Wikipedia:Editor review/Angusmclellan

User:Angusmclellan
I've been editing for about a year now. I'm curious as to how other editors think I'm doing, especially in terms of communicating with other editors. I have no interest in being an admin. Angus McLellan (Talk) 14:20, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * There's not much to say.. Your answer to #1 is pretty much everything. Opinion wise, your definetly a great editor! I share the same passion for history :)! (Chinese history though) AQu01rius (User &#149; Talk) 01:43, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count on the talk page (or with Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool).

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * Answer I am happiest with my mainspace contributions. I contributed to a featured article (Óengus I of the Picts) and a few good articles (Macbeth of Scotland; Malcolm III of Scotland; Picts; you might notice a theme here) and some that might be good when I get round to finishing or referencing them (Flann Sinna for example). I'm pretty useless on the image side of things: I have no talents for graphics or photography. I haven't done much with templates apart from cut and paste creation because they seem too like my day job. Other than XfD, I don't contribute much in Wikipedia space, apart from sniping at Naming conventions (names and titles) which I see as a Very Bad Thing.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * Answer Nothing enormous. I have had disagreements over the content of the Dál Riata article with various semi-anonymous editors. I have had some problems with article naming disputes, again nothing much to write home about. I'm expecting that my rewrite of Saint Patrick will be unpopular with some editors when it is done, but it will be carefully referenced so it shouldn't be a great problem. Same perhaps for Early Christian Ireland when that's done. Apart from Bluegold (talk • contribs), I haven't really had any prolonged disputes with other editors.
 * Answer Nothing enormous. I have had disagreements over the content of the Dál Riata article with various semi-anonymous editors. I have had some problems with article naming disputes, again nothing much to write home about. I'm expecting that my rewrite of Saint Patrick will be unpopular with some editors when it is done, but it will be carefully referenced so it shouldn't be a great problem. Same perhaps for Early Christian Ireland when that's done. Apart from Bluegold (talk • contribs), I haven't really had any prolonged disputes with other editors.