Wikipedia:Editor review/Buggie111 (3)

Buggie111 (3)
...and here I am again. It's been just over 1,000 edits and two two month hiatuses since my last editor review, and I have come back for more advice. I know that there is a backlog here at editor review (which I'll get to work on tomorrow), but I'll continue without delay. Since my last WP:ER, I have managed to help User: White Shadows and User:Parsecboy bring and article I created, SMS Erzherzog Franz Ferdinand, to FA, and two others, Russian battleship Sevastopol (1895) and SM UB-50, to GA. With the help of White Shadows and Parsecboy, I managed to create a GT (Battleships of Austria-Hungary) and have started to move old user subpages from my userspace into the mainspace. Along with that, I have been trying to do more XfD !voting and page patrolling as said to me in my last review, but it never seems to materialize on any given day (I'm thinking about making it a daily habit). Along with the normal volume of CSD tagging for me, which has already been reviewed by Rossami nothing else new has happened. I would like to know if there is anything else that I should do to become a better editor, or if I should just continue down my current track. Older reviews are here and here Buggie111 (talk) 23:47, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * Put shortly, SMS Erzherzog Franz Ferdinand, SM UB-50, Russian battleship Sevastopol (1895) and Featured topics/Battleships of Austria-Hungary
 * 1) Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
 * Besides some conflict with User:Hyperhippy92 over a section of Roller Coaster Tycoon 3, which we resolved peacefully with some outside help, I haven't been in any. My attitude is te same from the last review. Treet everyone as you want to be treated.
 * Besides some conflict with User:Hyperhippy92 over a section of Roller Coaster Tycoon 3, which we resolved peacefully with some outside help, I haven't been in any. My attitude is te same from the last review. Treet everyone as you want to be treated.

 Reviews  by Sp33dyphil
 * Civility towards the community: You are another person who follows The Golden Rule, which I think should be a policy of Wikipedia. Having looked through your edit history, I found no issues with your civility when you communicate with others.
 * Article contributions: Excellent content creation! I've seen a few of your FA articles, which I think are really really good additions to the FA vault. I think you have a good balance of FA and GA nominations (some people have written heaps of GAs but have rarely touched FAs). Ah! Now I think why Operation Majestic Titan is so successful! Maybe you should start mentoring FA/GA creator hopefuls, if you haven't already. Keep up the outstanding work.
 * Edit count analysis: I think you have a good pie chart, with emphasise on the article (33.08%), user talk (23.75%) and and Wikipedia (19.02%) namespaces. I have no problems with it.
 * RfA-worthiness: I don't think you can initiate an RfA yet, with your relative inactivity at AfDs, which is crucial in becoming an admin as AfDs indicate your understanding of Wikipedia's deletion policy. However, after scouring through your patrol log, you seem to have a good understanding of CSD, which is terrific(!) -- keep it up though. If you'd like to become an admin and receive support from Kudpung, I suggest you have a peep at this.
 * Final thoughts: I think you're doing a great job -- I can't think of any weakness, but I do suggest that you should get into admin areas. Keep up the great content-creation though! --Sp33dyphil © • © 03:30, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Sure, I'll get to your review. Thanks for working doing mine. Buggie111 (talk) 02:19, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
 * AFAIK< AFD was just one of several admin involved areas, like CSd, AIV, RPP and the like. Or has it changed so that AFD, regardless of other work, is a must for any admin candidate? Buggie111 (talk) 13:33, 30 October 2011 (UTC)