pop culture reference. I presume this false positive was because I quoted Peter's comment of how it "looks a lot like a penis", which is the point of the reference


 * Date and time
 * 19:09, 17 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * It was not the abuse filter, who reverted your edit. It was ClueBot. Please, report problems with this bot here. Ruslik_ Zero 19:24, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

76.19.137.40

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Road to the Multiverse


 * Description
 * Adding info; simply listing the universes. I presume this false positive was because one of the universes had "attractive men in swimsuits", and there were various random pop culture links


 * Date and time
 * 19:09, 17 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Your edit mentioned an urge to defecate. The edit filter disallowed your edit because too many anonymous editors vandalize articles with childish jokes about defecation. If you want to write about defecation in an article, please create an account and edit other articles first. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 15:04, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

99.241.110.76

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Mer Bleue Conservation Area


 * Description
 * Adding info


 * Date and time
 * 17:07, 17 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

user|miami33131 Mer Bleue Conservation Center Editing: mistake in summary of history
 * This is true positive (vandalism). Ruslik_ Zero 17:54, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

miami33131

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Premier Cruises


 * Description
 * signed by a mistake


 * Date and time
 * 18:55, 16 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You basically answered your own question. You don't need to sign speedy deletion requests.   Wknight94  <sup style="color: blue;">talk  15:16, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Kaalendaar

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Malayalam Calendar


 * Description
 * Removing vandalism Kaalendaar (talk) 11:04, 17 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 11:04, 17 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I don't see you removing vandalism. It looks like you were deleting most of the article.  Please try discussing on the talk page instead.   Wknight94  <sup style="color: blue;">talk  15:19, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

William M. Connolley
You can't spell: Plewase note that content, other than discussion, isn't yours to sign...

The actual error was adding my name to File:File-Dgv-surfbal-1.gif William M. Connolley (talk) 13:20, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Added exception for File: namespace. (Not sure what you mean by "Plewase" portion).   Wknight94  <sup style="color: blue;">talk  15:10, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

JaiQ13

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Shanell aka SnL


 * Description
 * Adding info


 * Date and time
 * 02:06, 16 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Trying to create new article.
 * Do not insert template into articles, which you create in the mainspace. Ruslik_ Zero  12:38, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

2006672051kang09

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * St. Joseph Home for the Aged


 * Description
 * substantial adding of information to the page. I suppose the error arose because it was almost replacing the entire content originally on the page. But the amount of content prior to the change intended was little. 2006672051kang09 (talk) 12:48, 15 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 12:48, 15 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The error appeared because (a) you removed all categories, which you should not have done (b) you inserted your signature into the text, which you should not have done either. Ruslik_ Zero 12:33, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Dinoguy1000

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Talk:Tactical Evolution


 * Description
 * I was attempting to remove the project banner from this talk page, as the article has been merged/redirected to Yu-Gi-Oh! Trading Card Game sets. While it's mildly entertaining that I am suddenly a sockpuppet, I'd appreciate being able to make this edit and not be troubled by this filter in the future. =D 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 17:33, 14 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 17:33, 14 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I tweaked the filter and also deleted the talk page for you. Sorry for the inconvenience.   Wknight94  <sup style="color: blue;">talk  17:58, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Cool, thanks for the speedy reply. =) 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 19:36, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Terri Brown

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Jean Sasson


 * Description
 * Someone keeps going onto the Jean Sasson page and stating that she is a promiment member of Feminists for Life. This is false information. Therefore I removed all references to Feminists for Life. I do not know what the group is making this false statement. Please help me to keep it off. Thank you.


