Wikipedia:Editor review/AxG

User:AxG
I have been a Wikipedian for almost a year (about 12 months), at the start I was a bit of a pain and I did not understand it, well 12 months down the line I would like someone to see how I am doing.  AxG   (talk)  05:24, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

 Reviews 

review by delldot:
 * In an RFA !voters are likely to criticize the fact that something like a quarter of your edits are to userpages; it looks like mostly your own. You do have a good amount of mainspace article contribution too, though, but I'd kick that up a notch.
 * Nice work reverting vandalism. I'd suggest leaving test messages on the talk pages of the offenders when you revert something they do.  It can help them get the message and cut it out, or at the very least they can be blocked before they cause further destruction.
 * I see you're welcoming newbies! This is excellent.
 * You create articles and add major content - excellent work.
 * what did you mean by this edit? I'm not aware of a guideline or policy saying that sources must be online, are you?  If that is wrong, as I think it is, I'd suggest going back and correcting the mistake with that new user, to avoid biting.
 * Not very high wikipedia and wiki talk edits, this will likely be a point of objection for !voters in an RFA.
 * Very good edit summary usage, you may want to change it in your preferences so that it prompts you if you go to save without one. Some folks in RFA look for 100%.
 * Nice work reverting vandalism. To quote Dar Ape: when you ... revert vandalism, I would recommend always warning the vandal with an appropriate template such as  for first time offenders. Warning users or just directing them towards the sandbox often prevents future vandalism and nonsense edits to the mainspace.  If it doesn't deter them, we can at least block them sooner.
 * I found no evidence of incivility though I thought some of your talk edits were a tad bit curt. It was kind of hard to determine your user interaction style for some reason, but you're obviously not getting in any really ugly wars, or that would (presumably) be showing up on your talk page.
 * Overall nice work, especially with your contributions to the article namespace. Hope to see you around!  delldot | talk 05:34, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * Not really anything
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * I have hardly been in any conflicts just a telling of by a user about fair user images on my userpage.
 * I have hardly been in any conflicts just a telling of by a user about fair user images on my userpage.