Wikipedia:Editor review/Airmatic

Airmatic
There has been too much confusion about the subject of vibratory stress relief, and it has taken years for successful lab and real-life applications to be recognized. Although significant strides have been made (thru various websites and more recent publications) a general working definition for the public would be useful to the metal-working community. This submission was intended to establish a base-line for this technology’s application areas, key performance details, and to act as a guideline for those interested in either applying the technology, or improving upon it. Airmatic (talk) 19:44, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * My only contribution to Wikipedia was the submission on Vibratory Stress Relief. I am pleased with this submission, but I believe the metal-working community would benefit from its being reviewed. This is especially true, since the energy savings realized by using vibratory stress relief are significant: Reductions in carbon footprints of 70 – 90% of a stress relieving process are easily feasible.
 * 1) Have you been in any disputes over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * There has been no feedback thus far, and I feel no stress at all. Editor or peer review is part of the process, with the outcome is intended to refine the submission, as needed.
 * There has been no feedback thus far, and I feel no stress at all. Editor or peer review is part of the process, with the outcome is intended to refine the submission, as needed.

 Reviews 


 * What is it that you want us to review? You have a grand total of six edits, three of which are to your userpage and two of which are to this editor review page. You can't exactly judge a person's editing career based on one edit. GorillaWarfare  talk  22:04, 2 August 2010 (UTC)


 * The contents of your user page is more suited to being in a sandbox. User pages are best kept as a means of interacting with other editors. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 00:53, 4 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Airmatic, I think it's too early to judge you at this point. At the time of writing you have been registered for one month and made only 5 contributions, 1 of them which is in the article namespace. / Hey Mid  (contributions) 15:16, 9 August 2010 (UTC)