Wikipedia:Editor review/Ahadland1234

Ahadland1234
I've been told on my request for adminship to request an editor review. So please folks, feel free to gimme an appraisal. Ahadland 23:43, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

 Reviews 

You are currently indefblocked, so your first and most pressing issue is to fully address the concerns raised by the admin who blocked you, and satisfy the blocking admin that you understand why you were blocked and will avoid future policy violations.

If and when you are unblocked, I see a number of issues worth commenting on. I'm sorry if this review comes across as overly negative, but I feel there are some serious issues that needed to be highlighted. Please consider contacting the blocking admin and sorting out any outstanding issues, your contributions are welcome. --Muchness 21:31, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * WikiGnome edits like this and this are always appreciated.
 * You have been involved in some incidents of image policy violations, occasional vandalism and incivility. Other editors have directed you to the appropriate policies and guidelines on your talk page but I'll reiterate their concerns.
 * Remember to use edit summaries; they are important to notify other editors of what changes you're making. It may be a good idea to go to Special:Preferences → Editing and check "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary".
 * It's generally frowned on to blank your user talk page while discussions are on-going, as you did here. If you want to clear your talk page of discussions that are no longer active, it's better practice to archive your talk page rather than blanking it. If you want to archive warning templates, it's a good idea to first resolve the issue with the editor who posted the template before archiving.
 * You've done a lot of good work in helping to promote images to featured status.

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * I am incredibly proud of my edits to the Holocaust over recent weeks. I have also modified the RMS Titanic article to improve it, which I think has been very successful given that it has maintained its featured article status. I also am proud that I provide good, solid references for articles.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * I have been in a few edit conflicts, and in my humble opinion, I think I have dealt with them quite well. I always try to adopt the "keep a cool head" and "always assume good faith" policy's. In edit conflicts where I act as a go between, I try to see both sides of the argument and try and reach a consensus between both parties
 * I have been in a few edit conflicts, and in my humble opinion, I think I have dealt with them quite well. I always try to adopt the "keep a cool head" and "always assume good faith" policy's. In edit conflicts where I act as a go between, I try to see both sides of the argument and try and reach a consensus between both parties