Wikipedia:Editor review/Bibliomaniac15 2

Bibliomaniac15
It's been a year since I was graciously entrusted with the extra tabs by the community here. I'd like to know if that trust still stands.  bibliomaniac 1  5  00:21, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

 Reviews 

Review by

 * Hi Bibliomaniac15 and thanks for requesting an editor review!
 * Mainspace - You have done some great work here, congratulations on the featured articles! I see you are collaborating with the Tzatziki Squad for another FA, at History of timekeeping devices; good luck and I hope you are successful. Outside of article writing, you have also done a great job reverting vandalism.
 * Sysop actions - You have appropriately blocked many vandals, and you have a rather lengthy block log. You have also protected pages when necessary. I note you also have deleted many pages at CSD, and these are still red links; clearly you have used your delete button effectively.
 * Coaching - I see you've done great work admin-coaching different editors, passing on your expertise. This shows your dedication to improving the community.
 * Edit summaries - Your use of edit summaries is very good, and each summary is meaningful.
 * Civility - Your comments are always civil, and you assume good faith and do not resort to personal attacks.
 * And finally... You are a solid, dedicated administrator and you have done a good job with the mop. So keep up the good work! And to answer the above, you have my trust. Best regards, EJF (talk) 16:56, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

 Comments 
 * Does the trust stand? Hell yes. dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 05:33, 27 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Just would like to say that I still trust you of course. Keep up the good work, coach!  Malinaccier (talk) 14:23, 3 May 2008 (UTC)


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool

Comments from iMatthew All I'd like to say is that I agree with everything EJF said above. Your comments are definately always civil. I can tell that your coaching program works...why I picked you. ;) Anyway, keep up the good work! iMat  thew   20  08  10:51, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Expert wikipedian, enough said. · AndonicO  Engage. 00:50, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * Since my RFA, I've put on almost 10k edits. I'm most pleased with my FAs Komodo dragon and Cannon, the latter of which was an outstanding collaboration with the Tzatziki Squad. I also have 2 GAs and 4 DYKs. I am also very pleased by those whom I have nominated for adminship, 9 of whom were promoted. Not the most prolific when it comes to articls, but more than the average editor.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * I've found that the greatest point of contention for me is when someone else changes an article's format that I've painstakingly worked on. This happened a lot for me on Komodo dragon. The other is with RFAs that I have nominated. In Epbr123's RFA, I confess that the hostile atmosphere really gave me a headache. In EyeSerene's, people were being jerks and disrupting the RFA. That was perhaps the most pissed off I've been.
 * 1) Now in your signature you are "spamming" this page. Doin' this thing, you believe that someone votes for you. Are you shore that in this method you'll take many positive votes or you know that someone reads here and votes "oppose"? Mojska   666  – Leave your message here 12:00, 10 May 2008 (UTC) (PS I don't like this spamming in the signs)