Wikipedia:Editor review/1234r00t (3)

1234r00t (3)*
After a series of events I've begun to wonder whether or not I'm still helping the project or if I've become a nuisance, or worse, someone that is no longer contributing constructively. I don't believe the latter currently. I'm considering retiring from Wikipedia and handing in the rollback and reviewer bits. ♫  Mr. R00t   Talk ♫ 04:01, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * My primary contributions are fighting vandalism. This has gotten me into trouble because according to some I've stopped AGF'ing. This is partly true. I've begun to believe that if it was an IP that made the edit it is more likely that it is vandalism then not. This is a serious problem.
 * 1) Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
 * Clearly using rollback leads to disputes. I usually handle these calmly.
 * Clearly using rollback leads to disputes. I usually handle these calmly.

 Reviews 

You handle edit disputes irrationally. Wikipedia is an online encyclopaedia. It is not a soap box for denialists. KBlott (talk) 22:01, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your comment. ♫  Mr. R00t   Talk ♫ 22:44, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Are you a memebe of the new kadampa tradition? Ithink so46.64.92.141 (talk) 09:43, 24 January 2011 (UTC) if you are going to use your position to edit out critical infrmation of a relgious group of which you are a memeber,please resign46.64.92.141 (talk) 09:44, 24 January 2011 (UTC)