Wikipedia:Editor review/Breawycker (2)

Breawycker (2)
It's been more than a year, since my RFA and I would like to know how much I've improved since then. Breawycker (talk to me!) 23:21, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * My primary contributions include anti-vandalism, deletion requests, Wikiflying and moving images to commons.
 * 1) Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
 * 'I have been recently involved with conflict with a few users, but I have alway been civil.'''
 * 'I have been recently involved with conflict with a few users, but I have alway been civil.'''

 Reviews 


 * Hi there. Comparing from your previous unsuccessful request for adminship to your recent status, it appears that you have improved only slightly in the past two years.

The distribution of your edits remain the same, and most of your recent contributions still seem to be automated edits. You are certainly doing good work. But the thing is, to become a better editor, it would be preferable if you could focus on other aspects of Wikipedia, particularly in the article namespace (as suggested by other editors in your previous review request).

And by that I don't mean random articles here and there, which is what I think you were doing; you should develop articles that are related to your interest into at least good article status and participate in Wikipedia discussions more.

Cheers. Alex ShihTalk 21:01, 25 July 2013 (UTC)