Wikipedia:Editor review/CaroleHenson

CaroleHenson
STATEMENT CaroleHenson (talk) 17:04, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * Answer to question 1 I have been working mostly on articles that either needed citations and/or expansion from stub class. The main topics have been Welsh gentry and paintings. I've enjoyed both topics quite a bit, but have especially enjoyed the articles on paintings, The Conjurer (painting), Ansidei Madonna, Aldobrandini Madonna, Basket of Bread and Madonna of Loreto (Raphael).--CaroleHenson (talk) 17:18, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Have you been in editing disputes or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future? If you have never been in an editing dispute, explain how you would respond to one.
 * Answer to question 2 I have been in editing disputes or clarifications and have generally found it to be helpful in the end. At first I was a bit sensitive and had comments from zealous editors, but now realize that their concern is to ensure a good, reliable end product.  Long and short, I'm good.--CaroleHenson (talk) 17:18, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Answer to question 2 I have been in editing disputes or clarifications and have generally found it to be helpful in the end. At first I was a bit sensitive and had comments from zealous editors, but now realize that their concern is to ensure a good, reliable end product.  Long and short, I'm good.--CaroleHenson (talk) 17:18, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

I have updated the Sir Richard Herbert to be more accurate (removed information about his uncle, Sir Richard Herbert) and added content and citations. Would the article still be considered a stub? Thanks!--CaroleHenson (talk) 17:04, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

 Reviews 

Hi, your article is nicely expanded! You can re-asses the article by changing the  parameter in the template on the talk page to , since the article is definitely more than a stub. Thank you also for including good sources in your article! Since it has been expanded enough in a short length of time, you can even nominate it for being featured in the Did you know? section on the Main Page. (To nominate it, follow the guidelines at the top of the page T:TDYK. Alternatively, I could nominate it for you if you would like or if you cannot figure it out!) Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:20, 16 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi, thank you! I'll go ahead and change the stub based upon your directions.  If you would nominate the article, that would be very nice of you!  I went to the page and was a bit overwhelmed by the amount of information. Thanks again! --CaroleHenson (talk) 00:20, 17 February 2011 (UTC)