Wikipedia:Editor review/Bibliomaniac15 4

Bibliomaniac15
As is my annual tradition, I run an editor review every year as an informal way to assess areas that I can improve in my editing, as well as whether I still am trusted with admin and crat tools. Normally I run it in April, but my lower levels of editing this year have forestalled my making this. If you have any questions, suggestions, or criticisms, please feel free to run them my way!  bibliomaniac 1  5  06:55, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Admin info:

Bureaucrat info:

Previous editor reviews: 2006, 2008, 2009

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * This year I really haven't been as active as I should be. Getting out with a real life (gasp) and going to college resulted in fewer edits this year. Most of my few edits this year (to my personal sorrow) haven't been towards article building, but more towards maintenance and crat tasks.
 * 1) Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
 * There's a saying that embodies my entire editing philosophy, which is conveniently posted on the top of my talk page: File:Essjay-Everytime.png. Often, someone makes a comment meant to be "fighting words," and of course it draws me into a response. But then after I type up a rejoinder and an edit summary and I'm about to hit that Save page button, I think, "Well, what use does it serve the encyclopedia?" And most of the time, I end up hitting the "back" button and going on my way. It's a way of double-checking myself that I've come to develop as a habit, and it has saved me from embroiling myself into many a dramatic affair. There are those times, of course, when "trouble troubles you," but if you just think before you speak civilly, it does wonders to keep a calm atmosphere.
 * There's a saying that embodies my entire editing philosophy, which is conveniently posted on the top of my talk page: File:Essjay-Everytime.png. Often, someone makes a comment meant to be "fighting words," and of course it draws me into a response. But then after I type up a rejoinder and an edit summary and I'm about to hit that Save page button, I think, "Well, what use does it serve the encyclopedia?" And most of the time, I end up hitting the "back" button and going on my way. It's a way of double-checking myself that I've come to develop as a habit, and it has saved me from embroiling myself into many a dramatic affair. There are those times, of course, when "trouble troubles you," but if you just think before you speak civilly, it does wonders to keep a calm atmosphere.

 Reviews 
 * Sorry if this is unhelpful and certainly sorry for being more than two months late, but I just don't see anything wrong with your edits. Keep up the good work and continue writing articles! / ƒETCH COMMS  /  03:32, 28 February 2011 (UTC)