 * Date and time
 * 18:03, 12 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

jojomacquade

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Ospreys (rugby team)


 * Description
 * trying to change the scoreboard some of the results were wrong


 * Date and time
 * 18:06, 9 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * It looks like this user has been blocked indefinitely for vandalism. Aiken&#39;s drum (talk) 12:51, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * This isn't a false positive - it appears that the user was, in fact, removing lots of text from the article. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:50, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Microvb

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Microvb


 * Description
 * Creating a new page


 * Date and time
 * 12:35, 10 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I do not think this is a false positive. You clearly have a conflict of interest, as you your username suggests. Ruslik_ Zero 18:28, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

69.46.103.131

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Uniforms of the Canadian Forces


 * Description
 * I was changing approx 4 lines of text relating to the Calgary Highlanders full dress and patrol dress uniforms. Definitely NOT editing or removing a large amount of content...


 * Date and time
 * 18:55, 9 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The filter log says otherwise—you nearly blanked the article. Ruslik_ Zero 18:31, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

75.197.45.105

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/GeoJSON


 * Description
 * Adding info


 * Date and time
 * 04:31, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

I was creating a new article. There was no blank space.
 * Comments


 * Still there were long strings of whitespace characters. Ruslik_ Zero 18:42, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Computer code examples should not trigger the warning. 75.199.12.198 (talk) 03:30, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I added exception for Articles for creation. Ruslik_ Zero 09:11, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Daveosmitho

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Aiden keane


 * Description
 * Adding info


 * Date and time
 * 21:56, 8 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

tryingto create page on surufc
 * These attempted edits were vandalism. Ruslik_ Zero 18:45, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

142.33.90.42

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Developmental disability


 * Description
 * Redirecting page to mental retardation. It's the same thing. 142.33.90.42 (talk) 19:41, 8 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 20:28, 8 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Not a false positive. Per Developmental disability, "Frequently, people with mental retardation, cerebral palsy, autism spectrum disorder, various genetic and chromosomal disorders such as Down syndrome and Fragile X syndrome, and Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder are described as having developmental disabilities."  That's a lot of things besides mental retardation.  NawlinWiki (talk) 20:29, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

djweb7

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * S.U.C.H.


 * Description
 * Adding info


 * Date and time
 * 23:10, 6 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I am djweb7 and i was making a page called S.U.C.H.
 * Can you create page without word "poop"? Ruslik_ Zero 18:54, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

98.248.33.198

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Moonbus


 * Description
 * Attempting to remove an invalid, redlinked See also listing. 98.248.33.198 (talk) 19:11, 5 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 19:11, 5 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

Track Listing:
 * 1) CUSTOM CARS & CLIPS (produced by: Schife)
 * 2) SEXY WHITE SAND (produced by: Phil 4 Real)
 * 3) BREAK IT DOWN (ft Bun B) (produced by: Don Logan)
 * 4) GO (ft Birdman) (produced by: Schife)
 * 5) HUSTLA (ft Akon) (produced by: Cool n Dre)
 * 6) TRICKN OFF (ft Gucci Mane) (produced by: Drumma Boy)
 * 7) THROW IT IN THE SKY (produced by: The Olympics)
 * 8) ERRYDAY (ft Young Jeezy & J.Dub) (produced by: Schife)
 * 9) CUSTOMIZED (produced by: Schife)
 * 10) GANGSTA SHIT (ft The Game) (produced by: B Rock Agee)
 * 11) FINER THINGS (ft Masspike Miles) (produced by: The Olympics)
 * 12) CHICKN TALKN (ft Mac 10) (produced by: The Olympics)
 * 13) DIAMONDS & MAYBACHS (ft Suede Royale) (produced by: The Olympics)
 * 14) 2010 SUPERBOWL (produced by: Schife)
 * 15) YAMS PT 2 (ft Yo Gotti) (produced by: Drumma Boy)

reported as unconstructive ???
 * Fixed the problem, thanks for the report. NawlinWiki (talk) 23:58, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

199.69.68.28

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * SuperDisk


 * Description
 * Correcting how the ref element was used by adding a references element. 12.74.50.203 (talk) 00:36, 5 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 00:36, 5 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * It reacted to the " Link title " at the bottom - not part of your intended edit. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:41, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Samus starwind

