Wikipedia:Editor review/AtheWeatherman(2)

AtheWeatherman
Hey everyone. I would like to request a review as I would like to see how I am getting on around the wiki, and to see if I can improve in any particular areas. Thanks for your input.  Athe Weatherman   18:48, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * My primary contributions are to weather articles, especially drought articles, and geography (caves and glaciers in particular). I also do some CSD and AFD work, as well as some wikignoming. My best conributions have been my DYK's that I have recieved, particuarly the Drought in the UK one, as I have done this from scratch and am hoping to get a GA on it. I am also quite proud of the Dewbow article as I started that one from stratch and got the image permission too
 * 1) Have you been in any disputes over editing in the past (please note that this does not refer to ) or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * I was once caught in the middle of an edit war, on sikh foods, as I was editing the article at that time. I got a settlement from both, and in this I was always civil and never really got stresses, as that really is not in my nature. In IP's, I simply revert and warn, as I have had some good old personal attacks in my time. :)
 * I was once caught in the middle of an edit war, on sikh foods, as I was editing the article at that time. I got a settlement from both, and in this I was always civil and never really got stresses, as that really is not in my nature. In IP's, I simply revert and warn, as I have had some good old personal attacks in my time. :)

 Reviews  Hey, I have taken a look at some of your recent speedy deletion nominations. As I'm sure you realize by now, I do think that you may need to read up on some of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please don't despair, you've clearly done a lot of good in recognizing and tagging inappropriate pages for deletion. I am glad that I got the chance to write this here, and not at RfA (assuming that you intend to run again some time in the future, apologies if I'm mistaken in that regard), because that could easily have lead to the request being unsuccesful. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. Regards, decltype (talk) 11:47, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Review by :
 * Hubba bubba story - this article did not meet criterion G1 as it is written in mostly coherent English. The criterion specifically excludes such pages.
 * Yang hee Roh, Sam Bandle - You tagged these with db-person, but the page had been blanked by the creator and therefore db-blanked (G7) would be preferable.
 * Hutu Cristian and Iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii - Tagged db-vandalism by you, but with no indication of being created in bad faith or containing inaccurate information. It's simply a biography of a person with no indication of significance or importance, thus A7.
 * The Urgency. Single-line article about a band with no indication of significance or importance. I am curious as to why you didn't use db-band (A7).
 *  . Unsourced biography of a person who "gets high ... drinks ... and party most of her life away". It is important that these articles are dealt with quickly to not cause harm to living individuals. Replacing the content with db-attack is therefore much preferred to A7.