Wikipedia:Editor review/Andrewjlockley

Username*
STATEMENT Andrewjlockley (talk) 13:22, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

 Reviews 

I've archived this review. Please see the reason listed above. If you wish to be reviewed, please file a new request and remember to transclude it onto the main Editor review page. Netalarm  talk  07:26, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?Establishing the Geoengineering category, because the field was poorly documented on wiki and it is important to have a good pool of knowledge in the public domain.
 * 2. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A: I had an edit of mine reversed by Alan Robock, a noted professional in the field. I removed his edit as it was not impartial, but I created new text in wiki-appropriate language that set out in detail the concerns raised in his edit.  Ken Caldeira criticised some of my section titles and page layouts, and I adapted the design based on his comments, except where they created conflicts with wiki style guides.

I also canvassed the opinion of 200+ experts and interested laymen using google groups and SurveyMonkey to guide my creation of content.Andrewjlockley (talk) 11:14, 4 January 2009 (UTC)