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Dinner


 * Description
 * What you were doing Samus starwind (talk) 22:03, 4 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 22:03, 4 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Is the word "poop" so necessary? Ruslik_ Zero 18:55, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes. This Dadaist form of fan edit is called "YouTube Poop". But that alone doesn't make the edit constructive. For one thing, YouTube Poop isn't notable yet. For another, it'd be like mentioning that Stephen Colbert incident in Elephant rather than in Wikipedia_in_culture, where it fits better. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 22:53, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

NewEditionFanClub

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Heads of State (R&B Group)


 * Description
 * Entering the NewEditionFanClub.com web site for references. NewEditionFanClub (talk) 21:03, 4 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 21:03, 4 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * This does not appear to be a false positive. The tag correctly identified the conflict of interest between User:NewEditionFanClub and the link he posted to NewEditionFanClub dot com.  Them From  Space  00:40, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

azthomasza

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Continuous Call Team


 * Description
 * Adding Information about Song lyrics to their songs played on the song


 * Date and time
 * 14:48, 3 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Please don't quote copyrighted lyrics in a free content encyclopedia. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 22:43, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

sv.andrei

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Ştefan cel Mare University of Suceava


 * Description
 * This page was a stub so I start editing, after writing the introduction and trying to save it gives me this "nonconstructive edit error". Sv.andrei (talk) 20:00, 3 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 20:00, 3 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * It reacted to the word "ARACIS". I have now modified it so that it won't react to "RACIS" itself. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:26, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

transfire

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Cut (object-oriented programming)


 * Description
 * Tried to save but kept getting error about whitespace, but that b/c of code example, and it wont let me save


 * Date and time
 * 00:28, 3 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I wrote an article on the band The New Blockaders, with cited sources.
 * I tweaked the filter. It will not catch such edits any more. Ruslik_ Zero 08:34, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Aiken's drum

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Florida State Road 72


 * Description
 * I removed a references section that had no references in it, and added an unreferenced template at the top. Aiken&#39;s drum (talk) 12:21, 1 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 12:21, 1 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I DID remove a large portion of the article. It consisted of the words 'I like waffles' repeated about one thousand times.  I believe that it's better now. Dante4848 (talk) 03:37, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * You removed reflist template while one reference was still present in the infobox (it was invisible). Ruslik_ Zero 09:10, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

DrChinchMagoo

 * Username

Jacob Groh
 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Description
 * I created the page but it will not work


 * Date and time
 * 07:12, 1 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * The filter worked as it was supposed to, and prevented you from creating an attack page. NawlinWiki (talk) 02:19, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

PrepJock101

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * List of Rugrats Characters


 * Description
 * Updating Drew Pickles' biography


 * Date and time
 * 23:33, 29 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * PrepJock101 (talk) 23:33, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * This is true positive. What you was doing is called vandalism. Ruslik_ Zero 09:12, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

38.116.200.85

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Theory of everything


 * Description
 * Tried to revert a blanker. First it said to do a captcha, then the filter message came up. It wouldn't let me revert the vandal because every time I completed the captcha the filter would activate, and vice versa, effectively making an endless loop. 38.116.200.85 (talk) 14:24, 29 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 14:24, 29 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The filter reacted to 'Dicke' and 'putative'. I fixed the problem. Ruslik_ Zero 15:08, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * When you say you fixed the problem, do you mean you just bypassed those words or did you fix the captcha/filter problem completely? Just curious. -38.116.200.85 (talk) 15:25, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I bypassed words. I can not fix captcha/filter problem—it requires site-wide changes in software. Ruslik_ Zero 18:36, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

NHPak

 * Username


 * Page you were editing
 * Music of NWFP


 * Description
 * Was trying to move article of Music of NWFP to Pashto music and put a redirect link on Music of NWFP!


