Wikipedia:Editor review/C628 (2)

C628
Second review, first one was in early February. Just checking in general to make sure I'm not doing anything awful  I'd also particularly like feedback on my interactions with. Said user hasn't made any edits since leaving a post on my talk page a couple weeks back over a disagreement, seems to have left. Seeing no evidence to the contrary, I'm assuming I was the reason why, and I'd like to know if there's anything I could have done to prevent it. The details can be found by working backwards from the note on my talk page; I'm not really interested in going over them again, as I've been going over the whole thing in my head for some time now. If you've got any questions on anything, feel free to ask. Cheers, C628 (talk) 23:51, 11 May 2010 (UTC) C628 (talk) 23:51, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * My primary contributions are work on articles; I've settled into a pattern of editing primarily railroad, music, and aerospace articles, along with some anti-vandalism stuff and new pages patrol, although neither of those are particularly consistent. There's nothing I'm especially proud of; my philosophy when it comes to editing articles is that raising ten articles from stub to start class is better than getting one to a featured article, and as a result, I have no particular articles I can hold up and say "Look! An FA!" about, or indeed even a DYK or two.
 * 1) Have you been in any disputes over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * Nothing that I'd really term disputes, more disagreements, particularly the one I mentioned above, and the endless mess that is Talk:Nickelback. I try stay far away from drama, such as RfA or ANI; I've found that keeping my head down has worked well so far.
 * Nothing that I'd really term disputes, more disagreements, particularly the one I mentioned above, and the endless mess that is Talk:Nickelback. I try stay far away from drama, such as RfA or ANI; I've found that keeping my head down has worked well so far.

 Reviews 

Review by PrincessofLlyr Here are a few of my thoughts from looking through your talk page and contributions. It looks like you are a strong, civil editor - just the kind WP needs! If you want to get involved in more controversial areas that will look good in an RfA (not sure if you're interested, just thought I'd throw it out). If you aren't interested in adminship, just keep doing what you're doing and you should be fine. Feel free to leave any questions or comments for me here or on my talk page. PrincessofLlyr royal court 01:09, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I believe you handled the conflict with Maideneer in an exemplary manner. You explained all of your actions, the reasons behind them, and were unfalteringly civil. As a note, the user has returned to editing recently.
 * Your contributions look good.
 * The balance between your article edits and other categories is impressive.

Review by Homework2
 * I think you are a very impressive editor. Your edits look great! The conflict with Maideneer, well, the way you handled it, it didn't look like a conflict at all. You did very well better than what I would have done . Making many stubs into start class is plenty important. So, overall, you look like an impressive, experienced editor. Homework2  Talk What I do!  02:49, 10 June 2010 (UTC)