Wikipedia:Editor review/Bibliomaniac15

User:Bibliomaniac15
After discovering Wikipedia on May 2005 and getting my present username in September 2005, I've been accumulating knowledge in the Wiki (rather slowly in my opinion). After such a long time, I feel that I should have other people give suggestions. After all, this is no normal encyclopedia, we are the encyclopedia ourselves.  bibliomaniac 1  5  06:02, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * It seems to be that you are a humorous, warm user. I could not find anything to criticize about. Just one thing: Activity in only three namespace (Main, User, Wikipedia). Maybe you can touch some other namespace sometimes? Just my opinion. Cheers AQu01rius (User &#149; Talk) 03:22, 6 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks! Reviewers are rare, so I thank you.  bibliomaniac 1  5  03:31, 6 December 2006 (UTC)


 * I'm not that good at reviewing but here goes!
 * General: Wikipediholic test score is quite high (although the test is a bit out of the ordinary). You are a member of Esperanza and several Wikiprojects. You have reverted quite a considerable number of vandalism and have several barnstars. You should be very proud of yourself.
 * Time at Wikipedia: 15 months, you should have quite a lot of experience now!
 * Edit count: Great (compared to me anyway :) ) 3000+ is quite good. Even if you remove all sandbox edits, the number is still quite high.
 * User page: Good, you may want to fix your "random smiley award."
 * User subpages: Good. May I advise a table on your userbox subpage? (Note: I did read the list and I already have a life)
 * Talk page: Quite good, though very long. Your archive shows that you've received a user warning template before but this is the only apparent flaw in your history of your talk page, which was ages ago and therefore you could have been clueless about Wikipedia at that time. In other words, that doesn't count a lot in this review.
 * RfA participation: You have nominated many sysops and even dedicated a user subpage to it.
 * Overall: You should be happy to be able to help Wikipedia so much! Although not entirely perfect (nobody is), you have actively participated in Wikipedia. I hereby give you an A. Go Futurama! Us e r:Sp3000 07:10, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

 Comments 
 * Just one comment: I see you everywhere! I can't possibly do anything without bumping noses with you; I think I've seen you in 5 different places already. Leave me a message when you're on RfA (unless I nominate you). My only suggestion is that you edit templates a bit more (or at least show you can). See you soon somewhere... | A ndonic O Talk 15:59, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, you seem like a good editor. Plus you're willing to reviwe a lot of other people here, which is a huge plus since it's rare. Your edit count is good, though I'd like to see more mainspace edits (to me half is ideal, 1/3 or lower's a little iffy). You get an A on the socal scale, though only a B+ on the editing scale, but that's more because most of your contributions are to areas I know nothing of. I have no problem with that, some people might point that out if you decide to run for adminship (you'd get my support vote already though). -- Wizardman 00:03, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * You've been a great mentor, you're a real asset to this place. Just H 00:11, 23 December 2006 (UTC)


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * I pretty much do everything, but particularly gnomish edits as well as vandal fighting make up much of my edits. However, I regard my best contribution to Wikipedia as someone to welcome newcomers. Newcomers are the future. Their talents and knowledge will eventually be added if they stay, and to make them stay, they must feel welcome in their environment. Too many Wikipedians overlook this fact, and I feel that this task is one of the largest in Wikipedia. I also look after others who seem to be having a hard time (User:Cute 1 4 u was an unusual case, right now, I am in the midst of looking at User:Whedonette). If we hope to have a good encyclopedia, by all means, the foundation must be good.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * As an inclusionist when it comes to the so-called "heretic" side of Wikipedia, I feel this is where the majority of my conflict has come. My first incident that I can really relate is this one, where I feel like I attacked Interrobamf. As a result, I gave an apology on his talk page. The second was in the great mfd'ing of the "fun stuff," which I alluded to a moment ago. I believe I attacked or told User:Elaragirl off in some way: . I sort of lost some steam after much of Esperanza was wiped away, and as a result, I've been pretty disgruntled with the "deletionist cabal". Now, I've been learning my lesson, and choose to steer away from very controversial arguments. Prevention is the best medicine, after all.
 * 1) (by Sp3000) Do you use any Wikipedia tools?
 * I admit that I do not, since there is a no-download policy in my family unless totally necessary, and I like the freedom that doing things manually brings. Really, the only thing I use are the edit counters, and that's it. I'm one of the manualists.  bibliomaniac 1  5  07:42, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) (by Sp3000) Do you use any Wikipedia tools?
 * I admit that I do not, since there is a no-download policy in my family unless totally necessary, and I like the freedom that doing things manually brings. Really, the only thing I use are the edit counters, and that's it. I'm one of the manualists.  bibliomaniac 1  5  07:42, 10 December 2006 (UTC)