Wikipedia:Editor review/Archives/Balthazar

Balthazar
I'm Balthazar, unless the rest of my SUL goes terribly wrong. I have one featured list and I'm coming up to the two thousand total edits after just under a years active editing, so it seemed like a good time for a review. Don't hesitate to be harsh for constructive purposes; I wouldn't. — Balthazar  (T 03:20, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * Hello. Looks to me like you're doing some great work—creating content, moving articles through the FL process. A couple suggestions: (1) take some time to give back to the Wikipedia community; e.g., reviewing articles (like WP:GAN), participating in WP:ADOPT, helping out at the Help desk, etc; as you take the reviewer's chair more, you'll become a better editor yourself; (2) with all the content you create, why not start off articles in good fashion by participating in WP:DYK? Anyway, like I said, you're doing well, so keep up the good work! --Eustress (talk) 05:54, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool


 * I don`t think you`re supposed to be using the col templates for sections here. ;) -- Pie is good  (Apple is the best)  19:32, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * That better? — Balthazar  (T 16:56, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * I'm most pleased with my contributions to the Angel Dust article and how far it's come since I started on it, even though it's still far from what I'd call finished, and quite a few of the other Faith No More related articles. I'm less proud of the discography article I created for them, even though it's now featured, simply because I don't think it should have taken 54 edits to get it were it is. A point which I set out to prove on the DragonForce discography article, which I submitted after a single massive edit (which only subsequently failed due being cut down to below the 10 item minimum during the FLC). I'm also quite pleased with my contribution to the Allegiance and The Premonition album articles, even though all the references to news releases on Firewind's site 404'd after they cleared out everything to make way with their new site. There are other contributions I'm more pleased with than the majority of my edits, but for the sake of refraining from an excessively verbose answer; I'll stop here. — Balthazar  (T 04:40, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * There was the issue I had with Undead warrior regarding the colour and standardisation of the black metal bands navigation templates after I changed one or two to the standard Navbox Musical artist which we reasoned out on our talk pages.
 * There was also the minor issue I had with Soul Crusher regarding the chronology links on song articles which I posted a (slightly irritated sounding) comment on his(her?) talk page, although since I didn't and haven't changed the edit in question back to how I believed it should be, and since I don't have time to follow his(her?) edits on other article and he(she) has never replied to anything on his(her?) talk page as far as I know, I have no idea if it got acknowledged or even read in the first place. — Balthazar  (T 04:40, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
 * There was also the minor issue I had with Soul Crusher regarding the chronology links on song articles which I posted a (slightly irritated sounding) comment on his(her?) talk page, although since I didn't and haven't changed the edit in question back to how I believed it should be, and since I don't have time to follow his(her?) edits on other article and he(she) has never replied to anything on his(her?) talk page as far as I know, I have no idea if it got acknowledged or even read in the first place. — Balthazar  (T 04:40, 22 August 2008 (UTC)