Wikipedia:Editor review/AquaStreak

AquaStreak
I'm not really sure what to do here. I was recommended to come here after an unsuccessful RfA in order to receive "feedback on where to get some good experience" AquaStreak 16:10, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * From what I can see, all your experience is in article writing etc. I would recommend contributing to the Wikipedia: namespace pages more, such as articles for deletion etc. Also, check out the template system and namespace, that's always something that goes down well in an RfA. I would also recommend getting a tool like TWINKLE, and working on some vandal-fighting. It's a great tool especially if you are just starting out. I noticed you have edits some pages and images related to video games, so I would recommend that you check out and consider joining the WikiProject Video games. Finally, you should strive to always use edit summaries. If you go to "My Preferences" in the top right, then to the Editing tab, you can check a box called "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary". This will remind you to always use one. Also, with RfA's, it's usually advisable to not go for adminship until at least 1.5K edits, usually around 2K. Anything under that is unlikely to pass. If you have any more questions, feel free to ask me. Thanks! Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 00:39, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.


 * View this user's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * I contribute frequently to the "iPod" article. I feel all of my contributions here are worthwhile. A typical edit here would be for clarity, or maybe to fix factual and typography errors.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * When I first joined Wikipedia, I made a few pages admins felt unnecessary and deleted them. But I never got angry and went on to edit only pages with solid edits that wouldn't have question.
 * When I first joined Wikipedia, I made a few pages admins felt unnecessary and deleted them. But I never got angry and went on to edit only pages with solid edits that wouldn't have question.


 * Can you clarify the word frequently, you've had an account for just over 6 months and I can count 5 edits to iPod, 1 in the last month indeed most of your edits in the last month have been today. Why do you not wikilink things like iPod rather than put them in quotes? --pgk 16:00, 7 July 2007 (UTC)