Wikipedia:Editor review/Addihockey10 (2)

Addihockey10
Greetings, I am Addihockey10, I have been editing for awhile and it has been a year since my last review. I'd like to be reviewed to see where I can improve my editing skills. I edit primarily with Huggle, I'm trying to go into WP:UAA and I participate a lot in WP:AIV.  Addi hockey  10  20:08, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * I primarily edit with Huggle, I am pleased with my AIV edits because I consider every vandal reported improves Wikipedia's level of reliability.
 * 1) Have you been in any disputes over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * I haven't had many (if any) disputes, just the occasional vandal. I don't engage in their little game and I don't plan to change that in the future.
 * I haven't had many (if any) disputes, just the occasional vandal. I don't engage in their little game and I don't plan to change that in the future.

 Reviews  It's useful when I do an editor review to know whether the editor has aspirations to be admin or not, but you haven't explicitly said so in your comments above. Based on the fact that you've self-nomed twice before (six months apart) and its been almost six months since the last one, I can only guess that you're probably getting antsy for a third try. All I can say is "Just say no!" In all probability, a third one right now will end up the same way as the other two, for pretty much the same reasons. That doesn't mean no forever, it just means you need a more rounded Wikipedia experience than you have now. The advice below will help you reach the point where you are ready for an Rfa:
 * Review by VictorianMutant:
 * Civility towards the community: I don't see any problems here. All indications are that you are a pleasant person to deal with.
 * Article contributions: The most you've contributed to any article is 8 edits to Panama. I see you've created a few new articles, but that's about it. My advice is this(and I give this advice a lot because it's my pet peeve): Find a few crappy articles which have the potential to be good articles with a little TLC. Turn them into GA's and maybe FA's. Who knows, you might even find article writing as enjoyable as vandal fighting.
 * Edit count analysis: What stands out to me here is the small number of edits to article talk space. With more content work, you will talk more on article talk pages, though.
 * RfA-worthiness: I'd love nothing more than to tell you you're ready, but I just can't do that... you still have a ways to go.
 * Final thoughts: You are a great vandal fighter, no one can take that away from you. Vandal fighting is a huge contribution to the community and I thank you. Some specific things, though which will round out your contribution: (1) My "Make an article your own" advice above (2) Join a WikiProject in an area which interests you dealing with content building or start your own. (3) Help with one of the areas in Category:Wikipedia backlog . (3) Get involved with WP:XFD. (4) Take a stab at creating a Wikipedia Book for something different. Thank you for your contributions and hope to see ya around... VictorianMutant (talk) 02:23, 2 October 2010 (UTC)