 * Date and time
 * 18:45, 29 September 2009 (PST)


 * Comments


 * You should not move articles by copy-pasting content and redirecting. Such moves break history of articles. You should use move function. Ruslik_ Zero 18:46, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

78.149.100.67

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Dr Willoughby


 * Description
 * I was adding character descriptions and more information about the show, I created the page yesterday so was just adding more info


 * Date and time
 * 13:56, 29 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

98.248.33.198

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:Lesterdavid


 * Description
 * trying to change autobio to uw-autobio 98.248.33.198 (talk) 05:03, 27 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 05:03, 27 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * See below. Ruslik_ Zero 19:00, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Twinstalk

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Gordy Jones


 * Description
 * What you were doing Twinstalk (talk) 16:52, 28 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 16:52, 28 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You was warmed because you have a COI as your name indicates. Ruslik_ Zero 18:59, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

98.248.33.198

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:Johnlittle001


 * Description
 * attempting to change a COI tag on a user page. 98.248.33.198 (talk) 16:04, 26 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 16:04, 26 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * These filters apparently need a LOT more work to make them truly functional and not an impediment to valid edits. I'm starting to become disgusted by the high failure rate.


 * I switched the filter to the tag only mode. Ruslik_ Zero 18:55, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

98.248.33.198

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:NawlinWiki


 * Description
 * Trying to add a new section and the text, "A user has requested a copy of a page you deleted." Got the message "An automated filter has identified this edit as potentially unconstructive, and it has been disallowed."


 * Date and time
 * 03:18, 26 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

71.116.122.93

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Andrew Sullivan


 * Description
 * this diff couldn't really be called a possible BLP vio/vandalism, but it was tagged as such. Protonk (talk) 00:52, 26 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 00:52, 26 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Fixed. Ruslik_ Zero 18:34, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Lobinson
The page that I was saving that I edited was constructive.
 * Username


 * Page you were editing About birds. (INFORMATION)(don't wikilink)
 * Shabalabadingdong


 * Description ERROR
 * Editing Lobinson (talk) 10:33, 23 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 10:33, 23 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * What you were doing is called vandalism. Ruslik_ Zero 18:09, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

194.158.79.70

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * La Massana


 * Description
 * False positive caused by reformatting the to use the newly implemented parameters. 194.158.79.70 (talk) 02:23, 22 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 02:23, 22 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Fixed. Ruslik_ Zero 19:27, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

98.248.33.198

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Juando Cunningham


 * Description
 * Still needs some refinement so blanking of attack pages doesn't trigger an alert.


 * Date and time
 * 01:06, 22 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Fixed so that courtesy blanking while tagging with a db-attack or a db-g10 won't be caught by the filter. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:13, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I simply edited this article for clartity, and there are no reasons the filter should pick it up.

Adambentley

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Casper Andreas


 * Description
 * Updating info


 * Date and time
 * 16:42, 25 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

chrisjepson

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Aqua (band)


 * Description
 * added link to concert photos mentioned in the text Chrisjepson (talk) 13:25, 21 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 13:25, 21 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * It appears to have reacted to the word "GAY" which appears in the link. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:53, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

comfurtn

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * West Liberty, Kentucky


 * Description
 * Adding two new external links, no other changes. Kyle W. 03:55, 21 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 03:55, 21 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * In this edit you removed the categories (we need to use the  [  [Categroy:XXX]  ]  format, not the [Category:XXX] format.) And in this edit you put an extra blank line at the end of a section (not visible in the diff link). עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:11, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

207.237.223.118

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:Aaps59


 * Description
 * Wanted to revert myself; I had confused this user with another 207.237.223.118 (talk) 22:53, 20 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 22:53, 20 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * If you create a page, and then realize it was a mistake, please add a db-author tag to have the page deleted.

rockyisback25

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * page pitbull page


 * Description
 * Adding info adding extra info to help give readers a better understanding so if they saw a mixed breed they wouldn't say its a full breed


 * Date and time
 * 19:19, 19 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * It appears you were trying to use external images. To use an image, you must first upload it. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 09:06, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

fcqv

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Alexander Goehr


 * Description
 * Adding an external link to archive of material belonging to Alexander Goehr.


