Wikipedia:Editor review/Avs5221

Avs5221
I've sprung into action recently dealing with vandalism, 3RR, verifiability, and the overall professionalism. I just want to ensure my interactions with other editors have been professional, meaningful, and above all helpful. avs5221 (talk) 22:11, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * My primary contribution is anti-vandalism work. But I also like stepping in when there's the beginning of an edit war. I try to calm down the situation and get people to move their disagreements to the talk page to find consensus.
 * 1) Have you been in any disputes over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * I try to abide to the 1RR rule. The great thing about Wikipedia versus real life is there's always time to step back and think before typing, so there should never be an excuse for losing your cool. Just remember to stop and think and things will work themselves out.
 * I try to abide to the 1RR rule. The great thing about Wikipedia versus real life is there's always time to step back and think before typing, so there should never be an excuse for losing your cool. Just remember to stop and think and things will work themselves out.

 Reviews 
 * R1: You seem to be an up-and-coming editor who is doing a lot of good to benefit the community. Your interactions with other editors appear professional and helpful. (I like that you use tb to notify newer users that you have responded to their inquiries on your talk page.) You also have a good adopter who is very responsive to your needs and has given you some good advice.
 * R1: You seem to be an up-and-coming editor who is doing a lot of good to benefit the community. Your interactions with other editors appear professional and helpful. (I like that you use tb to notify newer users that you have responded to their inquiries on your talk page.) You also have a good adopter who is very responsive to your needs and has given you some good advice.


 * My only advice—and perhaps advice that you weren't seeking—is that you make a concerted effort to create and refine your own content rather than solely critiquing the content of others. Doing so will teach you things that just can't be learned otherwise. For instance, the article you have contributed to most is only rated C-level on the quality scale. Get an article to GA status and then conduct some GANs of your own, and I think you'll be surprised at how much you learn.


 * Thank you for your conscientiousness and dedication to the 'pedia, and keep up the good work! —Eustress talk 13:46, 18 April 2010 (UTC)