Wikipedia:Editor review/Charles Edward

Charles Edward
I am always looking to improve! I have been editing on the wiki under this account since 2006, and without an account for about a year prior to that. I have made 17,000+ contribs, mostlty the old fashioned way. I have use twinkle for vandalism, and hotcat for categorizing. I do not really have any great ambition other than to continue contributing in the areas I already do so in. I am just curious to see what others think of my contributions, and any areas that others think I could improve in. :) &mdash;Charles Edward (Talk 17:27, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

 Reviews 


 * Very brief review. I love the amount of DYKs youve done. You are an asset to wikipedia. All that aside. If i can give any recommendation to improve (well really a place for your involvement) it would be to participate in wikipedia help desk. You seem to have a strong know how in devlopment and you could be extremlely helpful there.Ottawa4ever (talk) 22:26, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

 Questions


 * 1) What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
 * I have contributed most extensivly to Indiana History articles, and I consider History of Indiana to be my greatest project. However Battle of Tippecanoe and William Henry Harrison are probably the best quality articles I have been a major contributer to.
 * 1) Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
 * I have never been in any editting wars, or what I would think of as a significant content dispute. (The only one that would be very notable was one on Refund Anticipation Loan which occured before my present understanding of policy). That taught me a lesson about how to go about future situations to avoid drama and stick to the topic. As I see situations escalating I take it to the talk page and state my opinion and try to see what can be done to resolve preceived problems.
 * I have never been in any editting wars, or what I would think of as a significant content dispute. (The only one that would be very notable was one on Refund Anticipation Loan which occured before my present understanding of policy). That taught me a lesson about how to go about future situations to avoid drama and stick to the topic. As I see situations escalating I take it to the talk page and state my opinion and try to see what can be done to resolve preceived problems.