 * Date and time
 * 11:22, 19 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You added a link that contains your username, which is considered as a conflict of interest. The filter warned you about this fact. Ruslik_ Zero 12:02, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Peggoty1

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * citizenship


 * Description
 * Adding bibliographic entry


 * Date and time
 * 01:42, 18 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * In process of adding a "bibliographic entry" you removed the category the page had been in. The filter warned you about this fact, because all pages need to be categorized. Ruslik_ Zero 11:59, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

76.66.196.139

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Template talk:Planetary radius


 * Description
 * Creating a new talk page 76.66.196.139 (talk) 10:00, 17 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 10:00, 17 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * See below. Ruslik_ Zero 11:57, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

98.113.187.11

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User_talk:Rmyers19


 * Description
 * adding vandalism warning - uw-vandalism2


 * Date and time
 * 98.113.187.11 (talk) 04:36, 17 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments note: page was blank and i was trying to create if that has any relation.


 * This bug has been fixed. Ruslik_ Zero 11:57, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

PEOC3T

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * PM Warfighter Information Network-Tactical (WIN-T)


 * Description
 * Placing publicly releasable information about a US Army product on our wiki as directed by my US Army Public Information Officer PEOC3T (talk) 19:43, 16 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 19:43, 14 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You obviously have a conflict of interest (as your username indicates). The filter warned you about this fact. Ruslik_ Zero 11:54, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

70.108.128.240

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User_talk:70.108.89.47


 * Description
 * Deleting double content. I have replied on ipodnano's (page) (page) and want to delete the double content from my (page). Thanks. 70.108.128.240 (talk) 13:13, 16 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 13:13, 16 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The user_talk pages should not normally be blanked. Ruslik_ Zero 11:52, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Lifewithmikey52

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * page


 * Description
 * Adding info


 * Date and time
 * 14:32, 15 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

please let me create my fantasy baseball page


 * No thanks. Please see WP:ORG and WP:N.  NawlinWiki (talk) 14:35, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Rijnlands Lyceum

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Het Rijnlands Lyceum International School


 * Description
 * final changes and editing made, page now uptodate this is my final change for the day


 * Date and time
 * 13:43, 14 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * From what I can tell, the problems here are:
 * The text  Italic text  makes it look like a test edit.
 * All categories were removed in this edit.
 * The references were removed.
 * A known bug is that if the same edit is caught by both a tag filter (#2 and #3) and a warn filter (#1), then the edit is, in fact, disallowed. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 17:51, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

68.0.124.33

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * nantenna


 * Description
 * change "rectifying antennas" to " rectifying antennas", with edit summary "+rectenna". 68.0.124.33 (talk) 00:02, 14 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 00:02, 14 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The problem here isn't the edit you were doing, but the presence of the string "#REDIRECT" in that paragraph. I have done the edit for you. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:12, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Od Mishehu. It looks good now. --68.0.124.33 (talk) 03:48, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

windigo11

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Every Time I Die


 * Description
 * I added two dvd's that have been announced, but the filter rejcted it for some reason. Maybe because one of them, "Party Pooper", has poop in it. I don't know.


 * Date and time
 * 20:53, 12 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Yep, you guessed it. Blame the endless legions of immature people who insist on writing "poop" and such.   Wknight94  <sup style="color: blue;">talk  21:03, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Nskadden

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Battle of Mount Tumbledown


 * Description
 * I was copy-editing "The Battle of Mount Tumbledown". This was my first try, and I am learning your system, but I am an experienced editor.  I was conservative in the edits, and they can stand, however more editing of this piece, by someone with more knowledge of the military terminology will be necessary.  I will continue to find "overdue" articles listed, and work on them.  I expect to be much better very soon.


 * Date and time
 * 21:03, 12 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You accidentally inserted, which was considered a test type edit. Ruslik_ Zero 08:21, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

68.35.36.29

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * A Few Good Men (Play)


 * Description
 * I corrected a misstatement on the inspiration for A Few Good Men.


