Wikipedia:Editor review/Aviator006

Aviator006
It has been a year since I've joined Wikipedia as an editor and I would really value some feedback on my performance and any areas of improvement needed. Aviator006 (talk) 15:14, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * I have taken 10 articles to GA-status, particularly Oneworld, Cathay Pacific, Dragonair and Japan Airlines (Aviation articles), I'm pleased I'm able to make these articles a reliable source for our readers, with everything cited. There is nothing worse than reading something on Wikipedia that is untrue or only speculative rumours that is far from the truth.
 * 1) Have you been in any disputes over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * A user Toyotaboy95 added a table about the benefits of Cathay Pacific's Marco Polo Club diff to which I felt it was unnecessary and repetitive as the information has been represented in text format during my overhaul on the article (which was GA-approved), hence, I removed it diff. However, the editor disagrees and undid my removal diff. At the time, I felt because I have done such a major overhaul to the article, I may have been a bit possessive which was wrong, so I've now left the table untouched, even though I still feel it is unnecessary and repetitive.
 * A user Toyotaboy95 added a table about the benefits of Cathay Pacific's Marco Polo Club diff to which I felt it was unnecessary and repetitive as the information has been represented in text format during my overhaul on the article (which was GA-approved), hence, I removed it diff. However, the editor disagrees and undid my removal diff. At the time, I felt because I have done such a major overhaul to the article, I may have been a bit possessive which was wrong, so I've now left the table untouched, even though I still feel it is unnecessary and repetitive.

 Reviews 

When Toyotaboy95 brought the table back, did you send him a message explaining why you got rid of the table? If not, I think you should have. That's what I would have done, anyway. With that said, let's talk a little about your contributions. You appear to be a good editor that knows what they are doing. The fact that you have improved several articles to GA status is impressive. Keep it up! The Utahraptor (talk) 15:11, 1 April 2010 (UTC)