Wikipedia:Editor review/Addihockey10 (3)

Addihockey10 (3)
How's my driving? 1-800-REVIEW. I'm going up for editor review to see what I could improve on in the past year. Also please consider my global contribs and my account creations.-- Addi hockey  10 e-mail 18:10, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * Most frequently WP:AIV, WP:UAA, WP:RFPP, WP:CSD, WP:ACC and occasionaly WP:AN/3RR and WP:AN/I. I've done a few image uploads and article edits (Lyn Hancock, Dover Bay Secondary School, Hello Time Bomb,) I have also done a shwack of transferring images to commons.
 * 1) Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
 * mmm.... Not really. I'd respond to one by remaining WP:CIVIL and speaking person-to-person. I'd avoid templating the user as every dispute should be dealt on a case-by-case basis. In the case I have WP:Sysop tools WP:COOLDOWN blocks are never acceptable as it would only "heat-up" the user and would have the opposite of the intended effect.

 Reviews  Although I am a Veteran Editor III, this is my first editor review. First, I am very impressed by the wide variety of global contributions you have made in several different language Wikipedias, plus the Commons. Good work there.

On the other hand, you have a lot of contributions on English Wikipedia that involve differences of opinions with other editors. My suggestion would be to see if you can contribute new articles, done first in a sandbox, or additions to existing articles where you can add inline citations, or more information. Beyond that, I am devoting time to adding project templates and class and importance ratings to existing project templates on article talk pages. If you are interested in any particular Wikipedia project, look at the assessment summary table and take a look at the unassessed articles by clicking on the number of such articles. Best wishes. --DThomsen8 (talk) 21:13, 20 February 2011 (UTC)