 * Date and time
 * 01:32, 12 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * Correcting incorrect information based on information from IMDB, other parts of wikipedia, and the U.S. Attorney's office.
 * A filter prevented you from making the edit because you put #REDIRECT in the middle of the text. This is an incorrect use of the REDIRECT keyword. Ruslik_ Zero 08:26, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Mrbenneale

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Rigor Mortal


 * Description
 * What you were doing Mrbenneale (talk) 01:32, 12 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 01:32, 12 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The problem is that the page included the AFC submission/submit template, but was submitted as an articlke and not as part of the Articles for Creation procedure. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:16, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

72.251.177.151

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Editing User:Emmette Hernandez Coleman/monobook.js old


 * Description
 * I attempted to tag this cross-namespace redirect for speedy deletion per CSD R2, but was stopped by the edit filter because I attempted to place the speedy deletion template at the beginning of the line with the redirect text . I got around this by putting the redirect text on a new line, but it was still pretty annoying. -- as 72.251.177.151 (talk) 05:29, 12 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 05:29, 12 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I tweaked the filter. It should not match db-rN and rfd now. Ruslik_ Zero 08:30, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks! 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 18:21, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

76.111.160.65

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * List of characters from The Venture Bros.


 * Description
 * Were these two edits tagged as "possible vandalism" because they involved Stephen Colbert? Is that really necessary? The first edit corrected the spelling of his name, and the second edit removed his name (rightly as Colbert never voiced that character). Mike R (talk) 22:31, 11 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 22:29, 11 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * The filter was triggered by the limb link in added_lines. It should probably be removed. Ruslik_ Zero 08:42, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Samueljclemens

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * i was editing the page on goaltending coach bob bellemore


 * Description
 * i was adding information to the page.


 * Date and time
 * 21:53, 11 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * This happened because you included a Link title at the beginning of your edit. You can simply omit that or ignore the warning and let someone fix it for you.   Wknight94  <sup style="color: blue;">talk  22:00, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Banayan

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Stuart Allen Marshak


 * Description
 * I was creating a page for a professional poker player Banayan (talk) 18:30, 11 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 18:30, 11 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Hmmm, unfortunately more than one of the player's nicknames includes "poop". For this, you can blame the endless supply of immature editors here who include "poop" in new articles as a joke.  Once you become more experienced, the system will catch on that you are trying to create a serious article.  For now, you can ask for assistance at WP:RA or WP:HD or some such.  (Maybe someone with more time than me can help you here).   Wknight94  <sup style="color: blue;">talk  22:05, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

217.31.51.77

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:NawlinWiki


 * Description
 * Leaving a messege not vandalsim 217.31.51.77 (talk) 05:29, 11 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 05:29, 11 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * You should be able to edit User talk:NawlinWiki now. Ruslik_ Zero 11:15, 11 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Oh, the filter is working fine -- see the first attempted edit per filter 233 -- this is User:Hamish Ross on an open proxy, now blocked. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:16, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Jack0787

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Gotham City Massive


 * Description
 * WI was creating a page for a popular small band that is not very known but is known around my city and this must be published please. Jack0787 (talk) 19:36, 10 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 19:36, 10 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * We don't cover bands that are "not very known". See WP:MUSIC.  NawlinWiki (talk) 18:19, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

88.77.140.123

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * User talk:WhisperToMe


 * Description
 * Pasting a table in fixed space format (as in ye olde times ^^ with vertical bars between them) as a fixed width quote (you know, with a space in front). It apparently thinks it has too many spaces in it. But that’s the point of such an example!! ^^ 88.77.140.123 (talk) 19:45, 8 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 19:45, 8 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

87.194.171.224

 * Usernam


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * 2009 in heavy metal music


 * Description
 * Adding a sourced release to the table of album releases. Source was their own website, band was Devil's Whorehouse, album Blood & Ashes. Figured part of it out now, but it's still an error that needs fixing. 87.194.171.224 (talk) 09:03, 8 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 09:03, 8 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * I tweaked the filter. It should not react on Whorehouse. Ruslik_ Zero 18:52, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

