Wikipedia:Editor review/Antivenin

Antivenin
Hi! This is the first time I'm requesting an Editor Review so I am a bit nervous. =/ Still, be as harsh as you need to be. WP:SPADE at all times. The reason I want to be reviewed is because I feel I've been pretty undeviating during my time on Wikipedia (only anti-vandalism, AfDs, WP:Os) and I need guidance on what to do next. Thanks in advance for your reviews. Anti venin  15:31, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

 Reviews 

 Comments 
 * Hi there, Antivenin! Seems like you're doing a great job using Huggle to revert vandalism; this is greatly appreciated.  You might want to consider working in more collaborative areas of Wikipedia, such as WP:XfD.  Keep it up!  -  down  load  |  sign!  22:51, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Hello, Antivenin! I've seen you around a few times (edit-conflicting me, might I add :P) whilst reverting vandalism. Now, as you said, here comes the brunt of the blow: You should try to branch out on your Wikipedia mainspace to include various areas such as WP:AFC, WP:ANI, WP:CSD, WP:UAA, et cetera. In addition, while you like to edit various articles (Which is a good thing), it is also recommended that you focus on one article at a time, steadily raising the article to GA or even FA status. Last but not least, you can be more familiar with the community by editing at the Help desk, Pump Village, or something similar. Good job w/ your editing, though! Cheers.  Im per a t § r (Talk) 23:35, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Kudos for never being blocked; also you have an interesting userpage. Best, --A NobodyMy talk 15:35, 22 March 2009 (UTC)


 * View this user's edit count using X!'s counter

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * On Wikipedia I am most proud of my anti-vandalism work. I spent hours fighting vandalism, first through Twinkle and then Huggle. Anti-vandalism isn't as easy as browsing through pages using Huggle with your mouse on the revert button. I've got extensive practice in researching facts and figures which I believe has been invaluable in my anti-vandalism work.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * I've been harassed by numerous anon IPs in the past, either because I reverted their edits, or marked their page for deletion. These are some examples. Aside from anon IPs there are disagreeable aspects to RC and New Page patrol. Often I have to mark articles for deletion that are extremely well written but don't establish notability. I can see just how much work the author put in, and it hurts to get them deleted, but it's something that I've had to deal with. 
 * I've been harassed by numerous anon IPs in the past, either because I reverted their edits, or marked their page for deletion. These are some examples. Aside from anon IPs there are disagreeable aspects to RC and New Page patrol. Often I have to mark articles for deletion that are extremely well written but don't establish notability. I can see just how much work the author put in, and it hurts to get them deleted, but it's something that I've had to deal with. 

simple:Wikipedia:Editor review/Editor-reviewsubst