Wikipedia:Editor review/Ashnard

Ashnard
Hello. I've been here for about six months now, and I just want feedback about how to improve my services here. I'm invloved in WP:CVG; within that, I priorities articles pertaining to the Fire Emblem series and regularly contribute to them. Ashnard Talk  Contribs  21:27, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

 Reviews 

I am here to compliment you. You have made a lot of progress as an editor since our first encounter at Talk:Ashnard, and I applaud your efforts at editing video games related articles. User:Krator (t c) 21:57, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * To begin with, Icontributed regularly, but never really made any major contributions. I've always contributed to the Fire Emblem articles, but never really done anything ambitious with them until recently. I'm particularly pleased with my work on these article&mdash;I helped to get Fire Emblem, Fire Emblem (video game), Fire Emblem: Path of Radiance, and Fire Emblem: The Sacred Stones to GA. As well as this, I've cleaned up some of the other FE articles and merged all of the articles that didn't warrant their own page. Where as the Fire Emblem talk pages used to be barren in the past, there is now debates about where to take the articles next. I am especially pleased with this 


 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * ''Unfortunately, yes. Near the beginning of my usership, I was blocked from editing for two days for making insults at other users. These were actually in jest, and were in mutual humour. However, I do realise that I shouldn't have been making social edits on Wikipedia. I've also had conflicts with some users regarding the other user's etiquette on Wikipedial; although I still acknowledge that I was in the right, I really should have approached the issue differently. I was just slightly annoyed that a user ignored my posts on his talk page, and then got frustated further when this user debated this isuue. There were other minor conflicts in the past. Nothing serious, but I may have to take a breather in the future in editing disputes&mdash;due to the nature of clinical text, users are susceptible to interpreting the meaning of other users' posts, and I may have fell victim to this. Overall though, I do attempt to maintain a decent relationship with other users.
 * ''Unfortunately, yes. Near the beginning of my usership, I was blocked from editing for two days for making insults at other users. These were actually in jest, and were in mutual humour. However, I do realise that I shouldn't have been making social edits on Wikipedia. I've also had conflicts with some users regarding the other user's etiquette on Wikipedial; although I still acknowledge that I was in the right, I really should have approached the issue differently. I was just slightly annoyed that a user ignored my posts on his talk page, and then got frustated further when this user debated this isuue. There were other minor conflicts in the past. Nothing serious, but I may have to take a breather in the future in editing disputes&mdash;due to the nature of clinical text, users are susceptible to interpreting the meaning of other users' posts, and I may have fell victim to this. Overall though, I do attempt to maintain a decent relationship with other users.