24.140.73.233

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Breakdance


 * Description
 * I was only removing unreferenced sections/statements that were already flagged for being unreferenced. Not to mention there's an article issues template at the top of the article stating that there needs to be better references and more citations. Please remove this tag. It makes me look like I did something wrong when I'm actually helping the integrity of wikipedia. 24.140.73.233 (talk) 23:20, 6 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 23:20, 6 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * It was just a warning. Please, continue editing. Ruslik_ Zero 19:00, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Who then was a gentleman?

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Reference desk/Language


 * Description
 * My edits were completely innocuous, not only was I blocked from editing that page, but several other pages for about ten minutes.


 * Date and time
 * 19:23, 6 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * This problem was fixed. Ruslik_ Zero 18:52, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

66.167.48.79

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Dunluce Castle


 * Description
 * It supposedly had a problem with an image (Special:AbuseFilter/220) but I'm not clear on what the issue was. I switched from "Image:" to "File:" but I doubt that's the issue.


 * Date and time
 * 20:28, 4 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * I fixed it. -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 22:34, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

charleyp_1999

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Oliver Fish


 * Description
 * adding information to the character that has happened up to date


 * Date and time
 * 19:02, 4 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

201.37.230.43

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Yōkai


 * Description
 * Made 2 minor edits to Yōkai: 1) de-bolded inappropriate bold 2) removed 1 sentence of apparent WP:OR/WP:PEACOCK


 * Date and time
 * 12:17, 4 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * It should not match PEACOCK now. Ruslik_ Zero 19:43, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I do not understand what you mean. Could you please say that in a different way? Thank you. -- 201.37.230.43 (talk) 21:31, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The problem is that it found the character sequence "COCK" in the summary. Ruslik modified the filer so that the word "Peacock" won't be caught by the filter anymore. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:03, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Nashvilleroth

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Levi massie


 * Description


 * Date and time
 * 23:29, 3 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

conorpower

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Ned Power


 * Description
 * I was just stating that Adam Lmabert was gay, because I didn't see it written anywhere, and he has in fact admitted he was himself.


 * Date and time
 * 21:08, 2 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments
 * You saw a warning because you obviously have a conflict of interest. Ruslik_ Zero 18:51, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

79.180.25.233

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * List of Testees episodes


 * Description
 * Merging episode plots from the TV show's main article 79.180.25.233 (talk) 11:58, 2 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 11:58, 2 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * It's getting hung up on "are gay". Merges like this will become easier if you create an account and edit other topics for a while. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 23:20, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

75.69.0.58

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * Alex Band


 * Description
 * Fixing reference


 * Date and time
 * 04:40, 2 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments

Just caught this during RC patrol. Looks like an anon user was just trying to fix a reference and got tagged with "Repeating characters". -- &oelig; &trade; 04:40, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Doesn't seem like there's anything we can do about this one. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:41, 2 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Well is this report not useful for debugging purposes? I thought this page was for Edit Filter managers to figure out why something happened and fix the AbuseFilter so it won't happen again.. or is there a more specialized talk page for possible bug reports? -- &oelig; &trade; 23:16, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

147.70.242.54

 * Username


 * Page you were editing (don't wikilink)
 * X-Y Table


 * Description
 * Remove redlinked category and replaced with "uncategorized" tag. 147.70.242.54 (talk) 02:06, 1 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Date and time
 * 02:06, 1 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comments


 * Yes, in this case it seems to have been a correct edit. Please note, however, that usually when an anonymous or new user removes all categories, it is a disruptive edit (whether intended that way or not). עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:32, 1 September 2009 (UTC)


 * I have added uncategorized and related tags to the exclude list. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:38, 1 September 2009 (UTC)


 * 1) 3 Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA)# 3 Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA)# 3 Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA)