Wikipedia:Editor review/Cailil

Cailil
I have been on Wikipedia for 6 months and have made contributions to a number of articles and hopefully to the community. I'm very active at Project Gender studies and its related articles. I'm requesting an editor review so that I can improve my contributions to the community and to articles Cailil   talk 20:28, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * Cailil, let me tell you, it's about time someone gets this backlog fixed here. I'm going to review you in order to help get it back to normal. Alright, as of Wed Jun 13 22:57:14 2007 GMT you have made 2282 edits to various articles, particularly in the area of gender studies. I would spend more time in the mainspace, away from your userpage. You made 285 edits on an article about vandalism on gender studies articles; however, you only have 322 edits in the mainspace. I'm not sure what those 285 edits were about, but if you ever choose to go to RfA, you should have a few more mainspace article edits, and spend less time in userspace. Thats just a suggestion. You seem to care a lot about what you edit about, and I feel that that is a sign of true dedication. Be proud of yourself and build yourself with every edit you make. I would also recommend spending more time at either RfA or RfD (or similar area) if you ever plan on becoming an admin. Enjoy your time here. Wishes, --wpktsfs (talk) 23:09, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

 Comments 


 * View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool.


 * View this user's edit summary usage with mathbot's tool

 Questions


 * 1) Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
 * I'm proud of the work I've done at Project gender studies. I created a barnstar, a navbox and other graphics for the project.  I also brought the project's organization into line with the other projects (creating pages for collaboration and beginning the process of using WP 1.0 to assess articles).  It's still developing but I hope the project will benefit from my contributions.
 * I'm also quite proud of my work on the Gender studies article. In December 2006 it wasn't much of an article but now its starting to take shape - it's by no means finished but at least its on track.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * I have been in conflicts. The pages I edit (such as Feminism and Men's Rights) are sometimes the target of tigers and Angry mastodons.  One of my first experiences of Wikipedia was a dispute involving the user davidrusher who was adding unsourced comments to Men's Rights and who attacked me for disputing the material they added.  My response was to disengage, request comment, inform Wikiquette Alerts and ask an admin for advice.  This is how I have dealt with conflict since.  Being new to the community I found this conflict quite stressful but I would not find it stressful now that I understand how wikipedia works.  In the future I would follow the same proceedure but I wouldn't let it stress me out-- Cailil   talk 20:54, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I have been in conflicts. The pages I edit (such as Feminism and Men's Rights) are sometimes the target of tigers and Angry mastodons.  One of my first experiences of Wikipedia was a dispute involving the user davidrusher who was adding unsourced comments to Men's Rights and who attacked me for disputing the material they added.  My response was to disengage, request comment, inform Wikiquette Alerts and ask an admin for advice.  This is how I have dealt with conflict since.  Being new to the community I found this conflict quite stressful but I would not find it stressful now that I understand how wikipedia works.  In the future I would follow the same proceedure but I wouldn't let it stress me out-- Cailil   talk 20:54, 12 May 2007 (UTC)